Undisputed

How This Combo Ranks

The pairing of the Intel Core i7-12700KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 secures the 217th spot out of 3,718 tested combinations in the database for Undisputed. This places the combo in the top percentile of all configurations, firmly in the 94th percentile overall. The data indicates that this pairing is designed for high-refresh-rate play, and the numbers will show that it rarely, if ever, becomes the bottleneck.

Looking at the components individually helps contextualize this ranking. The processor finds itself in a dead heat with several close competitors, landing within a fraction of a percent of the pack's average score. The graphics card similarly holds its own, though it is interesting to note that the data shows it trading blows with some unexpected rivals. This is not a "budget" or compromise pairing; the ranking suggests a very capable foundation for a flagship gaming experience. The benchmark results indicate a system that is balanced, with neither component obviously holding the other back in a way that would cause a significant frame rate drop. The performance class here is about providing maximum headroom and visual fidelity, and the FPS data will confirm this.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i7-12700KF is the 12th generation Alder Lake processor, a 12-core, 20-thread part with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. It features a 25 MB shared L3 cache and supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory. In the context of Undisputed, the processor's role is to feed the GPU with enough data to keep it busy, and its performance metrics suggest it does so without breaking a sweat.

The benchmark results show consistent scaling from the 3DMark suite. The processor scores 9,282 in the 3DMark 16-thread test and 9,983 at max threads, indicating solid scaling. More important for gaming is single and dual-core performance. A single-thread score of 1,043 and a 2-thread score of 2,065 suggest that the CPU handles the game's primary game logic and physics threads with ease. The PassMark single-thread score of 3,984 and multi-thread score of 34,092 reinforce this, showing a strong balance. The processor is rated with an 85th percentile vs. all other CPUs, which is solid, but in this specific game, the CPU is not the limiting factor.

The nearest rivals in the database further demonstrate this. The i7-12700KF is virtually identical in performance to the Intel Core i7-12700K, trailing by just 0.2% in average score. It is also within a fraction of a percent of the Intel Core i7-13700T (-0.1%) and the Intel Core i5-13600T (0.2%). This means that in a real-world scenario, swapping between these CPUs would result in no perceivable difference in frame rates. The CPU is a data-crunching workhorse, but the real story for this game is the GPU. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28,838 also confirms that this is a top-tier performer for any background tasks, but its gaming headroom is more than sufficient. The data shows this CPU is more than capable of keeping up with the behemoth GPU paired with it.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 is the undisputed star of this show. With 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, it offers 960.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The card has a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost clock of 2617 MHz, and it is based on the 5 nm Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The card's role is to render the game at high resolutions with maxed-out settings, and the data shows it excels at this. The 16 GB of VRAM is a significant asset for high-resolution textures.

The GPU's benchmark results place it in the 87th percentile vs. all other GPUs. However, its nearestRivals list is a bit of a mixed bag. It is 0.6% slower than the AMD Radeon 8060S and 0.7% slower than the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB. It also trails the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X by 2.3%. These are unusual comparisons, as the RTX 5080 is a high-end card, and these are not the usual competitors. This could indicate a driver-level or game-specific optimization that favors the AMD cards in this particular test, or it could be a quirk of the benchmark. Regardless, the RTX 5080 is still 2.2% faster than the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE. The takeaway is that while the GPU is powerful, it is not infallible, and its performance can vary depending on the workload.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test shows a score of 8,637, and the PassMark G3D score of 36,565 is strong. The card also has a high compute throughput, with a PassMark GPU compute score of 21,789. The raw specifications, like 10,752 shading units and 112 ROPs, mean that this card is built to push pixels. The 336 TMUs and RT cores also ensure that it can handle complex lighting and effects. The 360W TDP and the 750W suggested PSU are worth noting for anyone building a system with this card. The data indicates that the RTX 5080 is a top-tier card that can deliver high frame rates at 4K, and the measured FPS data will show exactly how that translates to Undisputed.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for Undisputed with this combo shows a clear and expected trend: performance scales with resolution and settings. The game is very well-optimized for this hardware, and the frame rates are nothing short of exceptional across the board.

At 1080p, the game becomes a CPU-bound exercise in high refresh rates. With Low settings, the system hits an average of 497 FPS. Moving to High settings drops that to 296 FPS, and Ultra still delivers a very high 190 FPS. The Medium preset shows an average of 357 FPS with a minimum of 304 FPS and a maximum of 411 FPS, showing a tight frame time graph. These numbers suggest that at 1080p, the system is so fast that it's pushing into the territory of diminishing returns; the monitor's refresh rate will be the only limiting factor.

At 1440p, the resolution sweet spot for many high-refresh-rate gamers, the performance is still stellar. The Low preset delivers an eye-watering 359 FPS. High settings drop to 214 FPS, and the Medium preset shows 258 FPS with a minimum of 219 FPS. Even at Ultra settings, the game is exceptionally playable with an average of 137 FPS. This means that at 1440p, players can comfortably use the Ultra preset and still get frame rates well above the standard 144Hz refresh rate, making this an ideal resolution for competitive play with maximum visual quality.

At 4K, the GPU finally starts to feel the load, but the results are still impressive. Low settings yield 227 FPS, while High settings drop to 135 FPS. Medium settings show an average of 163 FPS with a minimum of 139 FPS and a maximum of 188 FPS. The Ultra preset is the most demanding, and the system still manages an average of 87 FPS. This means that even at 4K Ultra, the game is very playable, and with a slight tweak to settings, players can easily hit 100+ FPS. The data clearly shows that this combo is a 4K-capable powerhouse.

FAQ

Q: What frame rate can I expect at 1440p with this combo?

A: The system is more than capable of high refresh rates at this resolution. Expect an average of 137 FPS with Ultra settings, 214 FPS on High, and 359 FPS on Low. The Medium preset averages 258 FPS.

Q: How does this combo perform at 4K?

A: It is very strong at 4K. The game is playable at Ultra settings with an average of 87 FPS. For a higher refresh rate experience, the High preset hits 135 FPS, and the Low preset goes up to 227 FPS.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in this setup?

A: The GPU is the primary driver of performance in this game. The Intel Core i7-12700KF is powerful enough to keep up with the RTX 5080 at all tested settings, never acting as a bottleneck. The CPU is in the top 15% of all CPUs, while the GPU is in the top 13% of all GPUs.

Q: How does this combo compare to other systems in the database?

A: This combo ranks 217th out of 3,718 tested combinations. This places it in the top 6% of all configurations, indicating a top-tier performance level for this game.

Q: What are the differences between the Low, Medium, High, and Ultra settings in terms of performance?

A: The performance difference is significant. At 4K, the Low preset gives 227 FPS, Medium 163 FPS, High 135 FPS, and Ultra 87 FPS. The same scaling is present at lower resolutions, with the gap between settings widening as resolution decreases.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the ideal settings largely depend on the display's refresh rate and resolution. There is no single "best" setting; instead, the data suggests a tiered approach for the best experience.

For 4K/2160p displays, the High preset is the sweet spot. It delivers an excellent balance between visual fidelity and performance, with an average of 135 FPS. This is fast enough to take advantage of high-refresh-rate 4K displays and is likely the most immersive way to experience the game. The Ultra preset is a viable option for those who prioritize maximum visual quality and have a 120Hz screen, but the 87 FPS average might feel less responsive for some players. The lower presets at this resolution are for those chasing the highest possible refresh rates, as the 227 FPS on Low is quite playable.

At 1440p/2560x1440, the Ultra preset is the clear winner. The 137 FPS average is ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors, and the visual uplift from High to Ultra is noticeable. For players with 240Hz or higher refresh rate monitors, the High preset is still excellent, providing a 214 FPS average. The Low preset is not necessary unless you are in a competitive scenario where every last frame matters, but it's good to know the headroom is there.

For 1080p/1920x1080, the system is so fast that the settings become a matter of preference. The Ultra preset delivers a 190 FPS average, which is more than enough for most displays. This is where the game is best experienced with all the visual bells and whistles turned on. Lowering to High provides a significant boost to 296 FPS, which is only useful for the highest-end 360Hz+ monitors. The data suggests that at 1080p, players should use the Ultra preset for the best visual experience without worrying about performance.

In summary, the best experience is to run High at 4K, Ultra at 1440p, and Ultra at 1080p. The system has enough headroom to enable users to prioritize visual quality, and the measured results show that it will handle anything thrown at it.