Thief
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 125 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 80 | 84 | 110 | 123 |
| 1440p QHD | 118 | 120 | 133 | 147 |
| 1080p Full HD | 134 | 136 | 150 | 166 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Thief with AMD Ryzen 7 5700X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 form an exceptionally fast pairing for Thief, a 2014 stealth title from the benchmark database. This combination produces measured average frame rates between 80 and 166 FPS across low, medium, high, and ultra presets at resolutions from 1920×1080 to 3840×2160, and it ranks 555th out of 3,720 tested system combinations. The CPU, with 8 cores and 16 threads, and the GPU, a 24 GB GDDR6X monster, each bring specific strengths that dictate how this game scales between resolutions.
CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results
The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X is built on the Zen 3 architecture, specifically the Vermeer design that uses a 7 nm process from TSMC. It runs with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, with 8 cores and 16 threads. The TDP is 65 W, the socket is AMD Socket AM4, and the launch MSRP is $299. The CPU has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. Its integrated memory controller supports dual-channel DDR4 with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, and it offers ECC memory support.
When run through synthetic workloads, the 5700X performs well among desktop CPUs. It achieves a Cinebench R23 score of 13,184 in multi-core and 1,499 in single-core, while Geekbench reports 10,779 (multi) and 2,016 (single). Its average benchmark score across all tests is 27,578, and its average rank places it in the 79th percentile of all CPUs. The nearest rivals measured in the database show that the CPU is essentially tied with the Intel Core i5-12600K (0% delta), edges out the AMD Ryzen 7 5800 by 0.2%, and overcomes the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X by 0.2% and the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H by 0.3%. No CPU-side spec causes a major bottleneck for Thief; the game is not a heavy multi-threaded workload. Even at the fastest settings where the measured frame rate climbs to 166 FPS at 1080p Low, the 5700X has the per-core performance and enough thread capacity to feed the RTX 4090 without leaving obvious performance on the table. The single-thread headroom (3DMark single-thread 921, Geekbench single-core 2016) also aligns with the game’s age, which means the core clock may matter more than multi-thread scaling. The data suggests the CPU is more than sufficient for this game, and the system is not CPU-bound when the GPU is driven hard.
GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture (AD102) and fabricated on a 5nm node at TSMC. It has 16,384 shading units, 512 TMUs, and 176 ROPs, along with 128 ray-tracing cores and 512 tensor cores. The GPU’s memory is 24 GB of GDDR6X on a 384-bit bus, delivering 1.1 TB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1313 MHz with an effective speed of 21 Gbps. Core clocks are a modest base of 2235 MHz and a boost of 2520 MHz, and the card has a rated TDP of 450 W, suggested power supply of 850 W, and a triple-slot cooler. Its launch MSRP is 1,499 USD (exact value 1,599 USD). This GPU is capable of extreme power, and its observed data in this game reflects that.
The RTX 4090’s computational beef shows up in benchmark scores: it posts a PassMark G3D score of 38,194, a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 9,223, and an average benchmark score of 60,347 across all tests. Its percentile among all GPUs is 88th. The nearest rival scores indicate a tie with the Intel Arc Pro A60 (0% delta), a 0.3% margin over the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48, a ‑2.5% delta versus AMD Radeon Pro W6600M, and a 2.9% delta versus AMD Radeon PRO V710. In Thief, the RTX 4090 appears to be the primary driver of scalability: when the resolution increases, the frame rate drops because the GPU is doing more of the rendering the game in a graphics-bound way. At the tested 4K resolution, the High preset gives an average of 84 FPS, while Ultra yields 80 FPS. In comparison, at 1080p the same presets hit 136 and 134 FPS respectively. The clear relationship between settings and frame rate indicates the RTX 4090 is the component that scales the visuals of this game, whereas the CPU stays in the background, ready to feed data at higher rates than Thief can utilize. The large 24 GB frame buffer and 1.1 TB/s of bandwidth also ensure that even at the heaviest 4K texture payloads the GPU never appears to fall short on memory capacity.
Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component
The measured frames at three resolutions show a consistent scaling pattern that points to the RTX 4090 as the chief limiter at 4K, while still holding a playable frame rate across all settings. At 1080p, the Low preset averages 166 FPS, Medium 150 FPS, High 136 FPS, and Ultra 134 FPS. Moving to 1440p reduces those averages to 147, 133, 120, and 118 FPS respectively. At 4K (2160p), the Low setting falls to 123 FPS, Medium to 110 FPS, High to 84 FPS, and Ultra to 80 FPS. The gaps between each resolution step are large and highlight the GPU‑bound nature of the game. Between 1080p and 1440p, the frames drop by roughly 25% at High, but from 1440p to 4K the drop widens further, with High’s frame rate almost halving (from 120 to 84 FPS). This pattern indicates that, as resolution climbs toward 4K, the pixel fill rate and memory bandwidth of the RTX 4090 become the decisive factors, while the Ryzen 7 5700X’s edge doesn’t shift across resolutions. The existence of version-controlled frames for Medium at all resolutions (min 94 FPS at 4K, 113 at 1440p, 128 at 1080p) shows that frame pacing is stable under mid settings, which is a good sign for a smooth experience in a stealth game that requires precise timing They claim focused. Because even at Ultra, the 4K average remains at 80 FPS, the game’s engine appears to be placing limited pressure on the CPU side. In short, the resolution scale analysis refells the typical story for a high-end GPU: the 5700X handles the engine thread scaling fine, but the real headroom and the bottleneck sit in the GPU’s rendering pipeline at higher resolutions.
Setup Recommendations — which preset gives the best ability to run the game well
Based on the measured data, the Medium preset is the most balanced option. At 4K, Medium yields an average of 110 FPS with a measured minimum of 94 FPS and a maximum of 127 FPS. That is notably higher than High (84 FPS) and Ultra (80 FPS), and still only 13 FPS below Low at 123 FPS. The step to Low from Medium is more than enough to notice the visual quality trade‑off, but the difference of 13 FPS (for 4K) or 17 FPS (at 1440p or 1080p) is not proportionally large when the game’s frame times already stay within a smooth range. At 1440p, Medium again provides the best combination of speed and image quality: 133 FPS average with a low of 113, while High averages 120 and Ultra 118. At 1080p, Medium 150 FPS carries a 150% increase of headroom over High (136) and stays very close to Low’s 166, but with richer shadows and textures. The pattern in all three resolutions is identical: Medium gives the single highest midpoint between average frames per second and the likely visual fidelity lifting of the Visual setting beyond that lower step. For any resolution the system’s experience can be made even more advantageous by switching to Medium. The data does not show a circumstance where stepping all the way to Ultra offers a meaningful performance or experience benefit—at many resolutions, Ultra actually ties with High in average. So for this particular pair of CPU and GPU, the "on‑balance" recommendation is to pick Medium, specifically because it affords the best frame rate per workload setting in the table keeping the highest quality slider level that reveals a larger FPS fraction than the lower two presets.
How This Combination Ranks
The AMDRyzen7 5700X + RTX 4090 ranks 555th out of 3,720 tested combinations for Thief. This could be interpreted as “solidly in the top proportions” of the tested set—there are 3,720 entries, so position 555 places it strong inside the upper tail. By comparison, the CPU alone sits in the 79th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits in the 88th percentile among all GPUs. The combination is not to be mistaken for the absolute top of the load due to the CPU being a mid-range part that holds a smaller percentile than the GPU; the pair places it significantly up in frame handling, but not above combos with top-end CPUs. The rank 555 specifically ties to the two-part aspect: the RTX 4090 is a top-percent block, but the 5700X’s 8-core/16-thread compute footer means that at 1080p it may hold back some , but overall for this game the performance is strong. The measured data set includes only one combo (this one), so there is no other combination to directly compare with this exact list, but the averaging of the two components’ percentile ratings has an expected values in the same region. Since Thief is a slower-moving, stealth-focused game, the 555 rank still represents a highly capable desktop pairing, perfectly suitable for high monitor refresh setups, and the fact that the rank is not lower reflects the intersection of the two strong halves; the CPU adds fine, and the GPU adds full FPS numbers.
Common Questions (FAQ)
Q: What is the average frame rate at 4K with High settings?
A: The data lists 84 FPS at 3840×2160 with High settings.
Q: Do the minimum and maximum frame rates climb no matter which resolution?
A: The only settings that include min and max measurements are Medium at each resolution: 1080p Medium 128–173 FPS, 1440p Medium 113–152 FPS, and 4K Medium 94–127 FPS. High, Low, and Ultra presets always show an average but no lower/upper cap.
Q: How does the Ryzen 7 5700X compare to its closest scoring competitor per the benchmark averages?
**A: The 5700X has an average score of 27,578, which matches the Intel Core i5-12600K’s score with a 0% delta; the AMD Ryzen 7 5800 is 0.2% off, and the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X and Intel Core Ultra 5 125H are 0.2% and 2.9% slower respectively.
Q: What is the effective memory bandwidth of the RTX 4090 used in this data?
**A: The 24 GB GDDR6X video memory is paired with a 384-bit bus, delivering 1.1 TB/s of bandwidth.
Q: Is the RTX 4090 at the end of its production lifecycle?
**A: Yes, the GPU is marked as End-of-life (production status) in the data, even though it still ranks at the 88th percentile among all GPUs.
Q: For a resolution, which preset gives the strongest FPS?
**A: Low always runs the highest average FPS at each resolution (166 at 1080p, 147 at 1440p, 123 at 4K). However, Medium avoids large detail loss and still yields a strong average (150 at 1080p, 133 at 1440p, 110 at 4K), which defeats High and Ultra with a relatively small performance gap.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 5700X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 in Thief
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 123.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 110.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 84.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 80.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 147.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 133.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 120.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 118.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 166.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 150.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 136.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 134.0 |
Thief with Ryzen 7 5700X + Other GPUs
See how Thief performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Thief with RTX 4090 + Other CPUs
See how Thief performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 5700X + RTX 4090
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.