The Medium
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 78 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 47 | 58 | 76 | 93 |
| 1440p QHD | 64 | 73 | 82 | 99 |
| 1080p Full HD | 70 | 80 | 90 | 109 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
The Medium with Intel Core i5-10400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080, In-Depth Analysis
The data for The Medium, paired with the Intel Core i5-10400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080, reveals a configuration where the GPU is the dominant performance driver, but the CPU still imposes a measurable ceiling at lower resolutions. The benchmark results show a clear hierarchy of settings and resolutions, with the system delivering playable frame rates across the board, though the gap between Low and Ultra settings widens significantly as resolution increases.
Resolution Scaling
Resolution scaling in The Medium tells a clear story about where the performance bottleneck lies. Moving from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 on High settings yields a drop from 79.7 FPS to 73.2 FPS, a relatively modest decline of 6.5 FPS. However, the jump from 2560x1440 to 3840x2160 at the same settings is far more pronounced, with the average frame rate falling to 57.7 FPS. This pattern indicates that the RTX 5080 is the limiting component at 4K, where pixel throughput demands increase exponentially.
The scaling behavior changes character at lower settings. At Low, the 1080p result of 108.5 FPS drops to 99.2 FPS at 1440p, and then to 93 FPS at 4K. This is a surprisingly mild penalty for the resolution increase, suggesting that at Low settings, the workload shifts away from the GPU and toward the CPU. The i5-10400F, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, appears to hold the system back from reaching higher frame rates even at 1080p Low, as evidenced by the relatively compressed spread between resolutions.
Ultra settings exhibit the steepest scaling curve. The 1080p Ultra result of 70 FPS falls to 63.6 FPS at 1440p, and then to 47.1 FPS at 4K. This 22.9 FPS drop from 1080p to 4K represents a 32.7% reduction in performance, confirming that Ultra settings place a heavy burden on the GPU's shading units and memory subsystem. The data shows that 4K Ultra is marginally playable at 47.1 FPS, while 1080p Ultra remains comfortably above 60 FPS.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 brings substantial resources to this title, including 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, yielding 960.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration is more than sufficient for The Medium's requirements, as evidenced by the consistent performance scaling across settings. The GPU's 10752 shading units and 112 ROPs drive the pixel rate of 293.1 GPixel/s, which becomes the critical factor at 4K resolution.
Clock speeds play a notable role in the observed results. The base clock of 2295 MHz and boost clock of 2617 MHz provide the headroom needed to maintain frame rates across different settings. The 56.28 TFLOPS of FP32 compute power is the primary driver for the substantial differences between Low and Ultra settings. At 1080p, the gap between Low (108.5 FPS) and Ultra (70 FPS) is 38.5 FPS, but this spread narrows in relative terms as resolution increases.
The GPU's 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores are relevant for The Medium's rendering pipeline, though the benchmark data does not isolate ray tracing performance. The 360 W TDP and dual-slot design indicate a high-power part, and the data confirms it delivers accordingly. The GPU's percentile rank of 89 versus all GPUs places it firmly in the upper echelon, though its nearest rivals in aggregate benchmarks include the Intel Arc A570M and Arc A580, which show that synthetic scores do not always translate directly to gaming performance.
FAQ
Q: What is the highest average frame rate achievable with this combo?
A: The highest measured average is 108.5 FPS at 1920x1080 with Low settings. The next best is 99.2 FPS at 2560x1440 with Low settings, followed by 93 FPS at 3840x2160 with Low settings.
Q: Is 4K gaming viable with this processor and GPU combination?
A: Yes, but with caveats. At 4K, the Medium preset yields 75.5 FPS, and High produces 57.7 FPS. Ultra settings drop to 47.1 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold many players prefer.
Q: How does the RTX 5080's memory bandwidth affect performance?
A: The 960.0 GB/s bandwidth from 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus ensures that memory is not a bottleneck. The smooth scaling from 1080p to 4K, particularly at Medium and High settings, indicates sufficient bandwidth headroom.
Q: What is the CPU's contribution to frame rates at 1080p?
A: The i5-10400F, with 6 cores and 12 threads, appears to limit performance at 1080p Low, where the frame rate of 108.5 FPS is only 9.3 FPS higher than at 1440p. This suggests a CPU constraint that prevents the GPU from fully flexing at lower resolutions.
Q: Which settings preset provides the best balance of quality and performance?
A: Medium settings provide the most consistent experience across resolutions, with 90.3 FPS at 1080p, 81.5 FPS at 1440p, and 75.5 FPS at 4K. This preset keeps all resolutions above 60 FPS while offering better visual fidelity than Low.
Q: How does the combo rank among other tested configurations?
A: This combination ranks 366 out of 1689 tested combos for The Medium, placing it in the top 22% of all configurations. This rank reflects strong overall performance despite the CPU being a mid-range part.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo rank of 366 out of 1689 tested configurations places this system in the 78th percentile for The Medium. This is a strong showing given that the CPU is a 10th-generation part, while the GPU is from the current 50-series generation. The rank suggests that the RTX 5080's raw power compensates for the i5-10400F's age in this title.
The CPU's aggregate benchmark percentile of 73 versus all CPUs, with an average score of 14168, positions it near rivals like the AMD EPYC 7552 (14115, 0.4% delta) and Intel Core i5-8500 (14332, -1.1% delta). These close margins indicate that the i5-10400F is competitive with older and newer mid-range parts, though it lacks the headroom of higher-tier CPUs. The GPU's percentile of 89 and average score of 59188 place it well above its nearest rivals in synthetic tests, with the Intel Arc A570M at 58239 (1.6% delta) being the closest competitor.
The combination of a top-tier GPU with a mid-tier CPU yields a rank that is better than the CPU's individual standing but not as high as the GPU's alone. This indicates that The Medium is partially CPU-bound at lower settings, capping the system's overall potential. For players prioritizing frame rates at 1080p, this combo delivers, but the rank suggests that a stronger CPU would push the system into the top 300 configurations.
Settings Recommendations
The measured data supports Medium as the optimal settings preset for this configuration. At Medium, the system delivers 90.3 FPS at 1080p, 81.5 FPS at 1440p, and 75.5 FPS at 4K. These results are all comfortably above 60 FPS, providing a smooth experience across all common resolutions. The scaling from Medium to High is moderate, with a 10.6 FPS penalty at 1080p (90.3 to 79.7) and a 17.8 FPS penalty at 4K (75.5 to 57.7).
For players with 1080p displays, High settings offer a better visual experience at 79.7 FPS, which is still well above the 60 FPS threshold. However, the jump to Ultra at 1080p yields 70 FPS, which is acceptable but begins to approach the boundary where frame pacing issues may become noticeable. At 1440p, High settings at 73.2 FPS are the recommended choice for quality-focused players, while Medium at 81.5 FPS is the safer option for competitive play.
At 4K, the data strongly recommends Medium settings. The 75.5 FPS result at Medium is the only 4K preset that exceeds 60 FPS, while High at 57.7 FPS and Ultra at 47.1 FPS both fall short. Low settings at 4K produce 93 FPS, but the visual fidelity loss is substantial, making Medium the clear winner for balancing quality and performance at this resolution.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the frame rates scale predictably with settings. Low delivers 108.5 FPS, Medium produces 90.3 FPS, High achieves 79.7 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 70 FPS. The spacing between settings is relatively even, with roughly 10-18 FPS separating each tier. This indicates a balanced workload that responds well to graphics adjustments.
At 2560x1440, the results are 99.2 FPS for Low, 81.5 FPS for Medium, 73.2 FPS for High, and 63.6 FPS for Ultra. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is most pronounced at Low settings, where the frame rate falls by 9.3 FPS. At Ultra, the penalty is 6.4 FPS, showing that higher settings become more GPU-bound and thus less affected by the resolution change.
At 3840x2160, the frame rates are 93 FPS for Low, 75.5 FPS for Medium, 57.7 FPS for High, and 47.1 FPS for Ultra. The 4K results show the widest spread between settings, with a 45.9 FPS difference between Low and Ultra. This dramatic range demonstrates that the RTX 5080's capabilities are fully taxed at 4K, particularly when advanced graphical features are enabled.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i5-10400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Comet Lake architecture, built on Intel's 14 nm process. Its base clock of 2.90 GHz and boost clock of 4.30 GHz provide adequate single-thread performance, as reflected in its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1453 and Geekbench single-core score of 1454. These scores are sufficient for gaming, though they lag behind newer architectures.
The CPU's 12 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR4 memory support with 42.7 GB/s bandwidth are modest by modern standards. In The Medium, the CPU's influence is most evident at 1080p Low, where the frame rate of 108.5 FPS does not scale as aggressively with the GPU's capability as it does at higher resolutions. The data suggests that the CPU begins to saturate around 100-110 FPS in this title, regardless of resolution, which is why 1080p Low and 1440p Low produce similar results (108.5 and 99.2 FPS).
The CPU's aggregate benchmark score of 14168 places it in the 73rd percentile, with its nearest rival being the AMD EPYC 7552 at a 0.4% delta. This positioning indicates that the i5-10400F is a competent gaming processor, but its age limits the system's ability to push frame rates beyond the 110 FPS threshold in CPU-bound scenarios. For players targeting 60 FPS at 4K, the CPU is not a significant bottleneck, as the GPU becomes the limiting factor. However, for high-refresh-rate 1080p gaming, the CPU's 6-core, 12-thread configuration may prevent the RTX 5080 from reaching its full potential.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i5-10400F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i5-10400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 in The Medium
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 93.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 75.5 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 57.7 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 47.1 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 99.2 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 81.5 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 73.2 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 63.6 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 108.5 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 90.3 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 79.7 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 70.0 |
The Medium with ii5-10400F + Other GPUs
See how The Medium performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
The Medium with RTX 5080 + Other CPUs
See how The Medium performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii5-10400F + RTX 5080
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.