Undisputed

Undisputed, the boxing simulation from 2023, presents a demanding workload for the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650. This pairing with the Intel Core i7-14700F creates a significant bottleneck, as the data reveals a system where the GPU is the primary constraint across nearly all settings. The benchmark results show a wide performance spread that depends heavily on resolution and quality presets, making the choice of settings crucial for a playable experience.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data for this combination of Intel Core i7-14700F and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 indicates that the Low preset is the only reliable path to high frame rates at common resolutions. At 1920x1080, the Low setting achieves an average of 109 FPS, which is the only configuration in the entire dataset to surpass the 100 FPS mark. This provides a smooth and responsive experience for a fast-paced sports title. The Medium preset at 1080p yields an average of 79 FPS with a minimum of 67 FPS, which is still playable, but represents a 28% drop in average performance from Low. For gamers prioritizing smoothness and competitive timing, Low is the clear choice.

The High preset at 1080p drops the average to 65 FPS. While this is still nominally playable, the margin for error is thinner, and any demanding in-game moments could cause noticeable stutter. The Ultra preset at 1080p, with an average of just 42 FPS, is not recommended for a smooth experience. At 2560x1440, the situation becomes more restrictive. The Low preset is the only viable option, producing an average of 79 FPS. While this is still a decent frame rate, it is identical to the Medium preset at 1080p, highlighting the performance cost of the higher resolution. The High preset at 1440p averages only 47 FPS, and Medium falls to 57 FPS, both of which are below the ideal threshold for fluid gameplay. The data suggests that for this specific combo, the best experience is achieved by prioritizing the Low preset and adjusting resolution based on the desired frame rate target.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 is the definitive limiting factor in this configuration. Its performance percentile of 40 places it in the lower half of all GPUs, and its 4 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 128-bit bus is a significant constraint for modern titles like Undisputed. The GPU's modest specifications, including a base clock of 1485 MHz and a boost clock of 1665 MHz, are pushed to their limit by the game's rendering demands. The data confirms this, as the frame rates scale dramatically with the graphics preset, which primarily affects GPU workload.

The GTX 1650's average benchmark score of 7472, with its nearest rival being the Intel Arc A310 at a 1% higher score, shows it is at the entry-level of dedicated graphics. The impact of its limited 4 GB VRAM is likely a key reason why the Ultra preset performs so poorly across all resolutions, with the 4K Ultra run producing an average of only 19 FPS. This suggests that the game's high-resolution textures and effects at Ultra settings may exceed the available memory, leading to severe performance degradation. The GPU's 75W TDP also indicates its target market of low-power systems, which aligns with its performance envelope. In this pairing, the GTX 1650 is clearly the component that dictates the overall gaming experience.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS data shows a steep performance penalty as resolution increases, which is a classic sign of a GPU-bound scenario. Moving from 1080p to 1440p, the average FPS at Low settings drops from 109 to 79, a 28% reduction. This scaling continues at 4K, where the Low preset averages only 50 FPS. This pattern is consistent across all settings presets. For instance, the High preset goes from 65 FPS at 1080p to 47 FPS at 1440p, and finally to 30 FPS at 4K.

This consistent drop-off strongly indicates that the GTX 1650's rendering capabilities are the primary bottleneck. The Intel Core i7-14700F, with its high performance in synthetic benchmarks like a 35122 score in Cinebench R23 multicore, is more than capable of feeding the GPU with data. The fact that the frame rate is so heavily dependent on resolution means that the CPU is not the limiting factor in most scenarios. The only exception might be at 1080p Low, where the high frame rate could begin to strain the CPU, but the data does not show a stutter or a plateau that would confirm this. The scaling pattern is a clear indicator that to achieve higher frame rates, the user must lower the internal resolution, as the GPU's pixel throughput and memory bandwidth are insufficient for higher resolutions.

How This Combo Ranks

In the grand context of all tested combinations for Undisputed, this pairing of the Intel Core i7-14700F and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 ranks at 3591 out of 3718 tested combos. This places it in the bottom 4% of all systems, a very low standing that reflects the significant imbalance of the components. The CPU is a top-tier performer, with a percentile rank of 91 among all CPUs and an average benchmark score of 53620, putting it on par with the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X, which has a near-identical score with a deltaPct of 0.6. In contrast, the GPU is a low-tier part, and its performance drags the entire combo down.

This extreme rank is a direct consequence of pairing a high-end processor with an entry-level graphics card. The data implies that for the specific task of running Undisputed, the powerful CPU is almost entirely idle, waiting for the GPU to complete its work. This combo represents a textbook case of a severe bottleneck. The resulting frame rates are not a reflection of the system's overall capability but rather the hard limit imposed by the GTX 1650. The benchmark results suggest that this configuration would perform significantly better in tasks that are not graphically intensive, but for this game, it is near the bottom of the barrel.

FAQ

Q: Why is the performance so low in Undisputed with this CPU and GPU combo?

A: The performance is primarily limited by the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650. This GPU has a low performance percentile of 40 and is a significant bottleneck compared to the Intel Core i7-14700F, which ranks in the 91st percentile for CPUs. The frame rates are indicative of the GPU's capabilities, not the CPU's.

Q: What is the best resolution to play at with this system?

A: Based on the measured data, 1920x1080 is the best choice. At this resolution, the Low preset achieves an average of 109 FPS, which is the highest of any tested setting. Higher resolutions like 2560x1440 and 3840x2160 result in a significant performance drop, making smooth gameplay difficult.

Q: Can this system handle the Ultra graphics preset?

A: No. The Ultra preset results in an average of 42 FPS at 1080p, which drops to 19 FPS at 4K. These frame rates are too low for a smooth and responsive experience, indicating the GPU does not have the required memory or processing power for this setting.

Q: How does the GTX 1650 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The GTX 1650 has an average benchmark score of 7472. Its closest competitor is the Intel Arc A310, which has a score of 7550, making it 1% faster. Other rivals like the AMD Radeon HD 8850M and Intel UHD Graphics 750 have scores of 7447 and 7441 respectively, showing they are all within a 0.6% performance margin.

Q: Does the CPU have any impact on the gaming performance?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700F is a very powerful processor with 20 cores and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. However, in this specific game and resolution range, the data suggests the GPU is the limiting factor. The consistent FPS drops with increasing resolution indicate a GPU bottleneck, meaning the CPU's power is not being fully utilized.

Q: What is the most consistent frame rate I can expect?

A: The most consistent results are seen at the Medium preset, which is the only setting that reports minimum and maximum FPS values. At 1920x1080, it averages 79 FPS with a minimum of 67 and a maximum of 91. At 2560x1440, it averages 57 FPS with a minimum of 48 and a maximum of 65.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following table details the exact average FPS measurements for this specific hardware combination.

| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS | Min FPS | Max FPS |

| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |

| 1920x1080 | Low | 109 | - | - |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 79 | 67 | 91 |

| 1920x1080 | High | 65 | - | - |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 42 | - | - |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 79 | - | - |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 57 | 48 | 65 |

| 2560x1440 | High | 47 | - | - |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 30 | - | - |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 50 | - | - |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 36 | 31 | 41 |

| 3840x2160 | High | 30 | - | - |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 19 | - | - |

CPU Role

The Intel Core i7-14700F is a high-end desktop processor from the Core 14th Gen series, based on the Raptor Lake architecture. It features 20 cores and 28 threads, with a boost clock of up to 5.40 GHz. Its synthetic benchmark results are impressive, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 35122 and a Geekbench multicore score of 19620, placing it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. This data confirms that the processor has ample computational power for gaming and other demanding tasks.

However, in the context of playing Undisputed with the GTX 1650, the CPU's role is largely to feed data to the GPU. The benchmark results show that the system's performance is overwhelmingly dictated by the graphics card. The frame rates scale directly with GPU load and resolution, which is the opposite of what one would expect if the CPU were the bottleneck. The CPU's high scores, such as 155808 in Passmark Integer Math and 107005 in Floating Point Math, suggest it is not struggling to keep up. The data indicates that the i7-14700F is a future-proof component that will not need an upgrade for years, but its potential is completely untapped in this specific pairing, as the GTX 1650 prevents it from ever pushing the frame rate higher.