Thief
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 99 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 44 | 48 | 62 | 77 |
| 1440p QHD | 73 | 79 | 103 | 132 |
| 1080p Full HD | 108 | 115 | 148 | 197 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Thief with AMD Ryzen 5 7600X + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT delivers a robust performance profile in Thief, a 2014 stealth title that proves remarkably scalable across modern hardware. The data shows a combination that prioritizes high refresh rate gameplay at mainstream resolutions while remaining competent at 4K, with the GPU acting as the definitive performance ceiling. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS, scaling behavior, and how this specific pairing ranks against the broader database of tested combinations.
Resolution Scaling
The performance drop from 1080p to 4K is steep and consistent, clearly identifying the Radeon RX 6750 XT as the limiting component in this pairing. At Ultra settings, the average frame rate falls from 108 FPS at 1920x1080 to 72.6 FPS at 2560x1440, a reduction of 35.4 FPS, and then further down to 43.9 FPS at 3840x2160. This represents a total loss of 64.1 FPS from 1080p to 4K, a 59.4% decrease in performance, which is typical for a GPU-bound scenario where pixel throughput becomes the primary constraint.
The scaling pattern is consistent across all settings presets. At Low settings, the transition from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 yields a drop from 196.8 FPS to 132.2 FPS, a significant 64.6 FPS decline. Moving to 4K at Low settings further reduces the average to 77.2 FPS. This indicates that even when the graphical load is minimized, the GPU's rendering capabilities are still the bottleneck, as the Ryzen 5 7600X's six Zen 4 cores are more than capable of feeding frames at these rates.
The relative scaling between resolutions is also telling. At 1440p, the High preset achieves 79 FPS, which is only 1.3 FPS higher than the 4K Medium result of 62.1 FPS. This suggests that for this specific combination, resolution has a more pronounced impact on frame rate than the quality preset itself. The data implies that users seeking a balance between visual fidelity and smoothness would find the most headroom at 2560x1440, where even the Ultra preset maintains a playable 72.6 FPS, while the High preset at 1080p offers a comfortable 114.6 FPS for high-refresh-rate displays.
Settings Recommendations
The benchmark results indicate that the optimal settings preset depends heavily on the target resolution and desired frame rate. For 1920x1080, the data shows that the Ultra preset, averaging 108 FPS, provides a complete visual experience without sacrificing fluidity. This makes it the clear choice for 1080p gaming, as the drop from Ultra to High only yields a marginal 6.6 FPS gain, which is unlikely to be perceptible to most users.
At 2560x1440, the situation becomes more nuanced. The Ultra preset's 72.6 FPS average is acceptable, but the High preset at 79 FPS offers a better balance, providing a 6.4 FPS improvement while presumably reducing some demanding effects. However, the Medium preset at 102.9 FPS is the standout performer at this resolution, delivering a frame rate that is 30.3 FPS higher than Ultra. This suggests that for competitive or fast-paced play, Medium at 1440p is the most effective configuration, offering a significant performance boost that outweighs the visual downgrade from High or Ultra.
For 4K, the data reveals a clear hierarchy. The Ultra preset's 43.9 FPS average is below the 60 FPS threshold, making it a less desirable option for smooth gameplay. The High preset at 47.7 FPS offers only a marginal improvement, while Medium at 62.1 FPS crosses into playable territory. The Low preset at 77.2 FPS is the only option that provides a substantial margin above 60 FPS. The recommendation here is to prioritize the Medium preset for 4K, as it offers a playable frame rate while retaining a moderate level of graphical detail. The jump from Medium to High at 4K costs 14.4 FPS, which is a steep price for the incremental visual upgrade.
How This Combo Ranks
In the context of the entire benchmark database, this specific CPU-GPU pairing holds a strong position. The data shows a combo rank of 699 out of 1642 tested combinations, placing it in the upper-middle tier of all systems. This percentile placement, roughly in the 57th percentile, indicates that while it is not a top-tier enthusiast setup, it outperforms more than half of the other tested configurations in Thief.
This ranking is a product of the balance between the two components. The Ryzen 5 7600X is a highly capable processor, sitting in the 83rd percentile against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 26272. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, has a nearly identical score of 26262 with a deltaPct of 0, showing the 7600X's strong multi-threaded performance. The Radeon RX 6750 XT, while slightly less dominant, still ranks in the 79th percentile against all GPUs, with an average score of 35327. Its closest competitor in the database is the AMD Radeon RX 5600M, which scores 35264, a deltaPct of 0.2.
The combination's rank of 699 suggests that the GPU's performance is the limiting factor in this specific game. While the CPU is powerful enough to avoid being a bottleneck, the GPU's position, being slightly behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 in the database, prevents this combo from climbing higher. The data indicates that this pairing is well-suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but its rank reflects a performance ceiling that is defined by the RX 6750 XT's capabilities in this title.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of the combo's performance across all tested scenarios. At 1920x1080, the average frame rates are consistently high. The Low preset achieves 196.8 FPS, which is the highest recorded result for this pairing. The Medium preset follows at 148 FPS, while High and Ultra deliver 114.6 FPS and 108 FPS, respectively. The spread between Low and Ultra is 88.8 FPS, demonstrating the significant impact of quality settings at this resolution.
At 2560x1440, the performance scales down proportionally. The Low preset averages 132.2 FPS, which remains highly playable. The Medium preset produces 102.9 FPS, while High and Ultra deliver 79 FPS and 72.6 FPS, respectively. The difference between the highest and lowest settings at this resolution is 59.6 FPS, showing that the GPU is starting to feel the load of higher pixel counts.
At 3840x2160, the frame rates drop to more modest levels. The Low preset averages 77.2 FPS, which is the only setting to provide a smooth experience. The Medium preset follows at 62.1 FPS, while High and Ultra produce 47.7 FPS and 43.9 FPS, respectively. The gap between Low and Ultra at 4K is 33.3 FPS, which is the smallest spread across all resolutions, indicating that the GPU is saturated and the settings have less relative impact on overall performance.
GPU Role
The Radeon RX 6750 XT's role in this pairing is defined by its memory configuration and clock speeds. The GPU features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. This memory capacity is sufficient for Thief, a 2014 title, ensuring that texture loading and data streaming do not become a bottleneck, even at 4K resolution.
The card's clock speeds are set at a base of 2150 MHz with a boost clock of 2600 MHz, and a game clock of 2495 MHz. These high frequencies are crucial for maintaining the frame rates observed in the data. The boost clock allows the GPU to push performance when thermal and power headroom permits, which is evident in the 1080p results where it achieves nearly 200 FPS at Low settings. The GPU's 13.31 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 416.0 GTexel/s texture rate are key specifications that contribute to its ability to handle the game's rendering demands.
The data confirms that the GPU is the primary driver of performance in this combination. The CPU's role is to feed the GPU with data, and the Ryzen 5 7600X, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, is more than sufficient for this task. The GPU's percentile ranking of 79 against all GPUs, and its position relative to rivals like the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (which has a deltaPct of -1.3), underscores that it is a solid mid-range performer. While it lacks the raw power for maxed-out 4K gaming, its memory bandwidth and clock speeds enable it to deliver a strong 1440p experience, and its 12 GB VRAM ensures it will not be memory-limited in this title.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 7600X + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT in Thief
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 77.2 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 62.1 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 47.7 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 43.9 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 132.2 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 102.9 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 79.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 72.6 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 196.8 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 148.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 114.6 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 108.0 |
Thief with Ryzen 5 7600X + Other GPUs
See how Thief performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Thief with RX 6750 XT + Other CPUs
See how Thief performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 7600X + RX 6750 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.