To The Core

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F and Intel Arc B370 combination ranks 2750 out of 2991 tested combos in To The Core. This places the pairing in the bottom 10% of all tested systems, a position driven almost entirely by the graphics solution. The data indicates this is a pairing where the GPU is the decisive bottleneck; the CPU is a modern, capable desktop part, but the integrated graphics of the Arc B370 hold the entire system back to entry-level performance territory. The benchmark results show a system that can play the game, but only at lower resolutions and with compromises in visual quality, making it a functional, if not high-performing, option for this specific title.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo's rank of 2750 out of 2991 is a clear signal of its overall standing. This is a low placement, indicating that in the vast majority of tested configurations, To The Core will run at higher frame rates. The ranking is a composite of the CPU and GPU's individual capabilities, but the GPU's percentile is the dominant factor here. The Intel Arc B370 sits at the 5th percentile among all GPUs, a stark indicator of its low relative performance. This is not a mid-pack or entry-level contender; it is at the very bottom of the performance spectrum.

In contrast, the CPU tells a different story. The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F holds an 85th percentile ranking among all CPUs, which is a strong showing for a desktop processor. This means that in a large majority of systems, this CPU would be considered a solid performer. The wide gulf between the CPU's high percentile and the GPU's low percentile confirms that the graphics component is the limiting factor in this pairing. The system's overall rank is effectively dragged down by the GPU, as the CPU is more than capable of handling the game's logic and physics. The data suggests that if this CPU were paired with a more powerful discrete GPU, the overall combo ranking would be substantially higher, but as it stands, the Arc B370's integrated nature caps the potential.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B370 is the defining component of this combo, and its specifications explain the measured results. It is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) based on the Xe3-LPG architecture, built on Intel's 3 nm process. Its role is fundamentally different from a discrete graphics card; it shares system memory for its frame buffer, with its memory size, type, and bus width all listed as "System Shared." This means its performance is heavily dependent on the system's RAM configuration and bandwidth, which is a major reason for its low benchmark scores.

The GPU's clock speeds are notable: a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz. This boost clock is relatively high, but the sheer number of execution units is limited. The Arc B370 has 1280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 20 raster operation units (ROPs). These counts are low compared to even entry-level discrete GPUs, which is reflected in its compute throughput. The GPU's pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s, while its FP32 performance is 6.144 TFLOPS. These figures are modest, and they directly translate to the frame rates seen in To The Core.

The GPU's benchmark score in 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12) is 1184, placing it at the 5th percentile. Its nearest rivals, according to the data, are older discrete parts like the ATI Radeon HD 5770, which scores 1190, and the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570, which scores 1186. The Arc B370 is essentially performing at the level of integrated graphics from over a decade ago. In the context of To The Core, this means the GPU is the primary constraint. The game's rendering demands, even at lower settings, push the Arc B370 to its limits, and its performance is the reason the combo ranks so low.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data shows a clear and predictable scaling pattern across resolutions, which confirms the GPU-bound nature of this system. At 1080p (1920x1080) with High settings, the combo averages 97 FPS. Moving to 1440p (2560x1440) at the same High settings, the average drops to 65 FPS, a reduction of 32 FPS. At 4K (3840x2160), the average falls to 37 FPS, a further drop of 28 FPS from 1440p. This is a steep decline; the performance at 4K is only 38% of the performance at 1080p.

This scaling pattern is typical of a system where the GPU is overwhelmed by the increasing pixel count. The CPU is not the limiting factor here, as the Ryzen 5 5600F is powerful enough to feed the GPU at all resolutions. The data shows that the Arc B370's fill rate and memory bandwidth (which is system-dependent) are insufficient to maintain high frame rates as the resolution increases. The difference between 1080p and 1440p is a 33% performance hit, and the jump to 4K incurs another 43% loss from 1440p. These are substantial penalties, highlighting that the Arc B370 is best suited for 1080p gaming.

The trend holds across all settings. At Low settings, the combo averages 132 FPS at 1080p, 89 FPS at 1440p, and 51 FPS at 4K. Even at the lowest visual quality, the system cannot achieve a smooth 60 FPS experience at 4K. This indicates that the GPU's raw compute power is simply insufficient for high-resolution rendering, regardless of the graphical load. The resolution scaling data makes it clear that the Arc B370 is a 1080p-class part, and pushing it to higher resolutions will result in a significantly degraded experience.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The exact measured frame rates for this combo in To The Core are as follows. At 1920x1080, the system delivers an average of 132 FPS on Low settings, 112 FPS on Medium (with a min of 95 and max of 129), 97 FPS on High, and 78 FPS on Ultra. This is the only resolution where the system provides a consistently playable experience across all settings, with even Ultra settings clearing the 60 FPS threshold. The gap between Low and Ultra is 54 FPS, which shows a significant performance cost for the highest visual quality.

At 2560x1440, performance drops noticeably. The average FPS is 89 on Low, 75 on Medium (with a min of 64 and max of 87), 65 on High, and 53 on Ultra. Here, the system starts to struggle. While Low and Medium settings are playable, High settings dip below the 60 FPS mark, and Ultra settings fall further to an average of 53 FPS. This suggests that for a smooth 60 FPS experience at 1440p, users should stick to Medium settings or lower.

At 3840x2160, the system's limitations are fully exposed. The average FPS is 51 on Low, 43 on Medium (with a min of 37 and max of 50), 37 on High, and 30 on Ultra. None of these settings reach a playable 60 FPS average. Even on Low, the system only manages 51 FPS, which is below the standard for smooth gameplay. The 4K data clearly shows that this combo is not suitable for 4K gaming in this title, as even the lowest settings cannot provide a consistent frame rate. The min FPS of 37 at 1080p Medium also indicates that there can be noticeable stutters even at the lower resolution.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture (codenamed Vermeer), manufactured on TSMC's 7 nm process. It has a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.00 GHz. Its cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 and 512 KB of L2 per core, with a shared 32 MB L3 cache. This is a modern, competent desktop CPU with a 65 W TDP, and its benchmark scores reflect its strong performance. Its average benchmark score is 36945, placing it at the 85th percentile of all CPUs.

In terms of its rivals, the Ryzen 5 5600F is essentially tied with the Intel Core Ultra 5 225, which has an average score of 36938 (a delta of 0%). It is also very close to the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D, which scores 37018 (a delta of -0.2%). The data shows that the 5600F is a capable processor that can hold its own against these other parts. Its Passmark scores are solid, with a multithread score of 19236 and a single-thread score of 2872. For a game like To The Core, which is an idle genre title, the CPU's role is less about raw FPS and more about handling game logic, background simulations, and keeping the frame pacing stable.

The CPU's performance is more than adequate for this game. The bottleneck is not the CPU, as evidenced by the resolution scaling data; if the CPU were the limiting factor, we would see less FPS drop when increasing resolution. Instead, the FPS drops significantly with resolution, which is a classic sign of a GPU bottleneck. The Ryzen 5 5600F is likely delivering frames faster than the Arc B370 can render them, meaning the CPU is waiting on the GPU. This is a good indication that the system has headroom for a more powerful GPU in the future, and the CPU would not be the limiting factor in such an upgrade.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend heavily on the target resolution and desired frame rate. For a 1080p display, the High preset at an average of 97 FPS offers the best balance of visual quality and performance. It provides a smooth, high-refresh-rate experience without the performance cost of Ultra settings. While Ultra at 78 FPS is still playable, the jump from Low to High is a significant visual improvement, and the 35 FPS difference between High and Ultra is less justifiable for the marginal graphical gains. If a player prioritizes maximum smoothness, the Medium preset at 112 FPS is an excellent choice, but High offers a better visual experience at a still-very-playable frame rate.

For 1440p, the situation changes. The Medium preset, with an average of 75 FPS and a minimum of 64 FPS, is the recommended choice for a consistent 60+ FPS experience. The High preset at 65 FPS is borderline, and its minimum frame rate is likely to dip below 60 FPS, which can cause noticeable stutters. Ultra at 53 FPS is not recommended for smooth gameplay. The Medium preset provides a good middle ground, ensuring the frame rate stays within a comfortable range for most of the game session.

At 4K, the system is not capable of delivering a smooth experience at any setting. The Low preset at 51 FPS is the highest average achievable, but it will still feel less fluid than a 60 FPS target. For this resolution, the data suggests that the user should either lower the resolution or accept a capped frame rate below 60 FPS. The Medium preset at 43 FPS is a compromise, but it will result in more frequent frame drops. The data indicates that 4K gaming is not a viable option for this hardware combination in To The Core. The best experience for this combo is unequivocally at 1080p, where the High preset provides a strong balance of visual fidelity and performance that is not achievable at higher resolutions.