Valorant
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 351 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 235 | 246 | 259 | 392 |
| 1440p QHD | 293 | 308 | 323 | 491 |
| 1080p Full HD | 344 | 361 | 379 | 575 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Valorant with AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D + Intel Arc B580, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D paired with the Intel Arc B580 delivers exceptionally high frame rates in Valorant, demonstrating the game's modest hardware demands. The measured data indicates that this combination is capable of outputting well above the refresh rates of standard gaming monitors, with the lowest recorded average frame rate still being 235 FPS at Ultra settings in 4K. The performance ceiling in this title is extraordinarily high; at 1080p with Low settings, the combination reaches an average of 575 FPS, suggesting that the limiting factor is rarely the hardware, but rather the game's own rendering engine.
Resolution Scaling
The resolution scaling behavior of this combo reveals a clear division between CPU-bound and GPU-bound territories, though both components are robust enough to keep frame rates at competitive levels. The data shows a distinct FPS drop when moving from 1080p to 4K, but the magnitude of this drop is heavily dependent on the settings preset chosen.
At the Low preset, the 1080p average is 575 FPS. At 1440p, the average is 491 FPS, a drop of 84 FPS (approximately 14.6%). The 4K average at Low is 392 FPS, which is 183 FPS lower than the 1080p result — a 31.8% decrease from the 1440p figure. This scaling pattern indicates that even at the Low preset, the rendering resolution has a measurable impact, although the absolute frame rates remain high enough to be considered beyond the refresh rate of most displays.
With the High preset, the resolution scaling is more pronounced. The 1080p average is 361 FPS, 1440p is 308 FPS, and 4K is 246 FPS. The 4K figure is 68% of the 1080p value, a notable drop. The Medium preset shows similar scaling: 379 FPS at 1080p, 323 FPS at 1440p, and 259 FPS at 4K. The Ultra preset averages are 344 FPS at 1080p, 293 FPS at 1440p, and 235 FPS at 4K. The 4K Ultra average is 68% of its 1080p counterpart, mirroring the High preset's scaling.
The 4K to 1080p ratio at the Low preset is 392/575 = 0.68, which is similar to the ratio at High (246/361 = 0.68). This suggests that resolution scaling is consistent across presets, and the "bottleneck" is primarily the GPU's pixel throughput. However, the fact that the Low preset at 4K still delivers 392 FPS indicates that the GPU has plenty of headroom in this game, and the CPU is not a limiting factor even at high frame rates.
The data shows that moving from 1080p to 4K reduces the average FPS by roughly 32% when using the Low preset, and by a similar 32% when using the High preset, indicating that the game is not heavily GPU-limited at these settings. The limiting component at lower resolutions is likely to be the CPU, but the 9850X3D's high single-thread performance keeps it from being a bottleneck. The frame rate deltas between 1080p and 1440p are modest (about 15% for Low, 15% for High), while the 1440p to 4K delta is larger (20% for High, 20% for Low), which is typical of a GPU that begins to feel the pressure of pixel count.
GPU Role
The Intel Arc B580's role in this game can be understood through its memory and clock specifications. It features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 456.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 2375 MHz. These specifications are more than sufficient for Valorant's modest resource demands.
The GPU's base and boost clocks are both 2670 MHz, which is a high clock speed. The performance of the Arc B580 in this game shows that it is not a limiting factor. At 4K Ultra, it still manages an average of 235 FPS, which is a high frame rate. The GPU's rendering capabilities are well beyond the needs of the game, and the data suggests that the bottleneck is not the GPU in most scenarios, except possibly at 4K Ultra settings.
The Arc B580's performance in other benchmarks places it above the 68th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 23021. Its nearest rivals in the synthetic benchmark database are the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP, which has an average score of 23061, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080, which has an average score of 22895. These are older, lower-performance parts, but the Arc B580 outperforms them by a small margin. The data indicates that the Arc B580 is not a high-end GPU in the broader market, but in Valorant, it delivers frame rates that are far beyond what is needed for competitive play.
The GPU's frame rate scaling is not linear with the settings. For example, at 1080p, the Low preset (575 FPS) is 26.7% higher than the High preset (361 FPS), and the Medium preset (379 FPS) is 5% higher than High. The Ultra preset (344 FPS) is 4.7% lower than High. The differences between presets are more pronounced at 4K, where the Low preset (392 FPS) is 59% higher than High (246 FPS), and Ultra (235 FPS) is 4.5% lower than High. This suggests that the game's settings have a significant impact on the GPU load, especially at higher resolutions.
The VRAM requirement of the game is not a concern for the Arc B580, as the 12 GB of GDDR6 is far beyond the needs of Valorant. The GPU's memory bandwidth of 456 GB/s is also more than sufficient. The clocks are not the limiting factor either, as the 2670 MHz boost clock is high. In terms of the GPU's role, the data shows that it is the primary component that scales with resolution and settings, but it has enough headroom to keep frame rates high in all tested scenarios.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D is a desktop processor with 8 cores and 16 threads, designed for the AM5 socket. It operates at a base clock of 4.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. Its architecture is Zen 5, codenamed Granite Ridge, fabricated on a 4nm process. It has 96 MB of shared L3 cache, which is a large cache pool. This cache configuration is advantageous for gaming.
In the benchmark data, the 9850X3D has an average benchmark score of 58386, placing it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M (average score 58323, +0.1% relative) and the Intel Core i9-14900 (58115, +0.5% relative). The 9850X3D's single-core performance is strong, as evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2228 and a Passmark single-thread score of 4704.
In Valorant, the CPU's role is to feed the GPU with enough frames. The data shows that at 1080p Low, the average FPS is 575, which is a very high frame rate. This is likely CPU-bound, but the 9850X3D's high single-core performance keeps it from being a bottleneck. The fact that the 1080p Low average is 575 FPS and the 1440p Low average is 491 FPS shows that the CPU is not the limiting factor at 1080p, but the GPU is. The 1080p Low result is 17% higher than 1440p Low, indicating a GPU resolution scaling.
The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads are more than enough for Valorant, which is not heavily threaded. The game benefits from the high clock speed and the large L3 cache. The multi-core performance of the 9850X3D is strong, but the game does not utilize all cores. The high single-core performance is likely the reason for the high frame rates seen in the data.
The CPU's TDP is 120 W, which is not a high figure for a desktop processor. The process node is 4nm, which is modern. The CPU's memory support is DDR5, with a dual-channel memory bus and a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. This is more than enough for a game.
The data shows that the 9850X3D is not a bottleneck in Valorant. The fact that the 1080p Low average is 575 FPS and the 4K Low average is 392 FPS indicates that the CPU is not the limiting factor at 1080p, but the GPU is at 4K. The CPU is strong enough to feed the GPU at all tested resolutions and settings.
Settings Recommendations
The settings recommendations for this combo are based on the measured FPS data and the game's competitive nature. The highest average FPS is achieved at the Low preset, with 575 FPS at 1080p, 491 FPS at 1440p, and 392 FPS at 4K. These are all extremely high frame rates, far above the 144 Hz or 240 Hz refresh rates of typical gaming monitors.
The Medium preset offers a balance between visual quality and performance. At 1080p, the Medium preset averages 379 FPS, which is 25.6% lower than Low, but still very high. At 1440p, the Medium preset averages 323 FPS, which is 21.1% lower than Low. At 4K, the Medium preset averages 259 FPS, which is 28.8% lower than Low. The Medium preset has the best "visual quality per frame rate" ratio, as the FPS remains high enough for any competitive scenario.
The High preset reduces the FPS further. At 1080p, the High preset averages 361 FPS, which is 6.1% lower than Medium. At 1440p, the High preset averages 308 FPS, which is 4.6% lower than Medium. At 4K, the High preset averages 246 FPS, which is 5.0% lower than Medium. The High preset offers a good balance.
The Ultra preset is the most demanding, with the lowest FPS. At 1080p, the Ultra preset averages 344 FPS, which is 5.1% lower than High. At 1440p, the Ultra preset averages 293 FPS, which is 4.9% lower than High. At 4K, the Ultra preset averages 235 FPS, which is 4.5% lower than High. The Ultra preset is still very playable, but it offers the lowest frame rate.
For a competitive player, the Low preset at 1080p or 1440p would be the best choice, as it offers the highest FPS. For a player who wants a balance, the Medium preset is the best choice. The Ultra preset is not recommended for a competitive edge, but it is still above 235 FPS at 4K, which is a high frame rate.
The data shows that the drop from Low to Medium is significant (about 24% at 1080p), but the drop from Medium to High is small (about 5%), and from High to Ultra is also small (about 5%). This indicates that the game's settings have a non-linear impact on performance, with the Low preset being a "performance" mode and the Medium preset being the first "quality" mode.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D and the Intel Arc B580 ranks 2469th out of 3708 combos in the game's benchmark database. This puts it in the 33rd percentile of all tested combos. This rank is lower than one might expect given the high FPS numbers, but it reflects the fact that there are many combos with even higher FPS, likely with more powerful GPUs that can achieve even higher frame rates at 4K.
The comboRankInGame field indicates that this combo is not in the top tier of tested hardware, but it is still above the median. The data suggests that the game's performance is not heavily dependent on the GPU, so the ranking is more about the CPU's ability to drive high FPS. The 9850X3D is a strong CPU, but the Arc B580 is a mid-range GPU. The combo's rank is a reflection of the GPU's position in the market.
The nearest rivals of the GPU in the benchmark database are the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP (avg 23061) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (avg 22895). These are older cards, but the Arc B580 is only slightly faster. The CPU's nearest rivals are the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M (avg 58323) and the Intel Core i9-14900 (avg 58115). The 9850X3D is slightly faster than these.
In the context of the database, this combo is not a top-tier performer. The rank of 2465 out of 3708 means that about 66% of tested combos deliver higher frame rates in this game. This is due to the fact that many combos have GPUs that are more powerful than the Arc B580, such as the RTX 3080 (which is a rival in the GPU list, with an average score of 23172). The RTX 3080 is only 0.7% faster than the Arc B580 in the average benchmark score, but in a game, the difference could be larger.
The combo's rank is a good indicator that the Arc B580 is not a high-end GPU, but its high FPS in Valorant makes it suitable for competitive play. The data shows that the combo is capable of 235 FPS at 4K Ultra, which is far above the refresh of any display.
FAQ
Q: What is the COMBO's rank in the database for Valorant?
A: The combo ranks 2465th out of 3708 tested combos, placing it in the 33rd percentile.
Q: Is the Intel Arc B580's 12 GB VRAM enough for Valorant?
A: Yes, the game's VRAM requirements are low, and the 12 GB of VRAM is more than sufficient. The game runs at 235 FPS at 4K Ultra, proving that 12 GB is not a limitation.
Q: What is the highest FPS measured for this combo?
A: The highest average FPS is 575 FPS, measured at 1920x1080 with Low settings.
Q: How much of a performance drop is there between 1080p and 4K at High settings?
A: At High settings, the average FPS drops from 361 FPS at 1080p to 246 FPS at 4K, which is a 31.8% decrease.
Q: What is the best settings preset for this combo?
A: The Medium preset offers a good balance, with 379 FPS at 1080p, 323 FPS at 1440p, and 259 FPS at 4K. It is recommended for a balance of visual quality and frame rate.
Q: Is the CPU a bottleneck at 1080p Low?
A: No, the CPU is not a bottleneck at any tested setting. The 1080p Low average is 575 FPS, which is high, and the CPU's high single-core performance is not a limiting factor.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The following is the complete measured FPS data for this combo in Valorant:
1920x1080
- Low: 575 FPS
- Medium: 379 FPS (min 322, max 436)
- High: 361 FPS
- Ultra: 344 FPS
2560x1440
- Low: 491 FPS
- Medium: 323 FPS (min 275, max 372)
- High: 308 FPS
- Ultra: 293 FPS
3840x2160
- Low: 392 FPS
- Medium: 259 FPS (min 220, max 297)
- High: 246 FPS
- Ultra: 235 FPS
The data shows a consistent pattern: the Low preset offers the highest frame rates, and the Ultra preset offers the lowest. The Medium preset provides a middle ground. At 1080p, the Low preset is 51.7% faster than the Ultra preset. At 1440p, the Low preset is 67.6% faster than Ultra. At 4K, the Low preset is 66.8% faster than Ultra. The frame rates are high enough for any display, and the game is clearly not a demanding title for this hardware. The minimum FPS values are only recorded for the Medium preset, showing that the frame time consistency is good, with the lowest minimum being 220 FPS at 4K Medium. This is still high enough for a smooth experience.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D
Intel Arc B580
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D + Intel Arc B580 in Valorant
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 392.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 259.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 246.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 235.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 491.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 323.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 308.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 293.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 575.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 379.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 361.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 344.0 |
Valorant with Ryzen 7 9850X3D + Other GPUs
See how Valorant performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Valorant with Arc B580 + Other CPUs
See how Valorant performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 9850X3D + Arc B580
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.