Undisputed

The Intel Core i3-12100F is a 4-core, 8-thread desktop processor from the Alder Lake generation, built on Intel's 10 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. In benchmark tests, this CPU demonstrates a strong balance between single-threaded and multithreaded performance. Its single-thread score of 893 in 3dmark and 1681 in Cinebench R23 indicate solid per-core capability, which is crucial for a sports title like Undisputed that relies on consistent frame pacing. The processor’s 12 MB of shared L3 cache further supports gaming workloads by keeping frequently accessed data close to the cores.

However, the CPU’s most telling statistic for gaming is its multithreaded throughput. The chip scores 11912 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 4023 in 3dmark max threads, which are respectable numbers for a quad-core part. In the context of Undisputed, these results suggest the i3-12100F is capable of handling the game’s simulation and physics logic without becoming a bottleneck, especially when paired with a high-end GPU. The data shows a pattern: at 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves 349.2 FPS, which is nearly identical to the 349.2 FPS ceiling that the CPU can theoretically feed. This indicates that at lower settings, the CPU is working near its limit, but it does not cap performance in a way that prevents high frame rates.

The processor’s percentile ranking of 72 vs all CPUs places it in the upper tier of desktop chips, and it sits within 0.6% of the Intel Core i3-10105 in average benchmark score. This means its raw compute power is comparable to that of slightly older quad-core designs, but its higher boost clock and newer architecture give it an edge in latency-sensitive tasks. For Undisputed, the Core i3-12100F provides enough headroom to drive the Radeon RX 6800 XT at high frame rates, as evidenced by the fact that even at 4K Ultra, the combo still produces 62.8 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay.

FAQ

*Q: How does the Core i3-12100F’s single-thread performance impact Undisputed?*

A: The CPU’s 3dmark single-thread score of 893 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1681 indicate strong per-core speed. In a sports game where AI and physics calculations are often serialized, this translates to responsive gameplay and stable frame pacing, as seen in the 208.9 FPS average at 1080p High settings.

*Q: Is the i3-12100F a bottleneck for the RX 6800 XT in Undisputed?*

A: At lower settings, the CPU becomes more prominent. At 1080p Low, the combo hits 349.2 FPS, which is a very high ceiling. However, the gap between 1080p Low and 1440p Low is 96.3 FPS (from 349.2 to 252.9), showing that the GPU is scaling with resolution. At higher settings, the GPU is the limiting factor, as the CPU maintains enough throughput to avoid capping frame rates.

Q: What is the performance difference between the i3-12100F and its closest rival, the Intel Core i3-10105?

A: The i3-12100F has an average benchmark score of 13516, which is 0.6% higher than the Intel Core i3-10105’s 13430. This marginal advantage, combined with a higher boost clock, gives the i3-12100F a slight edge in gaming workloads, though the difference is likely imperceptible in Undisputed.

Q: How does the RX 6800 XT’s benchmark standing compare to its rivals?

A: The GPU has an average benchmark score of 49982, placing it 0.5% ahead of the Intel Arc A550M and 2.6% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER. It trails the NVIDIA RTX A1000 by 1.7%, but those differences are within a narrow band, indicating the RX 6800 XT is a top-tier graphics card.

*Q: Does the CPU’s memory support affect Undisputed performance?*

A: The i3-12100F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The benchmark results do not specify which memory type was used, but the dual-channel memory bus is sufficient for the game. The data shows no indication of memory bandwidth limiting performance, as frame rates scale predictably with resolution and settings.

Q: What frame rate can I expect at 1440p with High settings?

A: The measured average FPS at 2560x1440 with High settings is 147.3 FPS. This is a strong result for a sports title, providing smooth animation and responsive controls, especially when compared to the 93.6 FPS at 1440p Ultra.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data for Undisputed reveals a clear hierarchy across the four presets tested. At 1080p, the Low preset delivers 349.2 FPS, which is far beyond what any display can show, but it comes at the cost of visual fidelity. The Medium preset at 249.5 FPS and High preset at 208.9 FPS both offer excellent headroom for high-refresh-rate monitors, while the Ultra preset drops to 135.8 FPS. For most gamers, the High preset at 1080p represents the sweet spot, as it maintains above 200 FPS while providing significantly better visuals than Low.

Moving to 1440p, the High preset produces 147.3 FPS, which is ideal for 144 Hz displays. The Medium preset at 180 FPS offers even more headroom, but the visual difference between Medium and High is often substantial in sports games, where player models and arena details matter. The Ultra preset at 93.6 FPS is still playable, but it approaches the 90 FPS threshold where motion clarity starts to degrade. At 4K, the High preset yields 96.7 FPS, which is comfortably above 60 FPS and suitable for most 4K displays. The Ultra preset at 62.8 FPS is the only setting that dips close to the 60 FPS mark, making it a less desirable choice for consistent smoothness.

The data suggests that the High preset is the recommended choice across all resolutions. It provides a balanced combination of frame rate and visual quality, with the 4K High result of 96.7 FPS being particularly impressive given the RX 6800 XT’s capabilities. For competitive play, the Medium preset at 1440p offers a high frame rate without sacrificing too much detail, but for a game like Undisputed, where visual feedback is important, High is the more appropriate setting.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core i3-12100F and AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT ranks 552nd out of 1580 tested combos in Undisputed. This places it in the 65th percentile of all configurations, which is a strong showing for a mid-range CPU paired with a high-end GPU. The ranking reflects the balance between the CPU’s 4-core/8-thread design and the GPU’s massive 4608 shading units and 16 GB of GDDR6 memory. While the CPU is not the fastest available, its single-thread performance is sufficient to keep the GPU fed, as evidenced by the high frame rates achieved.

The combo’s ranking also benefits from the RX 6800 XT’s strong overall benchmark standing. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 49982 places it in the 87th percentile of all GPUs, and its performance is within 2.6% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER. This means the graphics card is doing most of the heavy lifting in Undisputed, allowing the i3-12100F to operate within its comfort zone. The result is a configuration that outperforms many systems with more expensive CPUs but weaker GPUs, as the game’s engine appears to scale well with graphics hardware.

The 552nd rank out of 1580 combos suggests there is room for improvement, particularly by upgrading the CPU to a higher-core-count part. However, for the price point of the i3-12100F, the performance is exceptional. The data shows that the combo achieves 208.9 FPS at 1080p High, which is a result that would challenge systems with more powerful processors. The ranking also indicates that the combo is not limited by the CPU in most scenarios, as the frame rates scale predictably with resolution, pointing to the GPU as the primary driver of performance.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data across resolutions provides insight into which component is limiting performance in Undisputed. From 1080p to 1440p, the average FPS drops by 29.5% at High settings, from 208.9 FPS to 147.3 FPS. This is a substantial decrease, but it is consistent with GPU-bound scaling, as the number of pixels increases by 78% (from 2.07 million to 3.69 million). The fact that the frame rate does not drop proportionally to the pixel count suggests that the CPU is keeping up with the increased load, and the GPU is handling the extra work efficiently.

Moving from 1440p to 4K, the High settings frame rate drops from 147.3 FPS to 96.7 FPS, a 34.4% reduction. This again aligns with GPU-bound behavior, as the pixel count jumps by 125% (from 3.69 million to 8.29 million). The less-than-proportional drop indicates that the RX 6800 XT has ample memory bandwidth and compute power to handle the resolution increase without hitting a hard limit. The data shows that the GPU is the limiting component at all resolutions above 1080p Low, where the CPU becomes the bottleneck.

The Low settings data reinforces this analysis. At 1080p Low, the combo reaches 349.2 FPS, which is the highest measured value. At 1440p Low, it drops to 252.9 FPS, and at 4K Low, it falls to 158.1 FPS. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p is a 27.6% reduction, while the 1440p to 4K drop is 37.5%. This pattern shows that even at Low settings, the GPU is still the primary constraint at higher resolutions, as the CPU’s 4-core design can only push so many frames. The conclusion is that the i3-12100F is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the RX 6800 XT is the component that determines the final frame rate at 4K.