Thief
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 86 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 38 | 40 | 52 | 69 |
| 1440p QHD | 65 | 68 | 89 | 117 |
| 1080p Full HD | 94 | 99 | 130 | 171 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Thief with AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D + AMD Radeon RX 9060, In-Depth Analysis
Thief, a 2014 stealth title, still delivers a demanding workload on modern hardware, and the pairing of the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D with the AMD Radeon RX 9060 produces a set of results that clearly map the boundaries of this system's capabilities. The measured frame rates show a configuration that is highly capable at mainstream resolutions but begins to strain at the upper limits of 4K, particularly when visual fidelity is maximized.
Settings Recommendations
The data from the measured FPS table provides a clear directive for optimizing the experience in Thief. At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset yields an average of 38 FPS, which is below the threshold for smooth, consistent play on many displays. The High preset at the same resolution jumps to 40 FPS, a marginal improvement that still leaves the system in a performance deficit. However, the Medium preset at 4K produces a 52 FPS average with a minimum of 45 FPS, presenting a playable middle ground. For the most responsive experience at this resolution, the Low preset delivers an average of 69 FPS, a significant leap in fluidity at the cost of visual detail.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance picture becomes more favorable. The Ultra preset averages 65 FPS, which is a solid baseline for high-refresh-rate monitors. The High preset at 68 FPS is nearly identical, suggesting that the jump from High to Ultra carries a small performance penalty. The Medium preset at 1440p offers a comfortable 89 FPS average, with a minimum of 76 FPS ensuring minimal dips. The Low preset here reaches 117 FPS, providing an exceptionally smooth experience for competitive or high-refresh-rate play.
At 1920x1080, the system is clearly in its element. The Ultra preset averages 94 FPS, which is perfectly playable. The High preset is the standout for a quality experience, hitting 99 FPS. For users with 144Hz or higher refresh rate monitors, the Medium preset achieves 130 FPS and the Low preset reaches 171 FPS. The best experience per the measured rows is the Medium preset at 1080p, as it balances a high average frame rate of 130 FPS with a minimum of 110 FPS, ensuring a consistently smooth and responsive feel without the visual compromises of the Low preset. The High preset at 1440p is also an excellent choice for those prioritizing visual quality at a higher resolution, as it maintains an average above 60 FPS.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 9060, built on the RDNA 4.0 architecture with the Navi 44 chip, is the primary driver of frame generation in this configuration. It operates with a base clock of 1700 MHz, a game clock of 2400 MHz, and a boost clock of 2990 MHz. The GPU's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus provides a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s. This memory configuration is a critical factor, especially at higher resolutions and with higher texture quality settings.
In Thief, the GPU's role is evident in the scaling of frame rates across settings. The difference between Low and Ultra presets at each resolution demonstrates the load placed on the graphics card. At 1920x1080, the GPU must render 171 FPS on Low but only 94 FPS on Ultra, showing a 77 FPS drop due to increased graphical work. This same pattern is observed at 2560x1440, where the average drops from 117 FPS on Low to 65 FPS on Ultra. At 3840x2160, the GPU is heavily taxed, with the Ultra preset yielding a mere 38 FPS.
The Radeon RX 9060's benchmark scores place it in a competitive position. Its Passmark G3D score is 17631, and its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 3322. These results position it slightly below the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, which has an average score of 16129, a 0.7% difference, and above the AMD Radeon RX 7700, which scores 15852, a 1% difference. The GPU has a percentile ranking of 59 among all GPUs, indicating it sits in the upper-middle tier of performance. The data shows that the 8 GB VRAM buffer is sufficient for the game's requirements at all tested settings, as there are no anomalies in the frame rate data that would suggest memory capacity is being exceeded.
Resolution Scaling
The frame rate drops from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160 reveal a classic GPU-bound scenario. At the Low preset, the average frame rate falls from 171 FPS at 1080p to 69 FPS at 4K, a reduction of 102 FPS, or roughly 60%. This steep decline indicates that the rendering resolution is a primary factor in performance, and the GPU is the limiting component. The pixel count quadruples from 1080p to 4K, and the data reflects this exponential increase in workload.
On the High preset, the progression is from 99 FPS at 1080p to 68 FPS at 1440p, and finally to 40 FPS at 4K. The drop from 1440p to 4K is 28 FPS, while the drop from 1080p to 1440p is 31 FPS. This shows a consistent, heavy penalty for resolution scaling, pointing directly at the GPU's rendering capabilities as the bottleneck. The Ultra preset follows a similar trajectory, with averages of 94 FPS, 65 FPS, and 38 FPS for 1080p, 1440p, and 4K, respectively.
The data suggests that the CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D, is not the primary constraint at higher resolutions. The consistent and proportional drop in frame rates with increased resolution is a hallmark of a GPU-limited system. At 1080p, the high frame rates of 171 FPS on Low and 130 FPS on Medium show that the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU. However, as resolution increases, the GPU's workload becomes more demanding, and its performance ceiling is reached, leaving the CPU with headroom to spare.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data is comprehensive, covering four settings at three resolutions. At 3840x2160, the system delivers an average of 40 FPS on High, 69 FPS on Low, 52 FPS on Medium (with a minimum of 45 FPS and maximum of 60 FPS), and 38 FPS on Ultra. The Ultra preset is the most demanding, while Low is the most performant.
At 2560x1440, the averages are 68 FPS on High, 117 FPS on Low, 89 FPS on Medium (with a minimum of 76 FPS and maximum of 102 FPS), and 65 FPS on Ultra. This resolution shows a strong balance between visual quality and performance, with High and Ultra presets staying above 60 FPS.
At 1920x1080, the averages are 99 FPS on High, 171 FPS on Low, 130 FPS on Medium (with a minimum of 110 FPS and maximum of 149 FPS), and 94 FPS on Ultra. This resolution is where the combination excels, with all presets delivering playable frame rates, and even the Ultra preset comfortably exceeding 90 FPS.
The delta between Medium and Ultra is consistent across resolutions, with Ultra being roughly 30-40% slower in all cases. Conversely, the jump from Medium to Low provides a substantial boost, typically improving frame rates by over 30%. The data indicates that the Medium preset offers the best compromise of visual impact and performance, as it maintains a minimum frame rate above 45 FPS at 4K and above 76 FPS at 1440p.
How This Combo Ranks
In the context of all tested combinations within the database, this specific pairing of the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D and the AMD Radeon RX 9060 ranks 1586 out of 2851 combos. This places it in the 56th percentile, meaning it outperforms a slight majority of the tested systems. This rank reflects the balanced nature of the components, where the high-end CPU is paired with a mid-range GPU.
The CPU's performance is a significant factor in this ranking. The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D has an average benchmark score of 54762, which places it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF (with a score of 55093, a 0.6% difference) and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K (54053, a 1.3% difference), show that the Ryzen 9 is competitively positioned at the top of the processor hierarchy. This high CPU score helps boost the combo's overall standing, even if the GPU's 59th percentile ranking (with an average score of 16014) holds the system back from a higher placement.
The combo's rank of 1586 suggests that while the CPU is a top-tier performer, the GPU prevents the system from reaching the upper echelon of the database. The pairing is less powerful than systems with top-tier GPUs, but the data shows it is not a poor performer. It sits in the middle of the pack, primarily due to the GPU's mid-range positioning relative to other tested graphics cards.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D, a 12-core, 24-thread processor from the 9000 series, provides the computational foundation for this system. It operates with a base clock of 4.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. This high clock speed, combined with the large 128 MB of L3 cache, is designed to deliver exceptional performance in gaming workloads. The CPU's 3DMark 16-thread score is 12490, and its Cinebench R23 multicore score is 47737, with a single-core score of 6739.
In Thief, the CPU's role appears to be secondary to the GPU, as the frame rate scaling is heavily dependent on resolution and settings. The high frame rates at 1080p, reaching up to 171 FPS on Low, indicate that the CPU is not a limiting factor at lower resolutions. The processor has the single-thread performance and multi-core muscle to feed the GPU efficiently.
However, the CPU's influence is less apparent in the frame rate data because the game's engine, from 2014, is unlikely to utilize the full 24 threads. The benchmark results show the CPU's massive multi-threaded capability, with a Passmark multithread score of 56154, but Thief's gameplay is likely more dependent on single-core performance. The CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 1269 and Cinebench R15 single-core score of 679 are strong, suggesting it can handle the game's physics and AI calculations without issue.
The processor's 120W TDP and specifications place it in a high-performance tier, but the measured FPS data shows that the GPU is the decisive factor in this game. The CPU is a high-end component that ensures the system never experiences a CPU-induced bottleneck, allowing the Radeon RX 9060 to operate at its maximum potential. The data confirms that the Ryzen 9 9900X3D is more than sufficient for Thief, and the system's overall performance is dictated by the graphics card's capabilities.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D
AMD Radeon RX 9060
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D + AMD Radeon RX 9060 in Thief
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 69.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 52.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 40.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 38.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 117.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 89.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 68.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 65.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 171.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 130.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 99.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 94.0 |
Thief with Ryzen 9 9900X3D + Other GPUs
See how Thief performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Thief with RX 9060 + Other CPUs
See how Thief performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 9 9900X3D + RX 9060
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.