Thief

Thief

AVERAGE FPS
86
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 86 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 38 40 52 69
1440p QHD 65 68 89 117
1080p Full HD 94 99 130 171

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 69
3840x2160 Medium 52
3840x2160 High 40
3840x2160 Ultra 38
2560x1440 Low 117
2560x1440 Medium 89
2560x1440 High 68
2560x1440 Ultra 65
1920x1080 Low 171
1920x1080 Medium 130
1920x1080 High 99
1920x1080 Ultra 94

Thief with Intel Core Ultra 7 265 + AMD Radeon RX 9060, In-Depth Analysis

Thief, a 2014 stealth title, remains a useful benchmark for modern hardware due to its demanding rendering techniques. This analysis examines the performance of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9060, using measured frame rate data across three resolutions and four quality presets. The data provides a clear picture of how this combination handles a game that is now over a decade old but still stresses contemporary components in specific ways.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate data reveals a predictable and steep decline as resolution increases, which is typical for a GPU-bound scenario. At 1080p with Ultra settings, the combo produces an average of 94 FPS. Moving to 1440p drops that average to 65 FPS, a reduction of approximately 31%. Pushing further to 4K (3840x2160) on Ultra yields just 38 FPS, which is a 60% decrease from the 1080p result. This scaling pattern strongly indicates that the AMD Radeon RX 9060 becomes the primary limiting factor as pixel count grows.

The trend is consistent across all settings presets. With High settings, the average frame rate falls from 99 FPS at 1080p to 68 FPS at 1440p and then to 40 FPS at 4K. The drop from 1080p to 4K on High is about 60%, matching the proportional loss seen on Ultra. The Low preset shows a slightly different curve, with 171 FPS at 1080p, 117 FPS at 1440p, and 69 FPS at 4K. While the absolute numbers are higher, the percentage loss from 1080p to 4K is still significant at roughly 60%.

The data suggests that the CPU is not the bottleneck at higher resolutions. At 1080p, where the GPU has less work per frame, the frame rates are high enough that CPU overhead could theoretically matter, but the consistent 60% performance drop when moving to 4K across multiple presets points squarely at the graphics card as the limiting component. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265, with its 20 cores and 5.30 GHz boost clock, appears to have ample headroom to feed the GPU at all tested resolutions. The 4K results, particularly the 38 FPS average on Ultra, indicate that this configuration is not suitable for 4K gaming at maximum quality in Thief.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 is a 20-core, 20-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture. It has a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, with 30 MB of shared L3 cache. In the context of Thief, a game from 2014, the CPU's role is less about raw multi-core throughput and more about single-thread performance and ensuring a consistent frame delivery. The benchmark data shows the CPU has a strong single-core presence, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5960.

The game's engine likely relies heavily on a few primary threads for game logic and scene management. The Core Ultra 7 265's high boost clock of 5.30 GHz is well-suited for this task. The measured frame rates, especially at 1080p, demonstrate that the CPU is capable of driving the GPU to high performance levels. For instance, at 1080p Low, the combo reaches 171 FPS, which is a frame rate that requires a capable CPU to maintain without stutters.

However, the CPU's multi-core capabilities are not directly reflected in the frame rate scaling. The PassMark multithread score of 49682 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42216 are excellent, but Thief does not appear to be a title that scales linearly with core count. The performance difference between the Ultra 7 265 and its nearest rivals, such as the AMD EPYC 4464P (which scores 0.3% lower on average) or the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F (which scores 0.3% higher), is negligible in synthetic benchmarks. This suggests that in a game like Thief, the CPU choice among these high-end parts will have minimal impact on the average FPS, with the GPU being the decisive factor.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combinations, this specific pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and AMD Radeon RX 9060 holds a rank of 1586 out of 2851 tested combos for Thief. This places it in the middle of the pack, which is a somewhat surprising result given the individual component specifications. The rank suggests that while this is not a low-end system, there are many other combinations that produce higher frame rates in this specific title.

The mid-pack ranking is likely a direct consequence of the GPU's performance ceiling. The Radeon RX 9060, while a modern RDNA 4.0 part, has a PassMark G3D score of 17631 and sits at the 59th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (which scores 0.7% higher) and the AMD Radeon RX 7700 (which scores 1% higher). These are all mid-range to upper-mid-range graphics cards. When paired with a top-tier CPU like the Core Ultra 7 265 (93rd percentile of all CPUs), the overall combo rank is dragged down by the GPU's relative performance level.

The data implies that the CPU is not the limiting factor in this ranking. For a game like Thief, the GPU's raw fill rate and pixel throughput are far more critical. The combo's rank of 1586 out of 2851 means that roughly 44% of tested systems perform worse, while 56% perform better. This is a clear indicator that the AMD Radeon RX 9060 is the component that defines this system's gaming performance in Thief, and the powerful CPU is being held back by it.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured frame rate data provides a complete picture of performance across different settings. At 1920x1080, the system delivers an average of 171 FPS on Low, 130 FPS on Medium (with a minimum of 110 and maximum of 149), 99 FPS on High, and 94 FPS on Ultra. The scaling from Low to Ultra shows a 45% performance penalty, which is substantial but not unexpected for a game with high-quality textures and effects. The 1080p results are all playable, with even the Ultra preset maintaining an average above 90 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the average frame rates are 117 FPS on Low, 89 FPS on Medium (with a minimum of 76 and maximum of 102), 68 FPS on High, and 65 FPS on Ultra. The step from High to Ultra at this resolution is only a 3 FPS difference, suggesting that the Ultra preset's additional settings have a minimal impact on the GPU at this resolution, or that the GPU is already nearing its limits. The 1440p results are generally good, with High and Ultra both staying above 60 FPS, which is the target for smooth gameplay.

At 3840x2160, the performance drops significantly. The average frame rates are 69 FPS on Low, 52 FPS on Medium (with a minimum of 45 and maximum of 60), 40 FPS on High, and 38 FPS on Ultra. The 4K results are the most telling. Low settings are the only preset that achieves a comfortable playable frame rate. Medium dips below 60 FPS on average, and both High and Ultra fall well below the 60 FPS threshold, making them less suitable for a smooth experience. The minimum frame rate of 45 FPS on Medium at 4K also indicates potential for noticeable stuttering in demanding scenes.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 is built on the RDNA 4.0 architecture and features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s. It has a boost clock of 2990 MHz and a game clock of 2400 MHz. The GPU's performance in Thief is primarily dictated by its pixel and texture processing capabilities, which are quantified by its 64 ROPs and 112 TMUs. The measured frame rates directly reflect these specifications.

The GPU's role as the primary performance limiter is evident when examining the resolution scaling. The 8 GB VRAM capacity is sufficient for Thief at 1080p and 1440p, but the memory bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s becomes a constraint at 4K with higher settings. This is a likely contributor to the steep frame rate drop at 3840x2160. The GPU's PassMark DirectX 11 score of 182 is relevant here, as Thief uses DirectX 11 for its rendering. The score indicates a reasonable level of performance for this API, but it is not exceptional.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the RX 9060 sits within a tight performance band. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has an average benchmark score 0.7% higher, while the AMD Radeon R9 370X is 1% lower. This places the RX 9060 in a competitive position against these older and newer cards. In Thief, this translates to the observed frame rates, which are respectable for 1080p and 1440p gaming but fall short for 4K at high quality settings. The GPU's 59th percentile ranking among all GPUs confirms that it is a solid mid-range performer, not a high-end solution.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured data, the optimal settings depend heavily on the target resolution. For 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the clear recommendation, as it delivers an average of 94 FPS while providing the maximum visual quality. The High preset offers a marginal performance increase to 99 FPS but sacrifices some visual fidelity for only a 5 FPS gain. There is no reason to drop below High at 1080p, as the system easily handles the Ultra settings.

At 2560x1440, the High preset appears to be the sweet spot, delivering an average of 68 FPS. This provides a smooth experience with high visual quality. The Ultra preset is nearly identical in performance at 65 FPS, offering a negligible visual improvement for a 3 FPS loss. The Medium preset at 89 FPS is a viable option for those who prefer higher frame rates over visual fidelity, but High offers a better balance. For a 1440p monitor with a 60 Hz refresh rate, High settings will provide a consistently smooth experience.

For 3840x2160, the options are more limited. The Low preset is the only one that provides a consistently smooth experience with an average of 69 FPS. The Medium preset averages 52 FPS, which is below the ideal 60 FPS threshold, and the minimum of 45 FPS may result in noticeable hitches. High and Ultra settings are not recommended for 4K, as they average 40 FPS and 38 FPS respectively, which are not ideal for a game that benefits from smooth motion tracking. If 4K is a priority, users should stick to Low settings, or consider a more powerful GPU, as the RX 9060 is not capable of delivering high-quality 4K performance in Thief.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core Ultra 7 265

Cores / Threads 20 / 20
Base Clock 2400 MHz
Boost Clock 5300 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket Intel Socket 1851
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 9060

VRAM 8 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2990 MHz MHz
TDP 132 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 7 265 + AMD Radeon RX 9060 in Thief

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 69.0
3840x2160 Medium 52.0
3840x2160 High 40.0
3840x2160 Ultra 38.0
2560x1440 Low 117.0
2560x1440 Medium 89.0
2560x1440 High 68.0
2560x1440 Ultra 65.0
1920x1080 Low 171.0
1920x1080 Medium 130.0
1920x1080 High 99.0
1920x1080 Ultra 94.0

Thief with iUltra 7 265 + Other GPUs

See how Thief performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Thief with RX 9060 + Other CPUs

See how Thief performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with iUltra 7 265 + RX 9060

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.