Undisputed

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT combination delivers a remarkable performance profile in Undisputed, positioning itself as a top-tier contender for high-refresh-rate play. The data indicates that this pairing excels at producing exceptionally high frame rates across all tested settings, with the GPU typically acting as the primary performance driver. This analysis breaks down the measured results to understand the distinct roles of the CPU and GPU, how they scale with resolution, and what settings provide the optimal experience.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture (codenamed Vermeer). It operates with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, and its 64 MB of L3 cache is a significant asset for gaming workloads. While Undisputed is a sports title that may not utilize all 32 threads, the processor's robust multi-threading capabilities ensure that it is never a bottleneck in the measured scenarios. The CPU's benchmark scores reflect its high-end positioning: it achieves a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26017 and a single-core score of 1614, alongside a Geekbench multicore score of 15233.

The processor's performance in synthetic tests places it in the 91st percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 51947. Its nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX (avg score 52073, deltaPct -0.2), the AMD EPYC 8124P (avg score 52121, deltaPct -0.3), and the Intel Core i9-13900F (avg score 51730, deltaPct 0.4). These scores indicate that the 5950X is statistically tied with these competitors, showing a performance difference of less than 1% in either direction. This performance parity suggests that, in a game like Undisputed where frame rates are generally high, the CPU is more than capable of feeding the GPU with enough data to avoid creating a CPU-side limitation.

The high frame rates observed even at 1080p with Low settings (404 FPS average) suggest that the CPU's single-thread performance and cache are sufficient to handle the game's logic and physics without creating a bottleneck. The processor's 3DMark scores for 2, 4, 8, and 16 threads (1856, 3595, 6598, and 10810 respectively) show a healthy scaling pattern, indicating that the game can leverage multiple cores effectively when needed. However, the fact that the 4K Ultra setting yields a much lower 71 FPS average compared to the 1080p Low setting's 404 FPS average points to the GPU, not the CPU, being the main factor limiting performance at higher graphical loads.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is a powerful graphics card built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture (codenamed Plum Bonito). It features 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 320-bit bus, providing a substantial 800.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. This large VRAM pool is particularly beneficial for high-resolution gaming, ensuring that texture data does not overflow into slower system memory. The GPU's clock speeds are notable, with a base clock of 1387 MHz, a game clock of 2025 MHz, and a boost clock of 2394 MHz.

In terms of raw compute, the RX 7900 XT offers 51.48 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and a pixel rate of 459.6 GPixel/s. Despite these impressive specifications, the GPU's benchmark scores paint a more complex picture. Its Passmark G3D score is 29009, and its Geekbench Vulkan score is 71068, but its average benchmark score is 13745, placing it in the 55th percentile among all GPUs. The nearest rivals listed include the AMD Radeon 660M (avg score 13812, deltaPct -0.5), NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile (avg score 13821, deltaPct -0.5), and the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT (avg score 13543, deltaPct 1.5). The deltaPct values here are small, but they are relative to the average benchmark score, which is heavily weighted by lower-end tests. In the specific context of Undisputed, the GPU's performance is clearly far superior to these rivals, as evidenced by the measured FPS data.

The RX 7900 XT's role as the primary performance limiter becomes evident when analyzing the frame rate scaling. At 1440p High, the combo achieves 174 FPS, while at 4K High, it drops to 110 FPS. This is a classic sign of GPU-bound performance, where the render resolution increases the workload on the graphics card. The 20 GB VRAM and 800.0 GB/s bandwidth ensure that even at 4K with Ultra settings, the GPU has ample resources to avoid memory-related hitches, but the computational load still dictates the final frame rate.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The measured FPS data across resolutions reveals a clear and consistent pattern of GPU-bound performance. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo produces an average of 404 FPS. Moving to 1440p Low lowers this to 292 FPS, a drop of 112 FPS (or approximately 27.7%). At 4K Low, the average FPS falls to 185, which is a further drop of 107 FPS (or approximately 36.6%) from the 1440p figure. This scaling shows that even at the lowest settings, the GPU is handling a significantly increased workload as resolution increases.

The trend is even more pronounced at higher settings. At Medium, the frame rates are 290 FPS at 1080p, 210 FPS at 1440p, and 133 FPS at 4K. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is 80 FPS (a 27.6% decrease), and from 1440p to 4K is 77 FPS (a 36.7% decrease). For High settings, the pattern continues: 240 FPS at 1080p, 174 FPS at 1440p, and 110 FPS at 4K. This represents a 66 FPS drop (27.5%) from 1080p to 1440p and a 64 FPS drop (36.8%) from 1440p to 4K. Finally, at Ultra, the frame rates are 155 FPS at 1080p, 112 FPS at 1440p, and 71 FPS at 4K.

The consistency of these percentage drops (around 27-28% from 1080p to 1440p, and around 36-37% from 1440p to 4K) is a strong indicator that the GPU is the limiting factor across all settings. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect to see a plateau or a much smaller drop in FPS when increasing resolution, as the CPU workload would remain relatively constant. Instead, the frame rate scales inversely with the number of pixels being rendered, which is the hallmark of a GPU-bound scenario. The data shows that the Ryzen 9 5950X is more than capable of keeping up with the RX 7900 XT, even at 1080p where CPU load is typically highest.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

In the specific context of Undisputed, this CPU and GPU pairing achieves a combo rank of 735 out of 3718 tested combinations. This places it in the top 19.8% of all systems in the database for this game. While the absolute frame rates are extremely high, the rank indicates that there are other combinations that can produce even higher average FPS. This is likely due to the presence of more recent or higher-end components that can push frame rates even further in this particular title.

The rank of 735 is notable when considering the individual component performance. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking and the GPU's 55th percentile ranking (based on average benchmarks) do not directly translate to a top-735 combo. The game's engine may favor certain architectures or have specific optimizations that benefit other combinations. However, the measured data shows that this combo is far from a slouch. With an average of 110 FPS at 4K High and 240 FPS at 1080p High, it provides a smooth and responsive experience for the vast majority of displays.

The fact that the combo ranks 735th out of 3718 combos (a top 20% finish) while the GPU only ranks in the 55th percentile suggests that the CPU is playing a crucial role in improving the overall performance in this game. The Ryzen 9 5950X's strong multi-core and single-core scores likely help maintain high minimum frame rates and prevent any CPU-related hitches that could drag down the average FPS. In a game like Undisputed, where the action is fast-paced and physics-based, this CPU headroom is valuable.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend heavily on the target resolution and refresh rate. For users with a 1080p display, the High preset provides an average of 240 FPS, which is more than sufficient for even the fastest 240Hz monitors. The Ultra preset at 1080p yields 155 FPS, which is still excellent and would be ideal for 144Hz displays, but the jump from High to Ultra comes with a significant 85 FPS penalty. The Medium preset at 1080p offers 290 FPS, but the visual quality increase from Medium to High is generally worth the 50 FPS drop for most players.

At 1440p, the High preset delivers 174 FPS, which is perfect for 165Hz or 170Hz monitors. The Medium preset provides 210 FPS, which could satisfy users with 240Hz panels, but the Ultra preset drops to 112 FPS, which is the minimum recommended for high-refresh gaming but may not be ideal for competitive play. The sweet spot for 1440p appears to be High, as it balances visual fidelity with a frame rate that is well above the 144Hz threshold.

For 4K gaming, the High preset is the best choice for high-refresh displays, offering 110 FPS. This provides a smooth experience on 120Hz 4K TVs. The Medium preset at 4K yields 133 FPS, which is also viable for 120Hz displays and offers a slight performance boost. The Ultra preset at 4K drops to 71 FPS, which, while playable, is below the 100+ FPS threshold that many players prefer for a responsive feel. The Low preset at 4K achieves 185 FPS, but the visual compromise is substantial. The data indicates that the High preset is the most balanced option across all resolutions, providing a high frame rate without sacrificing too much graphical quality.

FAQ

Q: What is the average FPS for this combo at 1440p with High settings?

A: The measured average FPS for the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X and RX 7900 XT at 2560x1440 with High settings is 174 FPS.

Q: How does the CPU's performance compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 9 5950X has an average benchmark score of 51947, which is nearly identical to the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX (52073, -0.2%), the AMD EPYC 8124P (52121, -0.3%), and the Intel Core i9-13900F (51730, +0.4%).

Q: Is this combo better at 4K Ultra or 1080p Ultra for achieving high frame rates?

A: At 1080p Ultra, the combo achieves an average of 155 FPS, while at 4K Ultra, it drops to 71 FPS. The 1080p resolution provides more than double the frame rate.

Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded for this combo?

A: The highest average FPS recorded is 404 FPS, which occurs at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.

Q: Does the GPU's VRAM seem sufficient for 4K gaming in this title?

A: Yes, the RX 7900 XT's 20 GB of GDDR6 memory with 800.0 GB/s bandwidth is ample. The data shows no signs of VRAM-related performance degradation at 4K, suggesting the memory capacity is not a limiting factor.

*Q: How does this combo rank among all tested combinations in Undisputed?*

A: This combo ranks 735th out of 3718 tested combinations, placing it in the top 20% of all systems for this game.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The following is the complete set of measured average FPS values for this CPU and GPU combination in Undisputed.

1920x1080:

• Low: 404 FPS
• Medium: 290 FPS (min 247, max 334)
• High: 240 FPS
• Ultra: 155 FPS

2560x1440:

• Low: 292 FPS
• Medium: 210 FPS (min 178, max 241)
• High: 174 FPS
• Ultra: 112 FPS

3840x2160:

• Low: 185 FPS
• Medium: 133 FPS (min 113, max 153)
• High: 110 FPS
• Ultra: 71 FPS

These numbers illustrate a clear hierarchy: the combo is capable of extreme performance at 1080p, comfortably handles high-refresh 1440p, and remains very playable at 4K with the right settings. The data confirms that this pairing is a powerful choice for a high-end gaming system, with the GPU being the primary determinant of performance at higher resolutions.