The Technomancer

# The Technomancer: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H + AMD Radeon 8050S

This combination of Intel's Core Ultra 7 155H mobile processor and AMD's Radeon 8050S integrated graphics delivers a playable but constrained experience in The Technomancer, a 2016 Action RPG. The measured data shows a system that handles 1080p gaming comfortably across most presets, but struggles to maintain smooth frame rates at higher resolutions. With a combo rank of 2087 out of 2825 tested combinations, this pairing sits in the lower-middle tier of the database, indicating that while it can run the game, it does so with notable compromises at 4K and demanding settings.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K reveals a system that is heavily GPU-bound at higher resolutions. At Medium settings, the average frame rate falls from 107 FPS at 1920x1080 to 70 FPS at 2560x1440, a reduction of 37 FPS. Pushing further to 3840x2160, the average drops to 38 FPS, representing a cumulative 69 FPS loss from 1080p to 4K. This steep decline — roughly a 65% reduction in average FPS from 1080p to 4K — indicates that the AMD Radeon 8050S becomes the limiting factor as pixel count increases.

The scaling pattern is consistent across all settings presets. At High settings, the transition from 1080p (92 FPS) to 1440p (60 FPS) costs 32 FPS, and the move to 4K (33 FPS) costs another 27 FPS. The Low preset shows a similar trajectory: 140 FPS at 1080p, 91 FPS at 1440p, and 50 FPS at 4K. This consistent proportional drop across presets suggests that resolution scaling is uniform and that the GPU's rendering throughput, rather than CPU limitations, dictates performance at higher resolutions.

At 1080p, the system appears reasonably balanced, with even the Ultra preset achieving 71 FPS. However, the 4K results — ranging from 26 FPS at Ultra to 50 FPS at Low — demonstrate that this integrated GPU lacks the raw pixel-pushing capability for native 4K gaming. The data suggests that users targeting 60 FPS should stay at 1440p or below, while 4K is only viable at Low settings, and even then only at 50 FPS average.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon 8050S is an integrated graphics solution based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, built on TSMC's 4 nm process. It features 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units, with 32 ray tracing cores. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1295 MHz and boosts to 2800 MHz, delivering 11.47 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. Its memory configuration is system shared, meaning it draws from the same DDR5 pool as the CPU, with bandwidth described as "System Dependent."

In the context of The Technomancer, the GPU's role is paramount. The benchmark data shows that at 4K Ultra, the system manages only 26 FPS, while at 4K Low it reaches 50 FPS. This 24 FPS spread between the lowest and highest quality presets at 4K highlights how much the GPU's fill rate and shading capabilities are stressed by this game's rendering demands. The Radeon 8050S ranks in the 89th percentile among all GPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 62108, placing it near the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M, which scores 61896 and is just 0.3% behind.

The pixel rate of 179.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 358.4 GTexel/s provide context for the 4K results. At 3840x2160, the GPU must process over 8.3 million pixels per frame, and at Ultra settings with 33 FPS minimum observed at Medium settings, the rendering pipeline is clearly saturated. The system shared memory architecture means there is no dedicated VRAM, which can exacerbate bandwidth constraints in memory-intensive scenes, though the exact impact varies with system configuration.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H is a Meteor Lake architecture processor with 16 cores and 22 threads, running at a base clock of 3.80 GHz and boosting to 4.80 GHz. It features a 24 MB shared L3 cache, with 112 KB L1 and 2 MB L2 per core. The processor's TDP is 28 W, indicating a power-efficient mobile design. In CPU benchmarks, it achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15028 and a single-core score of 1743, with a PassMark multi-thread score of 24873.

For The Technomancer, a game from 2016, CPU demands are moderate by modern standards, but the data suggests the processor is not the bottleneck in most scenarios. At 1080p Low, the system reaches 140 FPS, which is a high frame rate that could test CPU limits in CPU-bound scenes. However, the consistent performance scaling across resolutions — where 1080p Medium (107 FPS) drops to 1440p Medium (70 FPS) — indicates that the GPU becomes the limiting factor as resolution increases.

The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 32697, places it close to the Intel Core i5-14600T (32707, 0% delta) and AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 (32662, 0.1% delta). This processor is well-equipped to feed the Radeon 8050S at 1080p, where frame rates exceed 90 FPS on High settings. At 4K, the CPU's role diminishes further, as the GPU's rendering limits cap performance below 50 FPS even at Low settings.

The 22 threads and high boost clock of 4.80 GHz provide ample headroom for The Technomancer's gameplay logic and AI calculations. The PassMark physics score of 1727 and data compression score of 277353 suggest robust computational throughput, though these metrics are more relevant to CPU-intensive tasks than to this GPU-limited game. At 1080p Ultra, the 71 FPS result shows the CPU can support high frame rates when the GPU is not overwhelmed.

How This Combo Ranks

This combination of Intel Core Ultra 7 155H and AMD Radeon 8050S ranks 2087 out of 2825 tested combos for The Technomancer, placing it in the 26th percentile of all tested configurations. This is a below-average ranking, indicating that most other combinations in the database deliver better performance in this game. The rank reflects the integrated GPU's limitations at higher resolutions, as the CPU itself is a solid performer in its class.

The GPU's nearest rivals provide context for its performance tier. The AMD Radeon 8050S scores 62108 on average, which is just 0.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M (61896). It trails the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 by 2.5% (63693) and the AMD Radeon RX 7600M by 2.6% (63775). This clustering suggests the Radeon 8050S performs at a level comparable to mid-range discrete GPUs from previous generations, despite being an integrated solution.

The CPU's position among rivals is similarly tight. The Core Ultra 7 155H's average benchmark score of 32697 is essentially tied with the Intel Core i5-14600T (32707), AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 (32662), AMD Ryzen 5 7400F (32750), and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (32812). These deltas range from -0.4% to 0.1%, indicating that the processor is well-matched with its peers, and differences in game performance are likely attributable to GPU or system configuration rather than CPU capability.

Given the combo rank, users should expect that this system will handle The Technomancer at 1080p with playable frame rates, but it will not excel at higher resolutions. The 2087th rank out of 2825 means roughly 74% of tested combinations perform better, which is consistent with an integrated GPU solution facing off against systems with discrete graphics cards.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system delivers its strongest results. Low settings achieve 140 FPS average, which is exceptionally smooth. Medium settings reach 107 FPS with a minimum of 91 FPS and maximum of 123 FPS, ensuring a consistent experience. High settings produce 92 FPS average, still well above the 60 FPS threshold. Ultra settings drop to 71 FPS average, which remains playable but begins to show the GPU's limitations. All 1080p presets exceed 60 FPS, making this the target resolution for this combination.

At 2560x1440, performance becomes more variable. Low settings maintain 91 FPS average, which is good. Medium settings average 70 FPS with a minimum of 60 FPS and maximum of 81 FPS, providing a steady experience near the 60 FPS mark. High settings drop to exactly 60 FPS average, which is borderline playable but leaves no headroom for demanding scenes. Ultra settings fall to 47 FPS, which is below the smooth gameplay threshold and may exhibit noticeable stuttering in action sequences.

At 3840x2160, the system struggles. Low settings average 50 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target but potentially acceptable for less demanding play. Medium settings average 38 FPS with a minimum of 33 FPS and maximum of 44 FPS, indicating significant frame rate dips during intense moments. High settings manage only 33 FPS average, and Ultra settings drop to 26 FPS. None of the 4K presets deliver a consistently smooth experience, with even Low settings hovering near the edge of playability.

The Medium preset data includes min and max FPS values across all resolutions, providing insight into frame time consistency. At 1080p Medium, the 91-123 FPS range shows a variance of 32 FPS, which is acceptable. At 1440p Medium, the 60-81 FPS range tightens to a 21 FPS variance. At 4K Medium, the 33-44 FPS range shows a narrow 11 FPS variance, indicating that while the average is low, the frame pacing is relatively stable.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal experience for this combination is at 1920x1080 with Medium settings, which delivers 107 FPS average with a minimum of 91 FPS. This preset offers a strong balance between visual quality and performance, maintaining frame rates well above the 60 FPS threshold while providing better visual fidelity than Low settings. The 91 FPS minimum ensures that even in demanding scenes, the game remains fluid.

For users prioritizing visual quality, 1920x1080 with High settings at 92 FPS average is a viable alternative. This preset sacrifices some performance compared to Medium but still delivers a smooth experience. The 71 FPS at 1080p Ultra is also playable, though the margin above 60 FPS is thinner, and users sensitive to frame rate drops may notice occasional hitches.

At 1440p, the Low settings preset at 91 FPS is the only option that provides comfortable headroom above 60 FPS. Medium settings at 70 FPS average with a 60 FPS minimum are acceptable for users who prefer better visuals, but the minimum frame rate sitting exactly at 60 FPS means any scene complexity spike could push it below the threshold. High settings at 60 FPS average are marginal, and Ultra at 47 FPS is not recommended for smooth gameplay.

For 4K, the data suggests that Low settings at 50 FPS is the only viable option, and even this is borderline. Users who insist on 4K should accept reduced visual quality and potential frame rate dips. Medium settings at 38 FPS and below are not recommended for an enjoyable experience, as the frame rates fall into a range where input lag and stuttering become noticeable.

The overall recommendation is to run The Technomancer at 1080p with Medium or High settings, depending on whether visual fidelity or frame rate headroom is prioritized. At 1440p, users should restrict themselves to Low or Medium settings, and 4K should be reserved for users who prioritize resolution over smoothness.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution and settings combination for this system in The Technomancer?

A: The data shows 1920x1080 with Medium settings delivers 107 FPS average with a 91 FPS minimum, making it the optimal balance of visual quality and performance. High settings at 1080p also work well at 92 FPS average.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in The Technomancer?

A: At 3840x2160, the best result is Low settings at 50 FPS average. Medium settings drop to 38 FPS, High to 33 FPS, and Ultra to 26 FPS. None of these provide a consistently smooth 60 FPS experience, so 4K is not recommended for this game.

Q: How does the AMD Radeon 8050S compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The Radeon 8050S has an average benchmark score of 62108, which is 0.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M (61896) but 2.5% behind the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 (63693) and 2.6% behind the AMD Radeon RX 7600M (63775).

Q: Is the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H a bottleneck in this game?

A: The CPU does not appear to be the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The frame rate drops from 140 FPS at 1080p Low to 50 FPS at 4K Low indicate GPU limitation. The CPU's benchmark scores, including a Cinebench R23 multi-core of 15028, place it competitively with rivals like the Intel Core i5-14600T.

Q: What frame rates can I expect at 1440p with Medium settings?

A: At 2560x1440 with Medium settings, the system averages 70 FPS with a minimum of 60 FPS and maximum of 81 FPS. This is playable but leaves little headroom above the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to other tested combinations?

A: This combination ranks 2087 out of 2825 tested combos for The Technomancer, placing it in the lower-middle tier. Approximately 74% of tested configurations perform better, which is expected for an integrated GPU solution.