Thief
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 71 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 31 | 33 | 43 | 57 |
| 1440p QHD | 54 | 56 | 74 | 97 |
| 1080p Full HD | 78 | 82 | 108 | 142 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Thief with AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060, In-Depth Analysis
Thief, a 2014 stealth title, presents an interesting case study in how modern hardware handles a legacy game. The combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F processor and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 graphics card produces a range of results that shift dramatically based on resolution and settings. The data reveals a system where the CPU is immensely powerful for this workload, while the GPU becomes the definitive bottleneck at higher resolutions. This pairing lands at rank 2251 out of 2851 tested combos for this game, placing it in the lower-middle tier of the database, which is a telling statistic for a CPU that ranks in the 94th percentile overall.
CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results
The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F is a formidable processor on paper, built on the Zen 5 architecture and codenamed Granite Ridge. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. This configuration, paired with a 32 MB shared L3 cache, provides a massive amount of computational headroom. In synthetic benchmarks, its single-thread score is 4691, and its multithread score is 36470, placing it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. Its average benchmark score of 69996 puts it in a statistical tie with rivals like the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX (0.2% faster), the Intel Core i7-14700KF (0.2% slower), and the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (0.7% faster). For a game like Thief, which was released in 2014 and is not known for demanding modern multi-core scaling, this CPU is almost certainly not the limiting factor.
The evidence for this lies in the measured FPS data. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves 142 FPS. When the settings are bumped to Ultra, the FPS drops to 78. If the CPU were the primary constraint, we would expect the FPS to remain relatively flat across different settings, as the CPU workload for game logic and physics doesn't change as drastically as the GPU workload for rendering. The fact that the FPS scales so significantly with settings, even at 1080p, points directly to the GPU being the performance ceiling. The Ryzen 7 9700F's high boost clock and strong single-thread performance (4691 in Passmark) are more than sufficient to feed the RTX 2060 in this title. The data suggests that the CPU is in a state of relative idle, waiting on the GPU to finish its frame rendering tasks.
FAQ — 4-6 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data
Q: At which resolution and settings does the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + RTX 2060 combo achieve the highest frame rate?
A: The highest average frame rate is 142 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 (1080p) with Low settings.
Q: How does the frame rate at 4K Ultra compare to the frame rate at 1080p Ultra?
A: At 4K Ultra, the combo averages 31 FPS, while at 1080p Ultra, it averages 78 FPS. This represents a significant drop of 47 FPS when moving from 1080p to 4K at the same Ultra settings.
Q: What is the only resolution/settings combination where the average FPS falls below 35?
A: The only combination with an average FPS below 35 is at 3840x2160 (4K) with Ultra settings, which yields an average of 31 FPS. The 4K High setting is close, at 33 FPS, but it does not fall below the 35 FPS threshold.
Q: Is there a significant performance difference between the High and Ultra presets at 1440p?
A: Yes, the difference is measurable. At 2560x1440, the High preset averages 56 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 54 FPS. This is a small 2 FPS difference, suggesting the visual gains from Ultra might come at a relatively low performance cost at this resolution.
Q: How does the Ryzen 7 9700F's average benchmark score compare to its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX?
A: The Ryzen 7 9700F has an average benchmark score of 69996, while its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX, has an average score of 69875. This makes the 9700F effectively 0.2% slower than the 7940HX in the database's average scoring.
Q: Does the RTX 2060's performance place it closer to a high-end or low-end GPU in the database's rankings?
A: The RTX 2060 sits in the 58th percentile of all GPUs, which places it in the mid-range tier. Its average benchmark score of 15290 is nearly identical to that of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 (0% difference) and only 0.8% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 7600.
Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component
The resolution scaling data paints a clear picture of a GPU-bound system. When moving from 1080p to 1440p on the High preset, the average FPS drops from 82 to 56, a decrease of 26 FPS (or roughly 32%). The jump from 1440p to 4K on the same High preset is even more dramatic, with the average FPS falling from 56 to 33, a drop of 23 FPS (or roughly 41%). This pattern is consistent across all settings. At Low settings, the FPS goes from 142 at 1080p, to 97 at 1440p, and finally to 57 at 4K. The linear and substantial impact of resolution scaling indicates that the RTX 2060's rendering capabilities are being saturated.
This behavior is the classic signature of a GPU bottleneck. If the CPU were the limiting factor, the frame rate would be largely independent of resolution, as the CPU's workload (draw calls, physics, game logic) remains constant regardless of how many pixels are being rendered. The fact that doubling the pixel count from 1080p to 4K nearly halves the frame rate at every settings level is definitive proof. The RTX 2060, with its 6 GB of GDDR6 memory and 192-bit memory bus, is being pushed to its limits at 4K, a resolution that demands far more pixel throughput and memory bandwidth than it can provide for a smooth experience. The data shows that 4K is simply not a viable target for this GPU in Thief, except at the lowest settings where it still only manages an average of 57 FPS.
How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos
The combo of the Ryzen 7 9700F and RTX 2060 holds a rank of 2251 out of 2851 tested combinations for Thief. This places it in the bottom 21% of all tested systems, which is a surprising result given the strength of the CPU. This ranking is heavily influenced by the GPU's performance, as the database's ranking for this game appears to be primarily determined by the measured FPS. The RTX 2060, while a capable card, is a mid-range part from the Turing generation, and its performance in this older title is what drags the overall combo rank down. The CPU's high percentile ranking (94th) does not translate directly into a high combo ranking for this game because the GPU is the limiting factor.
When looking at the GPU's nearest rivals, the picture becomes even clearer. The RTX 2060's average benchmark score of 15290 is virtually identical to that of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 (0% delta) and the AMD Radeon 680M (0.1% delta). It is only 0.6% faster than the RTX 3050 OEM and 0.8% faster than the AMD Radeon RX 7600. This puts the RTX 2060 in a performance class that is simply not designed for high-refresh or high-resolution gaming in demanding scenarios. While the Ryzen 7 9700F is a top-tier modern CPU, the pairing with this GPU creates a significant imbalance, resulting in a combo rank that reflects the weaker component's capabilities.
Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers
The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of the combo's performance across a matrix of resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the combo is quite capable. The Low preset yields an average of 142 FPS, providing a very smooth experience. The Medium preset averages 108 FPS, with a minimum of 91 FPS and a maximum of 124 FPS. The High preset averages 82 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 78 FPS. All 1080p settings are playable, with even the most demanding Ultra preset staying well above 60 FPS.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance drops noticeably. The Low preset averages 97 FPS, which is still very good. The Medium preset averages 74 FPS (min 63, max 85). The High preset drops to 56 FPS, and the Ultra preset falls to 54 FPS. At this resolution, the High and Ultra presets are starting to become marginal for a 60 FPS target. Finally, at 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly overburdened. The Low preset is the only playable option, averaging 57 FPS. The Medium preset drops to 43 FPS (min 37, max 50). The High preset averages 33 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 31 FPS. The 4K data confirms that this combination is not suited for high-fidelity gaming at this resolution.
Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows
Based solely on the measured data, the optimal experience for a 60 FPS target is at 1080p with the High preset. This configuration delivers an average of 82 FPS, providing a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS threshold while still offering a substantial visual upgrade over the Low preset. The Medium preset at 1080p is also an excellent choice, with an average of 108 FPS and a minimum of 91 FPS, ensuring a very fluid experience with no noticeable dips. For players with high-refresh-rate monitors, the Low preset at 1080p, with its 142 FPS average, is the only way to approach 144 Hz, but it comes with the visual compromises of the lowest settings.
At 1440p, the data suggests that the Medium preset is the sweet spot. It is the only preset at this resolution that maintains an average FPS above 70, coming in at 74 FPS. The High and Ultra presets, at 56 and 54 FPS respectively, are technically playable but will not hold a consistent 60 FPS. For 4K, the data is clear: only the Low preset is viable for consistent gameplay, with an average of 57 FPS. The Medium preset's minimum of 37 FPS indicates significant stuttering potential. Therefore, for the best balance of visual quality and performance, 1080p High is the recommended starting point, with 1440p Medium being a strong alternative for those prioritizing resolution over some graphical details.
GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 is the definitive performance limiter in this pairing for Thief. Based on the Turing architecture, this GPU has a base clock of 1365 MHz and a boost clock of 1680 MHz. It is equipped with 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 336.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. While these specs were respectable for 2019, they are challenged by the demands of 4K rendering. The 6 GB VRAM capacity is a potential concern, as modern games and high-resolution textures can exceed this limit, but for a 2014 title like Thief, the bottleneck is more likely the raw compute throughput.
The GPU's benchmark scores reflect its mid-range status. It has a Passmark G3D score of 14111 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 65014. Its performance is nearly identical to the older GTX 580, which confirms how much performance per watt has improved, but it also shows the absolute performance ceiling. The 58th percentile ranking for the GPU, compared to the CPU's 94th percentile, perfectly illustrates the system's imbalance. The RTX 2060's 160W TDP and dual-slot design are typical for its class, but the data shows that it simply does not have enough processing power or memory bandwidth to feed the Ryzen 7 9700F at higher resolutions. The result is a system where the CPU is left waiting for the GPU, capping the overall frame rate and defining the experience across all tested settings.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 9700F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 in Thief
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 57.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 43.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 33.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 31.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 97.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 74.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 56.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 54.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 142.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 108.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 82.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 78.0 |
Thief with Ryzen 7 9700F + Other GPUs
See how Thief performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Thief with RTX 2060 + Other CPUs
See how Thief performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 9700F + RTX 2060
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.