Thief
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 72 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 34 | 37 | 49 | 61 |
| 1440p QHD | 57 | 63 | 81 | 96 |
| 1080p Full HD | 90 | 93 | 97 | 109 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Thief with AMD Ryzen 5 2600 + AMD Radeon RX 7600, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 and AMD Radeon RX 7600 pairing delivers a solid, if not spectacular, experience in Thief, with benchmark results that highlight a clear GPU bottleneck at higher resolutions. The data shows a system that excels at 1080p and remains playable at 1440p, but struggles to maintain smooth frame rates at 4K.
Settings Recommendations
For this combination, the benchmark data suggests that the "High" preset offers the most balanced experience across all tested resolutions. At 1920x1080, High settings produce 92.6 FPS, which is only 2.6 frames behind the Ultra preset’s 90 FPS, yet it is substantially ahead of Ultra at higher resolutions. The performance gap between presets widens dramatically as resolution increases, making High the most consistent choice.
At 2560x1440, High settings deliver 63.1 FPS, which is comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. The jump to Ultra at this resolution drops performance to 57.4 FPS, a 9% reduction that may be noticeable in fast-moving stealth sequences. Meanwhile, Medium at 1440p offers 80.6 FPS, but the visual fidelity trade-off is not justified given that High maintains playable frame rates.
The 4K results are the deciding factor. High at 3840x2160 produces 37.4 FPS, which is below the playable threshold for most users. Medium at 4K yields 49.3 FPS, while Low reaches 60.5 FPS. Given that the game is a stealth title where fluid movement matters, the data indicates that High at 1440p or 1080p is the optimal choice. For users who insist on 4K, Low settings are the only viable option, as they are the sole preset to reach 60 FPS at that resolution.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 7600 is the primary performance driver in this pairing, equipped with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU's boost clock of 2655 MHz and game clock of 2250 MHz are the key factors behind its performance. The card's 2048 shading units and 64 ROPs handle the game's DirectX 11 workload efficiently, as evidenced by its Passmark DirectX 11 score of 172.
The GPU's role becomes increasingly dominant as resolution scales. At 1080p, the RX 7600 delivers between 90 and 109.1 FPS depending on settings, showing that it has ample headroom. However, the 4K results tell a different story. The drop from 109.1 FPS at 1080p Low to 60.5 FPS at 4K Low represents a 44.5% reduction, while the High preset falls from 92.6 to 37.4 FPS, a 59.6% decrease. This pattern indicates that the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and memory bandwidth become limiting factors at higher resolutions.
The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 16634 places it in the 63rd percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT, which scores 0.6% higher, and the Intel Arc B570, which is 1.5% ahead. The RX 7600's performance in Thief aligns with these general benchmarks, showing that it is a capable mid-range card that can handle older titles like this one at mainstream resolutions.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 5 2600, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, provides adequate processing power for Thief, though it is not the primary bottleneck in most scenarios. The CPU's base clock of 3.40 GHz and boost clock of 3.90 GHz are modest by modern standards, but its 16 MB of shared L3 cache helps maintain consistent frame delivery. The processor's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11186 and single-core score of 1579 indicate that it can handle the game's AI and physics calculations without issue.
The CPU's role becomes more apparent when examining the frame rate scaling from 1080p to 1440p. At 1080p Ultra, the system achieves 90 FPS, while at 1440p Ultra it drops to 57.4 FPS, a 36.2% reduction. This substantial drop, despite the GPU having more work at higher resolution, suggests that the CPU is not the limiting factor at 1080p. If the CPU were the bottleneck, the frame rates at 1080p and 1440p would be much closer together.
The Ryzen 5 2600's Passmark multi-thread score of 13160 and single-thread score of 2239 place it in the 77th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-1345U, which scores 0.4% lower, and the Intel Core i7-10700F, which is 0.7% higher. These benchmarks confirm that the CPU is not holding back the RX 7600 in Thief, as the frame rates scale predictably with resolution changes, a hallmark of GPU-limited performance.
How This Combo Ranks
This specific combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 and AMD Radeon RX 7600 ranks 1316 out of 1642 tested combos in Thief, placing it in the lower 20% of all configurations. This ranking might seem surprising given the individual component scores, but it reflects the age of the CPU relative to the GPU. The Ryzen 5 2600, released in April 2018, is several generations behind the RX 7600, which launched in May 2023.
The combo's rank suggests that while the GPU is capable, the CPU's older architecture limits the overall system performance. The CPU's Zen architecture, built on a 12 nm process, has a memory bandwidth of 46.9 GB/s, which is significantly lower than what newer CPUs can provide. This memory bandwidth constraint may be affecting the system's ability to feed the GPU with data in Thief, particularly in scenes with many objects or complex geometry.
Despite the low ranking, the actual gameplay experience is acceptable at 1080p and 1440p. The rank of 1316 out of 1642 means that 326 other combinations perform worse, and many of those likely use much weaker GPUs. The data indicates that this combo is well-suited for 1080p gaming and can handle 1440p with settings adjustments, but it is not optimized for high-refresh-rate or 4K gaming.
Resolution Scaling
The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals a clear GPU bottleneck. At Low settings, performance drops from 109.1 FPS at 1080p to 96.3 FPS at 1440p, a 11.7% reduction, and then to 60.5 FPS at 4K, a 37.2% reduction from 1440p. This pattern shows that the GPU's memory bandwidth and VRAM capacity are the limiting factors at higher resolutions.
At High settings, the scaling is more severe. The frame rate falls from 92.6 FPS at 1080p to 63.1 FPS at 1440p, a 31.9% decrease, and then to 37.4 FPS at 4K, a 40.7% reduction from 1440p. The 4K High result of 37.4 FPS is below the 40 FPS threshold that many consider the minimum for playable stealth gameplay, making this setting impractical at that resolution.
The Ultra preset shows the most dramatic scaling. From 90 FPS at 1080p, performance drops to 57.4 FPS at 1440p, a 36.2% reduction, and then to 34.1 FPS at 4K, a 40.6% decrease from 1440p. The 4K Ultra result of 34.1 FPS is the lowest recorded for this combo, indicating that the GPU is severely overworked at this setting. The data suggests that the RX 7600's 8 GB VRAM buffer is insufficient for Ultra textures at 4K, causing the system to rely on slower memory transfers.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the system performs admirably across all settings. Low settings yield 109.1 FPS, Medium produces 97.1 FPS, High achieves 92.6 FPS, and Ultra delivers 90 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra is only 19.1 FPS, or 17.5%, indicating that the GPU has enough headroom at this resolution to handle the most demanding presets without significant frame rate penalties.
The 2560x1440 results show more variation between presets. Low settings reach 96.3 FPS, Medium drops to 80.6 FPS, High falls to 63.1 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 57.4 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1440p is 38.9 FPS, or 40.4%, which is more than double the difference seen at 1080p. This widening gap confirms that the GPU is becoming the primary constraint as pixel count increases.
At 3840x2160, the performance drops are substantial. Low settings manage 60.5 FPS, which is the only preset to reach the 60 FPS target. Medium falls to 49.3 FPS, High drops to 37.4 FPS, and Ultra produces just 34.1 FPS. The spread between Low and Ultra at 4K is 26.4 FPS, but the relative difference is 77.4%, showing that the GPU's resources are severely strained at this resolution. The 8 GB VRAM capacity is insufficient for Ultra textures at 4K, leading to the dramatic performance degradation observed in the data.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
AMD Radeon RX 7600
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 2600 + AMD Radeon RX 7600 in Thief
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 60.5 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 49.3 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 37.4 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 34.1 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 96.3 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 80.6 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 63.1 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 57.4 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 109.1 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 97.1 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 92.6 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 90.0 |
Thief with Ryzen 5 2600 + Other GPUs
See how Thief performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Thief with RX 7600 + Other CPUs
See how Thief performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 2600 + RX 7600
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.