Thief
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 64 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 27 | 29 | 42 | 49 |
| 1440p QHD | 48 | 50 | 64 | 89 |
| 1080p Full HD | 73 | 74 | 99 | 126 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Thief with AMD Ryzen 9 7900X + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070, In-Depth Analysis
Thief, a 2014 stealth title, responds predictably to this pairing of an AMD Ryzen 9 7900X and a NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070. The measured data shows a system where the GPU is the primary bottleneck at higher settings, while the CPU’s strong single-threaded performance ensures high frame rates when graphical load is reduced. The benchmark results provide a clear picture of how to configure the game for the best balance of visual quality and smoothness.
Settings Recommendations
The measured FPS data for this combo points to High as the most balanced preset for most users, but the choice depends heavily on your target resolution and refresh rate. At 1920x1080, the High preset delivers an average of 74.4 FPS, which is a solidly playable experience for a stealth game. This is the sweet spot, as it offers a significant visual upgrade over Medium while only costing about 24 FPS compared to the Medium preset's 98.7 FPS. The jump from High to Ultra at 1080p is marginal in performance, with a drop of just 1.7 FPS to 72.7 FPS, but the visual gains in a game like this are typically subtle. If you have a 144Hz monitor, the Medium preset at 1080p is the highest setting that stays comfortably above the 90 FPS mark, making it the optimal choice for high-refresh-rate displays.
At 2560x1440, the situation changes. The High preset produces an average of 50 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for fast-paced moments. The Medium preset, at 63.7 FPS, is the recommended starting point for 1440p, as it maintains a frame rate that feels responsive without sacrificing too much visual fidelity. The Low preset at 1440p yields 88.7 FPS, which is excellent for competitive play, but the graphical downgrade is severe. For 4K, the data shows that this combination is not suited for high settings. The Low preset at 3840x2160 is the only viable option for smooth gameplay, producing an average of 49.3 FPS. The High and Ultra presets at 4K fall below 30 FPS (29.3 and 26.5 FPS respectively), which is not a good experience for a game that requires precision and awareness.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 is the definitive performance limiter in this configuration for Thief. The GPU's 8 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 256-bit bus with 256.3 GB/s of bandwidth is sufficient for the game's textures, but its compute capabilities are what cap the frame rates at higher settings. The GPU's benchmark scores reflect its mid-range standing, with a Passmark G3D score of 13498 and a percentile ranking of 51 among all GPUs. This puts it in the middle of the pack, which is consistent with the measured FPS. The boost clock of 1683 MHz is the key factor here; it allows the card to perform at its peak, but that peak is simply not high enough to maintain 60 FPS at 1440p with High settings, where it averages 50 FPS.
The data shows a clear pattern: as settings increase, the average FPS drops significantly, which is a classic sign of GPU-bound performance. The difference between the Low and Ultra presets at 1440p is 40.7 FPS (88.7 vs 48.0 FPS), and at 4K, the difference is 22.8 FPS (49.3 vs 26.5 FPS). This scaling indicates that the GTX 1070's shader throughput (1920 shading units) and texture fillrate (202.0 GTexel/s) are the limiting factors. The card's performance relative to its nearest rivals is tight, with a deltaPct of just -1.4 against the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER, meaning its performance is nearly identical to that card. This places it in a specific performance tier that is adequate for 1080p High and 1440p Medium settings in this title.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS data demonstrates a steep performance drop as resolution increases, which strongly indicates that the GPU is the limiting component. Moving from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 at High settings, the average FPS falls by 24.4 FPS (from 74.4 to 50.0 FPS), a 32.8% reduction. The subsequent jump to 3840x2160 at High settings is even more punishing, dropping another 20.7 FPS to 29.3 FPS, which is a 41.4% reduction from the 1440p figure. This non-linear scaling is characteristic of a GPU that is running out of pixel-pushing capability.
The pattern holds across all presets. At Low settings, the FPS goes from 125.5 at 1080p to 88.7 at 1440p (a 36.8 FPS drop) and then to 49.3 at 4K (a 39.4 FPS drop). This consistent degradation across all settings confirms that the resolution is the primary factor, not the CPU. The Ryzen 9 7900X, with its high boost clock of 5.60 GHz and strong single-thread scores (e.g., 6168 in Cinebench R23 single-core), has ample headroom to feed the GPU at all these resolutions. The fact that the FPS scales down so predictably with pixel count shows that the GTX 1070's rendering pipeline is saturated, and the CPU is not the bottleneck in any of these scenarios.
FAQ
Q: Can this combo run Thief at 4K smoothly?
A: Not at high visual settings. The measured data shows that at 3840x2160, only the Low preset achieves a playable average of 49.3 FPS. The Medium preset drops to 41.8 FPS, while High and Ultra fall to 29.3 and 26.5 FPS respectively, which are too low for a comfortable experience.
Q: What is the best preset for a 1080p 144Hz monitor?
A: The Medium preset is the highest setting that reliably exceeds 90 FPS, with an average of 98.7 FPS at 1920x1080. While the High preset offers 74.4 FPS, it will not fully utilize a 144Hz display's refresh rate, making Medium the better choice for maximizing smoothness.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck at 1440p?
A: The data indicates the GPU is the limiting factor. At 2560x1440, the average FPS ranges from 88.7 on Low to 48.0 on Ultra. The Ryzen 9 7900X is far more powerful than needed for this game, so the performance is dictated by the GTX 1070's ability to render frames at that resolution.
Q: How much performance do I gain by dropping from High to Low at 1080p?
A: The measured data shows a gain of 51.1 FPS, jumping from an average of 74.4 FPS on High to 125.5 FPS on Low at 1920x1080. This is a substantial 68.7% improvement, but it comes with a significant reduction in visual quality.
Q: Is the GTX 1070's 8 GB of VRAM enough for this game?
A: The benchmark results show no signs of VRAM-related stuttering or crashes, as the game runs consistently at all tested settings. The 8 GB capacity and 256.3 GB/s of bandwidth are sufficient for Thief's engine at these configurations, as the performance scaling is smooth and predictable.
Q: How does this combo compare to the GTX 1650 SUPER?
A: According to the GPU's benchmark data, the GTX 1070 has an average score of 12331, which is -1.4% compared to the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER's score of 12504. This means their overall performance is nearly identical, so you can expect similar frame rates in Thief from those two cards.
How This Combo Ranks
In the database of tested combinations for Thief, this pairing of the Ryzen 9 7900X and GTX 1070 ranks at 1407 out of 1642 combos. This places it in the lower 15% of all tested systems, which is a direct reflection of the GPU's limitations. The CPU is a top-tier performer, with an average benchmark score of 50556 and a percentile ranking of 93 among all CPUs, but its power is irrelevant here. The combo rank confirms the fact that in a GPU-bound title like Thief, the graphics card dictates the overall standing. This rank is not a surprise given the GTX 1070's mid-range percentile of 51, and it tells a clear story: this is a system where the CPU is vastly overqualified for the GPU, resulting in a configuration that is held back by its graphics hardware.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X plays a supporting, yet crucial, role in this configuration. With 12 cores and 24 threads based on the Zen 4 architecture, this CPU has an immense amount of processing power that is largely untapped by Thief. The game's engine, being from 2014, does not scale well with many cores, but it benefits greatly from strong single-thread performance. The 7900X excels here, with a boost clock of 5.60 GHz and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6168. This ensures that the CPU can always feed the GPU with draw calls and game logic without becoming a bottleneck, even at 1080p Low where the frame rate reaches 125.5 FPS.
The data shows that the CPU is not the limiting factor in any of the measured scenarios. The FPS scaling is entirely dependent on resolution and settings, which are GPU-centric workloads. The CPU's high performance, evidenced by its 3DMark single-thread score of 1093 and Passmark single-thread score of 4238, means that it can easily handle the game's physics and AI calculations. Its 64 MB of shared L3 cache also helps with data locality, reducing latency. In practical terms, the Ryzen 9 7900X ensures that the GTX 1070 is always working at its maximum potential, but it cannot compensate for the GPU's raw pixel-pushing limits. This is a classic case of a high-end modern CPU paired with a mid-range older GPU, where the CPU provides a stable platform but the GPU defines the experience.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 9 7900X + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 in Thief
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 49.3 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 41.8 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 29.3 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 26.5 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 88.7 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 63.7 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 50.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 48.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 125.5 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 98.7 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 74.4 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 72.7 |
Thief with GTX 1070 + Other CPUs
See how Thief performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 9 7900X + GTX 1070
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.