The Technomancer

The Technomancer, a 2016 Action RPG, presents an interesting test for modern hardware. This analysis focuses on the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT combination, using measured FPS data from the database. The pair demonstrates that high refresh rate gaming is possible at 1080p, while 4K demands more conservative settings. The data reveals a CPU that is more than capable of feeding the GPU, and a graphics card that scales predictably with resolution and quality presets.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael. It operates on the AMD Socket AM5 platform and is built on a 5 nm process. Its base clock is 3.70 GHz, with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The CPU has a 65 W TDP and supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus. Its cache configuration includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 32 MB of L3 cache.

For a game like The Technomancer, which is an Action RPG from 2016, the CPU's single-thread performance is often the primary factor. The data shows the Ryzen 5 7500F scores 974 in 3dmark_single_thread and 3218 in cinebench_r23_singlecore. These scores indicate strong per-core performance. In multi-threaded tests, the processor scores 6379 in 3dmark_max_threads and 22799 in cinebench_r23_multicore. The benchmark results show a clear scaling from 2 threads (1902) to 8 threads (5372), and then a smaller increase to max threads (6379), which aligns with the 6-core/12-thread design.

The CPU's performance relative to its rivals is exceptionally tight. Its average benchmark score is 24993. Compared to the Intel Core i7-11850H, it is 0.1% faster. Against the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, it is 0.3% slower, and it is also 0.3% slower than the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F. It is 0.4% faster than the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX. These deltaPct values are all within a fraction of a percent, meaning the Ryzen 5 7500F sits in a performance tier where these four rivals are functionally equivalent in average score. The processor holds the 82nd percentile against all CPUs tested, suggesting it outperforms the vast majority of processors in the database.

In the context of the measured FPS, the CPU's power is evident. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo achieves 194.2 FPS. This high frame rate, even at the lowest settings, suggests the CPU is not a bottleneck in this scenario, allowing the GPU to work at its full potential. The Ryzen 5 7500F's robust single-thread performance ensures that the game's logic and draw calls are processed quickly, which is critical for maintaining high frame rates.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

The measured FPS data provides clear guidance on which settings preset to use for different resolutions. The goal is to find a balance between visual fidelity and a smooth frame rate, typically targeting 60 FPS or higher for a pleasant experience.

• 1920x1080 (1080p): The Ultra preset yields an average of 101.5 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold and provides a high-quality visual experience. This is the recommended preset for this resolution, as it offers the best combination of performance and image quality. For players with high refresh rate monitors, the High preset at 126.4 FPS or Medium at 148.6 FPS are viable options, with Low hitting 194.2 FPS for maximum competitive performance.

• 2560x1440 (1440p): At this resolution, the Ultra preset drops to 65.7 FPS. This is still playable, but it is close to the 60 FPS line. The High preset, at 83.4 FPS, provides a more comfortable margin and is the recommended choice for a consistently smooth experience. The Medium preset at 100.3 FPS is also excellent, offering a significant performance buffer for scenarios with more on-screen action.

• 3840x2160 (4K): The Ultra preset here averages 35.3 FPS, which is not smooth enough for most players. The High preset at 45.2 FPS is also below the 60 FPS target. To achieve a playable frame rate, the Medium preset at 52.8 FPS is the minimum recommended setting. For a stable 60 FPS or higher, the Low preset at 68.1 FPS is the only option that guarantees this. The data suggests that 4K gaming with this combo requires a significant compromise on visual quality.

The benchmark results indicate that the sweet spot for this combination is High settings at 1440p or Ultra settings at 1080p. The performance scaling between presets is consistent, with Ultra being roughly 20-30% slower than High across all resolutions, based on the numbers provided.

FAQ — 4-6 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the average FPS at 2560x1440 with High settings?

A: The measured average FPS is 83.4.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 7500F compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X in average benchmark score?

A: The Ryzen 5 7500F has an average benchmark score of 24993, which is 0.3% lower than the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X's score of 25057.

Q: Is the Radeon RX 7700 XT able to run The Technomancer at 4K Ultra settings?

A: The data shows an average FPS of 35.3 at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, which is not a smooth gaming experience. Lower settings are required for playable frame rates at 4K.

Q: What is the boost clock of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F?

A: The boost clock is 5.00 GHz.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT?

A: The launch MSRP is 449 USD.

Q: What is the average FPS difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1920x1080?

A: The average FPS at Low settings is 194.2, while at Ultra it is 101.5, a difference of 92.7 FPS.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT ranks 737th out of 1656 tested combos for The Technomancer. This places it in the 44.5th percentile of all tested system configurations, meaning it performs better than 44.5% of the combos in the database for this specific game. This rank is a holistic measure of the combo's capability.

This mid-pack ranking is interesting given the strong individual component scores. The CPU is in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs, and the GPU is in the 73rd percentile of all GPUs. The combo's lower rank in this specific game suggests that The Technomancer is heavily dependent on a single performance metric, likely raw GPU rasterization power, which is not the RX 7700 XT's primary strength compared to other cards at its performance tier. The game's age, from 2016, might also mean it does not utilize the newer architectural features of the GPU efficiently.

The rank indicates that while this system is capable of running the game well, there are many other combinations that achieve higher frame rates. The measured FPS data shows that the system can hit 101.5 FPS at 1080p Ultra, which is a good result. However, the rank suggests that a significant portion of the 1656 tested combos are faster, likely those with higher-tier GPUs that can push more frames at higher resolutions. For a builder, this rank confirms that the system is a solid, but not top-tier, performer for this title.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT is based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 32 chip, codenamed Wheat Nas. It has a base clock of 1435 MHz, a game clock of 2171 MHz, and a boost clock of 2544 MHz. The card is equipped with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. Its specifications include 3456 shading units, 216 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The GPU has a 245 W TDP and requires a 550 W suggested PSU.

The GPU's role in The Technomancer is the primary determinant of frame rate, especially at higher resolutions. The data shows a clear performance scaling based on resolution. At 1920x1080, the card easily handles the game, with the Low preset hitting 194.2 FPS and Ultra still achieving 101.5 FPS. Moving to 2560x1440, the performance drops proportionally, with Ultra at 65.7 FPS. At 3840x2160, the card starts to struggle with the higher settings, as the pixel count demands more from the 12 GB VRAM and the GPU's compute units.

The GPU's benchmark scores provide context for its relative performance. It scores 22547 in passmark_g3d and has an average benchmark score of 30097. This places it in the 73rd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060, has an identical average score of 30109 with a 0% deltaPct. The AMD Radeon RX 570 is 0.2% slower, while the NVIDIA Tesla M60 is 0.4% faster and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile is 0.6% faster. These numbers indicate the RX 7700 XT is a solid mid-range performer, but its relative ranking in this game's combo list suggests that its strengths are better utilized in newer titles than in this 2016 release.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive look at the performance of this combo across different settings and resolutions.

1920x1080 (1080p):

• Low: 194.2 FPS
• Medium: 148.6 FPS
• High: 126.4 FPS
• Ultra: 101.5 FPS

At 1080p, the combo delivers excellent performance. The jump from Low to Medium is a 45.6 FPS drop, while the drop from High to Ultra is 24.9 FPS. The system can easily power high refresh rate monitors at this resolution with the High or Ultra preset.

2560x1440 (1440p):

• Low: 128.8 FPS
• Medium: 100.3 FPS
• High: 83.4 FPS
• Ultra: 65.7 FPS

At 1440p, the performance remains strong. The Low preset is nearly as fast as the Ultra preset is at 1080p. The Ultra preset at 65.7 FPS is playable, but the High preset provides a better buffer for consistent frame times. The scaling from Low to Ultra shows a total drop of 63.1 FPS.

3840x2160 (4K):

• Low: 68.1 FPS
• Medium: 52.8 FPS
• High: 45.2 FPS
• Ultra: 35.3 FPS

At 4K, the limitations of the GPU become apparent. Only the Low preset achieves an average above 60 FPS. The Medium preset at 52.8 FPS is the minimum for a console-like experience, while High and Ultra fall below 45 FPS, which is not ideal for a fast-paced game. The data shows a steep drop-off in performance as settings increase at this resolution, highlighting the GPU's memory bandwidth and compute limits.