The Technomancer

The Technomancer, a 2016 Action RPG, is not a modern showcase title, but the data for the Intel Core i7-14700F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti combo reveals a system that utterly dominates this older game. The benchmark results place this pairing at rank 125 out of 1656 tested combos, putting it in the top 8% of all systems evaluated for this title. This is a strong position, though not the absolute pinnacle, suggesting that while the hardware is exceptionally fast, the game's engine or other system bottlenecks prevent it from claiming the top spot. The CPU, with a percentile rank of 94 against all processors, provides a robust foundation, while the GPU, sitting at the 87th percentile, delivers the graphical horsepower. The combination is clearly a high-end pairing that leaves little performance on the table in this specific title.

The measured frame rates are consistently high across all settings and resolutions. At 1920x1080, the lowest average frame rate recorded is 147.4 FPS on Ultra settings, which is still exceptionally smooth for a game from this era. The jump to 2560x1440 shows only a modest performance hit, with the Ultra preset still producing an average of 95.5 FPS. Even at the demanding 4K resolution (3840x2160), the Ultra preset maintains a playable 54.3 FPS average, while High settings push that to 65.5 FPS. This indicates a system that is not just capable of running the game but is effectively overkill for it, providing massive headroom for high refresh rate monitors at standard resolutions.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo's rank of 125 out of 1656 tested configurations places it in the top 8% of all systems tested for The Technomancer. This is a clear indication that the Intel Core i7-14700F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti are a formidable pairing for this title, but it also shows that other, likely more exotic or higher-end components, can still edge it out. The data shows that the combination is not the absolute fastest, but it is firmly in the enthusiast tier of performance. The CPU's average benchmark score of 54097 places it in a tight cluster with its nearest rivals. It is a mere 0.6% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X, which scores 54450, and 1.1% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D, which scores 54681. This indicates that the processor is a top-tier performer, and the deltaPct values show that its performance is nearly indistinguishable from those direct competitors. The system's overall rank reflects the synergy between this high-end CPU and GPU, resulting in a setup that will not struggle with any setting this game can throw at it.

The GPU's benchmark profile also reinforces this position. Its average benchmark score of 52086 is effectively identical to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, which scores 52085, with a deltaPct of 0. This means that in raw compute terms, the RTX 5070 Ti is a direct peer to that previous generation flagship. This explains why the measured FPS in The Technomancer is so high; the graphics card is more than capable of handling the game's demands. The fact that the entire system ranks in the top 8% is a direct result of having a CPU and GPU that are both at the top of their respective performance charts, with no weak link in the chain to bottleneck the other.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is the primary driver of the high frame rates observed in The Technomancer. Its specifications are more than sufficient for a game released in 2016. The 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus provides a massive 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth, ensuring that texture loading and memory-intensive scenes are never a bottleneck. The GPU's architecture, Blackwell 2.0, is built on a 5 nm process and features 8960 shading units. The boost clock of 2452 MHz is high, and the card is capable of delivering 43.94 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. These raw numbers explain why the GPU can push frame rates past 280 FPS at 1080p on Low settings; the hardware is simply not being stressed by the game's engine.

The performance scaling across settings shows that the GPU is the limiting factor only at the highest resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the difference between Low (284.4 FPS) and Ultra (147.4 FPS) is a significant 137 FPS, showing that the game's visual effects do put a measurable load on the card. However, even the Ultra number is far beyond what is needed for a smooth experience. The GPU's 87th percentile ranking against all other graphics cards confirms its high-end status. Its performance is a 0.8% match for the AMD Radeon RX 7700S, which scores 52505, and it sits 2.5% ahead of the NVIDIA RTX A1000, which scores 50826. The card is clearly a powerful piece of silicon, and in a game like The Technomancer, its role is to ensure that frame rates remain high and consistent, which the data confirms it does with ease.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance ranking of this CPU and GPU combination in The Technomancer?

A: The combo is ranked 125 out of 1656 tested configurations, placing it in the top 8% of all systems benchmarked for this game.

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-14700F compare to its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X?

A: The Intel processor's average benchmark score is 54097, which is just 0.6% lower than the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X's score of 54450. This makes the performance difference between the two negligible.

Q: Is the RTX 5070 Ti's performance in line with other high-end GPUs?

A: Yes. Its average benchmark score of 52086 is a perfect 0% delta compared to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, which also scores 52085, indicating they are performance peers.

Q: What is the highest average frame rate recorded for this combo?

A: The highest average frame rate recorded is 284.4 FPS, which was achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.

Q: Can this system handle The Technomancer at 4K resolution?

A: Yes. At 3840x2160 resolution, the system produces an average of 65.5 FPS on High settings and 54.3 FPS on Ultra settings, both of which are playable.

Q: How much faster is the 1080p Low preset compared to the 1080p Ultra preset?

A: The Low preset at 1920x1080 yields an average of 284.4 FPS, which is roughly 93% higher than the Ultra preset's average of 147.4 FPS at the same resolution.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend entirely on the user's display and preference for visual fidelity versus maximum frame rate. At 1920x1080, the High preset provides an excellent balance, delivering an average of 187.4 FPS. This is high enough to fully utilize a 144Hz or even a 165Hz monitor while maintaining a strong level of visual quality. The Ultra preset, at 147.4 FPS, is also viable for high refresh rate displays, but the visual difference between High and Ultra in a game of this age may not justify the 40 FPS loss. For players with 1440p displays, the High preset is again the sweet spot, with an average of 125.2 FPS. This is ideal for a 120Hz or 144Hz monitor. The Medium preset at 143.6 FPS is also a strong contender if a higher frame rate is desired, but the step up to High offers a significant visual improvement for a relatively small performance cost. The Ultra preset at 1440p, with an average of 95.5 FPS, is still a very playable and visually stunning option for those with 60Hz to 100Hz displays.

For 4K gaming, the choices are more constrained. The High preset is the recommended choice, as it provides a smooth 65.5 FPS average, which is well within the range for a standard 60Hz 4K display. The Medium preset at 79.4 FPS is also excellent and offers a bit more headroom. The Ultra preset is the most demanding, dropping to 54.3 FPS, which is still playable but sits below the 60 FPS target that many consider the baseline for a premium experience. Given the data, the High preset at 4K is the clear winner for a consistent and responsive experience. The Low presets are not recommended, as the performance gains do not justify the significant reduction in visual quality, especially given that even the most demanding preset is playable at every resolution.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of the system's scaling across resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, performance is extraordinary. The Low preset achieves an average of 284.4 FPS, which is the highest recorded for the entire test suite. The Medium preset follows at 219.6 FPS, and High at 187.4 FPS. The Ultra preset, while the most demanding, still produces a very high average of 147.4 FPS. This resolution shows the system is limited by the CPU or game engine at the lower settings, as the GPU has ample headroom.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain exceptionally high. The Low preset averages 186.3 FPS, which is still a phenomenal number for a 1440p resolution. The Medium preset achieves 143.6 FPS, and the High preset produces 125.2 FPS. Even the Ultra preset maintains an average of 95.5 FPS, which is a very smooth experience for most users. The performance drop from 1080p to 1440p is consistent, showing that the GPU is beginning to take on more of the workload.

At 3840x2160, the system's performance is still strong, but the GPU is now clearly the primary bottleneck. The Low preset averages 100.9 FPS, which is a great result for 4K. The Medium preset drops to 79.4 FPS, and the High preset to 65.5 FPS. The Ultra preset, which is the most visually demanding, produces an average of 54.3 FPS. This is the only configuration tested that falls below the 60 FPS mark, but it remains playable. The data shows a clear and predictable performance curve: as resolution and settings increase, the average frame rate decreases, but the system never becomes unplayable, even at the maximum settings at 4K.