To The Core

To The Core

AVERAGE FPS
80
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 80 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 33 41 48 56
1440p QHD 58 72 83 99
1080p Full HD 86 107 124 147

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 56
3840x2160 Medium 48
3840x2160 High 41
3840x2160 Ultra 33
2560x1440 Low 99
2560x1440 Medium 83
2560x1440 High 72
2560x1440 Ultra 58
1920x1080 Low 147
1920x1080 Medium 124
1920x1080 High 107
1920x1080 Ultra 86

To The Core with AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D + Intel Arc B390, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D paired with the Intel Arc B390 produces a highly unusual benchmark profile in To The Core. The data shows a combination where a top-tier desktop processor is paired with an integrated-class graphics solution, resulting in frame rates that are consistently playable but far from the top of the database. This analysis breaks down the measured performance, component roles, and scaling characteristics of this specific pairing.

FAQ

*Q: What is the overall ranking of this CPU and GPU combination in To The Core?*

A: The combo ranks 2643 out of 2991 tested combinations, placing it in the lower percentile of all systems tested for this game.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B390 compare to its nearest rivals in raw GPU benchmarks?

A: The Arc B390's average benchmark score of 1482 puts it slightly ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX, which scores 1463, and the NVIDIA GeForce 800M, which scores 1460. It is 2.5% faster than the GeForce GT 625 OEM and 2.7% faster than the GeForce GT 710.

Q: What is the best average frame rate achieved at 1080p?

A: The highest average frame rate recorded is 147 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with the Low settings preset.

Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the Low preset produces an average of 99 FPS, while the Ultra preset produces an average of 58 FPS. This represents a significant 41 FPS drop when moving to the highest quality settings.

Q: Does the CPU have a high multi-threaded benchmark score?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D scores 16817 points in the Cinebench R23 multi-core test and 34293 in the Passmark multithread test, indicating very strong processor performance.

Q: Is the frame rate data provided measured or estimated?

A: The data is marked as `dataIsMeasured: true`, indicating that the FPS figures are based on actual benchmark runs rather than predictions.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D is a desktop processor built on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 4.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The processor has a 120W TDP and uses the AMD Socket AM5. It is built on a 5 nm process at TSMC, containing 11,270 million transistors on a 71 mm² die.

In terms of memory, the CPU supports DDR5 with a dual-channel memory bus, providing a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. It also includes Radeon Graphics as integrated graphics. The processor's cache configuration includes 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and a substantial 96 MB of shared L3 cache, which is a key feature of the 3D V-Cache lineup.

Benchmark data shows the CPU's performance profile. It scores 16817 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 1713 in single-core. In Geekbench, it achieves 15610 multi-core and 2426 single-core. The Passmark multithread score is 34293, and the single-thread score is 3759. The 3DMark tests show scores of 7980 for 16 threads and 6539 for 8 threads. The processor holds an 83rd percentile ranking among all CPUs.

The nearest rivals in CPU benchmarks are the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G, Intel Core i7-13650HX, and AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, all with an average score of 33089, 33089, and 33091 respectively, showing a 0% delta. The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H is slightly ahead with a score of 33201, representing a -0.4% delta for the 7800X3D.

For To The Core, an idle genre game, the CPU's role is often less about raw frame rate generation and more about maintaining consistent frame pacing and handling background tasks. The strong multi-threaded scores, particularly the 16817 in Cinebench R23, suggest the processor is more than capable of handling the game's logic. The high L3 cache of 96 MB may help with data access patterns, though the game's simple graphical nature means the CPU is likely not the bottleneck in this pairing. The benchmark data shows the processor performs at a level near its closest rivals, with negligible percentage differences.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B390 is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) based on the Xe3-LPG architecture, part of the Arc Graphics-M generation with the chip codename Panther Lake. It is built on Intel's 3 nm process. The GPU has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2500 MHz. Its memory size, type, and bus width are all listed as "System Shared," meaning it relies on the system's main memory, with bandwidth being system-dependent.

The GPU's compute configuration includes 1536 shading units, 48 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 24 render output units (ROPs). It also has 12 ray tracing cores. The pixel rate is 60.00 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 120.0 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 7.680 TFLOPS, and the FP16 performance is 15.36 TFLOPS. The TDP is 80 W, and it is an IGP with no power connectors.

In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the Arc B390 scores 1482. This places it in the 9th percentile among all GPUs, indicating it is a low-performance part. Its nearest rivals are all NVIDIA integrated or entry-level desktop parts, including the GeForce GT 520MX with a score of 1463 and a delta of 1.3%, the GeForce 800M with a score of 1460 and a delta of 1.5%, the GeForce GT 625 OEM with a score of 1446 and a delta of 2.5%, and the GeForce GT 710 with a score of 1443 and a delta of 2.7%.

In To The Core, the GPU is likely the primary limiting factor for frame rates. The game is an idle genre title, which typically has low graphical demands, but the Arc B390's performance class is very low. The measured FPS across all resolutions and settings reflects this limitation. The GPU's reliance on shared system memory could also impact performance, though specific bandwidth figures are system-dependent. The data shows the GPU is only slightly faster than its closest rivals, reinforcing its position as the bottleneck in this configuration.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D and the Intel Arc B390 ranks 2643 out of 2991 tested combos in To The Core. This ranking places the system in the lower 12th percentile of all tested configurations. The high rank number indicates that most other CPU and GPU pairings tested for this game deliver higher frame rates.

This low ranking is a direct result of the GPU's performance. While the CPU is a high-end desktop part, the GPU is an integrated solution designed for low-power devices. The disparity between the two components is significant. The CPU's benchmark scores place it in the 83rd percentile, while the GPU is in the 9th percentile. This mismatch means that the GPU is severely holding back the system's overall gaming performance.

The combo rank of 2643 out of 2991 suggests that in the vast majority of other system configurations, the GPU is more capable than the Arc B390. Even with a powerful CPU like the 7800X3D, the system cannot escape the limitations of the integrated graphics. The data indicates that for this specific game, the combination is not competitive, falling behind most other pairings in the database.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured frame rates for this combo in To The Core show a clear pattern of performance scaling with resolution and settings. At 1920x1080, the system delivers its highest frame rates. The Low preset averages 147 FPS. The High preset averages 107 FPS. The Medium preset averages 124 FPS, with a minimum of 105 FPS and a maximum of 143 FPS. The Ultra preset brings the average down to 86 FPS.

At 2560x1440, performance drops noticeably. The Low preset averages 99 FPS. The High preset averages 72 FPS. The Medium preset averages 83 FPS, with a minimum of 71 FPS and a maximum of 96 FPS. The Ultra preset averages 58 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the frame rates drop further. The Low preset averages 56 FPS. The High preset averages 41 FPS. The Medium preset averages 48 FPS, with a minimum of 41 FPS and a maximum of 55 FPS. The Ultra preset averages 33 FPS.

The data shows that at 1080p Low, the system can achieve a very smooth 147 FPS average. However, as resolution and settings increase, the frame rate drops consistently. At 4K Ultra, the average falls to 33 FPS, which is at the edge of playability. The gap between Low and Ultra at each resolution is significant, with a 61 FPS difference at 1080p, a 41 FPS difference at 1440p, and a 23 FPS difference at 4K.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend on the target resolution. For a smooth 60 FPS experience, the data shows that the Low preset at 1080p is the only configuration that comfortably exceeds this threshold, with an average of 147 FPS. The Medium preset at 1080p also provides a high average of 124 FPS, which is well above 60 FPS.

For 1440p gaming, the Low preset is the only option that maintains an average above 60 FPS, achieving 99 FPS. The Medium preset at 1440p averages 83 FPS, which is still playable. The High preset at 1440p dips to 72 FPS, and the Ultra preset falls to 58 FPS.

At 4K, the system struggles to maintain high frame rates. The Low preset averages 56 FPS, which is slightly below the 60 FPS target. The Medium preset averages 48 FPS, and the High preset averages 41 FPS. The Ultra preset averages 33 FPS, which is likely not ideal for a smooth experience.

The data suggests that for the best balance of visual quality and performance, the Medium preset at 1080p or 1440p is the most reasonable choice. At 1080p, it provides an average of 124 FPS with a minimum of 105 FPS, ensuring smooth gameplay. At 1440p, the Medium preset averages 83 FPS with a minimum of 71 FPS, which is still quite playable. For users who prioritize frame rate above all else, the Low preset at 1080p is the clear winner, but for a better visual experience, Medium is the recommended setting.

Resolution Scaling

The performance drop from 1080p to 4K reveals the limiting component in this system. At 1080p Low, the average FPS is 147. Moving to 1440p Low, the average drops to 99 FPS, a decrease of 48 FPS or approximately 33%. Moving to 4K Low, the average drops to 56 FPS, a decrease of 91 FPS from 1080p, or approximately 62%.

This scaling pattern is typical of a GPU-bound system. As the resolution increases, the number of pixels the GPU must render also increases, putting more strain on the graphics processor. The CPU's performance remains relatively constant, but the GPU's workload grows significantly. The data indicates that the Intel Arc B390 is the limiting factor, as the frame rate drops are substantial with each resolution increase.

The relatively small difference between the Low and Ultra presets at 4K (23 FPS) compared to the difference at 1080p (61 FPS) further supports this. At higher resolutions, the GPU is already saturated, so the impact of changing settings is reduced. The system is unable to maintain high frame rates at 4K regardless of settings, highlighting that the GPU is the primary bottleneck. The powerful Ryzen 7 7800X3D has little influence on the frame rate once the resolution demands exceed the GPU's capabilities.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D

Cores / Threads 8 / 16
Base Clock 4200 MHz
Boost Clock 5000 MHz
TDP 120W
Socket AMD Socket AM5
View Full CPU Details →

Intel Arc B390

VRAM System Shared System Shared
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2500 MHz MHz
TDP 80 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D + Intel Arc B390 in To The Core

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 56.0
3840x2160 Medium 48.0
3840x2160 High 41.0
3840x2160 Ultra 33.0
2560x1440 Low 99.0
2560x1440 Medium 83.0
2560x1440 High 72.0
2560x1440 Ultra 58.0
1920x1080 Low 147.0
1920x1080 Medium 124.0
1920x1080 High 107.0
1920x1080 Ultra 86.0

To The Core with Ryzen 7 7800X3D + Other GPUs

See how To The Core performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

To The Core with Arc B390 + Other CPUs

See how To The Core performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 7 7800X3D + Arc B390

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.