Valorant
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 310 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 230 | 240 | 257 | 342 |
| 1440p QHD | 290 | 304 | 312 | 369 |
| 1080p Full HD | 323 | 329 | 332 | 392 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Valorant with AMD Ryzen 5 3600 + Intel Arc B580, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 paired with the Intel Arc B580 presents a compelling dataset for Valorant, a game known for its low system demands and high frame rates. The measured results reveal a system that is consistently capable of delivering extremely high performance across all tested configurations, with the data pointing towards a nuanced relationship between the CPU, GPU, and the game's engine that goes beyond simple raw power.
Resolution Scaling
The frame rate data shows how the system's performance scales as resolution increases, revealing the shifting bottleneck between components. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves an average of 392.1 FPS. Moving to 1440p Low, the average drops to 369.3 FPS, a decrease of about 5.8%. At 4K Low, the average falls to 342 FPS, which is another 7.4% reduction from the 1440p figure. This relatively modest decline from 1080p to 4K suggests that at lower settings, the system is not strictly limited by the GPU's rendering throughput; the performance remains exceptionally high, indicating a strong CPU and a GPU that is not being saturated.
The scaling pattern changes more dramatically when we examine the High settings. At 1080p High, the average FPS is 328.9. This drops to 303.7 FPS at 1440p High, a reduction of roughly 7.7%. The most significant drop occurs when moving to 4K High, where the average falls to 240.4 FPS, a substantial 20.8% decrease from the 1440p result. This steep decline at 4K High suggests that as the resolution and graphical load increase, the Intel Arc B580 becomes a more significant limiting factor. The GPU's workload scales with pixel count, and at 4K High, its processing capacity begins to constrain the frame rate more noticeably, whereas at lower resolutions and settings, the CPU is better able to keep the GPU fed.
The data implies a system that is well-balanced for high-refresh-rate 1080p and 1440p gaming. The FPS at these resolutions remains high enough to take advantage of fast displays. The transition to 4K, particularly with higher visual fidelity, is where the GPU's role becomes more prominent, and the system transitions from being a CPU-bound powerhouse to a more GPU-limited configuration.
How This Combo Ranks
The database places this specific CPU-GPU combination at rank 1310 out of 1650 tested combos for Valorant. This rank of 1310 out of 1650 suggests that while the performance is objectively very high, many other hardware pairings in the database achieve even higher frame rates in this specific title. Valorant is a game where extremely high FPS is the primary goal for competitive play, so the field of tested combos is likely crowded with configurations designed for maximum frame rates.
This ranking is interesting because the CPU's overall average benchmark score places it in the 76th percentile of all CPUs tested. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-11400, has an average score that is only 0.1% lower, indicating these two processors are effectively performance peers. The AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS is 0.2% higher, and the AMD EPYC 9274F is 0.3% lower, showing the Ryzen 5 3600 sits in a tight cluster of similarly performing processors. The GPU, the Intel Arc B580, sits in the 66th percentile of all GPUs, with its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon 760M, only 0.1% slower, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 being 0.7% faster in average benchmark score.
The combination of a 76th percentile CPU and a 66th percentile GPU results in a rank of 1310 out of 1650, which is in the bottom 21% of all combos. This suggests that in the specific context of Valorant, where the engine is highly optimized and often CPU-bound, the pairing's performance is strong in absolute terms but is outpaced by many other combinations, likely those with higher-clocked or more modern CPUs that are better able to push the game's frame rate to its absolute limits.
FAQ
Q: What is the highest average frame rate recorded for this combo in Valorant?
A: The highest average frame rate recorded is 392.1 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.
Q: How does the frame rate change when moving from 1080p to 4K on High settings?
A: The average frame rate drops from 328.9 FPS at 1080p High to 240.4 FPS at 4K High, a decrease of 88.5 FPS.
Q: Is the system more CPU-limited or GPU-limited at 1080p with Low settings?
A: The small performance delta between 1080p Low (392.1 FPS) and 1440p Low (369.3 FPS) suggests the CPU is the primary limiter, as the GPU has ample headroom to handle the increased resolution without a significant frame rate penalty.
Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?
A: At 1440p, the average frame rate is 369.3 FPS on Low settings and 289.9 FPS on Ultra settings, a difference of 79.4 FPS.
Q: Does the Intel Arc B580 have enough VRAM for Valorant at 4K?
A: The data shows the Intel Arc B580 has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory. At 4K Ultra settings, the combo achieves an average of 230 FPS, indicating the available VRAM is sufficient for this game at this resolution and settings.
Q: What does a combo rank of 1310 out of 1650 indicate about this pairing?
A: It indicates that while this combo produces very high frame rates, it is ranked in the lower portion of the database for Valorant, meaning many other hardware combinations tested achieve even higher performance in this specific title.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured data provides a comprehensive view of performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the frame rates are consistently high. The Low preset yields an average of 392.1 FPS. The Medium preset produces an average of 332 FPS. The High preset delivers 328.9 FPS, and the Ultra preset achieves an average of 323.2 FPS. The scaling between Medium, High, and Ultra is tight, with less than a 9 FPS difference between them.
At 2560x1440, the performance remains strong. The Low preset averages 369.3 FPS. The Medium preset averages 311.5 FPS. The High preset reaches an average of 303.7 FPS, and the Ultra preset delivers 289.9 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is more pronounced at this resolution, a difference of 79.4 FPS, showing a clearer impact from the graphical settings.
At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes a more defining factor. The Low preset averages 342 FPS, which is still exceptionally high for 4K. The Medium preset averages 257.1 FPS. The High preset yields an average of 240.4 FPS, and the Ultra preset produces an average of 230 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra at 4K is 112 FPS, the largest spread across all resolutions, clearly demonstrating the increased load on the Intel Arc B580 at higher settings and pixel counts.
GPU Role
The Intel Arc B580's role in these results becomes more critical at higher resolutions and settings. Its specifications, including a base and boost clock of 2670 MHz, are constant, but the workload changes. The GPU's 12 GB of GDDR6 memory is more than sufficient for Valorant, as evidenced by the high frame rates even at 4K Ultra. The 192-bit memory bus and bandwidth of 456.0 GB/s provide ample data throughput for a game of this visual complexity.
The data's resolution scaling is the key to understanding the GPU's role. At 1080p, the frame rates are likely constrained by the CPU's ability to process the game's logic and issue draw calls. The GPU can render frames faster than the CPU can provide them. As resolution increases to 1440p and then 4K, the pixel count and shading workload for the GPU increase. This is where the B580's compute power, rated at 13.67 TFLOPS for FP32, becomes the limiting factor. The steep drop in FPS from 1440p High to 4K High (303.7 to 240.4 FPS) is a clear indicator that the GPU is reaching its processing limits, while the CPU is still capable of providing more frames if the GPU could render them faster.
Settings Recommendations
For users prioritizing the highest possible frame rates, especially for competitive play, the Low settings preset at 1080p provides the best result with an average of 392.1 FPS. Even at 1440p, the Low preset delivers 369.3 FPS, which is higher than the High preset at 1080p. This suggests that for pure performance, lowering settings is more effective than lowering resolution within these tested ranges.
The data shows a clear plateau in performance between Medium, High, and Ultra presets at 1080p. The average FPS only varies between 323.2 and 332 FPS across these three presets. This indicates that the system is CPU-limited in this range, and the GPU can handle the increased graphical load of Ultra settings without a significant frame rate cost. Therefore, for a better visual experience at 1080p, the Ultra preset is recommended, as it offers the highest visual fidelity with a negligible performance penalty compared to Medium or High.
At 1440p, the Ultra preset still provides a very high average of 289.9 FPS. This is an excellent balance of visual quality and performance. At 4K, the Ultra preset drops to 230 FPS. While this is still very playable, the Medium preset at 257.1 FPS might be a better option for those who prefer a higher frame rate buffer at this resolution.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 5 3600's performance is a cornerstone of this combo's results. With 6 cores and 12 threads, its multi-threading capability is solid, as evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15045. However, Valorant's performance is often more dependent on single-core and lightly-threaded performance. The CPU's single-thread score of 2124 in Cinebench R23 and a 3DMark single-thread score of 696 are relevant metrics for this game.
The benchmark results show that the Ryzen 5 3600 provides a very strong foundation for Valorant. The fact that the frame rates at 1080p Low and Medium are nearly identical (392.1 vs 332 FPS) to those at 1440p Low and Medium (369.3 vs 311.5 FPS) suggests that the CPU is the primary bottleneck at these settings. The GPU has enough headroom to render the increased resolution, but the game's frame rate is being capped by the CPU's processing speed. The boost clock of 4.20 GHz and the 32 MB of shared L3 cache contribute to its ability to handle the game's data efficiently.
The CPU's 76th percentile ranking and its closeness to rivals like the Intel Core i5-11400 (0.1% slower) and the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS (0.2% faster) demonstrate that it is a competitive processor. However, the combo's rank of 1310 out of 1650 indicates that in Valorant, other CPUs are able to push even higher frame rates, likely due to higher single-thread performance or faster memory support. The data suggests that while the Ryzen 5 3600 is a capable and strong CPU, it is the element of this pairing that ultimately caps the maximum frame rate in the most CPU-bound scenarios, preventing the full potential of the Arc B580 from being realized at the lowest resolutions.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Intel Arc B580
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 3600 + Intel Arc B580 in Valorant
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 342.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 257.1 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 240.4 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 230.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 369.3 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 311.5 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 303.7 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 289.9 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 392.1 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 332.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 328.9 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 323.2 |
Valorant with Ryzen 5 3600 + Other GPUs
See how Valorant performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Valorant with Arc B580 + Other CPUs
See how Valorant performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 3600 + Arc B580
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.