Thief
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 98 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 46 | 44 | 59 | 77 |
| 1440p QHD | 74 | 77 | 101 | 136 |
| 1080p Full HD | 110 | 116 | 147 | 194 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Thief with Intel Core i7-12700KF + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT, In-Depth Analysis
The Intel Core i7-12700KF and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT pairing delivers a playable experience in Thief, but the performance curve across resolutions reveals a system that is firmly GPU-bound at higher settings. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo reaches 194.4 FPS, a figure that drops to 115.7 FPS at High and 109.9 FPS at Ultra. This relatively narrow gap between High and Ultra at 1080p suggests the CPU has ample headroom, allowing the GPU to be the primary scaling factor as settings increase.
Moving to 1440p, the pattern shifts. Low settings yield 136.4 FPS, but High falls to 76.7 FPS and Ultra to 73.8 FPS. The drop from Low to High is substantial—nearly 44%—indicating that the GPU is now working harder, yet the system still maintains smooth framerates. At 4K, the story becomes one of diminishing returns. Ultra settings produce 45.8 FPS, High produces 43.9 FPS, and Medium 58.5 FPS. The 4K results show that the RX 6750 XT is the limiting factor; even dropping from Ultra to High yields only a 1.9 FPS improvement, while Low jumps to 76.8 FPS. This indicates that at 4K, the GPU’s rendering workload dominates, and the CPU’s role is largely neutralized.
The scaling from 1080p to 4K at High settings is telling: 115.7 FPS to 76.7 FPS to 43.9 FPS. The framerate halves from 1080p to 4K, a classic sign that the GPU is the bottleneck. Conversely, at Low settings, the drop is from 194.4 FPS to 136.4 FPS to 76.8 FPS, a less severe decline that still shows the GPU’s limits at higher resolutions. For a stealth title like Thief, where fluidity matters for precise movement, the 1440p High setting at 76.7 FPS offers a strong balance, while 4K users will need to accept either Medium settings or a lower framerate.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data shows a clear hierarchy where resolution has a more significant impact than settings tweaks at the top end. At 4K, the difference between Ultra (45.8 FPS) and High (43.9 FPS) is negligible, suggesting that the GPU is saturated and the extra detail from Ultra is nearly free in performance terms. However, dropping to Medium at 4K yields 58.5 FPS, a 27% improvement over High, while Low jumps to 76.8 FPS. This indicates that the RX 6750 XT’s 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for the texture loads, but the shading units are overwhelmed by the pixel count at 4K.
At 1440p, the scaling is more forgiving. Low hits 136.4 FPS, Medium 100.5 FPS, High 76.7 FPS, and Ultra 73.8 FPS. The gap between High and Ultra is just 2.9 FPS, meaning that players can run Ultra at 1440p without sacrificing much. The 1080p results confirm this trend: Ultra is 109.9 FPS, High is 115.7 FPS, and Medium is 146.9 FPS. The 1080p Low score of 194.4 FPS is the highest recorded, showing that the CPU’s 20 threads and 5.00 GHz boost clock are more than adequate for this 2014 title.
The limiting component is unequivocally the GPU at 4K, where even the fastest settings fail to break 77 FPS. At 1080p and 1440p, the CPU’s headroom is evident, as framerates scale smoothly with GPU load. For a game released in 2014, the Core i7-12700KF’s single-thread performance, reflected in its 3dmark single-thread score of 1043, is not a constraint. The data suggests that 1440p is the sweet spot for this combo, with High settings providing a 76.7 FPS average that is both fluid and visually rich.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is a 7 nm part with a boost clock of 2600 MHz and a game clock of 2495 MHz. Its 2560 shading units and 64 ROPs deliver a pixel rate of 166.4 GPixel/s, which explains the 4K performance ceiling. The 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus provides 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth, a figure that proves sufficient for Thief’s textures, even at Ultra settings. The GPU’s 40 ray accelerators are irrelevant here, as the game does not use ray tracing, but the DirectX 12 Ultimate support ensures compatibility with modern APIs.
In benchmark terms, the RX 6750 XT scores 20700 in Passmark G3D and 9550 in Passmark GPU Compute, placing it in the 79th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, which scores 35787 with a deltaPct of -1.3, meaning the RTX 3080 is only 1.3% faster in average benchmark score. This close margin suggests that the RX 6750 XT is a competitive mid-range part, though its 250 W TDP and dual-slot cooler require a 600 W PSU.
The GPU’s role in Thief is most apparent in the 4K results. At Ultra settings, the 45.8 FPS average is below the 60 FPS threshold, while High is nearly identical at 43.9 FPS. This plateau indicates that the GPU is hitting a compute limit, not a memory bandwidth issue. The 1080p Ultra score of 109.9 FPS shows that the card is capable of high framerates when pixel count is lower. The boost clock of 2600 MHz is well-utilized, as the card maintains consistent performance across settings, with the 18 Gbps effective memory speed ensuring data flows freely.
Settings Recommendations
For the best experience per the measured rows, 1440p High stands out as the optimal configuration. It delivers 76.7 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS target for smooth gameplay, while retaining visual quality. At 1080p, Ultra is viable at 109.9 FPS, but the jump from High to Ultra is only 5.8 FPS, making High a more efficient choice. The 1080p Medium setting at 146.9 FPS is overkill for a stealth game, where reaction times matter less than in competitive shooters.
At 4K, the data suggests that Medium is the best compromise. It produces 58.5 FPS, which is close to playable, while High and Ultra hover around 44-46 FPS. The 4K Low setting at 76.8 FPS is the only way to exceed 60 FPS at that resolution, but it sacrifices too much visual fidelity. For players with a 1440p monitor, Ultra at 73.8 FPS is a reasonable choice, as the performance cost over High is minimal. The 1080p Low score of 194.4 FPS is the peak framerate, but it is unnecessary for this genre.
The measured data shows that the RX 6750 XT scales well from Low to Medium, but the gains from High to Ultra are marginal. At 1440p, Medium (100.5 FPS) offers a 30% improvement over High, which could be appealing for those prioritizing framerate. However, the visual difference in a stealth game like Thief is more impactful than a few extra FPS, so High is recommended for the balance of detail and smoothness.
FAQ
Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded for this combo?
A: The highest average FPS is 194.4 at 1080p with Low settings.
Q: Can this combo maintain 60 FPS at 4K?
A: No, the 4K results show 58.5 FPS at Medium, 45.8 FPS at Ultra, and 43.9 FPS at High, all below 60 FPS.
Q: How does the RX 6750 XT compare to the RTX 3080 in benchmarks?
A: The RTX 3080 has an average score of 35787, which is 1.3% higher than the RX 6750 XT, indicating near-parity.
Q: What is the best resolution for a 60 FPS experience?
A: 1440p with High settings delivers 76.7 FPS, comfortably above 60 FPS, while 1440p Ultra achieves 73.8 FPS.
Q: Does the CPU bottleneck the GPU at 1080p?
A: No, the 1080p Ultra score of 109.9 FPS and Low score of 194.4 FPS show the CPU has sufficient headroom, with the GPU being the limiting factor.
Q: What is the combo’s rank among tested configurations?
A: This combo ranks 708 out of 1642 tested combos in Thief.
How This Combo Ranks
In the database of tested configurations for Thief, the Intel Core i7-12700KF and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT ranks 708 out of 1642 combos, placing it in the upper-middle tier. This rank reflects the GPU’s 79th percentile standing and the CPU’s 89th percentile among all parts. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 35355 places it just 0.1% above the Intel Core i5-14400 (35336) and 0.2% below the Intel Core i7-13800H (35416). This tight grouping shows that the 12700KF is competitive with modern mid-range processors, though its 12 cores and 20 threads are more than needed for a 2014 title.
The GPU’s average score of 35327 places it 0.2% above the AMD Radeon RX 5600M (35264) and 1.3% below the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (35787). This suggests that the RX 6750 XT is a solid performer, but not at the top of the heap. The combo’s rank of 708 out of 1642 indicates that while it is not a leader, it is in the top 43% of all tested systems. For a stealth game where framerates above 60 FPS are achievable at 1440p, this rank is respectable.
The data shows that the CPU’s high single-thread performance, evidenced by its 3dmark single-thread score of 1043, is a strength, but it does not translate into a higher combo rank because the GPU limits the 4K experience. The combo’s position is largely determined by the GPU’s 4K performance, which falls short of the 60 FPS target at most settings. At 1440p and 1080p, the combo performs admirably, but the rank reflects the full resolution range. The 708th position out of 1642 is a fair assessment, placing this system in the upper half but not among the elite for Thief.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i7-12700KF
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i7-12700KF + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT in Thief
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 76.8 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 58.5 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 45.8 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 43.9 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 136.4 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 100.5 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 76.7 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 73.8 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 194.4 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 146.9 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 115.7 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 109.9 |
Thief with ii7-12700KF + Other GPUs
See how Thief performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Thief with RX 6750 XT + Other CPUs
See how Thief performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii7-12700KF + RX 6750 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.