Undisputed

# Undisputed with AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 delivers exceptional frame rates in Undisputed across all tested resolutions and settings. The dataset shows this combination ranks 85th out of 1,580 tested combos, placing it in the top tier of systems for this boxing title. With the CPU holding an 83rd percentile standing among all processors and the GPU at an 89th percentile among all graphics cards, the pairing is well-balanced for sustained high-refresh-rate gameplay. The measured results reveal that even the most demanding preset remains highly playable at 4K, while lower resolutions push into territory that exceeds the refresh rates of most high-end monitors.

Settings Recommendations

The benchmark data shows a clear hierarchy across the four quality presets. At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers 505.7 FPS on average, while Medium reaches 364.9 FPS, High achieves 304.1 FPS, and Ultra drops to 192.3 FPS. The performance curve from Low to Ultra represents a reduction of roughly 62% in average frame rate at 1080p, yet even the Ultra preset maintains a frame rate well above the threshold for competitive play.

At 2560x1440, the pattern continues with Low at 367.7 FPS, Medium at 266.8 FPS, High at 219.5 FPS, and Ultra at 138.3 FPS. The 1440p Ultra result remains comfortably above 120 FPS, making it viable for high-refresh-rate monitors. At 3840x2160, the spread tightens: Low produces 232.2 FPS, Medium 171.1 FPS, High 137.9 FPS, and Ultra 86.6 FPS.

The data indicates that the High preset offers the most balanced experience across all three resolutions. It maintains 304.1 FPS at 1080p, 219.5 FPS at 1440p, and 137.9 FPS at 4K. This preset provides a substantial visual uplift over Medium while still leaving enough headroom for demanding scenarios. For users with 240Hz displays at 1440p, the High preset is the recommended choice, as it exceeds 200 FPS. At 4K, High is the highest preset that stays above 120 FPS, making it the optimal selection for smooth gameplay on modern televisions and monitors. The Ultra preset, while visually superior, drops below 100 FPS at 4K and below 200 FPS at 1080p, which may introduce perceptible stutter on very high refresh rate panels.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 features 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 960.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU's memory clock runs at 1875 MHz with 30 Gbps effective speed, while the core operates between a 2295 MHz base and 2617 MHz boost clock. These specifications support the high frame rates measured in Undisputed, as the game's demands scale significantly with resolution.

The RTX 5080's 10,752 shading units and 112 ROPs contribute to its pixel rate of 293.1 GPixel/s and texture rate of 879.3 GTexel/s. With 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores, the GPU is well-equipped for modern rendering features, though Undisputed's measured results focus on traditional rasterization performance. The FP32 throughput of 56.28 TFLOPS provides ample compute headroom for physics and simulation tasks within the boxing gameplay.

The GPU's role becomes more pronounced as resolution increases. At 1080p, the CPU is likely the limiting factor, as evidenced by the massive frame rates at Low settings (505.7 FPS) that approach the practical limits of the Ryzen 7 5800X3D's single-thread performance. By 4K, the GPU's workload dominates, with the Ultra preset dropping to 86.6 FPS, suggesting that the RTX 5080 is fully utilized at this resolution. The 16 GB VRAM capacity is more than sufficient for Undisputed at any tested configuration, as the game does not appear to exceed memory limits even at 4K Ultra.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average frame rate achieved by this combo in Undisputed?

A: The maximum measured average FPS is 505.7, achieved at 1920x1080 with the Low preset.

Q: Can this system run Undisputed at 4K with the Ultra preset smoothly?

A: The 4K Ultra preset produces an average of 86.6 FPS, which is playable but below the 100 FPS threshold some users prefer. The High preset at 4K reaches 137.9 FPS, offering a smoother experience.

Q: How does the RTX 5080 compare to its nearest GPU rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The RTX 5080's average benchmark score is 59,188, which is 1.6% higher than the Intel Arc A570M (58,239), 2.5% higher than the Intel Arc A580 (57,756), and 2.6% higher than the AMD Radeon Pro W5500X (57,661). It trails the Intel Arc Pro A60 (60,326) by 1.9%.

Q: What is the performance difference between the Medium and High presets at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the Medium preset averages 266.8 FPS while High averages 219.5 FPS, representing a performance cost of approximately 18% for the visual upgrade.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 5800X3D's multi-threaded performance compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 26,574. It outperforms the AMD EPYC 8024P (26,555) and Intel Core i9-11900K (26,546) by 0.1% each, while trailing the AMD Ryzen 5 7600 (26,617) by 0.2% and the Intel Core i9-12900HK (26,672) by 0.4%.

Q: Does the Ultra preset provide a meaningful frame rate advantage over High at any resolution?

A: No. The Ultra preset is consistently slower than High across all resolutions: 192.3 vs 304.1 FPS at 1080p, 138.3 vs 219.5 FPS at 1440p, and 86.6 vs 137.9 FPS at 4K.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D with NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 combination ranks 85th out of 1,580 tested combos in Undisputed, placing it in the top 5.4% of all configurations. This high ranking reflects the synergy between the CPU's strong gaming performance and the GPU's raw throughput. The CPU itself sits at the 83rd percentile among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 26,574, while the GPU achieves an 89th percentile standing with an average score of 59,188.

The CPU's nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks include the AMD EPYC 8024P (26,555, 0.1% behind), Intel Core i9-11900K (26,546, 0.1% behind), AMD Ryzen 5 7600 (26,617, 0.2% ahead), and Intel Core i9-12900HK (26,672, 0.4% ahead). These margins are negligible, indicating the 5800X3D is competitive with newer and more expensive processors in general compute tasks. For gaming specifically, the 3D V-Cache design with 96 MB of shared L3 cache likely provides an advantage in title like Undisputed that benefit from larger caches.

The GPU's nearest rivals show a wider spread. The Intel Arc Pro A60 leads by 1.9% (60,326 vs 59,188), while the RTX 5080 leads the Intel Arc A570M by 1.6%, the Intel Arc A580 by 2.5%, and the AMD Radeon Pro W5500X by 2.6%. These comparisons are based on aggregate benchmark scores, not game-specific performance, but they indicate the RTX 5080 sits in a competitive mid-to-high range of graphics cards.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals the balance between CPU and GPU limitations. At the Low preset, the transition from 1920x1080 (505.7 FPS) to 2560x1440 (367.7 FPS) represents a 27.3% drop, and further to 3840x2160 (232.2 FPS) another 36.9% drop from 1440p. This steep decline indicates the GPU becomes increasingly dominant as pixel count rises, though the CPU still manages to feed the GPU adequately at lower settings.

At the High preset, the scaling is more moderate: 304.1 FPS at 1080p, 219.5 FPS at 1440p (27.8% drop), and 137.9 FPS at 4K (37.2% drop from 1440p). The consistent percentage drops across presets suggest that the game's rendering load scales predictably with resolution, and neither component becomes a sudden bottleneck at any tested configuration.

The Ultra preset shows the most pronounced scaling: 192.3 FPS at 1080p, 138.3 FPS at 1440p (28.1% drop), and 86.6 FPS at 4K (37.4% drop from 1440p). The fact that 4K Ultra still achieves 86.6 FPS indicates the GPU has sufficient headroom for this title, but the diminishing returns suggest that users targeting 4K at maximum quality may need to accept frame rates below 90 FPS. The data also reveals that the difference between Low and Ultra at 1080p (505.7 vs 192.3 FPS) is larger than at 4K (232.2 vs 86.6 FPS), confirming that resolution scaling amplifies GPU load more than settings changes at lower resolutions.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the four presets deliver the following average frame rates: Low 505.7 FPS, Medium 364.9 FPS, High 304.1 FPS, and Ultra 192.3 FPS. The step from Low to Medium costs 140.8 FPS, from Medium to High costs 60.8 FPS, and from High to Ultra costs 111.8 FPS. This uneven distribution suggests that the Medium preset may offer the best performance-per-visual-cost at this resolution, given the relatively small drop from Medium to High compared to the larger drops at other steps.

At 2560x1440, the results are: Low 367.7 FPS, Medium 266.8 FPS, High 219.5 FPS, and Ultra 138.3 FPS. The gaps are 100.9 FPS (Low to Medium), 47.3 FPS (Medium to High), and 81.2 FPS (High to Ultra). The 1440p results show a similar pattern to 1080p, with the Medium-to-High transition being the smallest performance penalty. All presets at 1440p exceed 120 FPS, making this resolution fully playable even at maximum quality settings.

At 3840x2160, the measured averages are: Low 232.2 FPS, Medium 171.1 FPS, High 137.9 FPS, and Ultra 86.6 FPS. The drops are 61.1 FPS (Low to Medium), 33.2 FPS (Medium to High), and 51.3 FPS (High to Ultra). At 4K, the High preset remains the sweet spot, delivering 137.9 FPS with a comfortable margin above 120 FPS. The Ultra preset's 86.6 FPS falls below this threshold, and users seeking maximum visual fidelity at 4K should be prepared for frame rates in the high 80s. The data shows that this combination excels at 1080p and 1440p across all settings, while 4K gaming is best limited to High settings for optimal smoothness.