The Technomancer

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti pairing delivers a highly capable 1080p and 1440p experience in The Technomancer, with 4K reserved for lower presets. The data shows a CPU that sits in the 89th percentile of all processors, paired with a GPU that places in the 59th percentile. This combination ranks 1375th out of 2825 tested combos for this title, placing it comfortably in the upper half of the database. The benchmark results indicate a system that prioritizes high refresh rate gaming at standard resolutions while maintaining playability at 4K with settings adjustments.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 7000 series, built on the Zen 4 (Raphael) architecture using a 5 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 4.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz, drawing a 65 W TDP. The CPU features a substantial 96 MB of shared L3 cache, which is a defining characteristic of the X3D line and proves beneficial in gaming scenarios. The processor supports DDR5 memory via a dual-channel bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. It also includes integrated Radeon Graphics, though the discrete RTX 3060 Ti handles all rendering in this configuration.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 44573. Its nearest rivals in synthetic testing include the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, which scores 44466 (0.2% higher), and the Intel Core i9-13950HX at 44342 (0.5% higher). The AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 trails by 0.6% with a score of 44309, while the Intel Core i5-14600 leads by 0.7% with 44889. These deltas are minimal, indicating that the 7500X3D is performance-competitive with a broad range of modern desktop and mobile flagship processors. The PassMark single-thread score of 3494 and multithread score of 25047 suggest robust per-core performance, which is crucial for games like The Technomancer that rely on strong single-threaded logic.

In the context of this game's measured frames, the CPU's capabilities are not the primary bottleneck. The data shows that at 1080p Low settings, the system achieves 175 FPS average, which is likely near the upper limit of what the engine can produce. The CPU's high L3 cache and Zen 4 architecture ensure that frame pacing remains consistent, even when the GPU is pushed to higher settings. The 6-core/12-thread configuration is sufficient for this 2016 Action RPG, which does not appear to use more than a handful of threads effectively. The processor's 96 MB L3 cache helps maintain high minimum frame rates in complex scenes, though the measured data for minimum FPS is only available for Medium settings across all resolutions, showing values of 114 (1080p), 75 (1440p), and 41 (4K). The CPU's performance headroom suggests that the RTX 3060 Ti is the limiting factor at higher resolutions and settings, which is typical for a mid-range GPU pairing.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on the Ampere architecture with the GA104 chip, fabricated on an 8 nm Samsung process. It features 4864 shading units, 152 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output units, along with 38 ray tracing cores and 152 tensor cores. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1410 MHz and a boost clock of 1665 MHz, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). It comes equipped with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. The card has a TDP of 200 W and requires a 550 W power supply, using a single 12-pin power connector.

In synthetic benchmarks, the RTX 3060 Ti scores 20349 in PassMark G3D, placing it in the 59th percentile of all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 16129. Its nearest rivals are closely matched: the AMD Radeon RX 9060 scores 16014 (0.7% higher), the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M scores 16351 (1.4% lower), the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT scores 16361 (1.4% lower), and the AMD Radeon R9 370X scores 15862 (1.7% higher). These figures show the RTX 3060 Ti is positioned between older and newer Radeon offerings, with its 8 GB VRAM being a potential limitation at 4K Ultra settings.

The measured FPS data for The Technomancer clearly illustrates the GPU's performance envelope. At 1080p, the RTX 3060 Ti delivers 175 FPS on Low, 135 FPS on Medium, 115 FPS on High, and 90 FPS on Ultra. Moving to 1440p, the numbers drop to 115 FPS (Low), 88 FPS (Medium), 75 FPS (High), and 59 FPS (Ultra). At 4K, the GPU struggles with higher presets: 63 FPS on Low, 48 FPS on Medium, 41 FPS on High, and only 32 FPS on Ultra. The 8 GB VRAM buffer appears sufficient for this title at 1080p and 1440p, but the 4K Ultra result at 32 FPS suggests that memory capacity or bandwidth becomes a constraint, as the game's textures at that resolution likely exceed comfortable limits. The GPU's boost clock of 1665 MHz is modest by modern standards, but the high memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s helps maintain smooth performance at lower resolutions.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

The measured data provides a clear hierarchy of presets across three resolutions. For a smooth 60 FPS baseline, the RTX 3060 Ti can achieve this at 1080p on Ultra (90 FPS) and 1440p on High (75 FPS). At 4K, only the Low preset (63 FPS) reaches above 60 FPS, while Medium (48 FPS) and High (41 FPS) fall short.

For 1080p gaming, the High preset at 115 FPS offers an excellent balance, providing a significant visual upgrade over Low (175 FPS) while maintaining a high refresh rate experience. The Ultra preset at 90 FPS is still very playable and likely delivers the best image quality for those with 144Hz monitors who prefer visual fidelity over raw speed. The Medium preset at 135 FPS is a strong middle ground, but High is recommended as the sweet spot.

At 1440p, the High preset at 75 FPS is the recommended choice for most users, as it maintains a smooth frame rate while offering good visual detail. The Ultra preset at 59 FPS is borderline for 60Hz displays, but those with variable refresh rate monitors may find it acceptable. The Medium preset at 88 FPS is a viable alternative for users who prioritize frame rate over visuals. The Low preset at 115 FPS is ideal for competitive play, though it sacrifices significant visual quality.

For 4K, the data suggests that the Low preset at 63 FPS is the only viable option for a consistently smooth experience. The Medium preset at 48 FPS is playable but may exhibit noticeable stutter in fast-paced scenes. The High preset at 41 FPS is only suitable for slower, exploration-heavy sections, and the Ultra preset at 32 FPS is not recommended for action sequences. Users with 4K displays should consider lowering the resolution to 1440p for better quality-to-performance ratio, or accept the visual compromises of the Low preset.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti combination ranks 1375th out of 2825 tested combos for The Technomancer, placing it in the 51st percentile of all configurations. This means the combo outperforms approximately half of the systems tested for this game, which is a solid result given the GPU's mid-range positioning. The rank reflects the balance between the CPU's strong performance (89th percentile) and the GPU's more modest standing (59th percentile).

In the context of the entire database, this combo sits in the upper-middle tier. The CPU's high single-thread score of 3494 and large L3 cache help ensure that the system does not suffer from CPU bottlenecks in most scenarios, allowing the GPU to operate near its full potential. The GPU's 59th percentile ranking suggests that many higher-end graphics cards will deliver better absolute frame rates, but the 3060 Ti's performance is respectable for its class. The rank of 1375 indicates that this combo is viable for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but users seeking 4K Ultra experiences would need to look at higher-tier GPUs. The delta between the CPU and GPU percentiles (89 vs 59) suggests an imbalance where the processor has more headroom than the graphics card can utilize, which is typical for gaming-focused builds at this price point.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average FPS achievable at 1080p with this combo?

A: The highest average FPS at 1080p is 175 FPS, achieved with the Low preset. The High preset delivers 115 FPS, Medium delivers 135 FPS, and Ultra delivers 90 FPS.

*Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in The Technomancer?*

A: Yes, but only at lower presets. At 4K, the Low preset provides 63 FPS average, which is playable. Medium drops to 48 FPS, High to 41 FPS, and Ultra to 32 FPS, making the Low preset the only option for a consistently smooth experience.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 7500X3D compare to its nearest rival in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The Ryzen 5 7500X3D scores 44573 on average, which is 0.2% higher than the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (44466) and 0.5% higher than the Intel Core i9-13950HX (44342). It trails the Intel Core i5-14600 by 0.7% (44889).

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded for the Medium preset at 1440p?

A: The minimum FPS for the Medium preset at 1440p is 75 FPS, with a maximum of 101 FPS and an average of 88 FPS.

Q: Is the RTX 3060 Ti's 8 GB VRAM sufficient for this game at 4K?

A: The data suggests it is barely sufficient. At 4K Ultra, the average FPS drops to 32, which is likely due to VRAM capacity or bandwidth limitations. At 4K High, the average is 41 FPS, and at Medium it is 48 FPS, indicating that the 8 GB buffer struggles with higher presets at this resolution.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to all tested configurations for this game?

A: This combo ranks 1375th out of 2825 total combos tested for The Technomancer, placing it in the upper half of all configurations. This reflects a balanced but not exceptional performance profile.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured FPS data for this combo covers three resolutions and four settings presets, providing a complete picture of performance scaling.

1920x1080:

• Low: 175 FPS average
• Medium: 135 FPS average, with a minimum of 114 FPS and a maximum of 155 FPS
• High: 115 FPS average
• Ultra: 90 FPS average

2560x1440:

• Low: 115 FPS average
• Medium: 88 FPS average, with a minimum of 75 FPS and a maximum of 101 FPS
• High: 75 FPS average
• Ultra: 59 FPS average

3840x2160:

• Low: 63 FPS average
• Medium: 48 FPS average, with a minimum of 41 FPS and a maximum of 56 FPS
• High: 41 FPS average
• Ultra: 32 FPS average

The data reveals a consistent performance drop of roughly 35-40% when moving from 1080p to 1440p across most presets. For example, High settings drop from 115 FPS to 75 FPS, a reduction of 34.8%. Moving from 1440p to 4K results in a further drop of approximately 45-50%, with High settings falling from 75 FPS to 41 FPS, a 45.3% reduction. The scaling is not perfectly linear, as the Medium preset shows a 34.8% drop from 1080p to 1440p (135 to 88 FPS) and a 45.5% drop from 1440p to 4K (88 to 48 FPS). The minimum FPS values for Medium settings are 114 (1080p), 75 (1440p), and 41 (4K), which indicate that the system maintains playable frame rates even in the most demanding scenes at these resolutions. The 4K Ultra result of 32 FPS is the only measured average below 40 FPS, confirming that this resolution and preset combination is not suitable for action gameplay.