The Medium

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F is a 6-core, 12-thread desktop processor based on the Zen 3 architecture (Vermeer codename) built on a 7 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.00 GHz, featuring 32 MB of shared L3 cache. The 5600F posts a Passmark single-thread score of 2872 and a multithread score of 19236, placing it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs. In the context of The Medium, these specifications indicate a processor that is well-equipped to handle the game’s logical simulation and streaming demands without becoming the primary bottleneck at typical gaming resolutions.

The Ryzen 5 5600F sits within a tightly contested performance envelope, as shown by its nearest rivals. Its average benchmark score of 36945 is virtually identical to the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 (36938, deltaPct 0), the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D (37018, deltaPct -0.2), the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 (37093, deltaPct -0.4), and the Intel Core i9-12900T (37112, deltaPct -0.5). The performance deltas here are negligible, all within 0.5% of each other, which suggests that for a game like The Medium, the 5600F is not a differentiator in frame rate; instead, the GPU and graphics settings will dictate the experience. Its Passmark physics score of 1043, while a separate metric, reinforces that the CPU can manage the game’s environmental interactions.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The data reveals that the Ryzen 5 5600F provides a stable foundation for The Medium, but its influence on the measured frame rates is secondary to the graphics card. The game’s performance scaling across resolution and settings is consistent with a GPU-bound workload. For instance, at 1920x1080 with Low settings, the average FPS is 101, but this jumps to 45 at High settings and drops to 36 at Ultra. This drastic reduction in frame rate when increasing graphical fidelity points directly to the GPU as the limiting factor, not the CPU.

The 5600F’s 6-core, 12-thread configuration is more than sufficient for the game’s multi-threaded engine, as evidenced by its Passmark multithread score of 19236. The 32 MB of shared L3 cache also helps in maintaining smooth frame pacing by reducing memory latency for frequently accessed game data. In this combo, the CPU is never the weakest link; it is a capable platform that allows the RTX 2070 SUPER to operate at its full potential. The measured FPS data shows a typical pattern where CPU-bound scenarios (like low resolution and low settings) yield very high frame rates, confirming that the 5600F is not holding back performance.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

Within the benchmark database, this specific pairing of the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ranked 1648 out of 2911 tested combinations for The Medium. This places it in the 56.6th percentile of all tested combos. This ranking suggests that while the hardware is competent, it is not at the top tier of performance for this title. The data shows that the combo sits in the middle of the pack, meaning there are many other tested systems that achieve higher average frame rates and some that perform worse.

This mid-pack ranking is a direct result of the RTX 2070 SUPER’s capabilities rather than a deficiency in the CPU. The benchmark results indicate that the combo is positioned in the upper-middle echelon of hardware, offering a playable experience at most settings but not reaching the high refresh rate territory at maximum graphical fidelity. The 1648th rank out of 2911 combos is a useful data point for setting expectations: this system is not a top-tier performer for The Medium, but it is far from the bottom, providing a solid baseline for 1080p and 1440p gaming.

FAQ — 4-6 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the highest average frame rate achieved by this combo in The Medium?

A: The highest average frame rate recorded is 101 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.

Q: How does the combo perform at 4K resolution?

A: At 3840x2160, the average frame rates range from 24 FPS at Ultra settings to 67 FPS at Low settings. The Medium setting averages 42 FPS, with minimum and maximum values of 35 and 48 FPS respectively.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the primary bottleneck in this configuration?

A: The benchmark data indicates the GPU is the primary bottleneck. When lowering graphical settings from Ultra to Low at the same resolution, frame rates increase dramatically (e.g., from 36 FPS to 101 FPS at 1080p), a pattern characteristic of GPU-limited performance. The CPU’s scores are consistent across all tests and do not show signs of limiting.

Q: What is the combo’s overall ranking compared to other tested systems?

A: This combo ranks 1648 out of 2911 tested combinations, placing it in the 56th percentile of all tested hardware pairings for this game.

Q: What are the minimum frame rates recorded for this combo?

A: Minimum frame rates are only provided for the Medium settings. At 1920x1080, the minimum is 54 FPS; at 2560x1440, it is 45 FPS; and at 3840x2160, it is 35 FPS. No minimum data is available for Low, High, or Ultra settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured FPS data for this combo provides a clear picture of its performance envelope across three resolutions and four quality presets. At 1920x1080, the system is highly capable. The Low preset delivers an average of 101 FPS, which is the highest frame rate recorded for this combo. Moving to Medium, the average drops to 63 FPS, with a minimum of 54 and a maximum of 72. High settings produce an average of 45 FPS, while the Ultra preset yields an average of 36 FPS. This scaling shows a clear pattern: each step up in quality reduces the average frame rate by a significant margin, indicating the GPU’s workload is the dominant factor.

At 2560x1440, the performance decreases as expected. The Low preset averages 85 FPS, which is a substantial drop from the 101 FPS at 1080p. The Medium preset averages 53 FPS, with minimum and maximum values of 45 and 61 FPS respectively. High settings bring the average down to 38 FPS, and Ultra settings result in 30 FPS average. The transition from 1080p to 1440p shows a roughly 15-20% reduction in frame rate across all settings, which is a typical penalty for the increased pixel count.

At 3840x2160, the combo struggles to maintain playable frame rates at higher settings. The Low preset is the only one that provides a comfortable experience, averaging 67 FPS. The Medium preset averages 42 FPS, with a minimum of 35 and a maximum of 48 FPS. High settings average 30 FPS, which is borderline for smooth gameplay. The Ultra preset averages just 24 FPS, making it unsuitable for a smooth experience. The data shows that this GPU is not designed for 4K gaming at maximum quality, but it can handle 4K at lower settings.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is the primary driver of performance in The Medium, as evidenced by the measured FPS scaling. This GPU features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. It operates at a base clock of 1605 MHz and a boost clock of 1770 MHz, with a TDP of 215 W. The card’s 2560 shading units and 64 ROPs are responsible for its rasterization performance, which is the core requirement for this horror title.

The benchmark results show that the RTX 2070 SUPER’s performance is heavily dependent on resolution and settings. At 1920x1080, it provides excellent frame rates, exceeding 60 FPS on Medium and reaching 101 FPS on Low. However, at 3840x2160, the frame rate drops below 30 FPS on Ultra settings, indicating that the GPU’s compute and memory resources are saturated. The 8 GB VRAM is likely a contributing factor at higher resolutions and quality presets, as the game’s textures and effects demand more memory, leading to reduced performance. The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 18169 places it in the 65th percentile, and its nearest rivals, such as the Intel Arc B570 (20556, deltaPct -1.3) and Arc A750 (20582, deltaPct -1.5), are slightly faster in synthetic tests, but the in-game data shows this card is still a solid performer for 1080p and 1440p gaming.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal experience for this combo depends on the target resolution. For 1920x1080, the Medium preset is the best choice for a smooth and visually appealing experience. It averages 63 FPS, with a minimum of 54 FPS, ensuring that frame pacing remains stable without dropping into stutter territory. The High preset, at 45 FPS average, is also playable but may feel less fluid during intense scenes. The Low preset, while hitting 101 FPS, sacrifices too much visual quality for a marginal gain in smoothness.

At 2560x1440, the Medium preset is again the recommended setting. It averages 53 FPS and maintains a minimum of 45 FPS, which is just above the threshold for comfortable play. The High preset at 38 FPS is a compromise, but the reduced minimum frame rates could lead to noticeable hitches. For players prioritizing frame rate over visual fidelity, the Low preset at 85 FPS is a viable option, but it does not showcase the game’s atmosphere effectively.

At 3840x2160, the data suggests that only the Low preset provides a consistently playable experience, averaging 67 FPS. The Medium preset, with an average of 42 FPS and a minimum of 35 FPS, is playable but may exhibit occasional slowdowns. High and Ultra settings are not recommended for 4K, as their average frame rates fall to 30 FPS and 24 FPS respectively, which is too low for a smooth experience in a horror game where quick reaction times may be necessary. The best overall experience for this hardware is to target 1920x1080 or 2560x1440 with the Medium preset, balancing visual quality and performance.