Undisputed

This combo, pairing the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER, delivers exceptional performance in Undisputed. The data shows a clear dominance across all tested settings, making it a top-tier choice for high-refresh-rate boxing action.

How This Combo Ranks

The benchmark database places this specific pairing at rank 239 out of 2813 tested combos for Undisputed. This puts it in the top 8.5% of all systems, a strong showing that reflects the hardware's capability. The ranking is primarily driven by the GPU's sheer horsepower, as the RTX 4080 SUPER's performance is a major differentiator in this game.

The CPU, while not the star of the show, holds its own. The Ryzen 5 5600F's percentile 85 against all CPUs indicates it is a solid, above-average processor. However, its nearest rivals show a tight cluster of performance. It sits within 0.5% of the Intel Core i9-12900T and is statistically tied with the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 and AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D. This suggests that in CPU-bound scenarios, the 5600F is not a bottleneck but also not a unique advantage; the GPU is what separates this combo from the pack.

For the GPU, the RTX 4080 SUPER's percentile rank is 86 against all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are fascinating, showing the GPU's position in the market. It is effectively tied with the standard RTX 4080 (a -0.1% delta), which is expected. More interestingly, it trails the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB by -2.7% and the AMD Radeon 8060S by -2.8% in average benchmark score. This means that while the RTX 4080 SUPER is a top-tier card, the synthetic benchmarks suggest a few other cards can match or slightly exceed its raw compute, but the in-game FPS results are what truly matter for this analysis.

FAQ

*Q: What is the overall performance rank for this CPU and GPU combo in Undisputed?*

A: This combo ranks 239th out of 2813 tested combinations, placing it in the top 8.5% of all systems for this game.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest competitors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F is essentially neck-and-neck with the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 (0% delta). It is also within a hair of the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D (-0.2%), AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 (-0.4%), and Intel Core i9-12900T (-0.5%), showing that performance is highly competitive in this segment.

Q: What is the performance difference between the RTX 4080 SUPER and the RTX 4080?

A: The difference is minimal. The RTX 4080 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 54209, while the RTX 4080 has a score of 54247, a delta of -0.1%. In practice, this means they are virtually identical in raw compute.

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo based on the data?

A: All three tested resolutions (1080p, 1440p, and 4K) produce playable frame rates. At 4K Ultra, the average FPS is 83, which is still very smooth. For maximum performance, 1080p Low yields an average of 437 FPS, but 1440p High at 205 FPS offers an excellent balance of visual fidelity and speed.

*Q: Does the GPU's 16 GB of VRAM matter for Undisputed?*

A: While the data doesn't show VRAM usage, the GPU's 16 GB of GDDR6X memory is a significant asset. It ensures that the game will not be constrained by memory capacity at any of the tested settings, allowing the GPU to focus on rendering rather than swapping data.

Q: Is the CPU a bottleneck at any resolution?

A: No. The data suggests the GPU is the primary driver of performance. Frame rates scale consistently with resolution and settings, indicating that the Ryzen 5 5600F with its 6 cores and 12 threads is more than capable of feeding the RTX 4080 SUPER in this title. The CPU's single-thread score of 2872 is strong enough to avoid limiting the high frame rates seen at 1080p.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate data reveals a predictable and clean scaling pattern as resolution increases. This analysis is crucial for understanding which component is the limiting factor.

At 1920x1080, the combo is clearly GPU-bound, but the CPU is keeping up. The difference between Low and Ultra settings is stark: 437 FPS on Low drops to 183 FPS on Ultra. This 254 FPS swing is primarily due to the increased GPU load from higher visual fidelity settings, not CPU limitations. The fact that the CPU can push over 400 FPS on Low shows it is not a bottleneck at this resolution.

Moving to 2560x1440, we see a proportional drop across the board. Low settings yield 344 FPS, a 21.3% decrease from 1080p. Ultra settings drop to 132 FPS, a 27.9% decrease from 1080p. This indicates that the GPU is now working harder to fill the extra pixels, but the system remains fluid. The CPU is no longer the primary bottleneck; the GPU's rendering workload is.

At 3840x2160 (4K), the GPU's heavy lifting is most apparent. Low settings produce 218 FPS, which is still incredibly high. High settings yield 130 FPS, and Ultra settings drop to 83 FPS. The scaling from 1440p to 4K is a 36.6% reduction on Low, 36.6% on High, and 37.1% on Ultra. This consistent percentage drop across all settings is a classic sign of a GPU-bound scenario; the CPU's performance headroom is no longer a factor, and the RTX 4080 SUPER's fill rate and memory bandwidth are the determining factors.

The data implies that for a 60Hz display, 4K Ultra is perfectly playable. For a 144Hz display, 1440p High or Ultra is the sweet spot. For competitive play on a 360Hz esports monitor, 1080p Low or Medium would be the target.

Measured FPS Breakdown

Here is the detailed breakdown of the measured average FPS for each tested configuration. The data is clean and shows a consistent hierarchy.

1920x1080 (1080p)

• Low: 437 FPS average. This is the maximum performance ceiling for this combo, indicating extreme headroom.
• Medium: 343 FPS average, with a minimum of 291 FPS and a maximum of 394 FPS. The minimum frame rate is still exceptionally high.
• High: 284 FPS average. This is more than enough for any high-refresh-rate monitor.
• Ultra: 183 FPS average. This setting provides a very smooth experience with maximum visual quality.

2560x1440 (1440p)

• Low: 344 FPS average. A substantial drop from 1080p but still extremely fast.
• Medium: 248 FPS average, with a minimum of 211 FPS and a maximum of 285 FPS. The frame times are consistent, with a narrow range.
• High: 205 FPS average. This is ideal for 144Hz and 165Hz monitors.
• Ultra: 132 FPS average. This is perfect for a 120Hz or 144Hz display with all settings maxed.

3840x2160 (4K)

• Low: 218 FPS average. An impressive result for 4K, showing the GPU's strength.
• Medium: 157 FPS average, with a minimum of 133 FPS and a maximum of 180 FPS. The minimum is still well above 60 FPS.
• High: 130 FPS average. This is a great result for 4K gaming on a high-refresh-rate panel.
• Ultra: 83 FPS average. This is the most demanding setting, but it still delivers a very playable experience.

The pattern is clear: the RTX 4080 SUPER provides a massive performance buffer, ensuring that even the most demanding configuration stays well within playable territory.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is the undisputed workhorse of this combo. Its specifications directly explain the exceptional frame rates observed. The card is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with a 5 nm process and features 10240 shading units. The boost clock of 2550 MHz is high, allowing for significant compute throughput.

The GPU's memory subsystem is a key strength. It comes with 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 736.3 GB/s. This massive bandwidth is crucial for feeding the GPU's cores at 4K resolution with high texture detail, preventing any memory-related stutters. The frame time data at 4K Medium (min 133 FPS, max 180 FPS) shows a tight window, which is a sign of a well-fed GPU with ample memory bandwidth.

The GPU's raw compute is reflected in its FP32 performance of 52.22 TFLOPS. This raw power translates directly to the high pixel and texture rates (285.6 GPixel/s and 816.0 GTexel/s, respectively). These metrics explain why the card can maintain 218 FPS at 4K Low and 130 FPS at 4K High. The transition from High to Ultra at 4K (from 130 to 83 FPS) shows a steep performance cost, indicating that the Ultra preset might be using effects that are particularly taxing on the GPU's compute units, such as advanced lighting or shadow algorithms.

This GPU is a top-tier part, as evidenced by its Passmark G3D score of 34245. The data suggests that in Undisputed, the RTX 4080 SUPER is never the limiting factor, and its capabilities far exceed the demands of the game at any of the tested settings.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F plays a supporting but reliable role. While it doesn't have the headline-grabbing specs of the GPU, its performance is more than adequate for this title. As a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, it provides a strong foundation for gaming workloads.

The CPU's boost clock of 4.00 GHz and a single-thread Passmark score of 2872 are the most relevant figures for game performance. Undisputed is not a massively multi-threaded game; it relies heavily on single-core performance for game logic and physics. The 5600F's strong single-thread showing ensures it can keep up with the GPU's frame generation, preventing a CPU bottleneck.

The data supports this. At 1080p Low, the system generates 437 FPS. If the CPU were a limiting factor, we would expect to see this frame rate cap out at a lower number regardless of GPU load. Instead, we see the frame rate scale down consistently as GPU load increases (from Low to Ultra), which is the signature of a GPU-bound scenario. The CPU is feeding the GPU with enough data to keep it busy.

Furthermore, the CPU's position relative to its rivals—all within 0.5% of the Intel Core i9-12900T—confirms that it is a modern, capable processor. The 32 MB of shared L3 cache is another asset, helping to reduce memory latency and improve performance in games that rely on cached data. In this pairing, the Ryzen 5 5600F is the quiet professional, ensuring the star of the show, the RTX 4080 SUPER, has all the support it needs to perform at its peak.

Settings Recommendations

Given the exceptional performance on display, the "best" setting depends entirely on the user's display refresh rate and desired visual fidelity. The data allows for precise recommendations.

For Maximum Refresh Rate (1080p/1440p): If a player has a 240Hz or 360Hz monitor, the goal is to maximize FPS. At 1080p, the Low preset (437 FPS) and Medium preset (343 FPS) are the top choices. At 1440p, the Low preset (344 FPS) is optimal for competitive play. These settings will prioritize frame rate above all else.

For the Best Balance of Visuals and Speed (1440p): This is the sweet spot for this combo. The High preset at 1440p delivers 205 FPS with a minimum of 211 FPS (from the Medium preset, which has the only min/max data), which is more than enough for a 144Hz or 165Hz monitor. The Ultra preset at 1440p (132 FPS) is also an excellent choice for a 120Hz display, offering the highest visual quality without sacrificing smoothness.

For 4K Gaming: The High preset at 4K (130 FPS) is the recommended choice for a 120Hz 4K display. It provides a significant visual upgrade over Medium (157 FPS) while still maintaining a frame rate that is well above 60 FPS. The Ultra preset at 4K (83 FPS) is playable, but the 47 FPS drop from High to Ultra suggests a high cost in visual effects for a marginal perceptual gain. For a 60Hz 4K panel, Ultra is perfectly fine, but for smoother motion, High is superior.

For a 60Hz Display: Any setting at any resolution will exceed 60 FPS by a large margin. At 4K, even the Ultra preset (83 FPS) will be smoother than a 60Hz display can show. Players can simply choose the highest visual quality possible without any concern for frame rate drops.

In summary, the data suggests that the High preset at 1440p or 4K offers the most compelling experience, balancing the high refresh rate capability of the system with the visual fidelity that the GPU can afford.