Control
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 105 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 54 | 62 | 70 | 98 |
| 1440p QHD | 80 | 92 | 104 | 146 |
| 1080p Full HD | 106 | 122 | 137 | 193 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Control with AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 combo ranks at #650 out of 2,888 tested configurations for Control. This places it in the top 22.5% of all recorded system pairings, a strong result for a mainstream desktop platform. The ranking reflects a balance where neither component bottlenecks the other severely, allowing the system to leverage the game's demanding physics and rendering workloads effectively. While it does not crack the top tier of enthusiast setups, its position indicates that this pairing is well above the median experience for this title, offering high frame rates at the most common gaming resolutions.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 is the primary driver of visual performance in this configuration. It features 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering a memory bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s. For a game like Control, which uses high-resolution textures and complex particle effects, this memory capacity and bandwidth are sufficient to avoid stuttering or texture pop-in at 4K, as the measured data shows playable frame rates at that resolution.
Clock speeds are substantial, with a base of 1920 MHz and a boost clock of 2475 MHz. The memory operates at an effective speed of 21 Gbps. These frequencies directly translate into the raw compute throughput necessary for the game's ray-traced reflections and physics-based destruction. The GPU's architecture, Ada Lovelace, includes 46 RT cores and 184 Tensor cores, though the benchmark data provided does not isolate ray tracing performance. The 29.15 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is the theoretical ceiling for rasterized work, and the measured average FPS values suggest the card is being utilized effectively across all settings.
The GPU's overall standing is confirmed by its 81st percentile rank among all GPUs, and its average benchmark score of 37,648 places it in close competition with several other cards. Specifically, it is 0.1% ahead of the NVIDIA Tesla P4 and 0.4% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56. It trails the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile by 1.3%. These small deltas highlight that the RTX 4070 is a consistent mid-to-high-range performer, and in Control, its strengths are clearly visible in the frame rate scaling.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data reveals a classic GPU-bound scaling pattern as resolution increases. The system is extremely capable at 1080p, with average frame rates well above the refresh rate of most monitors. Moving from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 results in a predictable drop in performance, and a further step to 3840x2160 (4K) shows the expected additional decline. This trend is consistent across all four settings presets.
At Ultra settings, the average FPS drops from 106 at 1080p to 80 at 1440p, a 24.5% decrease. Pushing to 4K Ultra further reduces the average to 54 FPS, another 32.5% drop from the 1440p figure. This steep decline at 4K indicates that the GPU is nearing its limits with maxed-out settings. In contrast, at Low settings, the drop is less severe proportionally: from 193 FPS at 1080p to 146 at 1440p (a 24.4% decrease) and then to 98 at 4K (a 32.9% decrease). The similar percentage drops across settings suggest that the limiting factor is consistently the GPU's fillrate and shader throughput, rather than a sudden CPU bottleneck appearing at lower resolutions.
The data strongly implies that the CPU, with its 8 cores and 16 threads, is not the primary constraint in this title. At 1080p Low, where CPU overhead is usually highest relative to GPU load, the system still achieves 193 FPS, indicating the Ryzen 7 9700F has ample headroom. The scaling curve is smooth and predictable, which is a sign of a well-balanced system where the GPU workload dominates the frame time budget.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The following table and analysis detail the exact average frame rates recorded for each resolution and settings preset.
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS | Min FPS | Max FPS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 98 | - | - |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 70 | 59 | 80 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 62 | - | - |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 54 | - | - |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 146 | - | - |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 104 | 88 | 119 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 92 | - | - |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 80 | - | - |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 193 | - | - |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 137 | 116 | 157 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 122 | - | - |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 106 | - | - |
At 1920x1080, the RTX 4070 is exceptionally powerful for Control. Even at Ultra settings, the average of 106 FPS provides a fluid experience. The Medium preset is particularly notable, with an average of 137 FPS and a minimum of 116 FPS, ensuring consistent frame pacing. The Low preset reaches 193 FPS, demonstrating the CPU's ability to feed the GPU without issue.
Stepping up to 2560x1440, the performance remains excellent. Ultra settings produce an average of 80 FPS, which is smooth for most players. The High preset offers 92 FPS, a good balance between visual quality and speed. Medium provides 104 FPS with a solid minimum of 88 FPS. The Low preset scales to 146 FPS, again showing no CPU limitation.
At 3840x2160, we see the true demands of 4K rendering. Ultra settings drop to an average of 54 FPS, which is borderline for fast-paced action but still playable. High settings yield 62 FPS, a more comfortable margin. Medium settings provide 70 FPS with a minimum of 59 FPS, keeping the experience mostly above the 60 FPS threshold. Low settings jump to 98 FPS, making it the only 4K preset that offers a consistently high refresh rate experience.
FAQ
Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming in Control?
A: Yes, but with caveats. At 4K with Medium settings, the average FPS is 70, and at High settings, it drops to 62. For a locked 60 FPS experience, players should stick to Medium or lower settings.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor at 1080p?
A: The data indicates the GPU is the primary limiter. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 193 FPS, which is very high, but the scaling to 4K shows a consistent GPU-bound pattern. The CPU's headroom is evident, but frame rates are still dictated by the graphics card's workload.
Q: How does the RTX 4070 compare to its direct rivals in synthetic benchmarks?
A: In the provided benchmark data, the RTX 4070's average score of 37,648 is 0.1% higher than the NVIDIA Tesla P4 and 0.4% higher than the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56. It is 1.3% slower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile.
Q: What is the best settings preset for a 1440p monitor with a 144Hz refresh rate?
A: The High preset at 1440p yields 92 FPS, which is smooth but not sufficient for maximum refresh rate. The Low preset produces 146 FPS, which is closer to hitting 144Hz, but sacrifices visual fidelity. The Medium preset at 104 FPS is a good middle ground for high-refresh gaming.
Q: Does the Ryzen 7 9700F bottleneck the RTX 4070 in any scenario?
A: Based on the frame rate scaling, no significant bottleneck is observed. The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads provide sufficient processing power to maintain high frame rates, as seen in the 193 FPS result at 1080p Low. The performance drops are consistent with a GPU-bound workload.
Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 4K?
A: The difference is substantial. At 4K, the Low preset averages 98 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 54 FPS. This represents a 44.9% reduction in frame rate when moving from the lowest to the highest settings, illustrating the heavy cost of the game's advanced visual effects.
Settings Recommendations
For players prioritizing a high refresh rate experience at 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the clear choice, delivering an average of 106 FPS without needing to compromise on visual quality. If aiming for the highest possible frame rates, the Low preset at 193 FPS is available, but the visual downgrade is significant. The Medium preset at 137 FPS offers an excellent balance, ensuring frame times stay well above the 60 FPS threshold.
At 2560x1440, the High preset (92 FPS) is recommended for a visually rich experience that remains smooth. For players with 144Hz displays, the Low preset (146 FPS) is the only option that approaches that target, though the Medium preset (104 FPS) provides a more stable experience with better graphics. The Ultra preset at 80 FPS is still very playable and offers the best image quality for slower-paced exploration.
At 3840x2160, the priority shifts to maintaining a playable frame rate. The Medium preset, with an average of 70 FPS and a minimum of 59 FPS, is the optimal choice for a consistent experience near 60 FPS. The High preset (62 FPS) is also viable, but the margin above 60 FPS is thinner. The Ultra preset (54 FPS) is best reserved for screenshots or scenarios where frame rate is secondary to maximum visual fidelity. The Low preset (98 FPS) is surprisingly effective for 4K, offering a high-performance option for those who prioritize smoothness above all else.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F is a Zen 5 architecture processor with 8 cores and 16 threads, operating at a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. Its 32 MB of shared L3 cache and support for DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s provide the necessary data throughput for feeding the GPU. In Control, which is known for its demanding physics simulations, the CPU's multithreaded capabilities are crucial.
The CPU's benchmark performance shows a 94th percentile rank among all CPUs, with an average score of 69,996. It is closely matched with several high-end rivals: it is 0.2% faster than the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX, 0.7% faster than the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, and 0.9% faster than the Intel Core i7-14700K. It is 0.2% slower than the Intel Core i7-14700KF. These tiny margins suggest that the 9700F is at the top of its class for gaming workloads.
In the context of the measured FPS data, the CPU's role is to ensure the GPU is never starved of data. The fact that the system reaches 193 FPS at 1080p Low without a significant drop-off indicates that the CPU is not a bottleneck in this title. The smooth scaling across resolutions confirms that the GPU is the limiting component, which is the ideal scenario for a balanced gaming system. The CPU's performance headroom is sufficient for this game, and likely for other similarly demanding titles, making it a solid foundation for the RTX 4070.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 9700F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 in Control
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 98.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 70.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 62.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 54.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 146.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 104.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 92.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 80.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 193.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 137.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 122.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 106.0 |
Control with Ryzen 7 9700F + Other GPUs
See how Control performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Control with RTX 4070 + Other CPUs
See how Control performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 9700F + RTX 4070
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.