Undisputed

Undisputed

AVERAGE FPS
113
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 113 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 40 63 76 105
1440p QHD 64 99 119 166
1080p Full HD 88 137 165 230

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 105
3840x2160 Medium 76
3840x2160 High 63
3840x2160 Ultra 40
2560x1440 Low 166
2560x1440 Medium 119
2560x1440 High 99
2560x1440 Ultra 64
1920x1080 Low 230
1920x1080 Medium 165
1920x1080 High 137
1920x1080 Ultra 88

Undisputed with AMD Ryzen 9 7900X + AMD Radeon RX 7600, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X and AMD Radeon RX 7600 combination delivers a playable experience in Undisputed, but the data reveals a pairing that is heavily skewed by the GPU. The 12-core CPU is rarely the limiting factor; instead, the RX 7600's 8 GB of VRAM and 128-bit memory interface dictate performance ceilings, particularly at higher resolutions. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS data to show exactly where this combo excels and where it falls short.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is steep and consistent, indicating that the Radeon RX 7600 is the primary bottleneck as pixel count increases. At Low settings, the average frame rate falls from 230 FPS at 1920x1080 to 105 FPS at 3840x2160—a 54.3% reduction. This scaling is typical of a GPU that is being pushed to its limits, as the rendering workload grows exponentially with resolution.

The pattern holds across all settings. At High, the average drops from 137 FPS at 1080p to 99 FPS at 1440p, then to 63 FPS at 4K. The 4K High result is notably tight at 63 FPS, suggesting the GPU is just barely keeping up. At Ultra, the situation worsens dramatically: 88 FPS at 1080p falls to 64 FPS at 1440p and plummets to 40 FPS at 4K. The 4K Ultra result is the only configuration in the entire dataset that falls below 60 FPS, making it the clear outlier.

The scaling between 1440p and 4K is harsher than between 1080p and 1440p. For example, at Medium, the 1440p average of 119 FPS drops to 76 FPS at 4K—a 36.1% loss. In contrast, the 1080p Medium result of 165 FPS only drops 27.9% to reach 119 FPS at 1440p. This suggests that the RX 7600's memory bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s becomes a critical constraint as the framebuffer demands grow, causing a super-linear performance penalty at 4K.

The data shows that 1080p is the sweet spot for this combo, with every settings preset except Ultra achieving over 130 FPS. At 1440p, the system remains viable for high-refresh gaming, but the 4K results are marginal. The 4K Medium average of 76 FPS with a minimum of 64 FPS is the only 4K configuration that offers both playability and a safety margin above the 60 FPS threshold.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 is the definitive limiting component in this pairing. Its specifications—8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth—explain the performance cliffs observed at higher resolutions. The GPU's boost clock of 2655 MHz and game clock of 2250 MHz provide solid raw throughput, but the memory subsystem is simply not wide enough for 4K Ultra workloads.

The GPU's benchmark scores contextualize its position. With a PassMark G3D score of 16634 and an average benchmark score of 15171, the RX 7600 sits in the 57th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM (with a deltaPct of -0.2) and the AMD Radeon 680M (with a deltaPct of -0.7). This indicates the RX 7600 is a mid-range performer, and the Undisputed results reflect that positioning—capable at 1080p, strained at 4K.

The VRAM capacity of 8 GB is a decisive factor. At 4K Ultra, the game likely exceeds this limit, causing the average FPS to collapse to 40. The fact that 4K High recovers to 63 FPS suggests that reducing texture quality and shadow details alleviates the memory pressure. The 64 ROPs and 128 TMUs are sufficient for the game's geometry and texture work, but the 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 compute is not enough to brute-force 4K rendering.

The GPU's PCIe 4.0 x8 interface could theoretically limit data transfer, but with the Ryzen 9 7900X providing Gen 5 lanes, this is unlikely to be a practical bottleneck. The measured data shows no signs of CPU-side stalling; instead, the FPS drops are smooth and predictable, which points squarely at GPU limitations rather than interface overhead.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured rows, the optimal balance of performance and visual fidelity is the Medium preset. At 1920x1080, Medium delivers 165 FPS average with a minimum of 141 FPS and a maximum of 190 FPS. This provides a comfortable margin above the 144 Hz refresh rate common on 1080p monitors, and the frame time consistency (indicated by the narrow min-max range) suggests a smooth experience.

At 2560x1440, Medium remains the best choice. The 119 FPS average with a 102 FPS minimum keeps gameplay fluid, and the visual uplift over Low is significant. Choosing Low at 1440p yields 166 FPS, but the graphical compromises are likely too severe for a modern sports title. The High preset at 1440p (99 FPS) is playable but leaves less headroom for demanding scenes.

For 4K, Medium is the only recommended preset. The 76 FPS average with a 64 FPS minimum is the sole 4K configuration that maintains a consistent 60+ FPS experience. High at 4K (63 FPS) is technically playable but has no reported minimum FPS, implying potential dips below 60. Ultra at 4K (40 FPS) should be avoided entirely.

The data clearly shows that Ultra is inefficient. At 1080p, Ultra (88 FPS) is 46.7% slower than High (137 FPS), yet the visual difference between High and Ultra in most sports games is minimal. The 1440p Ultra result (64 FPS) is 35.4% slower than High (99 FPS), reinforcing that Ultra offers poor returns. Users should max out at High if they prefer higher quality, but Medium offers the best frame rate per visual step.

FAQ

*Q: Can this system run Undisputed at 4K with playable frame rates?*

A: Yes, but only on Medium settings. The measured 4K Medium average is 76 FPS with a minimum of 64 FPS. High settings at 4K produce 63 FPS average, and Ultra drops to 40 FPS, which is not playable.

Q: What is the most consistent frame rate configuration?

A: The 1080p Medium preset shows the tightest frame time variance, with a 141 FPS minimum and 190 FPS maximum around a 165 FPS average. The 1440p Medium preset (102 FPS min, 137 FPS max) is also highly consistent.

Q: Why does the 4K Ultra preset perform so poorly?

A: The 4K Ultra result of 40 FPS is likely because the Radeon RX 7600's 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth cannot handle the combined load of 4K resolution and maximum settings. The GPU's 57th percentile benchmark ranking supports this limitation.

Q: How does the RX 7600 compare to its nearest rivals in general benchmarks?

A: The RX 7600's average benchmark score of 15171 is 0.2% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM (15199) and 0.7% higher than the AMD Radeon 680M (15270). It also outperforms the AMD Radeon Pro 560X by 0.6%.

Q: Is 1440p a viable resolution for this combo?

A: Yes, for Medium and High settings. 1440p Medium averages 119 FPS, and High averages 99 FPS. The 1440p Ultra preset (64 FPS) is marginal but playable.

Q: Should I use Low settings for competitive play?

A: Low settings at 1080p produce 230 FPS, which is exceptionally high. At 1440p, Low averages 166 FPS. However, Medium provides a better balance, with 165 FPS at 1080p and 119 FPS at 1440p, which is sufficient for any competitive scenario.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X plays a supporting role in this pairing, and the data suggests it is rarely the bottleneck. With 12 cores and 24 threads based on the Zen 4 architecture, the CPU's multi-threaded capabilities are far beyond what Undisputed requires. The 7900X's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 29300 and PassMark multi-thread score of 51406 place it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, meaning it has ample headroom.

The CPU's single-thread performance is equally strong. A PassMark single-thread score of 4238 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2617 indicate that the 7900X can feed the GPU efficiently even at high frame rates. The fact that 1080p Low reaches 230 FPS without a reported bottleneck confirms that the CPU is not limiting. If the CPU were the constraint, we would expect to see diminishing returns as resolution drops, but the FPS scales consistently with resolution, which is a GPU-bound signature.

The 7900X's nearest rivals in the benchmark database include the AMD EPYC 7313P (0.2% higher average score) and the Intel Core i7-14700F (0.6% higher score). This indicates the 7900X is competitive with modern server and desktop parts, making it an overkill match for the RX 7600 in this game. The CPU's 64 MB of L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 support at 83.2 GB/s provide more than enough memory bandwidth for the game's physics and AI calculations.

In practical terms, the 7900X ensures that frame drops are purely a function of GPU load. The 4K Medium minimum FPS of 64, for instance, is likely caused by GPU memory pressure, not CPU stalls. Users upgrading from a weaker CPU would see no FPS improvement in Undisputed because the RX 7600 is already saturated at all tested resolutions.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The complete dataset offers a clear picture of performance across all combinations. At 1920x1080, the results are as follows: Low settings average 230 FPS; Medium averages 165 FPS with a minimum of 141 and maximum of 190; High averages 137 FPS; Ultra averages 88 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a 61.7% performance penalty, which is substantial but expected for a GPU with this memory configuration.

At 2560x1440, the numbers shift down predictably: Low averages 166 FPS; Medium averages 119 FPS (min 102, max 137); High averages 99 FPS; Ultra averages 64 FPS. The 1440p Ultra result is notable because it is exactly 64 FPS, which is the same as the 4K High result. This suggests that the GPU hits a similar workload ceiling in both scenarios, likely due to VRAM usage.

At 3840x2160, the data becomes sparse but informative: Low averages 105 FPS; Medium averages 76 FPS (min 64, max 87); High averages 63 FPS; Ultra averages 40 FPS. The 4K Medium results are the most useful for analysis because they include minimum and maximum values, showing a 23 FPS spread that indicates some scene complexity variation. The 4K High result of 63 FPS lacks a minimum, but the average being so close to the Medium minimum suggests that High likely dips below 60 FPS in demanding moments.

The overall combo rank in Undisputed is 2574 out of 3718 tested combinations, placing it in the lower third. This ranking reflects the RX 7600's mid-range status rather than the CPU's capability. The 7900X alone ranks in the 91st percentile, but when paired with the RX 7600, the system's gaming performance is constrained by the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus. For users targeting 1080p or 1440p gaming, this is a capable pairing; for 4K, the Medium preset is the only sensible choice.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X

Cores / Threads 12 / 24
Base Clock 4700 MHz
Boost Clock 5600 MHz
TDP 170W
Socket AMD Socket AM5
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 7600

VRAM 8 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2655 MHz MHz
TDP 165 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 9 7900X + AMD Radeon RX 7600 in Undisputed

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 105.0
3840x2160 Medium 76.0
3840x2160 High 63.0
3840x2160 Ultra 40.0
2560x1440 Low 166.0
2560x1440 Medium 119.0
2560x1440 High 99.0
2560x1440 Ultra 64.0
1920x1080 Low 230.0
1920x1080 Medium 165.0
1920x1080 High 137.0
1920x1080 Ultra 88.0

Undisputed with Ryzen 9 7900X + Other GPUs

See how Undisputed performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Undisputed with RX 7600 + Other CPUs

See how Undisputed performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 9 7900X + RX 7600

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.