Undisputed

Undisputed is a sports title with measured FPS results for the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. The data set includes runs at 1920x1080, 2560x1440, and 3840x2160, each with Low, Medium, High, and Ultra presets. Average FPS ranges from 377 at 1920x1080 Low to 66 at 3840x2160 Ultra. The CPU carries a 95th-percentile average benchmark score, the GPU sits in the 88th percentile of all GPUs, and the pair is ranked 830th out of 3,718 tested combos in this game. The measured FPS values are the primary evidence for how this specific combination behaves in Undisputed.

Resolution Scaling

The resolution scaling pattern is clear and consistent across all settings. At 1920x1080, the combo produces 377 FPS on Low, 271 on Medium, 224 on High, and 144 on Ultra. Moving to 2560x1440, those values fall to 272, 196, 162, and 104. At 3840x2160, the averages drop further to 172, 124, 102, and 66. Every resolution increase reduces the average FPS at every preset, and every preset increase reduces the average FPS at every resolution.

The shape of this scaling suggests where the limiting component sits. At 1920x1080 Low, 377 FPS is an extremely high result. At 3840x2160 Low, the same GPU still produces 172 FPS. The CPU is a 16-core, 32-thread Zen 5 part, and the data shows it can keep the RTX 4090 fed at low settings even when resolution rises. The real stress appears when the preset moves to Ultra. At 1920x1080 Ultra, the average is 144 FPS; at 3840x2160 Ultra, it is 66 FPS. That is the lowest value in the entire measured set, and it points directly at the rendering load imposed by the Ultra preset.

One useful comparison is between resolution changes and preset changes. 3840x2160 Low averages 172 FPS, while 1920x1080 Ultra averages 144 FPS. In other words, running 4K on Low is faster than running 1080p on Ultra with this hardware. That means the Ultra preset is not simply a small step above High; it is a heavy enough workload to drop the frame rate below the low-settings 4K result. For a builder deciding how to play Undisputed, the preset selection is at least as important as the resolution choice.

The Medium preset includes min and max values, which adds context. At 1920x1080 Medium, the reported minimum is 230 FPS and the maximum is 312. At 2560x1440 Medium, the minimum is 166 and the maximum is 225. At 3840x2160 Medium, the minimum is 105 and the maximum is 142. The 4K Medium minimum of 105 is still a strong result, especially considering that the same resolution on Ultra averages only 66 FPS. This reinforces the pattern: the GPU has enough raw power to hold high frame rates through 4K Medium, but the Ultra preset creates a much larger performance load.

The limiting component at 1080p Low appears to be the frame generation ceiling of the system rather than the GPU’s pixel throughput. The limiting component at 4K Ultra is clearly the GPU workload. The measured data does not isolate CPU and GPU usage directly, but the monotonic drop across presets and resolutions is consistent with a high-end GPU being pushed hardest by the combination of maximum resolution and maximum preset.

FAQ

Q: What is the fastest measured FPS result for this combo in Undisputed?

A: The highest average is 377 FPS at 1920x1080 Low. The next highest values are 272 FPS at 2560x1440 Low and 271 FPS at 1920x1080 Medium.

Q: How does this system perform at 4K in Undisputed?

A: At 3840x2160, the measured averages are 172 FPS on Low, 124 on Medium, 102 on High, and 66 on Ultra. The Medium preset also reports a minimum of 105 FPS and a maximum of 142 FPS.

Q: What CPU benchmark scores are associated with the Ryzen AI Max+ 395?

A: The CPU scores 35,314 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, 2,044 in Cinebench R23 single-core, 20,992 in Geekbench multi-core, and 2,464 in Geekbench single-core. Its average benchmark score is 77,740, placing it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more likely to limit frame rates at low settings?

A: At 1920x1080 Low, the combo reaches 377 FPS, while at 3840x2160 Low it falls to 172 FPS. The lower-resolution result is high enough that the CPU does not appear to be holding the system back in Undisputed at low settings. As resolution increases, the GPU workload becomes the dominant variable.

Q: What does the combo rank in Undisputed mean?

A: The measured combo rank is 830 out of 3,718 tested combos. That places this CPU and GPU pair in the upper portion of the database, though not at the very top.

Q: Does the RTX 4090’s aggregate benchmark score explain its in-game result?

A: The GPU’s average benchmark score is 60,347, which places it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. In the nearest-rival data, it is 2.5% behind the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M on that aggregate score. Despite that, the measured Undisputed results are strong, with 224 FPS at 1920x1080 High and 102 FPS at 3840x2160 High.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 is an Ada Lovelace GPU built on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The die is 609 mm² and contains 76,300 million transistors. The base clock is 2235 MHz and the boost clock is 2520 MHz. The memory subsystem consists of 24 GB of GDDR6X on a 384-bit bus, with 1.01 TB/s of bandwidth and a memory clock of 1313 MHz, listed as 21 Gbps effective. These specifications are fixed across all measured FPS entries, so they define the GPU’s performance ceiling in Undisputed.

The raw throughput figures are substantial. The RTX 4090 is rated for 82.58 TFLOPS FP32, 82.58 TFLOPS FP16, 443.5 GPixel/s pixel rate, and 1,290.2 GTexel/s texture rate. It has 16,384 shading units, 512 TMUs, 176 ROPs, 128 RT cores, and 512 tensor cores. Those numbers explain why the GPU can handle 4K High at 102 FPS and 4K Ultra at 66 FPS. The measured results show the GPU is the component being loaded most heavily at the highest settings, but it is still returning playable average frame rates.

VRAM capacity is not likely to be the limiting factor in these results. The 24 GB frame buffer is present at every resolution and every preset, from 1920x1080 Low to 3840x2160 Ultra. The data set does not include VRAM usage measurements, so no claim about a specific VRAM ceiling can be made, but the FPS progression from 172 at 4K Low to 66 at 4K Ultra is best explained by the preset’s rendering workload rather than by memory capacity. The memory bandwidth of 1.01 TB/s is high enough that the GPU still averages 124 FPS at 4K Medium and 102 FPS at 4K High.

Clock behavior also fits the results. The boost clock of 2520 MHz is the relevant figure for sustained gaming performance. The base clock of 2235 MHz is the guaranteed floor. The measured FPS values at 1920x1080 Low and 2560x1440 Low, 377 and 272 respectively, indicate the GPU is being driven well beyond its base clock during these runs. An under-clocked GPU would not produce those averages.

The GPU also has a 450 W TDP, uses a triple-slot cooler, and requires a 1x 16-pin power connector, with a suggested PSU of 850 W. These characteristics are not directly visible in the FPS data, but they are part of the practical context for a builder pairing this GPU with a CPU. The PCIe interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, which matches the CPU’s PCIe Gen 4 implementation.

In GPU benchmark results, the RTX 4090 scores 9,223 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 255,416 in Geekbench OpenCL, 271,631 in Geekbench Vulkan, 38,194 in Passmark G3D, and 26,613 in Passmark GPU compute. These component-level scores place the GPU in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. The Undisputed measured FPS table is the more direct evidence for this game, and it shows a GPU that can handle even the heaviest tested preset at 4K.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo rank in Undisputed is 830 out of 3,718 tested combos. This is a game-specific ranking that reflects how the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and RTX 4090 work together in this title. It is not the same as the component-level percentile data. The CPU is in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, and the GPU is in the 88th percentile of all GPUs, but the in-game pairing lands at 830 of 3,718.

That placement is strong but not exceptional. A rank of 830 out of 3,718 means most tested configurations in the database are slower in Undisputed. However, it also means there are many combos ranked above it. The gap between the high component percentiles and the mid-800s in-game rank indicates that component tier alone does not determine where a combo lands in this game. The specific CPU and GPU interaction, along with the measured frame rates across settings, is what produces the final rank.

The nearest-rival data for the CPU and GPU is aggregate benchmark data, not in-game ranking data. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 77,740 puts it 1.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX and 2.0% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX, while trailing the Intel Core i9-14900K by 1.7%. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 60,347 is essentially tied with the Intel Arc Pro A60, 0.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48, 2.9% ahead of the AMD Radeon PRO V710, and 2.5% behind the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M. Those comparisons are separate from the Undisputed rank of 830.

The rank is also based on measured data, not estimates. The FPS table includes values for every combination of the three resolutions and four presets. The rank of 830 is therefore a data-backed position. It tells a buyer that this is a capable high-performance pairing for this game, but not the fastest possible combination in the database.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is a mobile Zen 5 processor with 16 cores and 32 threads. It has a 3.00 GHz base clock and a 5.10 GHz boost clock. The cache configuration includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of shared L3. The CPU supports quad-channel LPDDR5X memory with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth, uses AMD Socket FP11, and is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It also contains an integrated Radeon 8060S GPU, but in this measured configuration the active graphics solution is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

The CPU’s benchmark results show strong multi-threaded and single-threaded performance. It scores 35,314 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 2,044 in Cinebench R23 single-core. In Geekbench, it scores 20,992 multi-core and 2,464 single-core. Passmark results include 54,934 in multithreaded performance and 4,147 in single-thread performance. The average benchmark score is 77,740, with a 95th-percentile position among all CPUs.

These CPU numbers matter for Undisputed because the measured FPS reaches very high values at lower resolutions. At 1920x1080 Low, the average is 377 FPS. That result requires the CPU to generate enough frames to feed the RTX 4090. A weaker CPU would likely cap the frame rate below that level. The single-thread score of 4,147 in Passmark and 2,464 in Geekbench indicate the CPU can handle the type of per-thread work that tends to appear in sports titles. The multi-thread score of 54,934 in Passmark leaves substantial headroom if the game uses additional threads.

The CPU’s memory bandwidth also plays a role. The quad-channel LPDDR5X support provides 256.0 GB/s, which is relevant for an APU-class processor and helps with overall system throughput. The PCIe Gen 4 interface with 16 lanes is enough for the RTX 4090, which also uses PCIe 4.0 x16. That means the CPU is not artificially limiting the GPU through an older or narrower bus interface.

In the nearest-rival table, the CPU sits close to several other high-end desktop and workstation parts. Its average benchmark score of 77,740 is 1.6% higher than the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX, 1.6% higher than the AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P, and 2.0% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX. It is 1.7% lower than the Intel Core i9-14900K. These are aggregate CPU benchmark comparisons, not Undisputed-specific FPS comparisons, but they show the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is operating in a competitive performance class.

For this game, the CPU role appears to be secondary at high resolutions and primary at low resolutions. At 3840x2160 Ultra, the GPU is heavily loaded and the CPU only needs to keep up with the game thread and frame submission. At 1920x1080 Low, the GPU has far less work per frame, and the CPU’s ability to sustain FPS becomes more visible. The measured 377 FPS result demonstrates that the CPU is not a weak link in this pairing.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS table contains results for each resolution and preset. Medium is the only preset with min and max values reported; the Low, High, and Ultra entries list only an average FPS. The exact measured values are listed below.

| Resolution | Settings | Average FPS | Minimum FPS | Maximum FPS |

|---|---|---|---|---|

| 3840x2160 | High | 102 | — | — |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 172 | — | — |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 124 | 105 | 142 |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 66 | — | — |

| 2560x1440 | High | 162 | — | — |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 272 | — | — |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 196 | 166 | 225 |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 104 | — | — |

| 1920x1080 | High | 224 | — | — |

| 1920x1080 | Low | 377 | — | — |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 271 | 230 | 312 |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 144 | — | — |

These are the measured FPS values for this CPU and GPU combination. The highest average is 377 at 1920x1080 Low, and the lowest average is 66 at 3840x2160 Ultra. The Medium preset data shows that even at 4K, the minimum FPS stays at 105, which means the tested system does not fall below that level in that preset. The data as a whole shows a high-performance pairing with enough headroom at 1080p and 1440p to target high frame rates, while 4K Ultra produces a lower but still measurable 66 FPS average.