Undisputed

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F and Intel Arc B580 pairing delivers a solid, highly playable experience in Undisputed, with the data indicating that the GPU is the primary driver of performance at higher resolutions. This combination ranks in the 75th percentile of all tested combos for this game, offering a smooth 60 FPS at 4K High settings and excellent triple-digit frame rates at 1080p.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on the Zen 4 architecture (Phoenix codename) using a 4 nm process from TSMC. It operates with a base clock of 4.20 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, with a 65W TDP. This desktop chip supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, providing 83.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth, and connects via PCIe Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes. The CPU has a 16 MB shared L3 cache, along with 64 KB L1 and 1 MB L2 cache per core.

In synthetic benchmarks, the Ryzen 5 8400F shows a balanced profile. Its single-thread performance is respectable, scoring 951 in 3DMark single-thread and 3685 in Passmark single-thread. Multi-threaded performance scales well with the core count, as evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20,851 and a 3DMark max-threads score of 6,165. The Passmark multithread score of 24,389 further indicates the CPU's capability to handle workloads that utilize all 12 threads effectively.

For Undisputed, a sports game, the CPU's role is to maintain a stable frame delivery without becoming a bottleneck. The benchmark results suggest the Ryzen 5 8400F is well-suited for this task. At 1080p, where the GPU has more headroom, the CPU's single-thread strength helps drive the high frame rates observed. The processor's performance places it in the 77th percentile when compared to all CPUs in the database, positioning it as a capable mid-range option. Its nearest rivals, the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F (0.2% faster) and Intel Core i7-13620H (0.4% faster), are within a negligible margin, confirming that the 8400F holds its own in this segment. The data indicates that even at lower resolutions, the CPU does not appear to be the limiting factor, as frame rates scale consistently with GPU load.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F and Intel Arc B580 achieves a rank of 2,794 out of 3,718 tested combos for Undisputed. This places the pairing in the 75th percentile of all tested systems, indicating that it outperforms the majority of configurations in this specific game.

This ranking is notable because the individual components have different percentile standings. The CPU sits in the 77th percentile for all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 68th percentile for all GPUs. The combo's overall rank of 2,794 suggests a synergistic pairing where the performance of each component complements the other without a significant bottleneck. The relative strength of the CPU likely helps ensure that the GPU is fed with enough data to maintain consistent performance, particularly in scenarios where frame rates are high.

When analyzing the GPU's performance against its nearest rivals, the Arc B580 shows a competitive standing. It is virtually tied with the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP, which is only 0.2% faster on average. It also edges out the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 by 0.6% and outperforms the NVIDIA P106-100 by 1%. This indicates the Arc B580 is a strong performer in its class, delivering performance that can rival older high-end cards. The CPU's nearest rivals, such as the Ryzen 5 7500F and Core i7-13620H, are also extremely close in performance, reinforcing that the 8400F is a well-positioned choice. The data shows that this combo is not at the top of the charts, but it is firmly in the upper quartile, making it a reliable and capable setup for this title.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The measured FPS data across resolutions provides a clear picture of how this system scales in Undisputed. The performance drop from 1080p to 4K is substantial, which is typical for a system where the GPU is the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions.

At 1080p Low settings, the system achieves an average of 221 FPS. Moving to 1440p Low, the average drops to 160 FPS, a 27.6% decrease. At 4K Low, the average is 101 FPS, which is a 54.3% decrease from the 1080p figure. This significant drop indicates that the GPU is being increasingly taxed as resolution scales, which is expected.

The pattern continues across other settings. For High settings, the frame rates are 132 FPS at 1080p, 95 FPS at 1440p, and 60 FPS at 4K. This shows a 28% drop from 1080p to 1440p and a further 36.8% drop from 1440p to 4K. The scaling behavior suggests that the Intel Arc B580 is the limiting component at these higher resolutions. The CPU, with its strong single-thread performance, is likely capable of producing higher frame rates, but the GPU's rendering capacity caps the output.

The transition from 1080p to 4K is a clear indicator of GPU-bound performance. The frame rate does not halve perfectly with the four-fold increase in pixels, which is normal due to the nature of rendering overhead, but the steep downward trend confirms the GPU is the primary constraint. This is particularly evident at Ultra settings, where the 4K average of 39 FPS is less than half of the 1080p average of 85 FPS. The data shows that the CPU is not holding the system back; instead, the Arc B580's workload is what determines the final frame rate. For users prioritizing high refresh rates at 1080p, this combo excels, but for 4K gaming, the GPU becomes the bottleneck.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of performance across three resolutions and four quality presets. Here is a detailed breakdown of the results.

At 1920x1080, the system delivers high frame rates across all settings. With Low settings, the average FPS is 221, which is ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors. Medium settings yield a 159 FPS average, with a minimum of 135 FPS and a maximum of 183 FPS. High settings produce an average of 132 FPS, maintaining a smooth experience. Ultra settings drop the average to 85 FPS, which is still playable but represents a significant step down from the lower presets.

At 2560x1440, the performance remains strong but shows the expected reduction. Low settings average 160 FPS, which is still very high. Medium settings average 115 FPS, with a range of 98 to 132 FPS. High settings average 95 FPS, providing a solid experience for most players. Ultra settings bring the average down to 61 FPS, which is right at the threshold for smooth gameplay on standard 60Hz displays.

At 3840x2160 (4K), the GPU is clearly the limiting factor. Low settings average 101 FPS, which is respectable for 4K. Medium settings average 73 FPS, with a minimum of 62 FPS and a maximum of 84 FPS, indicating some variability. High settings average exactly 60 FPS, which is a smooth 60Hz experience but leaves no headroom for dips. Ultra settings are the most demanding, with an average of just 39 FPS, which may be too low for competitive play but could be acceptable for slower-paced games.

The data shows a clear hierarchy: 1080p is where this combo shines, 1440p is the sweet spot for a balance of quality and speed, and 4K is viable only at lower settings. The minimum FPS readings for Medium settings at 1440p (98 FPS) and 4K (62 FPS) suggest that even with frame drops, the experience remains mostly smooth. The maximum FPS readings indicate the potential headroom when the scene is less demanding.

FAQ

*Q: What is the best resolution to play Undisputed with this CPU and GPU combo?*

A: Based on the measured FPS, 2560x1440 at High settings offers an excellent balance, with a 95 FPS average. For maximum smoothness, 1920x1080 at High provides 132 FPS, while 4K at High delivers a playable 60 FPS average.

*Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Undisputed?*

A: Yes, it can. At 4K with High settings, the average FPS is exactly 60, which is suitable for standard displays. If you prefer higher frame rates, dropping to Low settings at 4K yields an average of 101 FPS.

Q: How does the CPU performance compare to its closest rivals?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F is virtually identical in performance to its nearest rivals. It is 0.2% slower than the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and 0.4% slower than the Intel Core i7-13620H, but it is 0.4% faster than the AMD EPYC 9474F. These differences are negligible in real-world gaming.

Q: Is the Intel Arc B580 a good match for the Ryzen 5 8400F in this game?

A: The data shows a strong pairing. The combo ranks in the 75th percentile of all tested configurations for Undisputed. The GPU's performance is competitive, with an average benchmark score that places it slightly ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080.

Q: What are the FPS differences between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: The difference is significant. At 1080p, Low settings average 221 FPS, while Ultra settings average 85 FPS. This represents a 61.5% performance drop, indicating that Ultra settings place a heavy load on the GPU.

Q: Does the CPU bottleneck the GPU at 1080p?

A: The data suggests not. The frame rates at 1080p are very high (up to 221 FPS on Low), and the performance scaling from 1080p to 1440p to 4K is consistent with a GPU-bound scenario. The CPU's single-thread score of 3685 in Passmark supports its ability to handle high frame rates.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend on your target resolution and refresh rate.

For 1920x1080 displays, the High preset is the recommended starting point. It delivers an average of 132 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold and provides a smooth experience on most monitors. If you have a high-refresh-rate display (144Hz or higher), the Medium preset at 159 FPS is a better choice, offering a significant boost in speed while maintaining good visual quality. The Low preset at 221 FPS is only necessary for ultra-competitive play where every frame counts, but it may not be worth the visual compromise. The Ultra preset at 85 FPS is playable but offers diminishing returns compared to the High preset, as the visual difference is often not worth the 47 FPS drop.

For 2560x1440 displays, the High preset is the sweet spot, providing a 95 FPS average that balances visual fidelity with smooth gameplay. The Medium preset at 115 FPS is also an excellent choice if you prefer a higher frame rate, with a minimum of 98 FPS ensuring minimal stutter. The Low preset at 160 FPS is ideal for esports-style play, while the Ultra preset at 61 FPS is best for those who prioritize image quality over frame rate and have a 60Hz monitor.

For 3840x2160 (4K) displays, the High preset is the only viable option for a smooth experience, as it averages exactly 60 FPS. The Medium preset at 73 FPS offers a slight buffer, but the minimum FPS of 62 suggests it may dip below 60 in heavy scenes. The Low preset at 101 FPS is the best choice for 4K if you want a higher frame rate, but you will need to accept lower visual detail. The Ultra preset at 39 FPS is not recommended for general play, as it falls below the playable threshold for most users.

In summary, the best experience per the measured rows is achieved by using the High preset at 1080p or 1440p. At 4K, the High preset is the maximum playable option, while the Low preset provides a smoother alternative. The Medium preset is a strong contender at all resolutions, offering a good balance of speed and quality, particularly at 1440p where it delivers 115 FPS with a minimum of 98 FPS.