Undisputed

Undisputed is a boxing title that demands a balance between CPU and GPU resources, but the data for the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and AMD Radeon RX 570 combo reveals a system that is heavily constrained by its graphics card. This pairing, ranked 2701 out of 2813 tested combos in this game, places it in the bottom 4% of all configurations, indicating that while the CPU is capable, the GPU is the primary bottleneck preventing high frame rates at demanding settings.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Undisputed?

A: The data shows that 1920x1080 is the most viable resolution. At this resolution, the combo achieves an average of 66 FPS on High settings and 110 FPS on Low settings, which is far smoother than the 47 FPS average at 2560x1440 on High or the 30 FPS average at 3840x2160 on High.

Q: Can this system handle Ultra settings?

A: Ultra settings are not playable at any resolution. The average FPS drops to 42 at 1920x1080, 31 at 2560x1440, and 19 at 3840x2160. These numbers fall below the typical threshold for smooth gameplay, making Ultra a poor choice for this specific hardware.

Q: How much of a performance jump is there between Low and High settings at 1080p?

A: The difference is substantial. The measured average FPS goes from 110 on Low to 66 on High at 1920x1080. This represents a 44 FPS drop, or a 40% decrease in performance, when moving from the lowest to the highest preset that remains playable.

Q: Is the Ryzen 5 7400F holding back the RX 570?

A: No, the benchmark data indicates the opposite. The CPU has a high average benchmark score of 32750 and sits in the 83rd percentile, while the GPU has a much lower average score of 28766 and sits in the 74th percentile. The significant FPS drops at higher resolutions point to the GPU being the limiting factor.

Q: What is the most consistent setting for this combo?

A: The Medium preset offers the most balanced experience with measured variance. At 1920x1080, the average FPS is 79 with a minimum of 67 and a maximum of 91. At 2560x1440, it averages 57 with a minimum of 49 and a maximum of 66, providing a more stable frame time than High or Ultra.

Q: How does this combo compare to the GPU's nearest rivals?

A: The RX 570's average benchmark score is 28766. It trails the AMD Radeon RX 470 (score 28996) by 0.8% and the AMD Radeon RX 6800M (score 28874) by 0.4%. It is faster than the AMD Radeon R9 M295X (score 28580) by 0.7% and the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 (score 28421) by 1.2%. These are marginal differences.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 570 is the primary bottleneck for this configuration in Undisputed. The GPU features 4 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. The base clock is 1168 MHz with a boost clock of 1244 MHz. This memory configuration is a critical factor; the 4 GB VRAM capacity is likely a limiting factor at higher resolutions and texture settings, which explains the steep performance degradation as resolution increases.

The GPU's compute capabilities, with 2048 shading units and a texture rate of 159.2 GTexel/s, are modest by modern standards. The data shows that the GPU's performance is the deciding factor in this game. At 1080p Low, the system hits 110 FPS, but this drops to 30 FPS at 4K High. This scaling is typical of a GPU that is being overwhelmed, as the rendering load increases exponentially with resolution. The CPU, in contrast, has ample headroom. The Ryzen 5 7400F, with its 6 cores and 12 threads based on Zen 4 architecture, is far more powerful than what this game requires at these settings.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 28766 places it in the 74th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals show a tight cluster of performance, with the RX 570 being 0.8% slower than the RX 470 and 0.4% slower than the RX 6800M. This indicates that the RX 570 is a mid-range performer, and its age is showing in a modern title like Undisputed. The FPS data confirms this: it can handle the game at lower presets and resolutions but struggles to maintain playable frame rates as the graphical load increases.

Resolution Scaling

The performance scaling across resolutions is a clear indicator of where the bottleneck lies. Moving from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 on High settings, the average FPS drops from 66 to 47, a 28.8% decrease. Moving from 2560x1440 to 3840x2160 on High, the average FPS falls from 47 to 30, a 36.2% decrease. This pattern shows that the GPU is struggling to keep up with the increasing pixel count.

The scaling is even more dramatic on the Ultra preset. The average FPS goes from 42 at 1080p to 31 at 1440p, and then plummets to 19 at 4K. This steep drop-off suggests that the 4 GB VRAM buffer is being exhausted at 4K, forcing the system to use slower memory paging. The 224.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth is insufficient for the demands of 4K rendering with high-detail textures.

This data definitively shows the GPU as the limiting component. If the CPU were the bottleneck, the FPS would remain relatively flat across resolutions, as the CPU workload doesn't change significantly with resolution. Instead, the FPS drops proportionally with the increase in pixel count, which is a classic symptom of a GPU-bound scenario. The Ryzen 5 7400F is not the issue; the RX 570 is simply not powerful enough for high-resolution gaming in this title.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combinations for Undisputed, this pairing of the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and AMD Radeon RX 570 ranks 2701 out of 2813 combos. This places it in the bottom 4% of all tested systems, which is a poor result. The rank reflects the overall gaming experience, which is heavily dragged down by the GPU's inability to maintain high frame rates at higher settings.

This low ranking is not a reflection of the CPU's capabilities. The Ryzen 5 7400F has an average benchmark score of 32750, putting it in the 83rd percentile. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-14600T (score 32707, 0.1% slower) and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (score 32812, 0.2% faster). This shows the CPU is a strong performer. The GPU, however, scores 28766, which is in the 74th percentile. The combination of a high-performing CPU with a mid-range GPU creates an unbalanced system for gaming.

The data suggests that to improve the combo's rank, the GPU would need an upgrade. The CPU has significant headroom to support a much more powerful graphics card. The current rank is a direct consequence of the GPU's performance ceiling. The measured FPS results across all resolutions and settings are subpar, with only the Low and Medium presets at 1080p and the Low preset at 1440p achieving average frame rates above 60 FPS.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS rows, the optimal experience for this combo is found at 1920x1080 resolution. The data shows that the Medium preset provides the best balance of visual quality and performance. It achieves an average of 79 FPS, with a minimum of 67 FPS and a maximum of 91 FPS. This is a playable frame rate with a reasonable amount of visual fidelity.

The High preset at 1920x1080 is also an option, with an average of 66 FPS. This is a 16.5% performance decrease from Medium but offers better visuals. The Low preset at 1080p is the only setting that provides a near-flawless experience, hitting an average of 110 FPS, but it comes at the cost of visual quality.

At 2560x1440, the experience becomes more challenging. The Low preset is the only one that provides a consistently smooth frame rate, averaging 80 FPS. The Medium preset, averaging 57 FPS, is borderline, and the High preset at 47 FPS is not recommended for competitive play. The 3840x2160 resolution should be avoided entirely, as even the Low preset only averages 50 FPS, and the Medium preset drops to 36 FPS.

The data indicates that the Ultra preset is not viable on this hardware. It averages below 42 FPS at all resolutions, which is a poor experience. The recommendation is to play at 1920x1080 with the Medium preset for the best balance, or drop to Low settings if a higher frame rate is preferred. For 1440p, Low settings are the only realistic option for a smooth experience.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following data is derived from the measured FPS table for this specific CPU and GPU combination.

1920x1080:

• Ultra: The average FPS is 42. This is the highest preset but results in a sluggish experience.
• High: The average FPS is 66. This is a playable setting for most users.
• Medium: The average FPS is 79, with a minimum of 67 and a maximum of 91. This shows the most stable frame delivery.
• Low: The average FPS is 110. This is the best-performing setting, offering a very smooth experience.

2560x1440:

• Ultra: The average FPS is 31. This is generally considered unplayable.
• High: The average FPS is 47. This is a marginal experience, likely to feel choppy.
• Medium: The average FPS is 57, with a minimum of 49 and a maximum of 66. This is on the edge of playability.
• Low: The average FPS is 80. This is the only setting at this resolution that provides a consistently smooth frame rate.

3840x2160:

• Ultra: The average FPS is 19. This is a slideshow and not a viable option.
• High: The average FPS is 30. This is at the absolute minimum for playability.
• Medium: The average FPS is 36, with a minimum of 31 and a maximum of 42. This is barely playable.
• Low: The average FPS is 50. This is the only setting at 4K that approaches a reasonable frame rate, but it is still not ideal.

The data shows a clear trend: performance is adequate only at lower resolutions and presets. The combo is best suited for 1080p gaming, where it can handle Medium to High settings. For 1440p, users will need to compromise with Low settings. The 4K resolution is not recommended for this hardware, as the frame rates are too low for a smooth experience. The 4 GB VRAM and the GPU's compute power are the limiting factors at higher resolutions.