The Technomancer

The Technomancer, a 2016 action RPG, presents a demanding workload that scales significantly with resolution and image quality settings. For the pairing of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700G and the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT, the measured frame rates reveal a configuration that is well-balanced for high-refresh-rate 1080p gaming but becomes increasingly GPU-bound as resolution climbs. The data shows a clear performance hierarchy across the three tested resolutions, with the transition from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 and then to 3840x2160 producing substantial, predictable frame rate drops. This analysis breaks down the measured results, contextualizes them against other tested combos, and isolates the roles of the CPU and GPU in this specific game.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data for The Technomancer shows a clear and consistent pattern of performance degradation as resolution increases. At 1920x1080 with High settings, the combo achieves an average of 93 FPS. Moving to 2560x1440, the average drops to 61 FPS, a reduction of 32 FPS or approximately 34%. Stepping up to 3840x2160, the average falls further to 33 FPS, which is another 28 FPS drop from 1440p and a 46% reduction from the 1440p figure. This steep decline indicates that the rendering load at 4K is significantly heavier, and the system's resources are being pushed much harder.

This scaling behavior is a strong indicator that the primary limiting component at higher resolutions is the GPU. The AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT, with its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 128-bit memory bus, appears to be the bottleneck when the pixel count increases. The frame rate drops are not linear but rather show an accelerating decline, which is typical of a GPU that is running out of raw fillrate and memory bandwidth as the resolution increases. At 1080p, the load on the GPU is lighter, allowing the CPU to play a more significant role in determining the final frame rate.

The pattern holds across all settings presets. For instance, at Low settings, the average FPS goes from 142 at 1080p, to 93 at 1440p, and then to 51 at 4K. This consistent scaling confirms that the resolution is a dominant factor in performance. The data suggests that for a smooth experience at 3840x2160, even at Low settings (51 FPS), the system is under considerable strain. The gap between 1080p and 1440p is significant, but the gap between 1440p and 4K is even more pronounced, indicating that 4K gaming is the most challenging scenario for this particular hardware combination.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT is central to the performance profile observed in The Technomancer. Its specifications, including a base clock of 1968 MHz, a game clock of 2359 MHz, and a boost clock of 2589 MHz, are all relevant to how it processes the game's graphics workload. The GPU's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s, is a key factor, especially at higher resolutions where more texture data and geometry need to be stored and accessed quickly. The data shows that at 3840x2160, the average frame rates across all settings are below 60 FPS, which suggests that the GPU is struggling to keep up with the demands of the game at that resolution.

The performance differences between settings presets further highlight the GPU's role. At 1080p, the difference between Low (142 FPS) and Ultra (73 FPS) is 69 FPS, a large gap that shows the GPU's processing power is heavily taxed by higher graphical fidelity features like shadows, reflections, and post-processing. At 4K, the same comparison shows a difference of 25 FPS (51 FPS at Low vs 26 FPS at Ultra), indicating that the GPU is so saturated that the additional workload from higher settings has a relatively smaller absolute impact, though the relative performance hit is still severe. The GPU's inability to maintain a 60 FPS average at 1440p Ultra (48 FPS) and 4K Medium (39 FPS) points to a hardware limit that cannot be overcome by the CPU.

In the context of other GPUs, the RX 6600 XT's average benchmark score of 24442 places it in the 70th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630, which has a deltaPct of 0.7, and the Intel Arc A350M, which has a deltaPct of -0.8. These rivals have similar average scores, indicating that the RX 6600 XT is a mid-range performer. The measured FPS in The Technomancer aligns with this positioning; it is capable of high frame rates at 1080p but not at 4K. The GPU's performance is the deciding factor in the high-resolution results, and its limitations are clearly visible in the data.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700G and the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT ranks 2643 out of 3696 tested combinations in The Technomancer. This places it in the lower half of all tested systems, which is a notable finding given the hardware's individual specifications. The combo rank is a holistic measure that considers both the CPU and GPU's performance in this specific game. The data indicates that while this pairing is not at the bottom, it is far from the top, and many other configurations are capable of delivering higher average frame rates.

This ranking is likely influenced by the fact that the Ryzen 7 5700G is a processor with integrated graphics, and while it is a powerful 8-core, 16-thread part, its performance in gaming is often compared to dedicated CPUs without an iGPU. The RX 6600 XT is a solid mid-range GPU, but when paired with this specific CPU, the overall result is a mid-to-low-tier gaming system for this title. The rank of 2643 out of 3696 means that roughly 71% of tested combos performed better, which is a significant majority. This suggests that for gamers prioritizing high frame rates in The Technomancer, there are more capable combinations available.

The individual components' percentile rankings provide context. The CPU is in the 79th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 70th percentile of all GPUs. However, the combo rank is lower than either of these individual percentiles, which could imply a slight bottleneck or that the game is particularly sensitive to the combination of this specific CPU and GPU. The benchmark scores for the CPU, such as a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12830.5, show it is a capable processor, but its gaming performance in this specific title, when paired with this GPU, results in a rank that is lower than expected based on the individual parts' standings.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a detailed look at performance across all settings and resolutions. At 1920x1080, the combo delivers playable frame rates across the board. With Low settings, the average is 142 FPS, which is excellent for high-refresh-rate monitors. Medium settings yield 109 FPS, with a minimum of 93 and a maximum of 126 FPS. High settings produce an average of 93 FPS, and Ultra settings bring the average down to 73 FPS. This range shows that at 1080p, the system can handle even the most demanding preset with a playable frame rate, though for the smoothest experience, Medium or High settings would be preferable.

At 2560x1440, the performance drops noticeably. Low settings average 93 FPS, which is still very good. Medium settings average 71 FPS, with a minimum of 61 FPS, which is right at the edge of being considered smooth. High settings average 61 FPS, making it a borderline experience for those who prefer a 60 FPS lock. Ultra settings drop to an average of 48 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold and will likely result in noticeable stutter. At this resolution, the GPU's limitations become more apparent, and users will need to compromise on settings to achieve a stable frame rate.

At 3840x2160, the system is clearly overwhelmed. Low settings average only 51 FPS, which is not a smooth experience for most gamers. Medium settings drop to 39 FPS, with a minimum of 33 FPS, which will be quite choppy. High settings average 33 FPS, and Ultra settings fall to 26 FPS. None of these results are ideal for a playable experience, and the data strongly suggests that 4K gaming is not a viable option for this hardware combination in The Technomancer. The minimum FPS values recorded at Medium settings (33 FPS at 4K and 61 FPS at 1440p) indicate that there are moments of significant frame drops, which can impact gameplay fluidity.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G plays a supportive role in this configuration, providing the processing power needed to feed the GPU. With 8 cores and 16 threads, based on the Zen 3 architecture, it has a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. Its benchmark scores are solid, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12830.5 and a single-core score of 1494. In The Technomancer, the CPU's role appears to be secondary to the GPU, as the frame rate scaling with resolution suggests a GPU bottleneck. At 1080p Low, the system reaches 142 FPS, which is likely a point where the CPU is still able to keep up with the GPU's output.

The CPU's performance is more critical at lower resolutions and settings where the GPU has more headroom. For example, the jump from 1080p Medium (109 FPS) to 1080p High (93 FPS) is a 16 FPS drop, which is a result of the GPU doing more work, but the CPU is still able to maintain high frame rates. The data does not show a scenario where the CPU is the primary bottleneck, as even at 1080p Ultra, the system can achieve 73 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS target. The CPU's 16 MB of L3 cache and dual-channel DDR4 memory support are sufficient for this game.

Compared to its nearest CPU rivals, the Ryzen 7 5700G has an average benchmark score of 27051, which is nearly identical to the Intel Core i9-9900K (27097, deltaPct -0.2) and the Intel Core i5-14400T (27166, deltaPct -0.4). This indicates that its raw processing power is competitive with those parts. However, in this specific game, the CPU's contribution to the overall FPS is not the limiting factor. The data shows that the GPU is the dominant component in determining the final frame rate, particularly at higher resolutions, and the CPU's role is to ensure that it can keep the GPU fed with data without becoming a bottleneck itself.

FAQ

Q: What is the average FPS at 1920x1080 with High settings?

A: The measured average FPS at 1920x1080 with High settings is 93 FPS.

Q: Can this hardware run The Technomancer at 3840x2160 with a smooth 60 FPS experience?

A: No. The data shows that at 3840x2160, even with Low settings, the average FPS is only 51. At Medium settings, it drops to 39 FPS, and at Ultra, it is just 26 FPS, indicating that a 60 FPS experience is not achievable at this resolution.

Q: Which component is the primary bottleneck at 2560x1440 resolution?

A: The GPU is the primary bottleneck. At 2560x1440, the average FPS drops from 142 at 1080p Low to 93 at 1440p Low, and the performance continues to decline with higher settings, showing that the RX 6600 XT is struggling to handle the increased pixel count.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to other tested systems?

A: This combo ranks 2643 out of 3696 tested combinations in The Technomancer, placing it in the lower half of all tested configurations.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for achieving high frame rates in this game?

A: The GPU is more important. The frame rate drops significantly as resolution increases, which is a classic sign of a GPU bottleneck. The CPU, while capable, does not appear to limit performance in the tested scenarios.

Q: What is the difference in average FPS between Low and Ultra settings at 1920x1080?

A: The difference is 69 FPS. At 1920x1080, Low settings average 142 FPS, while Ultra settings average 73 FPS.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured data, the optimal settings for this hardware depend on the target resolution and desired frame rate. For a high-refresh-rate experience at 1920x1080, the Medium preset is a strong choice, delivering an average of 109 FPS with a minimum of 93 FPS, which ensures smooth gameplay with minimal dips. High settings are also viable, averaging 93 FPS, but for the most consistent frame pacing, Medium is preferable. Ultra settings, while averaging 73 FPS, may be acceptable for some, but the lower minimum frame rate could lead to occasional stutter.

At 2560x1440, the choice becomes more constrained. The Low preset, with an average of 93 FPS, provides a very smooth experience and is the best option for high refresh rates. Medium settings, at 71 FPS, are also playable, but the minimum of 61 FPS suggests that it is close to the edge. High settings, at 61 FPS, are borderline, and Ultra settings, at 48 FPS, are not recommended for a consistently fluid experience. For the best balance of visual quality and performance at 1440p, the Medium preset is the most reasonable recommendation, as it maintains a frame rate that is near or above 60 FPS in most instances.

At 3840x2160, none of the settings presets provide a fully playable experience. The Low preset, with an average of 51 FPS, is the only one that comes close to 60 FPS, but it is still below the target. Medium settings, at 39 FPS, will feel choppy, and High and Ultra are not practical options for gameplay. Given the data, the only recommendation for 4K is to use the Low preset if a lower frame rate is acceptable, but users should expect a compromised experience. For the best overall experience across all scenarios, the data suggests that 1080p with Medium or High settings offers the best balance, while 1440p with Medium settings provides a good middle ground for those with higher-resolution monitors.