Valorant
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 469 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 328 | 340 | 357 | 549 |
| 1440p QHD | 408 | 425 | 448 | 616 |
| 1080p Full HD | 478 | 501 | 525 | 651 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Valorant with Intel Core i5-14600KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, In-Depth Analysis
Valorant is a competitive FPS where frame rates far beyond display refresh rates are the norm, and the Intel Core i5-14600KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 delivers exactly that kind of headroom. The measured data shows this combination producing triple-digit frame rates at every resolution and settings preset, with the lowest recorded average being 327.5 FPS at 4K Ultra. This places the combo in the 322nd position out of 1650 tested combinations, putting it in the top 20 percent of all systems benchmarked for this title. The performance profile is defined by a CPU that sits at the 93rd percentile among all processors and a GPU at the 72nd percentile, a pairing that proves exceptionally well-suited to Valorant's engine demands.
Resolution Scaling
The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals a system that remains consistently CPU-bound at lower resolutions and only begins to show GPU limitations at the highest pixel counts. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 651.4 FPS, which drops to 616.3 FPS at 1440p Low and further to 549.1 FPS at 4K Low. This progression shows a modest 15.7 percent reduction from 1080p to 4K, indicating that even at 4K, the RTX 3070 is not being pushed to its limits when graphical settings are minimal. The story changes when settings are raised to Ultra, where the frame rate falls from 477.8 FPS at 1080p to 407.8 FPS at 1440p and finally to 327.5 FPS at 4K — a 31.5 percent drop across the resolution range.
The gap between Low and Ultra settings widens as resolution increases, which points to the GPU becoming a more significant factor at higher pixel densities. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 173.6 FPS, while at 4K, that same gap expands to 221.6 FPS. This pattern suggests that at 1080p and 1440p, the Core i5-14600KF's 14 cores and 20 threads are the primary driver of performance, with the RTX 3070's rendering capabilities only becoming the limiting factor at 4K with heavier settings. The data indicates that players targeting 240Hz or even 360Hz displays will find ample performance at 1080p and 1440p regardless of quality preset, while 4K gaming remains viable for high-refresh monitors but with less overhead.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo's 322nd place out of 1650 tested configurations places it firmly in the upper quintile of systems measured in Valorant. This ranking reflects a balance where the CPU's strong single-thread performance — evidenced by a Passmark single-thread score of 4273 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2778 — pairs effectively with the GPU's 5888 shading units to handle the game's draw calls and physics calculations. The CPU's benchmark scores show it sitting just 0.4 percent below the Intel Core i5-14600K in average score, while trailing the AMD EPYC 4345P by 0.5 percent and leading the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X by 0.6 percent. This places the processor in a tight cluster of high-performance parts, all within 1.4 percent of each other.
On the GPU side, the RTX 3070's average benchmark score of 28238 places it 0.9 percent ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT and 1 percent ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti, while sitting 0.6 percent behind the AMD FirePro S7150 and 1.1 percent behind the AMD Radeon R9 M295X. The combination of a top-tier CPU with a mid-range GPU from its generation creates a system that excels in CPU-bound esports titles like Valorant, where the 3070's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are more than sufficient for the game's texture and geometry loads. The rank of 322 suggests that while many systems exceed this combo's raw GPU power, few can match its balanced performance in this specific title.
Settings Recommendations
The measured FPS data provides clear guidance for optimizing the experience across different display capabilities. For players with 1080p monitors, even the Ultra preset delivers 477.8 FPS, which exceeds the refresh rate of virtually all gaming displays on the market. The Low preset at 1080p produces 651.4 FPS, a 36.3 percent improvement over Ultra, but this gain is only perceptible on 360Hz panels and above. The Medium preset at 524.5 FPS and High at 501.2 FPS both offer substantial headroom, making High the recommended choice for 1080p due to the visual improvements over Low with only a 23.1 percent frame rate penalty.
At 1440p, the data shows a similar pattern with the Ultra preset still achieving 407.8 FPS, which comfortably supports 240Hz displays. The Low preset at 616.3 FPS provides maximum competitive advantage, but High at 424.9 FPS and Medium at 448.1 FPS both maintain frame rates above 400 FPS. For 4K gaming, the situation changes: the Ultra preset drops to 327.5 FPS, which still exceeds 240Hz but leaves less margin for demanding scenes. The Low preset at 549.1 FPS shows that players prioritizing maximum frame rates at 4K can achieve excellent results, while those wanting visual fidelity with High settings at 339.5 FPS remain well above typical high-refresh requirements. The optimal strategy for competitive play is to run Low settings for maximum frame rate, while High or Medium offers the best balance of visuals and performance for most users.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the full settings spectrum shows the combo's strengths. Low settings produce 651.4 FPS, which drops to 524.5 FPS at Medium, 501.2 FPS at High, and 477.8 FPS at Ultra. The transition from Low to Medium costs 126.9 FPS, representing a 19.5 percent reduction, while the step from Medium to High is comparatively minor at 23.3 FPS. The jump from High to Ultra costs another 23.4 FPS, showing diminishing returns as settings increase. These figures indicate that the GTX 3070's 8 GB frame buffer and the CPU's 24 MB of shared L3 cache are both well-utilized, with the system maintaining frame rates that are multiple times higher than typical display refresh rates.
Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain exceptionally high but show more sensitivity to settings. Low achieves 616.3 FPS, a 5.4 percent reduction from 1080p, while Medium reaches 448.1 FPS, High hits 424.9 FPS, and Ultra settles at 407.8 FPS. The percentage gap between Low and Ultra grows to 33.8 percent at this resolution, compared to 26.6 percent at 1080p. At 3840x2160, the scaling becomes more pronounced: Low produces 549.1 FPS, Medium delivers 357.2 FPS, High reaches 339.5 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 327.5 FPS. The difference between Low and Medium at 4K is 191.9 FPS, a 34.9 percent drop, indicating that the GPU's memory bandwidth and shading throughput become more critical at this resolution. The data shows consistent behavior across all resolutions: Low settings provide the highest frame rates, while Ultra offers the most visually demanding experience with frame rates that still exceed 300 FPS at 4K.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, built on the Ampere architecture with a GA104 chip, contributes to this combo's performance through its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus. The 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth proves sufficient for Valorant's asset streaming, even at 4K resolution where the game's textures and effects demand more from the memory subsystem. The GPU's boost clock of 1725 MHz and base clock of 1500 MHz, combined with 5888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units, provide the raw processing power needed to maintain high frame rates when settings are increased. The 46 ray tracing cores and 184 tensor cores are present but not heavily utilized in this competitive title, as Valorant's rendering pipeline favors traditional rasterization.
The RTX 3070's benchmark results show it performing at 72 percent of all GPUs, with a Passmark G3D score of 22214 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3162. These numbers place it in the same performance tier as the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT, which it leads by 0.9 percent in average benchmark score. The GPU's 220 W TDP and 17,400 million transistors on an 8 nm Samsung process node give it the efficiency to sustain high clock speeds during extended gaming sessions. In Valorant specifically, the GPU's role becomes more pronounced at higher resolutions and settings, as evidenced by the frame rate scaling data. At 1080p, the CPU's strong single-core performance — shown by its 468 Cinebench R15 single-core score and 4643 Cinebench R23 single-core score — dominates the frame rate equation, but at 4K Ultra, the GPU's 20.31 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 165.6 GPixel/s pixel rate become the limiting factors. The 3070's end-of-life production status does not diminish its capability in this title, as the measured data shows it delivering exceptional performance that far exceeds the requirements of competitive play.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i5-14600KF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i5-14600KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 in Valorant
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 549.1 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 357.2 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 339.5 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 327.5 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 616.3 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 448.1 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 424.9 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 407.8 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 651.4 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 524.5 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 501.2 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 477.8 |
Valorant with ii5-14600KF + Other GPUs
See how Valorant performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Valorant with RTX 3070 + Other CPUs
See how Valorant performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii5-14600KF + RTX 3070
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.