Thief
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 92 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 41 | 43 | 56 | 74 |
| 1440p QHD | 70 | 73 | 96 | 126 |
| 1080p Full HD | 101 | 106 | 140 | 180 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Thief with Intel Core Ultra 9 185H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070, In-Depth Analysis
The Intel Core Ultra 9 185H and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 combination delivers a thoroughly capable Thief experience, with benchmark results showing that 1080p and 1440p gaming are well within its comfort zone. The data reveals a component pairing where the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions, while the CPU’s substantial core count and high boost clock ensure frame pacing remains stable even at lower settings. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS data to clarify how each component contributes to the final performance picture.
FAQ
Q: What is the average FPS at 1080p with High settings?
A: The measured average frame rate at 1920x1080 with High settings is 106 FPS, which places this configuration well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay.
Q: How does the RTX 4070 compare to its nearest rival in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The RTX 4070’s average benchmark score is 37648, placing it 1.3% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile (score 38135) but 0.4% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 (score 37507).
Q: What is the lowest average FPS recorded across all tested settings?
A: The lowest average FPS is 41, which occurs at 3840x2160 resolution with Ultra settings. This is the only configuration that drops below 43 FPS in the measured data.
Q: Does the CPU bottleneck the GPU at any resolution?
A: At 1080p with Low settings, the average FPS reaches 180, indicating the CPU’s 16 cores and 22 threads are sufficient to feed the RTX 4070 without creating a significant bottleneck at lower resolutions.
Q: What is the FPS difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?
A: At 2560x1440, the average FPS drops from 126 on Low settings to 70 on Ultra settings, representing a 56 FPS reduction that highlights the GPU’s workload scaling with graphical fidelity.
Q: Is the 12 GB VRAM of the RTX 4070 sufficient for Thief at 4K?
A: The measured data shows playable 4K performance with an average of 43 FPS at High settings, indicating the 12 GB VRAM and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for this game’s demands at that resolution.
CPU Role
The Intel Core Ultra 9 185H is a 16-core, 22-thread processor based on the Meteor Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 7 nm process node. Its base clock of 3.90 GHz can boost up to 5.10 GHz, providing the single-thread headroom necessary for Thief’s game logic and physics calculations. The CPU’s L3 cache totals 24 MB shared across all cores, which helps maintain consistent frame times when the game streams in level geometry.
In the context of Thief’s measured performance, the CPU’s role becomes most apparent at 1080p resolution, where the GPU is less likely to be the limiting factor. The data shows a Low settings average of 180 FPS at 1920x1080, a figure that approaches the upper limits of what many displays can show. This result indicates the CPU can sustain high instruction throughput without throttling, as its 5.10 GHz boost clock and 22 threads provide ample computational resources for the game’s AI routines and stealth mechanics.
The CPU’s benchmark scores reinforce this interpretation. In Cinebench R23 multi-core testing, the Ultra 9 185H scores 17984.5 points, while its single-core score is 1810.5 points. These figures place the processor in the 85th percentile among all CPUs, showing it is well above average for both multi-threaded and single-threaded workloads. Compared to its nearest rivals, the CPU is essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 (deltaPct -0.1%) and Intel Core 7 250H (deltaPct -0.2%), meaning the 185H offers no significant CPU-side advantage or disadvantage relative to those alternatives in synthetic tests.
At higher resolutions, the CPU’s impact diminishes as the GPU becomes the dominant constraint. The 4K Ultra result of 41 FPS versus the 1080p Ultra result of 101 FPS shows a 60 FPS drop, with the CPU’s contribution remaining constant while the GPU struggles to fill more pixels. The measured FPS data suggests the Ultra 9 185H is never the primary bottleneck in this pairing, as even the most demanding 4K configurations produce frame rates that scale predictably with GPU workload rather than showing signs of CPU starvation.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with a 5 nm process node from TSMC, featuring 5888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs. Its base clock of 1920 MHz boosts to 2475 MHz, and the 12 GB of GDDR6X memory runs at 21 Gbps effective across a 192-bit bus, yielding 504.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth. These specifications position the GPU as the primary driver of frame rate differences across Thief’s resolution and settings matrix.
The GPU’s synthetic benchmark results show an average score of 37648, placing it in the 81st percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Tesla P4 (deltaPct 0.1% faster) and the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 (deltaPct 0.4% slower), indicating the RTX 4070 sits in a competitive performance band. However, the GPU’s more relevant comparison is against the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile, which scores 1.3% higher — a margin that explains why the 4070 sees 43 FPS at 4K High while the 4080 Mobile might push slightly higher in the same scenario.
In Thief, the GPU’s role is most evident when comparing settings at a fixed resolution. At 2560x1440, the average FPS drops from 126 on Low to 96 on Medium, then further to 73 on High, and finally to 70 on Ultra. This progression shows the GPU’s shader and memory subsystems being increasingly taxed as texture quality, shadow detail, and post-processing effects ramp up. The Medium setting at 1440p records a minimum FPS of 82 and a maximum of 110, providing a frame time window that suggests the GPU maintains consistent performance without sudden spikes.
The GPU’s 12 GB VRAM and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth prove sufficient for Thief’s engine, as evidenced by the playable 4K results. The 3840x2160 High setting averages 43 FPS, while the same resolution on Low jumps to 74 FPS — a 31 FPS improvement that comes entirely from reducing the GPU’s per-pixel workload. The RTX 4070’s 29.15 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 158.4 GPixel/s pixel rate explain why 4K remains viable, though the Ultra preset at 4K (41 FPS) dips below the 43 FPS High preset, showing diminishing returns at the highest settings.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data for Thief includes twelve distinct configurations, spanning three resolutions (1920x1080, 2560x1440, 3840x2160) and four settings presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra). At 1080p, the average FPS ranges from 180 on Low to 101 on Ultra, with Medium hitting 140 and High at 106. The Medium preset at 1080p records a minimum of 119 and a maximum of 161, showing a 42 FPS variance that indicates some scene complexity swings, but the overall averages remain well above playable thresholds.
Moving to 1440p, the averages compress downward: Low produces 126 FPS, Medium 96 FPS, High 73 FPS, and Ultra 70 FPS. The Medium setting at this resolution has a minimum of 82 and maximum of 110, a 28 FPS range that is tighter than the 1080p Medium spread. This suggests that at higher resolution, the GPU’s workload is more consistent, reducing frame time spikes. The difference between High (73 FPS) and Ultra (70 FPS) at 1440p is only 3 FPS, indicating that the Ultra preset’s additional visual features have minimal performance cost at this resolution.
At 4K, the averages continue to fall: Low achieves 74 FPS, Medium 56 FPS, High 43 FPS, and Ultra 41 FPS. The Medium setting at 4K records a minimum of 48 and a maximum of 65, which is the only 4K configuration with min/max data. This 17 FPS range is the narrowest of any Medium preset tested, implying that 4K rendering on the RTX 4070 produces stable frame pacing despite the heavy load. The 4K Ultra result of 41 FPS is the lowest average in the entire dataset, but it remains just above the 40 FPS threshold, making it technically playable for users who prioritize visual fidelity.
The overall combo rank for this CPU-GPU pairing in Thief is 1902 out of 3720 tested combinations, placing it slightly above the median. This ranking reflects that while the RTX 4070 is a strong mobile GPU, Thief’s 2014 engine and the CPU’s high single-thread performance mean that many other configurations can achieve similar or better frame rates, particularly at 1080p where the GPU’s capabilities are less stressed.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is substantial across all settings, revealing the limiting component in this pairing. At Low settings, the average FPS falls from 180 at 1080p to 126 at 1440p (a 30% reduction) and then to 74 at 4K (a 59% reduction from 1080p). This scaling pattern is characteristic of a GPU-limited scenario, where the CPU’s frame generation capacity remains constant while the GPU’s pixel throughput declines with increasing resolution.
For High settings, the progression is 106 FPS at 1080p, 73 FPS at 1440p, and 43 FPS at 4K. The percentage drop from 1080p to 1440p is 31%, and from 1080p to 4K is 59%, which mirrors the Low settings scaling almost exactly. This consistency indicates that the GPU’s workload scaling is linear with pixel count, regardless of the quality preset. The RTX 4070’s 504.2 GB/s memory bandwidth and 158.4 GPixel/s pixel rate are the constraining factors at higher resolutions.
The Medium settings tell a similar story: 140 FPS at 1080p, 96 FPS at 1440p, and 56 FPS at 4K. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is 44 FPS (31%), and from 1080p to 4K is 84 FPS (60%). The min/max data at each resolution shows that the 1080p Medium spread (119-161) is wider than the 1440p spread (82-110) and the 4K spread (48-65), suggesting that at lower resolutions the CPU can push frame rates high enough to encounter occasional engine-level hiccups, while at 4K the GPU’s consistent workload smooths out these variations.
Ultra settings produce the most dramatic scaling: 101 FPS at 1080p, 70 FPS at 1440p, and 41 FPS at 4K. The 1440p to 4K drop is 29 FPS (41%), which is slightly less severe than the 1080p to 1440p drop of 31 FPS (31%). This suggests that at Ultra settings, the GPU is already heavily loaded at 1440p, so the additional pixel count at 4K causes a relatively smaller marginal impact. Across all settings, the data indicates the CPU is not the limiting factor at any resolution — the consistent 59-60% FPS reduction from 1080p to 4K aligns with the GPU’s theoretical pixel throughput, confirming the RTX 4070 is the bottleneck at higher resolutions.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend on the user’s resolution and performance priorities. At 1920x1080, every preset delivers playable performance, with even Ultra averaging 101 FPS. The Medium preset, which records 140 FPS average with a minimum of 119, offers the best balance of visual quality and headroom for high-refresh-rate displays. Users with 144Hz or 165Hz monitors can comfortably use Medium at 1080p, while those with 60Hz displays could push to Ultra without dropping below 60 FPS.
For 2560x1440, the High preset at 73 FPS is the recommended choice for most users, as it stays above 60 FPS while providing substantial visual improvements over Medium (96 FPS) and Low (126 FPS). The Ultra preset at 70 FPS is nearly identical in performance to High, so users who value the extra visual features can select Ultra with only a 3 FPS penalty. The Medium preset at 1440p, with its 82 FPS minimum, is the best option for users who prioritize frame rate stability over maximum quality.
At 3840x2160, the Low preset at 74 FPS is the only configuration that comfortably exceeds 60 FPS, making it the recommended choice for 4K gaming on this hardware. The Medium preset at 56 FPS is playable but may exhibit occasional drops to 48 FPS, which could be noticeable in fast-paced stealth sequences. High (43 FPS) and Ultra (41 FPS) at 4K are best reserved for users who prioritize visual fidelity over smoothness, as both remain above the 40 FPS threshold but lack the headroom for consistent 60 FPS gameplay.
The data shows that the RTX 4070 paired with the Ultra 9 185H is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming in Thief, with 4K requiring compromises. The most balanced experience across all resolutions is the Medium preset, which delivers 140 FPS at 1080p, 96 FPS at 1440p, and 56 FPS at 4K. For users targeting 60 FPS as a baseline, the recommended settings are Ultra at 1080p (101 FPS), High at 1440p (73 FPS), and Low at 4K (74 FPS), each providing a comfortable margin above the playability threshold.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 9 185H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 in Thief
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 74.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 56.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 43.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 41.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 126.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 96.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 73.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 70.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 180.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 140.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 106.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 101.0 |
Thief with iUltra 9 185H + Other GPUs
See how Thief performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Thief with RTX 4070 + Other CPUs
See how Thief performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with iUltra 9 185H + RTX 4070
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.