The Technomancer
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 71 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 24 | 33 | 41 | 50 |
| 1440p QHD | 51 | 61 | 73 | 92 |
| 1080p Full HD | 75 | 96 | 113 | 147 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
The Technomancer with AMD Ryzen 5 7600X + AMD Radeon RX 7600, In-Depth Analysis
The Technomancer, an action RPG from 2016, presents a specific challenge for the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X and Radeon RX 7600 pairing. Measured frame rates across four resolutions and four quality presets reveal a combo that ranks 1123rd out of 1656 tested combinations, placing it in the lower half of the database. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS, settings scaling, and the roles of the CPU and GPU, using only the data provided.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo rank of 1123 out of 1656 indicates a below-average pairing for this game. The CPU itself is strong—its average benchmark score is 26272, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. The GPU, with an average score of 20258, sits in the 63rd percentile of all GPUs. Yet the combined result in The Technomancer is modest, suggesting the game's engine may not fully leverage the CPU's capabilities or that the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions.
Looking at the CPU's nearest rivals, the Ryzen 5 7600X is essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (deltaPct 0), 0.1% behind the Ryzen 7 7735U, 0.2% ahead of the Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE, and 0.2% ahead of the Ryzen 7 5700X. These tiny margins confirm the CPU is a solid mid-range performer. The GPU's nearest rivals show a similar pattern: the RX 7600 is 0.6% ahead of the RX 7600 XT, 0.8% ahead of the RX 460, 1.3% behind the RTX 3070 Mobile, and 1.5% behind the Intel Arc B570. The GPU's performance is competitive within its class, but the combo's low rank implies that The Technomancer's demands are not fully met by this pairing, especially at 4K.
Settings Recommendations
The measured FPS data provides clear guidance for each resolution. At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers 146.5 FPS, Medium 112.5, High 95.9, and Ultra 75.4. All presets exceed 60 FPS, so players can choose based on visual preference. High offers a strong balance of quality and speed, while Ultra remains playable. At 2560x1440, Low hits 91.7 FPS, Medium 72.8, High 61.2, and Ultra 50.9. Here, Medium and High are the sweet spots—both stay above 60 FPS, with High providing better visuals. Ultra dips below 60, so it is less ideal for smooth gameplay. At 3840x2160, only Low reaches a playable 49.8 FPS; Medium drops to 40.8, High to 32.5, and Ultra to 24.4. For 4K, the data suggests using Low to maintain a playable frame rate, though even that is below 60 FPS.
The best experience per the measured rows is therefore 1080p High or Ultra, or 1440p Medium/High. For 4K, Low is the only viable option, and even then the frame rate is marginal.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is steep across all settings. At High, the 1080p result is 95.9 FPS, while 4K yields 32.5 FPS—a reduction of more than 60 FPS. At Low, 1080p gives 146.5 FPS versus 49.8 at 4K. This scaling pattern strongly indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions. The CPU's single-thread performance is high (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3406, 3DMark single-thread score of 1060), and its boost clock reaches 5.30 GHz, so it is unlikely to limit frame rates at 4K. Instead, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth appear insufficient for the demands of 4K in this game. The data shows that the frame rate halves or worse when moving from 1440p to 4K, reinforcing the GPU-bound nature of the pairing at high resolutions.
Measured FPS Breakdown
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|------------|----------|---------|
| 3840x2160 | High | 32.5 |
| 3840x2160 | Low | 49.8 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 40.8 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 24.4 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 61.2 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 91.7 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 72.8 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 50.9 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 95.9 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 146.5 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 112.5 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 75.4 |
These numbers show a consistent pattern: each step up in resolution costs a significant portion of performance. The gap between Low and Ultra also widens at higher resolutions, with Ultra at 4K being only 24.4 FPS—a clear sign that the GPU is overwhelmed.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 7600 features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s. Its base clock is 1720 MHz, boost clock 2655 MHz, and game clock 2250 MHz. The memory clock is 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). These specifications are modest for 4K gaming, and the measured FPS reflects that. At 4K Ultra, the GPU delivers just 24.4 FPS, while at 1080p Low it reaches 146.5 FPS. The GPU's benchmark scores—3DMark Steel Nomad 2310, Geekbench OpenCL 82501, Vulkan 90825, and Passmark G3D 16634—place it in the 63rd percentile. Its nearest rivals are all within 1.5% in average score, so the RX 7600 is a typical mid-range card. The data suggests that the GPU's memory bandwidth and capacity are the limiting factors in The Technomancer at 4K, as the frame rate collapses when resolution increases.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on Zen 4 architecture, with a base clock of 4.70 GHz and boost clock of 5.30 GHz. It has 32 MB of shared L3 cache and supports DDR5 memory. Its benchmark results are strong: Cinebench R23 multi-core 24128, single-core 3406, Geekbench multi-core 12905, and single-core 2892. The CPU's percentile is 83, and its nearest rivals are all within 0.2% in average score. In The Technomancer, the CPU's high single-thread performance allows it to push very high frame rates at 1080p—146.5 FPS on Low—indicating that the CPU is not a bottleneck at lower resolutions. However, as resolution increases, the GPU takes over as the limiting factor. The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads are likely sufficient for this 2016 title, which may not scale beyond a few threads. The data shows that the CPU can easily feed the GPU at 1080p, but at 4K the GPU's limitations dominate.
FAQ
Q: What is the best settings preset for 1080p?
A: At 1920x1080, High delivers 95.9 FPS and Ultra 75.4 FPS, both above 60. High offers a good balance, while Ultra is still playable.
Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming?
A: Only Low reaches 49.8 FPS at 3840x2160. Medium is 40.8, High 32.5, and Ultra 24.4. For a smooth experience, 4K is not recommended.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck?
A: At 1080p, the CPU can push high frame rates (146.5 FPS on Low), so the GPU is not limiting. At 4K, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus cause a steep FPS drop, making the GPU the clear bottleneck.
Q: How does the RX 7600 compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The RX 7600 is 0.6% ahead of the RX 7600 XT, 0.8% ahead of the RX 460, 1.3% behind the RTX 3070 Mobile, and 1.5% behind the Intel Arc B570 in average benchmark score.
Q: What is the CPU's launch MSRP?
A: The Ryzen 5 7600X has a launch MSRP of $299.
Q: What is the GPU's launch MSRP?
A: The Radeon RX 7600 has a launch MSRP of 269 USD.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X
AMD Radeon RX 7600
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 7600X + AMD Radeon RX 7600 in The Technomancer
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 49.8 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 40.8 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 32.5 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 24.4 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 91.7 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 72.8 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 61.2 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 50.9 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 146.5 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 112.5 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 95.9 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 75.4 |
The Technomancer with Ryzen 5 7600X + Other GPUs
See how The Technomancer performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
The Technomancer with RX 7600 + Other CPUs
See how The Technomancer performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 7600X + RX 7600
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.