Evolve
This combination offers playable performance with an average of 43 FPS, though you may want to lower settings for smoother gameplay.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 14 | 21 | 26 | 34 |
| 1440p QHD | 25 | 36 | 46 | 60 |
| 1080p Full HD | 37 | 54 | 69 | 89 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Evolve with AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D + Intel Arc B390, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D paired with the Intel Arc B390 presents a striking imbalance in Evolve, where a top-tier CPU is shackled to an entry-level integrated GPU. The measured frame rates are consistently low, indicating that the graphics solution is the primary bottleneck across all tested configurations. For a playable experience, the data suggests that prioritizing frame rate over visual fidelity is the only viable path, as the GPU simply lacks the throughput for higher settings.
Settings Recommendations
The benchmark data for Evolve with this combo shows a clear hierarchy where the Low preset is the only option that approaches playable frame rates. At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers an average of 89 FPS, which is the highest score recorded across any resolution and settings combination. This is a significant jump from the Medium preset, which drops to 69 FPS, and a massive leap from the High preset at 54 FPS. The Ultra preset is nearly unplayable at 37 FPS on 1080p, and the situation degrades further at higher resolutions.
At 2560x1440, the Low preset still manages a 60 FPS average, which is exactly on the cusp of smooth gameplay. However, the Medium preset falls to 46 FPS, and High drops to 36 FPS. The data implies that for a consistent 60+ FPS experience, the Low preset is the only reliable choice. At 3840x2160, even the Low preset struggles, averaging only 34 FPS, which is below the threshold for comfortable play.
Therefore, the recommended settings are the Low preset at 1920x1080. This configuration yields the best balance of performance and playability, as it is the only one that breaks the 60 FPS barrier comfortably. While the Medium preset at 1080p offers a slightly higher visual quality, the 20 FPS drop to 69 FPS is a substantial sacrifice. The data suggests that the Low preset at 1080p is the "sweet spot" for this hardware combination, as it leverages the CPU's strength while minimizing the GPU's workload. For users who prioritize visual fidelity over frame rate, the Medium preset at 1080p is the highest setting that remains semi-playable, but the performance penalty is steep.
How This Combo Ranks
The overall ranking for this CPU-GPU combination in Evolve is remarkably poor, placing 2530 out of 2872 tested combos. This places it in the bottom 12% of all systems, which is a clear indication of the GPU's severe limitations. The data shows that this pairing is not competitive for gaming, even with a CPU that is in the top 17% of all processors (83rd percentile). The high rank of the CPU is completely negated by the GPU's low percentile rank of 9%, which places it in the bottom 9% of all graphics cards.
This ranking suggests that the Intel Arc B390 is the sole reason for the poor performance. The CPU's substantial processing power is left largely unused, as the GPU cannot keep up with the demands of rendering frames. The data indicates that this combo would perform far better with a discrete graphics card, even a modest one, as the CPU would be able to drive frame rates much higher. The combo's rank confirms how a single weak component can bottleneck an entire system, rendering a high-end processor nearly irrelevant in a gaming scenario. The delta between the CPU's potential and the GPU's actual output is enormous, and the benchmark results reflect this imbalance.
GPU Role
The Intel Arc B390 is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) based on the Xe3-LPG architecture, and its role in this combo is the definitive limiting factor. It has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2500 MHz, but the data suggests these clocks do not translate into gaming performance. The GPU's memory is "System Shared," meaning it relies on the system's DDR5 RAM, with bandwidth described as "System Dependent." This is a critical weakness, as the GPU must compete with the CPU for memory bandwidth, which severely hampers its ability to feed the rendering pipeline.
The GPU's benchmark score is a single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result of 1482, placing it in the 9th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are extremely old and low-end parts like the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX and GT 710, with delta percentages of only 1.3% and 2.7% respectively. This comparison highlights the Arc B390's position at the very bottom of the performance stack. With 1536 shading units and 24 ROPs, the theoretical pixel rate is 60.00 GPixel/s, but this is clearly not achieved in real-world Evolve tests. The data implies that the GPU is starved for memory bandwidth and raw compute power, making it unsuitable for any demanding task beyond basic 2D rendering.
FAQ
*Q: What is the highest average frame rate achievable with this combo in Evolve?*
A: The highest average frame rate recorded is 89 FPS, which is achieved at 1920x1080 with the Low settings preset.
*Q: Is this CPU-GPU combination capable of running Evolve at 4K resolution?*
A: The data shows that at 3840x2160, the best average frame rate is 34 FPS on Low settings, which is not a playable experience. The Ultra preset at this resolution only manages 14 FPS.
Q: How does the Intel Arc B390 compare to its closest rivals in terms of benchmark scores?
A: The Arc B390's average benchmark score is 1482. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX, scores 1463, which is a 1.3% difference. Other rivals like the GT 625 OEM (1446) and GT 710 (1443) are within 2.7% of its score.
Q: What is the performance difference between the Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?
A: At 2560x1440, the Low preset delivers an average of 60 FPS, while the Ultra preset delivers an average of 25 FPS. This represents a 35 FPS difference, or a 58% drop in performance when switching from Low to Ultra.
Q: Does the CPU's performance have a significant impact on the measured frame rates?
A: No. Despite the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D having a high 83rd percentile rank, the measured frame rates are consistently low across all settings, indicating that the GPU is the primary bottleneck and the CPU's power is not being utilized to its potential.
Q: Is this combo ranked favorably compared to other tested systems?
A: No, it ranks 2530 out of 2872 tested combos, placing it in the bottom 12% of all systems tested for Evolve.
Resolution Scaling
The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals a classic GPU-bound scenario. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the average FPS is 89. Moving to 2560x1440 drops this to 60 FPS, a 33% decrease. At 3840x2160, the average FPS falls to 34, which is a 62% decrease from the 1080p result. This pattern is consistent across all settings, showing that the GPU's rendering workload is the primary constraint.
The data indicates that the GPU is overwhelmed as resolution increases, which is expected for an IGP with shared memory. The performance drop is not linear, suggesting that the GPU's memory bandwidth and shading units become saturated at higher resolutions. For example, at Medium settings, the FPS drops from 69 at 1080p to 46 at 1440p (a 33% drop), and then to 26 at 4K (a 62% drop from 1080p). This steep decline confirms that the limiting component is the graphics processor, not the CPU, as the CPU's performance is unaffected by resolution changes. The high-resolution data points are essentially unplayable, reinforcing that this combo is only viable for 1080p gaming at the lowest settings.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D is a high-end desktop processor with 8 cores and 16 threads, based on the Zen 4 architecture. It has a base clock of 4.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, along with a large 96 MB shared L3 cache. Its benchmark scores are strong, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16817 and a Geekbench multicore score of 15610. This places it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 33079, making it a top-tier processor for general and multi-threaded workloads.
However, in Evolve, the CPU's role is minimized. The measured frame rates are so low that the CPU is never the bottleneck. The data shows that even at 1080p with Low settings, where the CPU's single-thread performance is most critical, the 89 FPS average is likely capped by the GPU's output. The CPU's nearest rivals, such as the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G and Intel Core i7-13650HX, have nearly identical average scores (33089), with a deltaPct of 0%, indicating that the 7800X3D is not uniquely positioned for this title. The CPU's high core count and clock speeds are irrelevant when the GPU can only produce a fraction of the frames the CPU could theoretically handle. The benchmark data clearly shows that the CPU is not a limiting factor; it is waiting on the GPU to deliver frames.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive look at the combo's performance across three resolutions and four settings. At 1920x1080, the results are as follows: Low averages 89 FPS, Medium averages 69 FPS (with a min of 59 and max of 79), High averages 54 FPS, and Ultra averages 37 FPS. This shows a clear climb down from the Low preset, with a 20 FPS drop from Low to Medium, a 15 FPS drop from Medium to High, and a 17 FPS drop from High to Ultra.
At 2560x1440, the performance degrades further: Low averages 60 FPS, Medium averages 46 FPS (with a min of 39 and max of 53), High averages 36 FPS, and Ultra averages 25 FPS. The drop from Low to Medium is 14 FPS, from Medium to High is 10 FPS, and from High to Ultra is 11 FPS. At 3840x2160, the results are mostly unplayable: Low averages 34 FPS, Medium averages 26 FPS (with a min of 22 and max of 30), High averages 21 FPS, and Ultra averages 14 FPS. The drop from Low to Medium is 8 FPS, from Medium to High is 5 FPS, and from High to Ultra is 7 FPS.
The data reveals that the performance gaps between settings narrow as resolution increases, which is typical of a GPU-bound scenario. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 52 FPS, while at 4K, the difference is only 20 FPS. This suggests that at higher resolutions, the GPU is so saturated that even lower settings cannot provide a significant frame rate boost. The only configuration that consistently provides a playable 60+ FPS experience is 1080p Low, with 1440p Low being borderline at exactly 60 FPS. The data strongly suggests that users should stick to 1080p and the Low preset for any semblance of smooth gameplay.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Intel Arc B390
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D + Intel Arc B390 in Evolve
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 34.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 26.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 21.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 14.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 60.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 46.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 36.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 25.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 89.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 69.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 54.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 37.0 |
Evolve with Ryzen 7 7800X3D + Other GPUs
See how Evolve performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Evolve with Arc B390 + Other CPUs
See how Evolve performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 7800X3D + Arc B390
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.