Control

# Control with AMD Ryzen 5 7400F + AMD Radeon RX 570

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and AMD Radeon RX 570 combination ranks 2768 out of 2888 tested combos in Control, placing it in the bottom 4% of all system pairings for this title. This is a pairing where the graphics card, an older Polaris-based part, becomes the decisive bottleneck; the CPU's modern architecture cannot compensate for the GPU's aging memory subsystem and raw compute throughput. The measured data shows a system that can run Control, but only at lower resolutions and with significant settings compromises to achieve playable frame rates.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo's rank of 2768 out of 2888 tested combinations places it firmly in the lower quartile of all systems tested in Control. This is not unexpected given the GPU's age and tier; the RX 570 was a mid-range part from 2017, and Control's demanding rendering engine pushes it hard. Benchmark results indicate that the CPU is not the limiting factor in most scenarios; the Ryzen 5 7400F sits in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs tested, while the RX 570 sits in the 74th percentile of all GPUs. However, in a game like Control, the GPU percentile is far more relevant to achieved FPS.

Looking at the GPU's nearest rivals in the benchmark database, the RX 570's average score of 28766 is within 0.8% of the AMD Radeon RX 470 (score 28996) and 0.4% of the AMD Radeon RX 6800M (score 28874). It also trails the AMD Radeon R9 M295X (score 28580) by 0.7% and leads the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 (score 28421) by 1.2%. These deltas are all under 1.5%, meaning the RX 570's raw compute performance is tightly clustered with a set of disparate GPUs from different eras and market segments. In practice, this means the measured FPS in Control will be very similar to what these rival cards would produce, with any differences being within the margin of measurement noise.

The CPU side tells a different story. The Ryzen 5 7400F's average benchmark score of 32750 places it within 0.3% of the Intel Core i5-14600T (score 32707), 0.2% of the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (score 32697), and 0.3% of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 (score 32662). It also trades blows with the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (score 32812), which is 0.2% faster. These rival CPUs are all modern or recent mobile/desktop parts, indicating that the 7400F's Zen 4 architecture delivers competitive multi-threaded and single-threaded performance. In Control, this CPU headroom is largely wasted because the RX 570 cannot push frame rates high enough to stress the processor.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 570 brings 4 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 256-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. This memory configuration is the primary constraint at higher resolutions. The GPU's base clock is 1168 MHz with a boost clock of 1244 MHz, and memory runs at 1750 MHz (7 Gbps effective). With 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 32 ROPs, the RX 570 delivers a pixel rate of 39.81 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 159.2 GTexel/s. Its FP32 throughput is 5.095 TFLOPS, which is low by modern standards but was adequate for 1080p gaming in 2017.

In Control, the 4 GB VRAM capacity becomes a limiting factor at 1440p and especially 4K. The measured FPS data shows a stark drop from 1080p to 1440p, and an even more severe collapse at 4K. At 2560x1440 with High settings, the average FPS is 27, which is 25% lower than the 36 FPS at 1920x1080 High. At 3840x2160 High, the average drops to 18 FPS, a 50% reduction from 1080p. This scaling pattern suggests the GPU is running out of memory bandwidth and fill rate, rather than raw compute, at higher resolutions. The 224.0 GB/s bandwidth is simply insufficient for 4K textures and effects in a game like Control, which uses heavy post-processing and physics simulation.

The GPU's 74th percentile ranking among all GPUs is misleading in this context; it reflects performance across a broad set of benchmarks, not specifically Control. The measured 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 880 indicates that the RX 570 is a DirectX 12-capable part, but its GCN 4.0 architecture (Polaris 20 chip on 14 nm) lacks the hardware features found in newer GPUs. The GPU supports DirectX 12 (12_0), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3, which means it can run Control's rendering paths, but without the efficiency of newer architectures.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data provides clear guidance on which settings preset offers the best experience for each resolution. At 1920x1080, the Low preset yields an average of 57 FPS, which is the only setting that approaches a smooth 60 FPS target. The Medium preset drops to 40 FPS average (with a min of 34 and max of 46), which is playable but not ideal for fast-paced action sequences. High settings produce 36 FPS average, and Ultra falls to 31 FPS. For a consistent experience at 1080p, Low settings are the clear choice; the jump from Low to Medium costs 17 FPS (a 30% reduction), while the visual fidelity gain may not justify that performance hit.

At 2560x1440, the situation worsens. The Low preset delivers 43 FPS average, which is marginally playable but below the 60 FPS target. Medium drops to 30 FPS (min 26, max 35), and High yields 27 FPS. Ultra is essentially unplayable at 24 FPS average. For 1440p, Low settings are the only viable option, and even then, the frame rate is 25% below what most players would consider smooth. The data suggests that this resolution is borderline for the RX 570 in Control; users would need to accept significant visual compromises to maintain playability.

At 3840x2160, none of the presets are playable. The Low preset achieves 29 FPS average, Medium drops to 21 FPS (min 17, max 24), High yields 18 FPS, and Ultra is at 16 FPS. These frame rates are below the threshold for acceptable gameplay, even for slower-paced action-adventure titles. The recommendation is clear: avoid 4K with this GPU in Control. The 4 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for the texture and geometry demands at this resolution.

The best overall experience per the measured rows is 1920x1080 with the Low preset, which provides 57 FPS average. This is the only configuration that comes close to hitting a 60 FPS target without dipping into the 30s. For users willing to tolerate lower frame rates, 1440p Low at 43 FPS is the second-best option, but the quality trade-off may not be worth it.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the RX 570 delivers a range of performance across the four tested presets. The Low preset achieves an average of 57 FPS, which is the highest measured frame rate for this combo. Medium settings produce 40 FPS average, with a minimum of 34 and maximum of 46 FPS, indicating some consistency in frame pacing. High settings yield 36 FPS average, and Ultra drops to 31 FPS average. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a 46% reduction in average FPS (from 57 to 31), which highlights the GPU's sensitivity to Control's visual effects at 1080p.

At 2560x1440, the average FPS drops across all presets. Low settings produce 43 FPS, Medium delivers 30 FPS (min 26, max 35), High yields 27 FPS, and Ultra falls to 24 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium is 13 FPS (30% reduction), while the gap between Medium and High is only 3 FPS (10% reduction). This suggests that the Medium-to-High transition is less demanding than the Low-to-Medium transition, possibly due to texture memory pressure. The 1440p results show a 25% reduction in FPS compared to 1080p at the same settings (e.g., 43 vs. 57 FPS at Low, 30 vs. 40 at Medium).

At 3840x2160, the frame rates are uniformly low. The Low preset achieves 29 FPS average, Medium drops to 21 FPS (min 17, max 24), High yields 18 FPS, and Ultra is at 16 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra at 4K is 13 FPS, which is a 45% reduction, similar to the percentage drop seen at 1080p. However, the absolute numbers are so low that no preset is playable. The min FPS of 17 at Medium indicates that even the peak performance is insufficient for smooth gameplay.

The measured data shows that the RX 570's performance scales roughly linearly with resolution, but the absolute numbers are constrained by the GPU's 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth. At 1080p, the GPU can maintain playable frame rates at Low settings, but at 1440p and 4K, it falls below the threshold for a good experience. The lack of min/max data for most presets limits the analysis, but the available min/max values for Medium settings at each resolution (1080p: 34-46, 1440p: 26-35, 4K: 17-24) show a consistent pattern of frame times that would be noticeable to players.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Control?

A: Based on the measured FPS data, 1920x1080 is the only resolution where the combo achieves playable frame rates. At 1080p, the Low preset delivers 57 FPS average, which is the highest measured performance. At 1440p, even Low settings only reach 43 FPS, and at 4K, all presets are below 30 FPS.

Q: Can this combo run Control at 60 FPS?

A: No, the measured data shows that no settings preset at any resolution achieves a 60 FPS average. The closest is 1080p Low at 57 FPS, which is 5% below the 60 FPS target. All other configurations fall further short, with 1440p Low at 43 FPS and 4K Low at 29 FPS.

Q: How much of a performance difference is there between Low and Ultra settings?

A: At 1080p, the difference between Low (57 FPS) and Ultra (31 FPS) is 26 FPS, representing a 46% reduction. At 1440p, the difference is 19 FPS (43 vs. 24 FPS, a 44% reduction). At 4K, the difference is 13 FPS (29 vs. 16 FPS, a 45% reduction). The percentage drop is consistent across resolutions.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck in this combo for Control?

A: The data indicates the GPU is the primary bottleneck. The Ryzen 5 7400F ranks in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, while the RX 570 ranks in the 74th percentile of GPUs. More importantly, the CPU's nearest rivals (Intel Core i5-14600T, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H) have very similar average scores, yet the combo's FPS is limited by the GPU's memory bandwidth and fill rate.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded for this combo?

A: The measured data includes minimum FPS values only for the Medium preset at each resolution. The lowest recorded minimum is 17 FPS at 3840x2160 Medium. At 2560x1440 Medium, the minimum is 26 FPS, and at 1920x1080 Medium, it is 34 FPS. No min FPS data is available for other presets.

Q: How does this combo compare to other RX 570 configurations?

A: The RX 570's average benchmark score of 28766 is within 0.8% of the AMD Radeon RX 470 (score 28996) and 0.4% of the AMD Radeon RX 6800M (score 28874). This means the GPU's raw performance is similar to these rivals, and the measured FPS in Control would likely be within a few frames of what these cards would produce with the same CPU.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture (codenamed Raphael), built on TSMC's 5 nm process. It has a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, with a TDP of 65W. The CPU features 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache, totaling 6 MB L2 and 32 MB L3. It supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, providing a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The CPU has 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes and is unlocked for overclocking.

In Control, the CPU's role is secondary to the GPU. The game's engine relies heavily on GPU-side rendering, physics, and post-processing, which the RX 570 handles poorly at higher resolutions. The CPU's benchmark scores are strong: Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21765 and single-core score of 3072, with a PassMark multi-thread score of 25645 and single-thread score of 3689. These scores place the 7400F in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, indicating it can handle the game's CPU-side logic without becoming a bottleneck.

The CPU's nearest rivals in the benchmark database are all within 0.3% of its average score of 32750. The Intel Core i5-14600T (score 32707) is 0.1% slower, the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (score 32697) is 0.2% slower, and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 (score 32662) is 0.3% slower. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (score 32812) is 0.2% faster. This clustering suggests that the 7400F's performance is competitive with modern mid-range to high-end processors, and in a GPU-bound scenario like Control with an RX 570, the CPU choice has minimal impact on the final FPS.

The CPU's 65W TDP and 5 nm process node indicate that it runs efficiently, which is relevant for system cooling but not directly reflected in the game's FPS. The 7400F's support for DDR5 memory with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth is more than sufficient for Control, which does not require high memory bandwidth to the CPU. The measured FPS data shows that the combo's performance is consistently GPU-limited across all resolutions and settings, meaning that upgrading the CPU alone would yield no measurable improvement in this game.