The Long Drive
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 106 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 29 | 45 | 72 | 82 |
| 1440p QHD | 53 | 78 | 128 | 153 |
| 1080p Full HD | 85 | 121 | 193 | 233 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
The Long Drive with Intel Core i5-13400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, In-Depth Analysis
Resolution Scaling
The Long Drive's frame rate behavior across resolutions reveals a system that transitions from CPU-bound at 1080p to increasingly GPU-bound as pixel count rises. At 1080p Low, the Intel Core i5-13400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 combination produces 232.8 FPS, but that figure drops by roughly 47% when moving to 1440p Low (153.2 FPS) and by another 47% when stepping up to 4K Low (81.8 FPS). This steep, consistent decline at the lowest settings indicates the RTX 3070's rendering throughput becomes the limiting factor even before visual complexity increases.
The scaling pattern shifts dramatically when settings are raised. At Ultra quality, the frame rate falls from 84.8 FPS at 1080p to 53 FPS at 1440p—a 37.5% reduction—and then to 29.1 FPS at 4K, another 45% drop. The 4K Ultra result of 29.1 FPS is the lowest measured figure in the entire dataset and sits below the 30 FPS threshold often considered the minimum for playable frame pacing. Meanwhile, the gap between Low and Ultra at each resolution tells its own story: at 1080p the spread is 148 FPS (232.8 down to 84.8), but at 4K that spread narrows to just 52.7 FPS (81.8 down to 29.1). This compression of performance headroom at higher resolutions confirms that the RTX 3070's 8 GB frame buffer and memory bandwidth are being saturated by the increased pixel workload.
The Medium preset occupies an interesting middle ground. At 1080p Medium, the combo delivers 192.6 FPS, which is 17% lower than Low but still 127% higher than Ultra. At 1440p Medium, the 128 FPS result remains comfortably above the 60 FPS playability mark. However, at 4K Medium, the frame rate falls to 71.9 FPS, which is only 11.9 FPS higher than the 4K High result of 44.5 FPS. The relatively small delta between Medium and High at 4K—just 27.4 FPS—suggests that the GPU's shading resources are already stretched thin, and additional pixel work from higher settings yields diminishing returns. The data points to a component balance where the i5-13400F has ample headroom at lower resolutions, but the RTX 3070 becomes the definitive bottleneck as resolution climbs.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i5-13400F brings a 10-core, 16-thread configuration based on Raptor Lake architecture, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and boost clock of 4.60 GHz. Its 20 MB shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 memory support provide the memory subsystem necessary for feeding a discrete GPU in a driving simulation. In synthetic benchmarks, the processor scores 21,279 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 3,004 in single-core, with a PassMark multithread score of 25,032. These figures place it at the 82nd percentile among all CPUs, indicating strong absolute performance.
The CPU's behavior in The Long Drive is best understood through the frame rate differentials at 1080p. At Low settings, the combo reaches 232.8 FPS, which is 40.2 FPS higher than the Medium result of 192.6 FPS and 148 FPS higher than Ultra. This wide spread at the same resolution suggests the game's simulation logic—physics, AI, and world-state updates—is not the limiting factor; otherwise, all settings would cluster near the same frame rate. Instead, the CPU delivers enough single-thread throughput to keep up with the GPU even at high frame rates. The single-core Cinebench R20 score of 1,261 and Geekbench single-core score of 2,301 support this interpretation, as driving simulations often rely heavily on a few primary threads for vehicle dynamics.
The i5-13400F's multi-threaded capabilities appear sufficient for this title's background tasks. Its 3DMark 16-thread score of 7,314 and max-thread score of 7,307 show near-linear scaling from 8 threads (5,591) to 16 threads, indicating the processor can handle parallel workloads like asset streaming and physics sub-systems without creating a bottleneck. The fact that 1080p Low delivers 232.8 FPS—nearly double the 1440p Low result of 153.2 FPS—while the CPU's work per frame remains constant across resolutions confirms that the processor is not the primary constraint at higher pixel counts. The data shows the CPU's role is enabling high frame rates at lower resolutions, where its 4.60 GHz boost clock and 10-core layout provide sufficient headroom for the game's logic to run unimpeded.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, built on the Ampere architecture with the GA104 chip, features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its boost clock of 1725 MHz and 5888 shading units produce 20.31 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, with 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores for hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS. The GPU's 72nd percentile ranking among all GPUs places it in the upper-midrange tier, and its PassMark G3D score of 22,214 reflects solid rasterization performance.
In The Long Drive, the RTX 3070's VRAM capacity becomes a notable factor at 4K. The 8 GB frame buffer is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p at all settings, as evidenced by playable frame rates even at Ultra (84.8 FPS at 1080p and 53 FPS at 1440p). However, at 4K Ultra, the combination drops to 29.1 FPS, and the gap between 4K Medium (71.9 FPS) and 4K High (44.5 FPS) suggests that texture data and shading complexity are overwhelming the memory subsystem. The 448.0 GB/s bandwidth, while substantial for a 2020 GPU, appears insufficient to sustain high-quality rendering at 4K in this title, where draw distances and open-world streaming may demand larger texture pools.
The GPU's clock behavior and compute throughput are better demonstrated at lower resolutions. At 1080p Low, the 232.8 FPS result shows the RTX 3070 is not the limiting factor—the CPU's frame output ceiling is higher, but the GPU keeps pace. The transition from 1080p to 1440p at Low settings (232.8 to 153.2 FPS) represents a 34% performance reduction, which correlates with the 78% increase in pixel count (2.07 million to 3.69 million pixels). This near-linear scaling indicates the GPU's fill rate and texture units are being fully utilized. The RTX 3070's 184 texture mapping units and 96 ROPs deliver a texture rate of 317.4 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 165.6 GPixel/s, which explains why the GPU can maintain high frame rates at 1440p Medium (128 FPS) but struggles when pixel workload quadruples at 4K.
FAQ
Q: What frame rate can this combo achieve at 1080p with Ultra settings?
A: The Intel Core i5-13400F with NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 delivers 84.8 FPS on average at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, which is comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay.
Q: Is the RTX 3070's 8 GB VRAM sufficient for The Long Drive at 4K?
A: At 4K Medium, the combo achieves 71.9 FPS, but at 4K High the frame rate drops to 44.5 FPS, and at 4K Ultra it falls to 29.1 FPS. The data suggests the 8 GB frame buffer and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for consistent playability at 4K with high or ultra settings.
Q: How does the i5-13400F compare to its nearest CPU rivals?
A: The i5-13400F has an average benchmark score of 25,236, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core i7-13620H (25,201) and 0.5% higher than the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 (25,099). It trails the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D (25,365) by 0.5% and sits 0.5% behind the AMD EPYC 9474F (25,103).
Q: What is the best resolution/settings combination for this system?
A: Based on the measured data, 1440p High delivers 78.4 FPS, while 1080p High reaches 121.1 FPS. For 4K, only Low settings (81.8 FPS) or Medium settings (71.9 FPS) provide frame rates above 60 FPS.
Q: Does the CPU bottleneck the GPU at 1080p Low?
A: The 1080p Low result of 232.8 FPS is the highest measured frame rate in the dataset, and the CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 960 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,004 indicate strong single-thread performance. The data shows the CPU can feed the GPU effectively at this resolution and settings level.
Q: How does the RTX 3070 compare to its nearest GPU rivals?
A: The RTX 3070's average benchmark score is 28,238, which is 0.9% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (27,985) and 1% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti (27,956). It trails the AMD FirePro S7150 (28,409) by 0.6% and the AMD Radeon R9 M295X (28,541) by 1.1%.
How This Combo Ranks
The Intel Core i5-13400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 ranks 748th out of 1,734 tested combinations in The Long Drive, placing it in the 57th percentile of all measured system configurations. This mid-pack positioning reflects the balance between the CPU's strong 82nd percentile ranking and the GPU's more modest 72nd percentile standing. The combo outperforms roughly 57% of all tested systems, which is a solid result for a desktop setup with components from the 13th-gen Core and 30-series GeForce lineups.
The rank becomes more meaningful when contextualized against the component-level benchmarks. The CPU's average benchmark score of 25,236 places it in the top 18% of all processors, while the GPU's average score of 28,238 places it in the top 28% of all GPUs. The system's 748th rank of 1,734 suggests that many higher-ranked combinations likely pair the RTX 3070 with faster CPUs or pair the i5-13400F with more powerful GPUs. However, the measured frame rates in The Long Drive reveal that this combination's actual performance is competitive with systems ranked higher, particularly at 1080p and 1440p where the CPU's headroom allows the GPU to operate near its full potential.
The gap between component-level percentiles and the system's overall rank indicates that The Long Drive's performance characteristics favor the GPU more heavily than the CPU. At 4K Ultra, the 29.1 FPS result is a clear GPU limitation, and even a higher-ranked CPU would not meaningfully improve that outcome. Conversely, at 1080p Low, the 232.8 FPS result shows the CPU is capable of driving frame rates that exceed most display refresh rates. The combo's rank of 748 is therefore a reasonable reflection of its balanced but not top-tier positioning, with the RTX 3070's 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth serving as the primary constraints in this driving simulation's most demanding scenarios.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i5-13400F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i5-13400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 in The Long Drive
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 81.8 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 71.9 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 44.5 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 29.1 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 153.2 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 128.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 78.4 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 53.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 232.8 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 192.6 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 121.1 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 84.8 |
The Long Drive with ii5-13400F + Other GPUs
See how The Long Drive performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
The Long Drive with RTX 3070 + Other CPUs
See how The Long Drive performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii5-13400F + RTX 3070
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.