The Technomancer

The Technomancer

AVERAGE FPS
73
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 73 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 27 37 43 53
1440p QHD 49 66 71 97
1080p Full HD 75 97 114 150

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 53
3840x2160 Medium 43
3840x2160 High 37
3840x2160 Ultra 27
2560x1440 Low 97
2560x1440 Medium 71
2560x1440 High 66
2560x1440 Ultra 49
1920x1080 Low 150
1920x1080 Medium 114
1920x1080 High 97
1920x1080 Ultra 75

The Technomancer with Intel Core i5-12400 + AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT, In-Depth Analysis

The Technomancer, a 2016 Action RPG, proves to be a demanding title at higher resolutions, and the combination of the Intel Core i5-12400 and AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT shows a clear performance hierarchy across the tested settings. The data indicates that while the pair is highly capable at 1080p, the GPU becomes the definitive bottleneck as resolution increases, with frame rates dropping sharply at 4K. This analysis breaks down the measured performance to determine the optimal way to play and the role each component plays.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data shows a significant and predictable drop in performance as resolution scales from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160. At High settings, the average frame rate falls from 96.7 FPS at 1080p to 65.9 FPS at 1440p, a reduction of approximately 32%, and then further down to 37.3 FPS at 4K. This steep decline from 1440p to 4K, a 43% performance hit, is a strong indicator that the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT is the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The GPU is working at its maximum capacity, as the pixel count quadruples from 1080p to 4K, demanding significantly more from the graphics hardware.

This pattern is consistent across all settings. At Low settings, the frame rate drops from 150.1 FPS at 1080p to 97.3 FPS at 1440p, and then to 53.4 FPS at 4K. The fact that even at the lowest graphical preset, the 4K performance cannot maintain a stable 60 FPS confirms that the GPU's raw throughput is the primary constraint in this scenario. Conversely, the CPU’s role appears to diminish at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the CPU is more likely to be a co-contributor to performance, but as resolution increases, the workload shifts overwhelmingly to the GPU, and the CPU's headroom becomes less relevant. The data suggests that for a smooth 4K experience, a more powerful GPU would be necessary, while the Intel Core i5-12400 has ample processing power to feed frames at 1440p and below.

Settings Recommendations

The benchmark results indicate that the "High" preset offers the best balance between visual fidelity and playable frame rates for this combination. At 1920x1080, High settings produce an average of 96.7 FPS, which is well above the smooth 60 FPS threshold and provides a responsive experience. The jump to Ultra at 1080p yields 74.8 FPS, a 23% performance cost for what is typically a marginal visual improvement over High. Conversely, dropping to Medium settings at 1080p increases performance to 114.3 FPS, but this is likely unnecessary given the already strong High preset performance.

At 2560x1440, the High preset again stands out as the recommended choice, delivering an average of 65.9 FPS. This is just above the 60 FPS target and offers a great experience for users with higher-resolution monitors. The Medium preset at 1440p provides 71.4 FPS, but the visual quality reduction may not be worth the modest 8% performance gain. Ultra settings at 1440p, with an average of 48.7 FPS, fall below the ideal playable threshold and are best avoided if smooth motion is a priority. For 4K gaming, the data shows a compromise is required. At 3840x2160, the Low preset is the only one that approaches playability, with an average of 53.4 FPS. High and Medium settings at 4K offer 37.3 FPS and 43.2 FPS respectively, which are not ideal for a smooth experience. The Ultra preset at 4K, with an average of 27.2 FPS, is effectively unplayable. Therefore, the "High" preset at 1080p or 1440p provides the best measured experience, offering a strong combination of quality and performance.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-12400, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, demonstrates that it is more than sufficient for The Technomancer. Its architecture, Alder Lake, and boost clock of 4.40 GHz provide strong single-thread performance, as evidenced by its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2249. This is crucial for game logic and physics calculations. The CPU's multi-threaded capabilities, shown by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15935, also ensure that background tasks and the game's engine can be handled without issue.

The benchmark data suggests that the CPU is not the primary bottleneck in this pairing for most scenarios. The performance scaling from 1080p to 4K is almost entirely dictated by the GPU, as the CPU's workload does not change significantly with resolution. At 1080p Low settings, the CPU is pushed harder to maintain the 150.1 FPS average, but it manages to do so effectively. The data indicates that the i5-12400 has enough headroom to keep up with the RX 7600 XT at 1080p and 1440p. Its performance places it in the 77th percentile of all CPUs, and its average benchmark score of 19850 is nearly identical to that of the Intel Core i7-9700, with a negligible delta of 0.1%. This suggests that in CPU-bound scenarios, the i5-12400 performs on par with that older i7, ensuring a smooth experience in this title.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo run The Technomancer at 4K with playable frame rates?

A: The data shows that at 3840x2160, only the Low preset approaches playability, with an average of 53.4 FPS. High, Medium, and Ultra presets yield 37.3, 43.2, and 27.2 FPS respectively, indicating that a smooth 4K experience is not achievable with higher graphical settings.

Q: What is the best preset to use at 2560x1440?

A: The High preset is recommended, as it delivers an average of 65.9 FPS. This is above the 60 FPS target. The Medium preset offers 71.4 FPS, but the visual downgrade may not justify the small performance gain. Ultra drops to 48.7 FPS, which is below the desired threshold.

Q: Is the Intel Core i5-12400 a bottleneck for the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT?

A: Based on the resolution scaling data, the CPU is not the primary bottleneck. The frame rate drops are consistent with a GPU limitation at higher resolutions. At 1080p Low, the CPU is able to push the GPU to 150.1 FPS, indicating it has sufficient power for this game.

Q: How much performance is lost by switching from High to Ultra at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset averages 74.8 FPS, while the High preset averages 96.7 FPS. This represents a 22% performance decrease for the increased visual fidelity of the Ultra preset.

Q: How does this CPU compare to its nearest rival in general performance?

A: The Intel Core i5-12400 has an average benchmark score of 19850, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core i7-9700's score of 19831. This indicates they have nearly identical overall processing power.

Q: What is the performance difference between the Low and Ultra presets at 1440p?

A: The Low preset at 2560x1440 produces 97.3 FPS on average, which is double the 48.7 FPS average of the Ultra preset. This shows a significant performance headroom is available by lowering graphical fidelity.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT is the defining component in this system's 4K performance, and its role is clearly illustrated by the measured FPS. The GPU's 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus provides 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming. However, at 4K, the sheer amount of data required to fill the frame becomes a challenge. The GPU's boost clock of 2755 MHz and 2048 shading units are tasked with rendering an immense number of pixels, leading to the significant frame rate drops observed.

The GPU's performance is directly reflected in its benchmark scores, ranking in the 63rd percentile of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 20146 is only 0.6% lower than that of the AMD Radeon RX 7600, indicating they are very close in raw compute power. This is consistent with the measured FPS, where the RX 7600 XT shows it is a strong 1080p and 1440p card. The data shows that the GPU is the limiting factor at 4K, as even at Low settings, it cannot maintain a 60 FPS average. At 1080p Ultra, it delivers 74.8 FPS, proving it has enough power for high-fidelity gaming at standard resolutions. The 16 GB VRAM capacity is a notable asset, ensuring that texture memory is not a constraint at any of the tested settings, but the GPU's compute throughput is what ultimately caps performance at higher resolutions.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following data represents the measured average frame rates for the Intel Core i5-12400 and AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT combination in The Technomancer.

1920x1080 (1080p)

  • Low: 150.1 FPS
  • Medium: 114.3 FPS
  • High: 96.7 FPS
  • Ultra: 74.8 FPS

2560x1440 (1440p)

  • Low: 97.3 FPS
  • Medium: 71.4 FPS
  • High: 65.9 FPS
  • Ultra: 48.7 FPS

3840x2160 (4K)

  • Low: 53.4 FPS
  • Medium: 43.2 FPS
  • High: 37.3 FPS
  • Ultra: 27.2 FPS

The data shows a clear and consistent pattern. At 1080p, all presets are highly playable. At 1440p, the High preset remains above 60 FPS, but Ultra falls below. At 4K, all presets fail to reach a stable 60 FPS, with only the Low preset coming close.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combinations for The Technomancer, this specific pairing of the Intel Core i5-12400 and AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT ranks 1062 out of 1656 total combos. This places it in the lower half of all tested systems, a ranking that is heavily influenced by the demanding nature of the game at 4K resolution. While the combo performs admirably at 1080p and 1440p, the inability to maintain high frame rates at 4K likely pulls its overall ranking down. The 4K Ultra result of 27.2 FPS is a significant weak point. The ranking of 1062 suggests that many other combinations, likely with more powerful GPUs, are able to achieve better overall performance in this specific title. However, for a user targeting 1080p or 1440p gaming, this combo would rank much higher in practical terms, as its measured performance in those resolutions is strong. The ranking serves as a reminder that the GPU's 4K performance is the limiting factor for this otherwise capable pairing.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core i5-12400

Cores / Threads 6 / 12
Base Clock 2500 MHz
Boost Clock 4400 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket Intel Socket 1700
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT

VRAM 16 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2755 MHz MHz
TDP 190 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core i5-12400 + AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT in The Technomancer

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 53.4
3840x2160 Medium 43.2
3840x2160 High 37.3
3840x2160 Ultra 27.2
2560x1440 Low 97.3
2560x1440 Medium 71.4
2560x1440 High 65.9
2560x1440 Ultra 48.7
1920x1080 Low 150.1
1920x1080 Medium 114.3
1920x1080 High 96.7
1920x1080 Ultra 74.8

The Technomancer with ii5-12400 + Other GPUs

See how The Technomancer performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

The Technomancer with RX 7600 XT + Other CPUs

See how The Technomancer performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with ii5-12400 + RX 7600 XT

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.