To The Core
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 221 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 92 | 115 | 132 | 157 |
| 1440p QHD | 161 | 201 | 231 | 274 |
| 1080p Full HD | 240 | 298 | 344 | 407 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
To The Core with Intel Core i3-12100F + AMD Radeon RX 9070, In-Depth Analysis
The Intel Core i3-12100F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9070 delivers a compelling performance profile in To The Core, a title that appears to scale strongly with both CPU and GPU capabilities. The measured data reveals a system that is capable of extreme frame rates, yet the relationship between settings, resolution, and component utilization tells a nuanced story about where the bottlenecks truly lie.
Settings Recommendations
The benchmark data presents a clear hierarchy of performance across the four available presets, with the differences between them being substantial enough to inform a definitive recommendation. At 1920x1080, the Low preset achieves an average of 407 FPS, which is the highest recorded figure in the entire dataset. Moving to Medium yields 344 FPS, High drops to 298 FPS, and Ultra falls to 240 FPS. The step from Low to Medium represents a 15.5% performance reduction, while the jump from High to Ultra costs another 19.5% of frame throughput.
For players prioritizing maximum smoothness and competitive responsiveness, the Low preset at 1080p is objectively the best choice, as it delivers the highest average frame rate of any configuration tested. However, the data suggests that the Medium preset offers a more balanced experience. The Medium setting at 1080p still produces an average of 344 FPS, which is 44% higher than the Ultra preset’s 240 FPS, while presumably offering improved visual fidelity over Low. The gap between Medium and High (344 vs 298 FPS) is a 13.4% difference, which may be perceptible on high-refresh-rate displays.
At 2560x1440, the same pattern emerges. Low leads with 274 FPS, followed by Medium at 231 FPS, High at 201 FPS, and Ultra at 161 FPS. The Medium preset here maintains a 43.5% advantage over Ultra, making it the recommended choice for users who want both visual quality and high frame rates. The 4K resolution tells a different story, as the Ultra preset drops to 92 FPS, which is below the 100 FPS threshold that many gamers consider the minimum for a premium experience. At 3840x2160, the Low preset averages 157 FPS, Medium 132 FPS, and High 115 FPS.
The data strongly suggests that the Medium preset is the sweet spot across all resolutions. It consistently outperforms High and Ultra by significant margins while offering a meaningful visual upgrade over Low. The measured minimum FPS values for Medium at 1080p (292 FPS) and 1440p (197 FPS) indicate that even the worst-case frame times remain highly playable, whereas the Ultra preset’s lack of recorded minimums suggests potential instability under load.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the Intel Core i3-12100F and AMD Radeon RX 9070 achieves a rank of 1121 out of 3725 tested combos in To The Core. This places the system in the 69.9th percentile of all configurations tested, meaning it outperforms roughly 70% of the combinations in the database. The ranking is notable given the CPU’s position in the broader market; the i3-12100F sits at the 68th percentile among all CPUs, while the RX 9070 ranks at the 69th percentile among all GPUs.
The combo’s rank relative to its component percentiles suggests that the pairing is well-balanced for this particular title. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 13494 places it just 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i5-9500 and 1.1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-1250U, according to the nearest rivals data. The GPU’s average score of 23877 sits 0.6% above the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z and 1.1% above the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile, while trailing the AMD Radeon RX 6800S by 0.8%.
The fact that this combo ranks at 1121 out of 3725, rather than higher, reflects the reality that To The Core is likely sensitive to both CPU and GPU performance in ways that favor higher-end components. The i3-12100F’s 4 cores and 8 threads, while sufficient for many titles, may limit performance in scenarios where the game’s simulation or logic threads scale beyond 8 threads. The RX 9070’s 16 GB of VRAM and 644.6 GB/s of bandwidth are more than adequate for this title, suggesting that the CPU is the more likely constraint in the most demanding settings.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 9070 brings substantial hardware to To The Core, including 3584 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 128 raster operation pipelines. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1330 MHz with a boost clock of 2520 MHz, and a game clock of 2070 MHz. These specifications translate to a pixel rate of 322.6 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 564.5 GTexel/s, which provide the raw throughput needed for high-resolution rendering.
The GPU’s 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus delivers 644.6 GB/s of bandwidth, a figure that becomes increasingly relevant at 4K resolution where texture data demands are highest. The measured FPS at 3840x2160 ranges from 92 FPS on Ultra to 157 FPS on Low, indicating that the GPU’s memory subsystem is not a limiting factor in this title. The 56 ray tracing cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate support suggest the hardware is future-proof, though To The Core is an Idle genre title that may not heavily utilize these features.
The GPU’s benchmark results reinforce its capability. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6290 and the Geekbench OpenCL score of 131539 indicate strong compute performance. The PassMark G3D score of 25381 places it in the 69th percentile among all GPUs, with nearest rivals including the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER (1.2% slower) and the AMD Radeon RX 6800S (0.8% faster). These comparisons suggest that the RX 9070 is a high-mid-range performer that excels in rasterization-heavy workloads.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the Low preset achieves 407 FPS average, which is the highest recorded value. The Medium preset at 1080p averages 344 FPS with a minimum of 292 FPS and a maximum of 396 FPS, showing a narrow frame time distribution. High averages 298 FPS, and Ultra drops to 240 FPS.
At 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 274 FPS, a 32.7% reduction from the 1080p Low result. Medium at 1440p averages 231 FPS with a minimum of 197 FPS and maximum of 266 FPS. High averages 201 FPS, and Ultra averages 161 FPS. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a consistent pattern: Low drops by 32.7%, Medium by 32.8%, High by 32.6%, and Ultra by 32.9%. This uniformity suggests the GPU is the primary driver of performance at these resolutions.
At 3840x2160, the Low preset averages 157 FPS, Medium 132 FPS, High 115 FPS, and Ultra 92 FPS. The transition from 1440p to 4K shows a more pronounced drop: Low falls by 42.7%, Medium by 42.9%, High by 42.8%, and Ultra by 42.9%. The fact that all settings presets drop by nearly the same percentage when moving from 1440p to 4K indicates a GPU-bound scenario, as the CPU’s contribution becomes less significant at higher pixel counts.
The Medium preset at 1440p (231 FPS) outperforms the Ultra preset at 1080p (240 FPS) by a small margin, suggesting that resolution has a greater impact on performance than visual quality settings in this title. This insight is valuable for users with high-refresh-rate 1440p monitors who want to maintain frame rates above 200 FPS.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS data reveals a clear pattern of resolution scaling that identifies the limiting component at each stage. From 1080p to 1440p, the average FPS across all settings drops by approximately 33%. This substantial reduction indicates that the GPU is heavily engaged, as pixel count increases by 78% (from 2.07 million to 3.69 million pixels) while frame rates fall by roughly one-third.
The scaling from 1440p to 4K is even more dramatic, with FPS dropping by approximately 43% across all settings. The pixel count increases by 125% (from 3.69 million to 8.29 million pixels), yet the frame rate reduction is less than proportional, suggesting that the GPU has headroom in other areas. The RX 9070’s 16 GB of VRAM and 644.6 GB/s bandwidth prevent memory-related bottlenecks at 4K, as evidenced by the fact that even the Ultra preset maintains a 92 FPS average.
The uniformity of the resolution scaling across all four settings presets is a key finding. Whether running Low or Ultra, the percentage drop from 1440p to 4K is nearly identical (42.7% to 42.9%). This consistency strongly indicates that the GPU is the limiting factor at higher resolutions, as CPU performance would show more variation across different settings. The i3-12100F’s 4 cores and 8 threads are sufficient to feed the GPU at 1080p, as evidenced by the 407 FPS Low result, but become less relevant as resolution increases.
At 1080p, the FPS differences between settings are more pronounced (407 vs 240 FPS between Low and Ultra), suggesting that the CPU can keep up with the GPU even at lower settings. However, the 4-core CPU may begin to show limitations at extremely high frame rates, as the 42.9% drop from 1440p to 4K on Ultra (161 to 92 FPS) indicates the GPU is working harder relative to the CPU’s capability.
FAQ
*Q: What is the highest average FPS achievable with this combo in To The Core?*
A: The highest recorded average FPS is 407, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with the Low settings preset.
Q: How does the Ultra preset at 1080p compare to the Medium preset at 1440p?
A: The Ultra preset at 1080p averages 240 FPS, while the Medium preset at 1440p averages 231 FPS. The 1080p Ultra configuration is only 3.9% faster, indicating that resolution has a significant impact on performance.
Q: Is the RX 9070’s 16 GB VRAM sufficient for 4K gaming in this title?
A: Yes, the measured data shows the GPU maintains 115 FPS average at 4K High settings and 92 FPS at 4K Ultra, with no indication of memory-related stuttering or frame drops.
*Q: What is the combo’s rank among all tested configurations in To The Core?*
A: The combo ranks 1121 out of 3725 tested combinations, placing it in the 69.9th percentile of all systems tested for this game.
Q: How does the CPU’s 4-core, 8-thread configuration affect performance?
A: The i3-12100F’s 4 cores and 8 threads appear sufficient for this title, as the system achieves 407 FPS at 1080p Low, but the uniform FPS drops across resolutions suggest the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck at higher pixel counts.
Q: What are the measured minimum and maximum FPS values for the Medium preset?
A: At 1080p Medium, the minimum is 292 FPS and the maximum is 396 FPS. At 1440p Medium, the minimum is 197 FPS and the maximum is 266 FPS.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i3-12100F is a 4-core, 8-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process. It operates at a base clock of 3.30 GHz with a boost clock of 4.30 GHz, and features 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU has a TDP of 58 W and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory on the Intel Socket 1700 platform.
The CPU’s benchmark results place it at the 68th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 13494. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core 3 N355 (0% delta), the Intel Core i5-9500 (0.3% faster), and the Intel Core i7-1250U (1.1% faster). The i3-12100F’s multi-threaded performance is respectable for its class, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11860 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 7252. Single-thread performance is also solid, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1674 and a PassMark single-thread score of 3444.
In To The Core, the CPU’s role appears to be secondary to the GPU at higher resolutions, but it becomes more critical at 1080p. The 407 FPS average at 1080p Low demonstrates that the 4-core, 8-thread configuration can feed the RX 9070 effectively at high frame rates. However, the uniform FPS drops across resolutions (33% from 1080p to 1440p, 43% from 1440p to 4K) suggest that the GPU is the primary driver of performance scaling.
The CPU’s 4.30 GHz boost clock and 12 MB of L3 cache provide sufficient single-thread performance for the game’s logic and physics, while the 8 threads handle background tasks and any multithreaded game systems. The absence of integrated graphics means the RX 9070 handles all rendering duties, eliminating any potential competition for system resources. The CPU’s 58 W TDP and 10 nm process node contribute to efficient operation, allowing the GPU to draw up to its 220 W TDP without thermal constraints from the CPU.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i3-12100F
AMD Radeon RX 9070
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i3-12100F + AMD Radeon RX 9070 in To The Core
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 157.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 132.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 115.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 92.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 274.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 231.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 201.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 161.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 407.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 344.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 298.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 240.0 |
To The Core with ii3-12100F + Other GPUs
See how To The Core performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
To The Core with RX 9070 + Other CPUs
See how To The Core performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii3-12100F + RX 9070
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.