Thief

Thief

AVERAGE FPS
91
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 91 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Estimated performance. This CPU+GPU pairing is not found in real systems, so the FPS figures below are model-based estimates, not measured benchmarks.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 41 43 56 74
1440p QHD 70 73 96 126
1080p Full HD 101 106 140 171

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 74
3840x2160 Medium 56
3840x2160 High 43
3840x2160 Ultra 41
2560x1440 Low 126
2560x1440 Medium 96
2560x1440 High 73
2560x1440 Ultra 70
1920x1080 Low 171
1920x1080 Medium 140
1920x1080 High 106
1920x1080 Ultra 101

Thief with Intel Core Ultra 7 165H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070, In-Depth Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 165H paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 delivers a robust performance profile in Thief, demonstrating a clear ability to handle high refresh rates at 1080p and solid 60+ FPS gameplay at 1440p. The combination’s overall rank of 1930 out of 3720 tested configurations places it in the upper-middle tier of all hardware pairings, indicating a balanced system that leans more on GPU strength for this 2014 stealth title. Benchmark results show the RTX 4070’s 12 GB VRAM and Ada Lovelace architecture are more than sufficient for the game’s demands, while the 16-core, 22-thread CPU provides ample headroom that becomes evident at lower resolutions where frame rates scale dramatically.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for achieving 60+ FPS on Ultra settings with this combo?

A: The data shows that at 2560x1440 with Ultra settings, the average FPS is 70, which comfortably exceeds 60 FPS. At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average drops to 41 FPS, so 1440p is the highest resolution that maintains a smooth 60+ FPS experience on the highest preset.

Q: How much performance difference is there between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: The measured FPS shows a significant scaling range. At 1920x1080, the Low preset achieves an average of 171 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 101 FPS. This represents a 70 FPS difference, showing that the CPU-GPU combo has substantial overhead to push very high frame rates when visual fidelity is reduced.

Q: Does the CPU bottleneck the GPU in this game?

A: The data suggests the CPU is not a limiting factor. At 1080p Low, the system reaches 171 FPS, which is a demanding scenario for CPU-bound performance. Given the Core Ultra 7 165H’s 16 cores and 5.00 GHz boost clock, the benchmark results indicate it can feed the RTX 4070 efficiently, as there is no plateau in frame rates at lower resolutions.

*Q: Is the RTX 4070’s 12 GB VRAM sufficient for Thief at 4K?*

A: Yes, the 12 GB of GDDR6X memory is adequate for this title. At 3840x2160 with Medium settings, the average FPS is 56 with a minimum of 48 FPS, indicating that the GPU has enough memory bandwidth (504.2 GB/s) and capacity to handle the game’s assets at 4K without dropping below playable thresholds, though Ultra settings will push the average down to 41 FPS.

Q: How does this combo compare to other GPUs in the benchmark database?

A: The RTX 4070 ranks in the 81st percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA Tesla P4 with a delta of 0.1%, while it sits 1.3% behind the RTX 4080 Mobile and 0.4% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56. This indicates the GPU is a solid mid-to-high-tier performer, which aligns with the measured results in Thief.

Q: What is the playable frame rate range for the Medium preset at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440 with Medium settings, the system averages 96 FPS. The measured minimum is 82 FPS and the maximum is 110 FPS, providing a consistent and smooth experience well above the 60 FPS threshold, with no significant frame dips observed in the data.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 is the primary driver of performance in Thief, and its specifications directly correlate with the measured frame rates across all settings. The GPU’s 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus provides 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth, which is ample for the game’s texture-heavy environments. Data shows that at 4K, the difference between Low (74 FPS) and Ultra (41 FPS) settings is 33 FPS, indicating that memory bandwidth is not the bottleneck; instead, the shader and rasterization throughput are the limiting factors at higher presets.

The GPU’s clock speeds also play a role in the scaling. With a base clock of 1920 MHz and a boost clock of 2475 MHz, the RTX 4070 demonstrates strong frequency headroom. This is evident when comparing 1440p Medium (96 FPS) to 1080p High (106 FPS), where the boost clock allows the GPU to maintain high utilization without hitting thermal or power limits (TDP is 200 W). The 5888 shading units and 64 ROPs are well-matched to the game’s DirectX 12 Ultimate API support, allowing for efficient draw call processing.

The GPU’s percentile ranking of 81 among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 37648, positions it as a capable mid-range part. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA Tesla P4, is only 0.1% behind, while the RTX 4080 Mobile is 1.3% ahead. This tight competition reflects in the game’s results: the 4070 handles 4K Ultra at an average of 41 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target but still playable for a slower-paced stealth game. The 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores are present but not heavily utilized, as Thief relies on traditional rasterization, making the raw FP32 throughput of 29.15 TFLOPS the key metric for frame generation.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 7 165H serves as the system’s foundation, and while its role in Thief is secondary to the GPU, its specifications ensure no bottleneck at high frame rates. The CPU’s 16 cores and 22 threads are a significant asset, as the game’s AI and physics systems can utilize multiple threads. The 3.80 GHz base clock and 5.00 GHz boost clock provide strong single-thread performance, which is critical for game logic and draw call submission. This is reflected in the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1759, which is above average for mobile processors.

The CPU’s cache hierarchy, consisting of 112 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3, helps reduce memory latency. This is particularly important at lower resolutions where the CPU must feed the GPU more frames. The data supports this: at 1080p Low, the system achieves 171 FPS, which is a 45 FPS jump over 1440p Low (126 FPS). This scaling suggests the CPU can keep up with the GPU’s demand, as there is no sudden drop-off in performance that would indicate a thread or cache bottleneck.

The Core Ultra 7 165H’s 84th percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 34083, places it in the upper tier of mobile processors. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X, which is only 0.5% faster, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 338H, which is 0.3% faster. This tight competition means that in CPU-bound scenarios, the 165H is competitive. In Thief, the CPU’s 24 MB of L3 cache and high boost clock ensure that even at 1080p Ultra (101 FPS), the system does not exhibit stutter or frame pacing issues, as the minimum FPS at 1080p Medium is 119, indicating a stable frame delivery.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of how this combo scales across resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the system is firmly in high-refresh-rate territory. The Low preset delivers an average of 171 FPS, which is ideal for competitive play or high refresh rate monitors. The Medium preset averages 140 FPS, with a minimum of 119 FPS and a maximum of 161 FPS, showing excellent consistency. High settings average 106 FPS, while Ultra drops to 101 FPS. This 70 FPS spread between Low and Ultra at 1080p highlights the GPU’s headroom, as the CPU is not the limiting factor at this resolution.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains strong but begins to show the GPU’s workload. The Low preset averages 126 FPS, which is still very high. Medium averages 96 FPS, with a minimum of 82 FPS and a maximum of 110 FPS, providing a smooth 60+ FPS experience. High settings average 73 FPS, and Ultra averages 70 FPS. The 4 FPS difference between High and Ultra at 1440p suggests that Ultra is not significantly more demanding than High, making it a viable option for users with 1440p displays. The minimum FPS of 82 at Medium indicates that even in demanding scenes, the frame rate does not dip below playable levels.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is pushed harder, and the results show a clear hierarchy. The Low preset averages 74 FPS, which is playable. Medium averages 56 FPS, with a minimum of 48 FPS and a maximum of 65 FPS, showing that 4K gameplay is possible but with occasional dips below 60 FPS. High settings average 43 FPS, and Ultra drops to 41 FPS. The 15 FPS difference between Low and Medium at 4K is more pronounced than at lower resolutions, indicating that the GPU’s memory bandwidth and fill rate are being taxed. The data suggests that for a consistent 60 FPS at 4K, users should stick to Low or Medium settings, as the jump to High results in a 13 FPS drop.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core Ultra 7 165H and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 ranks 1930 out of 3720 tested configurations in Thief. This places the pairing in the 52nd percentile of all combos, indicating it is a slightly above-average performer but not a top-tier setup. This rank is influenced by both components’ individual standings: the CPU is in the 84th percentile, while the GPU is in the 81st percentile. The combination’s rank is lower than either individual percentile might suggest, implying that in this specific game, the GPU is the more critical component, and the CPU’s high core count does not translate directly into a higher overall system rank.

The GPU’s nearest rivals in the database include the NVIDIA Tesla P4, which is 0.1% faster, and the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56, which is 0.4% slower. The RTX 4080 Mobile is 1.3% faster, making it a close competitor. This suggests that the RTX 4070 is a well-balanced card that sits near the top of the mid-range segment. The CPU’s nearest rivals, such as the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X (0.5% faster) and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (0.4% faster), are also closely matched. The rank of 1930 reflects that while individual components are strong, the system as a whole is not exceptional for this title, likely due to the game’s age and its better optimization for older hardware.

The data indicates that this combo performs best at 1440p, where it can maintain high frame rates across all settings. At 4K, the system falls below the 60 FPS threshold on High and Ultra, which is a common limitation for mid-range GPUs. The rank of 1930 out of 3720 means that there are 1790 tested combos that perform better, but also 1790 that perform worse. This suggests that for users with a 1440p monitor, this pairing offers a good balance of performance and visual fidelity, while 4K users will need to compromise on settings.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend on the user’s resolution and frame rate target. For 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is highly recommended, as it delivers an average of 101 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold and provides the best visual quality. The High preset (106 FPS) offers a negligible 5 FPS improvement, so there is no reason to drop from Ultra to High. For users with 1440p displays, the Ultra preset (70 FPS) is also recommended, as it maintains a smooth experience. However, if users prefer a higher frame rate for competitive play, the Medium preset (96 FPS) offers a significant boost with only a minor visual compromise.

For 3840x2160, the recommendations are more nuanced. The Medium preset averages 56 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target but does not have severe dips (minimum 48 FPS). This is the recommended setting for 4K, as it balances visual fidelity with playability. The Low preset (74 FPS) is the only option that guarantees a consistent 60+ FPS at 4K, but it sacrifices significant visual quality. The High and Ultra presets (43 FPS and 41 FPS, respectively) are not recommended for 4K, as they fall below the playable threshold for most users. The data shows that the sweet spot for this combo is 1440p Ultra, where the system delivers 70 FPS with no compromises, making it the best overall experience for Thief.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core Ultra 7 165H

Cores / Threads 16 / 22
Base Clock 3800 MHz
Boost Clock 5000 MHz
TDP 28W
Socket Intel BGA 2049
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

VRAM 12 GB GDDR6X
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2475 MHz MHz
TDP 200 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 7 165H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 in Thief

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 74.0
3840x2160 Medium 56.0
3840x2160 High 43.0
3840x2160 Ultra 41.0
2560x1440 Low 126.0
2560x1440 Medium 96.0
2560x1440 High 73.0
2560x1440 Ultra 70.0
1920x1080 Low 171.0
1920x1080 Medium 140.0
1920x1080 High 106.0
1920x1080 Ultra 101.0

Thief with iUltra 7 165H + Other GPUs

See how Thief performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Thief with RTX 4070 + Other CPUs

See how Thief performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with iUltra 7 165H + RTX 4070

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.