Valorant

Valorant

AVERAGE FPS
310
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 310 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 207 217 228 347
1440p QHD 259 272 286 434
1080p Full HD 304 319 335 508

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 347
3840x2160 Medium 228
3840x2160 High 217
3840x2160 Ultra 207
2560x1440 Low 434
2560x1440 Medium 286
2560x1440 High 272
2560x1440 Ultra 259
1920x1080 Low 508
1920x1080 Medium 335
1920x1080 High 319
1920x1080 Ultra 304

Valorant with AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D + Intel Arc B570, In-Depth Analysis

Valorant is a highly frame-rate-sensitive tactical FPS, and the combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D and Intel Arc B570 delivers exceptional performance that prioritizes competitive fluidity over visual fidelity. The measured data indicates that this pairing is capable of pushing well beyond the refresh rates of standard high-end monitors, with the most significant gains found in lower graphical presets. While the Ultra preset remains highly playable, the data overwhelmingly supports using the Low or Medium settings to maximize the responsiveness that is critical for this genre.

Settings Recommendations

For players seeking the absolute highest competitive advantage, the Low preset is the definitive choice, as it yields the highest average frame rates across all tested resolutions. At 1080p, the Low preset produces an average of 508 FPS, which is a substantial 40% higher than the High preset's 319 FPS and 67% higher than the Ultra preset's 304 FPS. This trend continues at 1440p, where Low achieves 434 FPS, and even at 4K, it maintains a commanding 347 FPS. The data suggests that the Arc B570 is not the primary bottleneck at lower settings, allowing the high-frequency Ryzen processor to push frame rates to their absolute peak.

However, for users who prefer a balance between visual clarity and performance, the Medium preset offers a compelling middle ground. Benchmark results indicate that the performance penalty for moving from Low to Medium is relatively modest. At 1080p, the drop is from 508 FPS to 335 FPS, a 34% reduction, but the latter figure still far exceeds the needs of even the fastest 360Hz displays. The Medium preset at 1440p delivers 286 FPS, and at 4K it produces 228 FPS, with a recorded minimum of 194 FPS and a maximum of 263 FPS, indicating consistent frame pacing. This preset likely provides a more visually stable image with better texture filtering and shadow details, which can aid in spotting enemies in certain map areas without sacrificing the high frame rates essential for smooth aiming.

The High and Ultra presets are demonstrably less optimal for this specific hardware combination in Valorant. While they produce average frame rates of 319 FPS and 304 FPS at 1080p, respectively, the performance scaling suggests the GPU is becoming a more significant limiting factor. The difference between High and Ultra is minimal, but the jump from Medium to High yields a noticeable 5% decrease in average FPS at 1080p. For a game where frame time consistency is paramount, the data suggests that the minimal visual gains from these higher presets are not worth the corresponding loss in performance headroom, especially when the Medium preset already provides a superior combination of speed and visual quality.

How This Combo Ranks

The overall performance of this combination in Valorant is surprisingly modest when compared to other tested hardware configurations. The combo rank is 2227 out of 2883 tested combos, placing it in the bottom 23% of all pairings. This ranking is counterintuitive given the exceptionally high absolute frame rates measured, but it underscores that the database includes many high-end configurations with more powerful GPUs and CPUs that achieve even higher scores. The ranking reflects the relative standing against the entire spectrum of tested hardware, which includes top-tier components designed for maximum 1080p esports performance.

This low percentile ranking does not indicate a failure of the hardware, but rather highlights the extreme competitiveness of the Valorant benchmark environment. The Ryzen 5 7500X3D, while a strong performer, is a 6-core processor, and the Arc B570 is an entry-level to mid-range GPU. When compared against combos utilizing flagship CPUs and high-end graphics cards, this pairing naturally falls behind in raw benchmark scores. The data shows that while this combo is highly capable of delivering playable frame rates, it does not sit at the absolute top tier for pushing the highest possible FPS in Valorant, which is a metric heavily dominated by the most powerful consumer hardware available.

The rank signifies that users should not expect this system to outperform configurations with more expensive, higher-core-count CPUs or GPUs with significantly higher memory bandwidth. However, the context of this rank is crucial; it is a relative measure. The absolute frame rates measured in this test are still exceptionally high and will provide a smooth, responsive experience for the vast majority of players. The combination reflects the efficiency of the X3D cache technology and the generational improvements in Intel's graphics architecture, even if it doesn't top the charts against extreme enthusiast setups.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B570 plays a critical role in determining the performance ceiling at higher resolutions and graphical settings. The GPU features 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s. This memory configuration proves to be sufficient for Valorant, even at 4K resolution, where the game's art style does not demand an excessive amount of video memory. The 10 GB frame buffer is not a limiting factor in the measured results, as the game is not VRAM-intensive.

The GPU's clock speeds are fixed at a 2500 MHz base and boost clock, which is a relatively high frequency for a graphics card. This consistent clock speed ensures predictable performance. The Arc B570's architecture, Xe2-HPG, is built on a 5 nm process from TSMC, and its performance in this benchmark shows that it scales reasonably as resolution increases. However, the data reveals that the GPU becomes a more significant bottleneck as the preset quality increases. For example, at 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra settings is a 40% drop in FPS. This indicates that the GPU's shading units (2304) and texture mapping units (144) are being taxed more heavily with increased visual effects, which is expected.

The benchmarks show a clear performance hierarchy tied to the GPU. While the CPU is the star of the show at Low settings, the GPU's capabilities define the performance at High and Ultra. The Arc B570's compute power, rated at 11.52 TFLOPS FP32, is adequate to maintain high frame rates, but it is not so powerful that it can brute-force through the most demanding settings without a significant FPS hit. The data suggests that the card is best utilized in scenarios where the CPU can feed it frames efficiently, which is precisely what the Ryzen 5 7500X3D excels at. The GPU's role is to keep up with the CPU's output, and it manages this effectively up to the Medium preset across all tested resolutions.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of the system's capabilities across different resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the system is clearly CPU-bound at lower settings. The Low preset achieves a staggering 508 FPS average, which drops to 335 FPS on Medium (with a min of 285 and max of 385). The High preset yields 319 FPS, and the Ultra preset produces 304 FPS. This pattern shows that the CPU is capable of generating an immense number of frames, and the GPU only begins to limit performance when the graphical load is increased.

Moving to 2560x1440, the system continues to deliver exceptional performance. The Low preset still achieves a very high 434 FPS average. The Medium preset drops to 286 FPS (min 243, max 329), while the High and Ultra presets produce 272 FPS and 259 FPS, respectively. The performance scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a 15% decrease in FPS on the Low preset, which is relatively small and indicates the CPU is still the primary driver. For the High and Ultra presets, the drop is more pronounced (15% and 15%, respectively), signaling the GPU is starting to take on a more substantial workload.

At 3840x2160, the system remains remarkably playable. The Low preset manages a 347 FPS average, which is still extraordinarily high for 4K. The Medium preset delivers 228 FPS (min 194, max 263), which indicates the system's balance. The High preset yields 217 FPS, and the Ultra preset drops to 207 FPS. The data shows that even at 4K, this combination is capable of pushing frame rates well beyond the 144Hz mark on all but the highest preset, making it a versatile option for users with high-refresh-rate 4K displays. The minimum FPS recorded on the Medium preset at 4K (194 FPS) still comfortably exceeds the refresh rate of most high-end monitors.

Resolution Scaling

Analyzing the frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals critical insights into the system's bottleneck characteristics. The most telling data point is the performance drop on the Low preset. From 1080p (508 FPS) to 4K (347 FPS), the frame rate drops by 32%. This relatively modest decrease, given the 4x increase in pixel count, strongly indicates that the system is heavily CPU-bound at this setting. The Ryzen 5 7500X3D's 3D V-Cache is likely providing a significant advantage in feeding the GPU with processed frames, preventing the GPU from being fully utilized at lower resolutions.

However, the scaling pattern changes significantly with higher graphical presets. On the Ultra preset, the frame rate drops from 304 FPS at 1080p to 207 FPS at 4K, a 32% decrease. While the percentage is similar, the absolute drop is smaller, and the frame rates are lower overall. This suggests that at Ultra settings, the GPU becomes a more prominent limiting factor. The Arc B570's rendering capabilities are being taxed more, and the GPU can no longer rely solely on the CPU's high frame generation to maintain its maximum output.

The scaling behavior indicates that the limiting component shifts depending on the workload. At Low and Medium settings, the 6-core, 12-thread Ryzen processor with its large L3 cache is the primary engine, and the GPU has enough headroom to render the simpler scenes at very high speeds. At High and Ultra settings, the GPU's pixel and texture processing rates (200.0 GPixel/s and 360.0 GTexel/s) become more relevant, and the performance becomes more balanced between the two components. The data suggests that users who prioritize maximum FPS should stick to lower resolutions and settings to fully leverage the CPU's strengths, while those who want 4K should be prepared for the GPU to take the lead.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D is the defining component in this configuration for achieving extreme frame rates. With 6 cores and 12 threads, it is not a high-core-count processor, but its key differentiator is the massive 96 MB of shared L3 cache. This large cache is highly effective for gaming workloads, particularly in a game like Valorant where the entire game state can reside within the cache, leading to incredibly low memory latency and high throughput. The base clock of 4.00 GHz and boost clock of 4.50 GHz are respectable, but the cache is what allows the CPU to perform so exceptionally in this test.

The CPU's benchmark scores confirm its strong single-thread and multi-thread capabilities. Its Passmark single-thread score is 3494, and its multi-thread score is 25047. The single-thread performance is crucial for Valorant, as the game's engine often relies heavily on a single primary thread for game logic and rendering commands. The CPU's percentile ranking of 89 (vs. all CPUs) places it in the top 11% of all processors, indicating it is a high-performing part. Its nearest rivals, such as the Intel Core i9-13950HX and Intel Core i5-14600, have similar average benchmark scores, with the Ryzen 5 7500X3D trailing the i5-14600 by 0.7% and leading the i9-13950HX by 0.5% in aggregate benchmarks.

This CPU's role is to deliver the raw frame generation that the GPU can then render. The data shows that at 1080p Low, the system achieves 508 FPS, a number that is primarily a function of the CPU's speed and cache efficiency. The CPU is so powerful in this context that it allows the GPU to operate at its maximum potential without being starved for data. The 3D V-Cache technology is a clear winner for this specific game genre, as it minimizes the bottlenecks often associated with memory access, ensuring that the processor's execution units are always fed with the necessary instructions and data. This makes the 7500X3D an ideal choice for players who prioritize maximum FPS in competitive shooters.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D

Cores / Threads 6 / 12
Base Clock 4000 MHz
Boost Clock 4500 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket AMD Socket AM5
View Full CPU Details →

Intel Arc B570

VRAM 10 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2500 MHz MHz
TDP 150 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D + Intel Arc B570 in Valorant

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 347.0
3840x2160 Medium 228.0
3840x2160 High 217.0
3840x2160 Ultra 207.0
2560x1440 Low 434.0
2560x1440 Medium 286.0
2560x1440 High 272.0
2560x1440 Ultra 259.0
1920x1080 Low 508.0
1920x1080 Medium 335.0
1920x1080 High 319.0
1920x1080 Ultra 304.0

Valorant with Ryzen 5 7500X3D + Other GPUs

See how Valorant performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Valorant with Arc B570 + Other CPUs

See how Valorant performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 5 7500X3D + Arc B570

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.