Undisputed

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT secures the 365th position out of 1,580 tested combinations in Undisputed, placing it comfortably inside the top quarter of all recorded hardware pairings. This ranking reflects a configuration with substantial headroom for the game’s demands, though it is far from the absolute top tier. The combo’s standing is largely defined by the GPU’s raw output at high resolutions, while the CPU’s strong multi-threaded and single-threaded scores ensure it does not bottleneck the frame delivery in a sports title that relies on consistent physics and AI simulation.

How This Combo Ranks

The 365th rank out of 1,580 combos indicates that roughly 77% of tested configurations are slower or less capable in this specific title. Benchmark results show this pairing sits in the upper echelon, but it is not a leaderboard-topping setup. The CPU component alone achieves a 93rd percentile rank against all processors, meaning it outperforms the vast majority of installed CPUs. However, the GPU’s 82nd percentile rank against all graphics cards suggests that the visual processor is the more limiting factor in this duo, especially when pushing extreme graphical presets.

When examining the CPU’s nearest rivals, the data shows a tightly contested field. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X posts an average benchmark score of 50,556, which is virtually identical to the Intel Core Ultra 5 235’s 50,598, a negligible 0.1% difference. Similarly, the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT trails by only 0.4% with a score of 50,738, and the Intel Core i7-13850HX is 0.5% behind at 50,827. Even the Intel Core i9-13980HX, a mobile flagship, is only 0.8% ahead with a score of 50,944. This clustering implies that the 7900X delivers a performance envelope that is nearly indistinguishable from its closest competitors in synthetic benchmarks, making the GPU selection the primary differentiator for gaming outcomes.

For the GPU, the nearest rivals show a similar pattern of parity. The Radeon RX 7900 XT averages 38,358 points, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile scores 38,349, a 0% delta. The NVIDIA CMP 70HX is 0.3% ahead, and the GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is 0.6% behind. The most notable outlier is the NVIDIA GeForce MX570, which is 0.4% slower, but this is a mismatch in class. This data suggests that the RX 7900 XT’s performance is finely balanced against several competitors, and in Undisputed, the in-game rank of 365 reflects a system that delivers high frame rates across most settings but falls short of the extreme performance needed for a top-100 placement.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is built on the Navi 31 chip using a 5 nm process from TSMC, housing 57,700 million transistors on a 529 mm² die. Its memory subsystem is a defining feature: 20 GB of GDDR6 on a 320-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 800.0 GB/s. This large frame buffer is particularly relevant for Undisputed at high resolutions, where texture data and geometry can quickly consume memory. The base clock runs at 1387 MHz, with a game clock of 2025 MHz and a boost clock reaching 2394 MHz. The memory clock is rated at 2500 MHz, translating to 20 Gbps effective.

These clocks directly influence the measured frame rates. At 4K Ultra, the average FPS drops to 69, indicating that the GPU’s compute units are heavily loaded, but the 20 GB VRAM prevents any memory-related stutter. The card’s shading units number 5,376, supported by 336 texture mapping units and 192 raster output processors, allowing it to push 459.6 GPixel/s and 804.4 GTexel/s. For a sports game like Undisputed, which relies on rapid scene changes and detailed character models, the pixel rate is crucial for maintaining smooth motion. The FP32 performance of 51.48 TFLOPS ensures the GPU can handle the physics calculations for punches and knockdowns without breaking a sweat.

The GPU’s API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, meaning it is fully compatible with modern rendering paths. The power delivery requires a 300 W TDP and a suggested 700 W power supply, which is typical for a high-end card of this generation. The end-of-life production status suggests that while new units may be scarce, the performance remains competitive. In benchmark tests, the GPU scores 29,009 in Passmark G3D and 16,828 in compute, with a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,623. These figures align with the measured in-game results, where the GPU’s capabilities are the deciding factor between smooth 4K gameplay and a compromised experience.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to achieve over 100 FPS on Ultra settings?

A: At 2560x1440 with Ultra settings, the average FPS is 110.7, while 1920x1080 Ultra yields 151.6 FPS. At 4K Ultra, the average drops to 69 FPS, which is below the 100 FPS threshold.

Q: How much faster is the Low preset compared to Ultra at 1080p?

A: The Low preset at 1920x1080 averages 400.8 FPS, which is 249.2 FPS higher than the Ultra preset’s 151.6 FPS, representing a substantial performance gain of over 2.6 times.

Q: Does the 20 GB VRAM make a difference in this game?

A: The data indicates that even at 4K Ultra, the average FPS of 69 is maintained without any reported minimum frame drops, suggesting the 20 GB frame buffer is sufficient to prevent memory-related performance hits.

Q: How does the CPU’s multi-threaded score relate to gaming performance?

A: The Ryzen 9 7900X scores 43,695 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, which ensures that background tasks and the game’s AI logic do not starve the rendering pipeline, allowing the GPU to operate near its full potential.

Q: Is the 4K High preset playable?

A: Yes, the 4K High preset averages 107.6 FPS, which is above the typical 60 FPS playability threshold and provides a smooth experience for a sports title.

Q: What is the FPS difference between Medium and High at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the Medium preset averages 210.5 FPS, while High averages 173.7 FPS, resulting in a 36.8 FPS difference in favor of Medium.

Settings Recommendations

For the best balance of visual fidelity and performance, the High preset at 2560x1440 emerges as the sweet spot, delivering an average of 173.7 FPS. This exceeds the refresh rate of most high-end monitors and maintains a crisp image without the overhead of Ultra settings. At 4K, the High preset is also viable, averaging 107.6 FPS, which is smooth for a sports game where reaction time matters. The Ultra preset at 1440p is acceptable at 110.7 FPS, but the marginal visual gains over High may not justify the 63 FPS drop. Conversely, the Medium preset at 4K offers 132.9 FPS, which is a strong alternative for those prioritizing frame rate over maximum detail.

The data suggests that Low settings are unnecessary for this configuration, as even 4K Medium provides well over 100 FPS. For competitive play, 1080p Medium at 291.5 FPS or High at 242.2 FPS offers extremely high responsiveness, but this may be overkill for a title like Undisputed. The most practical recommendation is to run High at 1440p for a perfect blend of speed and quality, or High at 4K if the display supports it. Ultra should only be used at 1080p, where 151.6 FPS remains fluid, while 4K Ultra is best avoided due to its 69 FPS average, which can dip into noticeable stutter during intense exchanges.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the performance scales predictably with settings. The Low preset averages 400.8 FPS, which is an exceptional floor for any display. Medium drops to 291.5 FPS, still far beyond any standard monitor’s refresh rate. High provides 242.2 FPS, and Ultra delivers 151.6 FPS. These numbers indicate that at 1080p, the CPU and GPU combination is severely underutilized, offering headroom for future titles or higher refresh rate displays.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain high but begin to show the GPU’s workload. Low averages 293.9 FPS, Medium hits 210.5 FPS, High achieves 173.7 FPS, and Ultra settles at 110.7 FPS. The gap between High and Ultra is 63 FPS, which is significant and suggests that Ultra’s additional effects (likely shadows and reflections) are costly. At 3840x2160, the scaling becomes more pronounced. Low averages 184.1 FPS, Medium drops to 132.9 FPS, High follows at 107.6 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 69 FPS. The 4K Ultra result is the only sub-100 FPS figure in the entire dataset, highlighting the GPU’s limits at the highest resolution and settings. Across all resolutions, the pattern is consistent: Low settings provide a massive performance buffer, while Ultra at 4K is the only configuration that fails to maintain triple-digit frame rates.