Thief

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER combination ranks 979th out of 1,642 tested combos in Thief, placing it in the upper-middle tier of the database. With the CPU sitting at the 83rd percentile among all processors and the GPU at the 65th percentile among all graphics cards, the pairing is well-balanced for this 2014 stealth title. The benchmark results show a system that can handle the game comfortably at 1080p and 1440p, though 4K Ultra pushes it to the edge of playability.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo’s rank of 979 out of 1,642 tested configurations represents a solid mid-pack standing. This position makes sense given the component mix: the CPU is a strong performer relative to its peers, while the GPU is more modest in its percentile placement. The data indicates that in Thief, this pairing outperforms a significant portion of the tested combos, but it is not near the top tier where high-end current-generation hardware resides.

The CPU’s nearest rivals in aggregate benchmarks illustrate its competitive position. The Intel Core i9-11900KF scores 26,196, a mere 0.1% behind the Ryzen 7 5700X’s 26,214 average. The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X edges ahead by 0.2% with a score of 26,272, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U is 0.2% ahead at 26,262. The tight clustering of these scores — all within a fraction of a percent — shows that the 5700X delivers performance squarely in line with several modern alternatives, making it a capable foundation for this game.

On the GPU side, the RTX 2070 SUPER’s nearest rivals show a similar pattern of close competition. The NVIDIA RTX A400 scores 22,307, which is 0.5% higher, while the GeForce GTX TITAN Z trails by 0.9% at 22,006. The RTX 4060 Mobile is 2.3% ahead at 22,729, and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 sits 2.5% behind at 21,670. These margins are small, suggesting that the 2070 SUPER holds its own against a range of contemporaries in synthetic tests, which translates into competitive frame rates in Thief.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is built on the Turing architecture with the TU104 chip, fabricated on a 12 nm process at TSMC. The GPU packs 2,560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation processors, along with 40 RT cores and 320 tensor cores. Its base clock runs at 1,605 MHz, boosting to 1,770 MHz, while the 8 GB of GDDR6 memory operates at 1,750 MHz with a 256-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. This memory configuration is well-suited to Thief’s demands, providing enough capacity and throughput for high-resolution textures without becoming a bottleneck.

The GPU’s compute capabilities include a pixel rate of 113.3 GPixel/s, a texture rate of 283.2 GTexel/s, and FP32 performance of 9.062 TFLOPS. These figures indicate a card that can handle the lighting and shadow effects prevalent in a stealth game like Thief, where the ability to render dynamic environments smoothly is crucial. The measured frames per second at various settings confirm that the GPU is the primary driver of performance in this title, as frame rates scale predictably with resolution and quality adjustments.

The RTX 2070 SUPER’s support for DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 ensures compatibility with modern rendering paths, though Thief’s 2014 release date means the game likely relies on older API versions. Nevertheless, the card’s raw throughput is sufficient to deliver strong results, as seen in the measured FPS data. The GPU’s thermal design power of 215 W and dual-slot footprint are reasonable for a card of this performance class, and the 1x 6-pin plus 1x 8-pin power connectors align with its power requirements.

FAQ

Q: What is the combo’s overall ranking in Thief?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER ranks 979th out of 1,642 tested combos in Thief, placing it in the upper-middle portion of the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in aggregate benchmarks?

A: The Ryzen 7 5700X averages a score of 26,214. It is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i9-11900KF (26,196), 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT (26,161), and 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (26,262) and AMD Ryzen 5 7600X (26,272).

Q: What frame rate can I expect at 1080p with Ultra settings?

A: At 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, the combo achieves an average of 97 FPS. High settings yield 99 FPS, Medium delivers 127.4 FPS, and Low reaches 168.5 FPS.

Q: Is 4K gaming viable with this setup?

A: At 3840x2160, High settings produce 38.3 FPS and Ultra yields 38.6 FPS, which is borderline playable. Dropping to Medium improves this to 50.8 FPS, while Low settings deliver a more comfortable 71.1 FPS.

Q: How does the GPU’s benchmark score compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 2070 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 22,206. It trails the NVIDIA RTX A400 by 0.5% (22,307) and the RTX 4060 Mobile by 2.3% (22,729), but it leads the GeForce GTX TITAN Z by 0.9% (22,006) and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 by 2.5% (21,670).

Q: What memory specifications does the GPU have?

A: The RTX 2070 SUPER features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s and an effective memory clock of 14 Gbps.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data reveals a clear performance hierarchy across resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the combo delivers strong results: Low settings average 168.5 FPS, Medium hits 127.4 FPS, High reaches 99 FPS, and Ultra settles at 97 FPS. These numbers indicate that at 1080p, the system is never CPU-limited, as even the most demanding settings maintain near-triple-digit frame rates. The gap between High and Ultra is minimal at just 2 FPS, suggesting that the visual quality increase from Ultra adds little performance cost at this resolution.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain respectable but show a more pronounced drop. Low settings average 116 FPS, Medium delivers 88.8 FPS, High manages 66.3 FPS, and Ultra drops to 65.5 FPS. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p at High settings reduces performance by roughly 33%, from 99 FPS to 66.3 FPS, which is a significant but expected hit given the increased pixel count. The Ultra setting at 1440p (65.5 FPS) is nearly identical to High, again showing that the GPU handles the extra quality settings without substantial additional strain.

At 3840x2160, the system begins to struggle with higher settings. Low settings average 71.1 FPS, which remains playable, but Medium drops to 50.8 FPS, High falls to 38.3 FPS, and Ultra is nearly identical at 38.6 FPS. The 4K results highlight the GPU’s limitations: while it can handle lower quality settings, pushing to High or Ultra at this resolution results in frame rates below the 40 FPS threshold, which may feel choppy in a game that relies on smooth movement for stealth mechanics. The minimal difference between High and Ultra at 4K (0.3 FPS) suggests that the GPU is fully saturated at this resolution, with the rendering pipeline becoming the limiting factor.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K provides insight into which component is the bottleneck. At Low settings, the progression from 168.5 FPS at 1080p to 116 FPS at 1440p to 71.1 FPS at 4K shows a steady decline that tracks closely with the increase in pixel count. This pattern indicates that the GPU is the primary limiting factor, as the CPU has ample headroom to feed the graphics card at lower resolutions. The 57% drop from 1080p to 4K at Low settings is consistent with a GPU-bound scenario.

At Ultra settings, the scaling is even more pronounced. The frame rate falls from 97 FPS at 1080p to 65.5 FPS at 1440p to 38.6 FPS at 4K, a total reduction of 60% across the resolution range. The fact that High and Ultra settings produce nearly identical results at both 1440p (66.3 vs. 65.5 FPS) and 4K (38.3 vs. 38.6 FPS) suggests that the GPU’s shading and memory bandwidth are exhausted, and the additional quality features in Ultra do not add meaningful visual improvement at these resolutions. The RTX 2070 SUPER’s 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p and 1440p, but at 4K, the card’s compute throughput becomes the limiting factor, capping frame rates in the high-30s regardless of whether High or Ultra is selected.

The data shows that for optimal playability, users should target 1080p or 1440p with this combo. At 1080p, all settings are playable, with even Ultra exceeding 90 FPS. At 1440p, Medium settings provide a smooth 88.8 FPS, while High and Ultra hover around 66 FPS, which is acceptable for a slower-paced stealth game. The 4K resolution is only viable at Low or Medium settings, where the frame rate remains above 50 FPS, but the visual compromise may not be worth the resolution gain. Overall, the benchmark results indicate a balanced pairing that excels at mainstream resolutions but falls short of high-refresh 4K gaming.