The Technomancer

The Technomancer, a 2016 Action RPG, presents a demanding workload for the Intel Core i5-11400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER combination. The measured FPS data reveals a system that is clearly capable of smooth gameplay at high resolutions, but it also exposes a significant performance ceiling when settings are pushed to their maximum. This analysis breaks down the benchmark results to identify where the bottlenecks lie and what the data implies for potential users.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The transition from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160 shows a classic pattern of GPU-bound scaling. At High settings, the average FPS drops from 103.4 at 1080p to 64.9 at 1440p, and finally to 38.4 at 4K. This represents a steep decline, but the data suggests the GPU is the primary driver of this falloff. The RTX 2070 SUPER, with its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth, is being taxed heavily as pixel count quadruples.

The scaling from 1440p to 4K is particularly telling. At Medium settings, the drop is from 81.3 FPS to 41.3 FPS, which is a 49% reduction in performance. This is a sharper decline than the 1080p to 1440p transition, which sees a 34% drop from 122.6 to 81.3 FPS. This non-linear scaling is a strong indicator that the GPU is hitting a hard limit at 4K, likely due to fill-rate and memory bandwidth constraints. The i5-11400F’s 6 cores and 12 threads are sufficient to keep feeding the GPU at lower resolutions, but at 4K, the graphics card’s raw compute power becomes the deciding factor.

The data implies that for a smooth 60 FPS experience at 4K, the system would need to avoid Ultra settings. The difference between High and Ultra at 4K is a 11 FPS gap (38.4 vs 27.4), which is substantial. This suggests that the jump to Ultra introduces rendering features that are disproportionately expensive at high pixel counts, reinforcing the idea that the RTX 2070 SUPER is the limiting component in this configuration for this game.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The RTX 2070 SUPER’s specifications directly correlate with the observed performance. Its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory is adequate for The Technomancer’s textures, even at 4K, but the memory clock of 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) and 256-bit bus width contribute to a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. This bandwidth is a critical resource, and the benchmark results suggest that at Ultra settings and 4K, the card’s ability to move texture data quickly is strained.

The GPU’s compute capabilities, rated at 9.062 TFLOPS for FP32, are substantial. However, the measured FPS at 4K Ultra (27.4 FPS) shows that the game’s Ultra preset demands more than this card can deliver at that resolution. The boost clock of 1770 MHz ensures high peak performance, but the sustained load of 4K rendering appears to cause the card to settle into a state where its pixel rate of 113.3 GPixel/s and texture rate of 283.2 GTexel/s become the limiting factors.

Comparing this GPU to its nearest rivals, the RTX 2070 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 22206, placing it just 0.5% behind the NVIDIA RTX A400 (22307) and 2.3% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile (22729). It sits 2.5% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 5700 (21670). This indicates that the GPU is positioned in a competitive mid-range tier, and its performance in The Technomancer aligns with this positioning, delivering playable frame rates at 1440p but struggling to maintain 60 FPS at 4K on higher presets.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Core i5-11400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Rocket Lake architecture. Its base clock of 2.60 GHz and boost clock of 4.40 GHz provide strong single-threaded performance, which is evident in its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2029. This is crucial for games like The Technomancer, which often rely on a few primary threads for game logic and physics.

The benchmark results indicate that the CPU is not the primary bottleneck in this configuration. At 1080p Low settings, the system achieves 157.7 FPS, a very high frame rate that suggests the CPU can handle a significant amount of draw calls and game logic. The multi-threaded performance, shown by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 14372, is also robust, ensuring that background tasks and additional game systems do not cause stutters.

The CPU’s 12 MB of shared L3 cache and support for DDR4 memory with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s are sufficient for the game’s demands. When compared to its nearest rivals, the i5-11400F’s average benchmark score of 17181 is effectively tied with the AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (17189) and Intel Core i7-1260P (17212). This shows that the CPU is a balanced performer, and the data from The Technomancer suggests that it provides ample headroom for the GPU to be the limiting factor, especially at higher resolutions.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The combined performance of this CPU and GPU places it at rank 1029 out of 1656 tested combos in The Technomancer. This ranking, which puts it in the top 62% of all configurations, is a direct result of the balance between the components. The data shows that the GPU, while capable, is not a top-tier part, and the CPU is a solid mid-range option.

This rank of 1029 suggests that there are many other combinations that can outperform this setup, but it also means that a significant portion of tested systems are slower. The percentile rankings of the individual components support this: the CPU sits in the 75th percentile against all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 65th percentile against all GPUs. The lower GPU percentile relative to the CPU indicates that the graphics card is the weaker link in this pairing, which aligns with the resolution scaling analysis.

The implication of this rank is that for users seeking the highest frame rates, particularly at 4K, this specific combo is not ideal. However, for 1080p and 1440p gaming, the system’s performance is respectable. The data suggests that the combo’s rank is dragged down by its 4K Ultra performance, which is below the threshold for smooth gameplay. This is a nuanced result that shows the importance of considering resolution and settings when evaluating a hardware combination.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of the system’s capabilities across different configurations.

At 1920x1080, the system is exceptionally capable. Low settings yield an average of 157.7 FPS, which is more than enough for high-refresh-rate monitors. Medium settings drop to 122.6 FPS, while High settings produce 103.4 FPS. Even the most demanding Ultra preset manages an average of 81.2 FPS, which is still very smooth for most gaming scenarios.

At 2560x1440, the performance remains strong but begins to show the GPU’s limitations. Low settings hit 102.1 FPS, which is excellent. Medium settings drop to 81.3 FPS, and High settings produce 64.9 FPS. The Ultra preset, however, falls to 53.2 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target that many gamers prefer.

At 3840x2160, the system struggles to maintain high frame rates. Low settings are the only playable option, with an average of 55.3 FPS. Medium settings drop to 41.3 FPS, High settings to 38.4 FPS, and Ultra is virtually unplayable at 27.4 FPS. These numbers suggest that 4K gaming with this combo requires a significant reduction in visual fidelity.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

Based on the measured FPS, the optimal settings depend heavily on the target resolution and desired smoothness.

For a 1080p display, the High preset (103.4 FPS) offers an excellent balance of visual quality and performance. For users with high-refresh-rate monitors, the Medium preset (122.6 FPS) is a better choice to push frame rates higher, while the Low preset (157.7 FPS) is available for competitive play. The Ultra preset at 81.2 FPS is still smooth, but the visual gains over High may not justify the 22 FPS drop.

For a 1440p display, the High preset (64.9 FPS) is the recommended choice for a near-60 FPS experience. The Medium preset (81.3 FPS) provides a more comfortable margin above 60 FPS and is a strong alternative. The Ultra preset (53.2 FPS) is not recommended for a consistently smooth experience, as it falls below the 60 FPS threshold. The Low preset (102.1 FPS) is excellent for maximum responsiveness.

For a 4K display, the data suggests that the Low preset (55.3 FPS) is the only viable option for playable frame rates. The Medium and High presets (41.3 and 38.4 FPS) are too choppy for most users, and Ultra (27.4 FPS) is not recommended. Users should consider dropping to 1440p for a better visual experience at higher settings.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in The Technomancer?

A: The data shows that 1920x1080 is the most comfortable resolution, offering over 100 FPS on High settings (103.4 FPS). 2560x1440 is also viable with High settings (64.9 FPS), while 4K gaming requires Low settings (55.3 FPS) to be playable.

Q: Can this setup handle 4K gaming in The Technomancer?

A: Yes, but only with significant compromises. The measured 4K performance shows that Low settings produce an average of 55.3 FPS, while Ultra settings drop to a poor 27.4 FPS. A smooth 60 FPS experience is not achievable at 4K.

Q: How does the RTX 2070 SUPER compare to its closest rivals?

A: The GPU’s average benchmark score is 22206. It is 0.5% behind the NVIDIA RTX A400 (22307) and 2.3% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile (22729). It is 2.5% faster than the AMD Radeon RX 5700 (21670).

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in this game?

A: The data indicates the GPU is the primary bottleneck. At 1080p Low, the system hits 157.7 FPS, showing the CPU can keep up. However, frame rates drop dramatically at 4K, especially on Ultra (27.4 FPS), which points to the graphics card as the limiting component.

Q: What is the combo’s overall rank among all tested systems?

A: This Intel Core i5-11400F + RTX 2070 SUPER combination is ranked 1029 out of 1656 tested combos in The Technomancer, placing it in the top 62% of all configurations.

Q: What settings should I use for a 1440p monitor?

A: The High preset (64.9 FPS) is the best choice for a balanced experience, while the Medium preset (81.3 FPS) is recommended for a more comfortable frame rate buffer above 60 FPS. The Ultra preset (53.2 FPS) should be avoided for consistent smoothness.