The Technomancer

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 pairing delivers a robust experience in The Technomancer, a 2016 Action RPG. The data shows a configuration capable of high refresh rates at 1080p and solid performance at 4K, with the balance between the 8-core processor and the 12 GB graphics card shifting predictably as resolution increases. The measured frames per second (FPS) reveal a system where the CPU provides ample headroom at lower resolutions, while the GPU becomes the primary factor at higher settings and pixel counts.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Granite Ridge. It operates with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, which are significant factors for a game like The Technomancer that relies on both single-thread responsiveness and multi-threaded background tasks. The processor sits in the 94th percentile when compared to all CPUs, indicating a very high level of general processing capability.

Benchmark data shows the CPU achieving a Passmark single-thread score of 4691 and a multithread score of 36470. These scores place the 9700F in close competition with several high-end desktop parts; it is only 0.2% behind the Intel Core i7-14700KF and 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX in average benchmark scores. This suggests that for CPU-bound scenarios, the 9700F is unlikely to be the limiting factor in The Technomancer, as its performance profile is commensurate with other top-tier processors.

The game's measured FPS at 1080p reinforces this interpretation. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo achieves an average of 233 FPS, a figure so high that it points to the CPU’s ability to feed frames rapidly without bottlenecking the GPU. As settings increase to Ultra at the same resolution, the average FPS drops to 119, but this decline is more attributable to the increased graphical load on the GPU rather than a CPU limitation. The processor’s 32 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 memory support (with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s) provide the necessary data throughput to keep the GPU supplied with draw calls and game logic updates.

The presence of 16 threads is also relevant for a game from 2016, which may utilize multiple cores for physics, AI, and streaming. With an 8-core/16-thread configuration, the 9700F offers substantial headroom for these processes, ensuring that the game’s simulation and rendering loops do not contend for the same resources. The data suggests that at 1080p, the CPU is performing its role effectively, enabling the GPU to reach its maximum output. The 65 W TDP of the processor indicates an efficient design that does not require exotic cooling, allowing the system to maintain consistent performance without thermal throttling, which is crucial for sustained gaming sessions.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture and features 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s. Its boost clock of 2475 MHz and base clock of 1920 MHz are key to its performance. The GPU sits in the 81st percentile among all graphics cards, a solid ranking that confirms its capability for modern gaming. Its Passmark G3D score is 26927, placing it in close proximity to rivals like the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 (0.4% ahead) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile (1.3% behind).

In The Technomancer, the GPU’s role becomes more pronounced as the resolution and settings increase. The 12 GB VRAM capacity is sufficient for the game’s textures and assets, even at 4K resolution. At 3840x2160 with Medium settings, the average FPS is 64, with a minimum of 55 and a maximum of 74. This indicates that the GPU is handling the workload, but the average is noticeably lower than at 1440p, showing the rendering demands of 4K.

The RTX 4070’s 5888 shading units and 64 ROPs are responsible for the pixel and texture processing. The texture rate of 455.4 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 158.4 GPixel/s are metrics that directly influence how quickly the GPU can fill the screen with detailed imagery. When looking at the FPS progression from Low to Ultra at 4K, the decline from 84 FPS to 43 FPS underscores the GPU’s sensitivity to the increased shader complexity and draw distances associated with higher presets. The data suggests that the RTX 4070 is a capable 4K card for this title, but the frame rates at Ultra settings (43 FPS) indicate that users may need to compromise on visual fidelity to achieve smoother motion. The GPU’s performance is consistent with its benchmark position, demonstrating that it is neither a bottleneck at 1080p nor a runaway performer at 4K, but rather a balanced component that scales predictably with workload.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The measured FPS data across resolutions provides a clear picture of where the performance bottleneck lies. At 1920x1080 with High settings, the average FPS is 153. Moving to 2560x1440 at the same settings, the average drops to 100 FPS, a 34.6% decrease. Further scaling to 3840x2160 results in an average of 55 FPS, a 45% drop from the 1440p figure. This pattern is consistent with a GPU-bound system, as the CPU is able to maintain high frame rates at lower resolutions, but the GPU’s rendering workload increases exponentially with pixel count.

The data for Low settings shows a similar trend. At 1080p Low, the average is 233 FPS. At 1440p Low, it is 152 FPS, and at 4K Low, it is 84 FPS. The large absolute numbers at 1080p Low (233 FPS) indicate that the CPU is capable of producing frames far beyond what the GPU can render, confirming that the processor is not the limiting factor. The massive drop from 233 to 152 FPS (34.8%) when moving to 1440p, and then to 84 FPS (44.7%) at 4K, is characteristic of the GPU working harder to fill more pixels.

Interestingly, the scaling becomes less steep at higher settings. From 1080p Ultra (119 FPS) to 1440p Ultra (78 FPS) is a 34.5% drop, and from 1440p Ultra to 4K Ultra (43 FPS) is a 44.9% drop. This suggests that at Ultra settings, the GPU is already near its limits at 1080p, and the additional resolution pushes it further into a state of being fully saturated. The gap between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p is 114 FPS (233 vs 119), while at 4K, the gap narrows to 41 FPS (84 vs 43). This convergence indicates that as resolution increases, the GPU becomes the definitive constraint, regardless of the graphical preset. The data strongly suggests that the limiting component in this combo is the GPU, especially at 1440p and 4K resolutions, where the CPU’s headroom is not fully utilized.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average FPS achieved by this combo in The Technomancer?

A: The highest average FPS is 233, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rivals in terms of performance?

A: The Ryzen 7 9700F is 0.2% behind the Intel Core i7-14700KF and 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX in average benchmark scores, indicating nearly identical performance levels.

Q: Is this configuration capable of 4K gaming?

A: Yes, it can run The Technomancer at 3840x2160. At High settings, it averages 55 FPS, and at Medium settings, it averages 64 FPS, with a minimum of 55 FPS.

Q: At which resolution does the CPU become less of a factor in performance?

A: At 2560x1440 and above, the FPS drops are more significant, indicating the GPU is the limiting component. For example, at 1440p High, the average is 100 FPS, while at 4K High, it falls to 55 FPS.

Q: What is the average FPS at 1080p with Medium settings?

A: The average FPS at 1920x1080 with Medium settings is 179, with a minimum of 152 and a maximum of 206.

Q: How does the GPU's benchmark score compare to the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56?

A: The RTX 4070 is 0.4% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 in average benchmark scores.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database for The Technomancer, this configuration of the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 holds the rank of 614 out of 2825 tested combos. This places it in the top 21.7% of all tested systems, which is a strong showing. The rank reflects the combined capability of the CPU and GPU, and given the individual high percentiles of both components (94th for CPU, 81st for GPU), a top-quartile overall rank is expected.

The rank of 614 suggests that while this is a high-performing combo, there are many other configurations that achieve higher average FPS in this specific game. This could be due to combinations with more powerful GPUs (e.g., higher-tier RTX 40-series cards) or CPUs with higher benchmark scores. However, the data indicates that this pairing is well-balanced, as the CPU’s high percentile prevents it from dragging down the GPU’s performance. The combo’s rank confirms its ability to handle the game’s demands without a severe bottleneck, making it a reliable choice for a smooth gaming experience. The position within the 2825 combos suggests that users can expect performance better than the majority of systems, but there is headroom for improvement with more powerful components.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following data points are the exact measured average FPS values for the combo. The minimum and maximum values are only provided for the Medium settings at each resolution.

At 1920x1080:

• Low: Average FPS of 233.
• Medium: Average FPS of 179, with a minimum of 152 and a maximum of 206.
• High: Average FPS of 153.
• Ultra: Average FPS of 119.

At 2560x1440:

• Low: Average FPS of 152.
• Medium: Average FPS of 117, with a minimum of 99 and a maximum of 134.
• High: Average FPS of 100.
• Ultra: Average FPS of 78.

At 3840x2160:

• Low: Average FPS of 84.
• Medium: Average FPS of 64, with a minimum of 55 and a maximum of 74.
• High: Average FPS of 55.
• Ultra: Average FPS of 43.

These figures show a clear hierarchy: performance scales directly with resolution and settings. The 1080p Medium score of 179 FPS is notably high, suggesting a very smooth experience for high-refresh-rate monitors. The 1440p High score of 100 FPS is excellent for most gaming displays, while the 4K Medium score of 64 FPS is playable but approaching the threshold where some users might notice a drop in fluidity. The Ultra preset at 4K, with an average of 43 FPS, is the most demanding scenario and may require a lower refresh rate or adaptive sync to feel comfortable.

Settings Recommendations

For users targeting a high-refresh-rate 1080p experience, the High preset is the optimal choice. With an average of 153 FPS, it provides a significant boost over the Ultra preset (119 FPS) while likely offering a visually comparable experience. The Medium preset (179 FPS) could be used for competitive play, but the jump to High is relatively small and likely worth the visual upgrade.

At 1440p, the High preset is again the sweet spot, delivering an average of 100 FPS. This is a perfect match for 100Hz or 144Hz monitors with G-Sync. While Ultra (78 FPS) is playable, the drop to below 80 FPS might introduce noticeable judder on displays with higher refresh rates. Choosing High ensures a fluid experience without sacrificing too much visual detail.

For 4K gaming, the Medium preset is the recommended starting point. It provides an average of 64 FPS, which is the most balanced option for maintaining a playable frame rate. The High preset (55 FPS) is borderline, as the average dips into the 50s, which is less consistent. The Low preset (84 FPS) is viable for users prioritizing frame rate over visual quality, but the Medium preset offers a better balance of fidelity and performance. The Ultra preset (43 FPS) is not recommended for a smooth experience, as it falls below the 60 FPS threshold.

Overall, the data suggests that the High preset at 1440p offers the best combination of visual fidelity and performance for this combo, providing a buttery-smooth 100 FPS. For 1080p users, High is the clear winner, and for 4K users, Medium is the safest bet to avoid significant frame rate drops. The measured minimum FPS values for Medium settings (55 FPS at 4K, 99 FPS at 1440p, 152 FPS at 1080p) indicate that this preset maintains a stable performance floor, making it a reliable choice across all resolutions.