Undisputed

# Undisputed with Intel Core i5-12400 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

The combination of the Intel Core i5-12400 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 ranks 331st out of 1,580 tested combos in Undisputed, placing it in the top 21% of all configurations. This is a strong result for a pairing built around a mid-range 12th-generation processor and a current-generation graphics card. The rank reflects the balanced nature of this setup: the RTX 5070 provides substantial raw rendering power, while the i5-12400 supplies enough single-thread performance to keep frame rates high even at lower resolutions where CPU overhead becomes more relevant.

How This Combo Ranks

The 331st position out of 1,580 combos places this configuration comfortably in the upper quartile of all tested systems for Undisputed. This rank is particularly impressive given that the CPU itself sits at the 77th percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks at the 83rd percentile among all graphics cards. The data suggests the combo outperforms what either component's individual percentile would imply, indicating efficient scaling in this sports title.

Looking at the CPU's nearest rivals, the Intel Core i7-9700 scores 19,831 on average benchmark score, a mere 0.1% below the i5-12400's 19,850 average. The Intel Core i7-8700 (19,894) trails by 0.2%, while the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX (19,928) is 0.4% behind. The Intel Core i5-11600K (19,771) comes closest, sitting only 0.4% below. These margins are essentially negligible, meaning the i5-12400 trades blows with several older high-end parts and even a workstation-class Threadripper in synthetic workloads.

For the GPU, the RTX 5070's average benchmark score of 41,687 places it 0.2% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 (41,610) and 0.6% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 (41,441). The NVIDIA Tesla M40 (41,897) leads by 0.5%, and the AMD Radeon Pro 580X (41,991) sits 0.7% higher. These deltas are within noise, but the RTX 5070's 83rd percentile ranking confirms it competes with top-tier previous-generation hardware. In Undisputed specifically, the measured FPS data shows this combo delivers triple-digit averages at 1440p and even 4K on most settings, which aligns with its strong overall rank.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-12400 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The CPU's cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. These specifications place it as a mainstream desktop part, yet its benchmark results show it punches above its weight class.

In synthetic testing, the i5-12400 achieves a single-thread score of 910 in 3DMark and 2,249 in Cinebench R23 single-core. Multi-threaded results are notably strong: 5,873 in 3DMark with 16 threads, 5,890 at max threads, and 15,935 in Cinebench R23 multi-core. The PassMark multi-thread score of 18,747 and single-thread score of 3,456 reinforce a pattern of balanced performance. For a game like Undisputed, which is a sports title that typically relies more on consistent frame pacing than extreme multi-threading, the i5-12400's strong single-core showing ensures the CPU does not bottleneck the RTX 5070.

The 6-core/12-thread configuration is sufficient for modern game engines that may spawn background threads for physics, AI, or streaming. The 4.40 GHz boost clock provides responsive frame delivery, and the 18 MB L3 cache helps with data locality. The CPU's 77th percentile ranking among all processors indicates it outperforms a majority of installed CPUs, which is crucial when paired with a high-end GPU like the RTX 5070. At 1080p, where CPU load is highest relative to GPU work, the i5-12400's single-thread performance becomes the limiting factor, but it still allows frame rates well above typical display refresh rates.

FAQ

Q: How does this combo perform at 4K Ultra settings in Undisputed?

A: At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average FPS is 69. This is the lowest measured result across all configurations but remains playable for most users, sitting right at the threshold for smooth 60 Hz displays.

Q: What is the best resolution for this pairing to maximize frame rate?

A: At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo achieves 403.2 FPS average. Even at High settings, 1080p delivers 243.2 FPS, making it the resolution where the RTX 5070's power is most fully utilized.

Q: How does the RTX 5070 compare to the RTX 3090 in this context?

A: The RTX 5070's average benchmark score of 41,687 is 0.6% higher than the RTX 3090's 41,441. In Undisputed, the 5070 delivers playable 4K performance, which is consistent with its slight lead in synthetic tests.

Q: Does the i5-12400 bottleneck the RTX 5070?

A: Data shows the CPU's single-thread score of 910 in 3DMark and 2,249 in Cinebench R23 are strong. At 1080p Low, the combo reaches 403.2 FPS, indicating minimal CPU limitation, though the CPU's 77th percentile ranking does cap absolute maximum frame rates.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the RTX 5070?

A: The RTX 5070 has a launch MSRP of 549 USD. The i5-12400 launched at $199, though pricing details are not the focus of this analysis.

Q: Is this combo better suited for high refresh rate gaming or 4K?

A: The measured data shows 1440p High delivers 175.1 FPS, while 4K High achieves 113.9 FPS. Both are above 100 FPS, but 1440p is the sweet spot for high refresh rate monitors, while 4K remains viable for 60-120 Hz displays.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo demonstrates exceptional headroom. Low settings produce an average of 403.2 FPS, Medium delivers 291.3 FPS, High reaches 243.2 FPS, and Ultra drops to 154.4 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra shows a 61.7% reduction in frame rate, but even the lowest Ultra figure is well above competitive thresholds. The 1080p results indicate the RTX 5070 is rarely the limiting factor; the CPU's single-thread performance, while strong, becomes the constraint at these high frame rates.

Moving to 2560x1440, the results remain robust. Low settings average 291.6 FPS, Medium hits 212.4 FPS, High achieves 175.1 FPS, and Ultra settles at 109.4 FPS. The drop from 1080p to 1440p at each setting is roughly 27-30%, which aligns with the increased pixel count. At 1440p, the GPU begins to take on more responsibility, and the frame rates still comfortably support 144 Hz displays on High settings and 100 Hz on Ultra.

At 3840x2160, the data shows the GPU's limits. Low settings still deliver an impressive 186.3 FPS, Medium reaches 132.5 FPS, High produces 113.9 FPS, and Ultra drops to 69 FPS. The 4K Ultra result is the only measured configuration below 100 FPS, indicating that the RTX 5070's 12 GB of GDDR7 memory and 672.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for most settings, but Ultra at 4K demands more than the GPU can sustain at high refresh rates. The 4K Low result of 186.3 FPS demonstrates the raw capability of the 30.87 TFLOPS FP32 performance when settings are reduced.

Across all resolutions, the pattern is consistent: Low settings provide roughly 2.5-2.6 times the frame rate of Ultra settings. This ratio is stable whether at 1080p (403.2 vs 154.4) or 4K (186.3 vs 69), suggesting the performance scaling is primarily GPU-bound at these quality levels.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K reveals the balance between CPU and GPU workload. At Low settings, the progression is 403.2 FPS at 1080p, 291.6 FPS at 1440p, and 186.3 FPS at 4K. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is 27.7%, while the drop from 1440p to 4K is 36.1%. This steeper decline at higher resolutions indicates the GPU becomes increasingly the limiting component as pixel count rises.

At High settings, the scaling is 243.2 FPS at 1080p, 175.1 FPS at 1440p, and 113.9 FPS at 4K. The percentage drops are 28.0% and 35.0%, respectively. These figures are nearly identical to the Low settings pattern, confirming that resolution scaling is consistent regardless of quality preset. The RTX 5070's 192-bit memory bus and 672.0 GB/s bandwidth appear to handle the increased memory pressure at 4K without disproportionate penalties.

Ultra settings show the most dramatic scaling: 154.4 FPS at 1080p, 109.4 FPS at 1440p, and 69 FPS at 4K. The 1080p to 1440p drop is 29.1%, and the 1440p to 4K drop is 36.9%. The 4K Ultra result of 69 FPS indicates the GPU is fully saturated, with the shading units and ROPs (80) working at their limit. The fact that 4K Ultra is barely above 60 FPS while 4K High achieves 113.9 FPS suggests Ultra settings introduce rendering features that disproportionately impact performance at high resolutions.

The scaling data points to the RTX 5070 as the primary limiter at 4K, while the i5-12400's role diminishes as resolution increases. At 1080p, the CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 910 and PassMark single-thread of 3,456 contribute to keeping frame rates high, but the GPU's 83rd percentile ranking is what allows 4K Medium to still hit 132.5 FPS.

Settings Recommendations

For 4K displays, the data strongly favors High settings. The 113.9 FPS average at 3840x2160 High is a 65% improvement over Ultra's 69 FPS, while the visual difference between High and Ultra in most sports titles is minimal. The 4K High result comfortably supports 100 Hz displays, and even 120 Hz panels would be usable with adaptive sync. Ultra at 4K is only recommended for users with 60 Hz monitors who prioritize maximum visual fidelity over frame rate.

For 1440p, High settings at 175.1 FPS is the optimal balance. This result exceeds the refresh rate of most 144 Hz monitors, providing headroom for frame time spikes. Medium at 212.4 FPS is viable for 240 Hz displays, but the jump from Medium to High only costs 37.3 FPS while offering improved visuals. Ultra at 109.4 FPS is also playable and suitable for 100-120 Hz screens, making 1440p the most flexible resolution for this combo.

For 1080p, the data suggests High or even Medium settings are excessive for most users, as 243.2 FPS at High already exceeds the maximum refresh rate of most gaming monitors (typically 240-360 Hz). The 291.3 FPS at Medium and 403.2 FPS at Low are primarily useful for competitive play on 360 Hz panels, but the visual trade-offs are significant. Ultra at 154.4 FPS remains a strong choice for 144 Hz monitors, delivering a 36% boost over the 4K Ultra result while still maintaining smooth motion.

The single best experience per the measured rows is 1440p High at 175.1 FPS. This configuration maximizes the combo's strengths: the CPU provides enough single-thread power to avoid bottlenecks, the GPU delivers ample headroom above 144 Hz, and the visual quality is only one step below maximum. For users prioritizing frame rate above all, 1080p Low at 403.2 FPS is the ceiling, but the 1440p High result represents the sweet spot where performance and fidelity converge.