Steamworld Build

Steamworld Build is a city builder, and the data for this combo of AMD Ryzen 5 7600X and Intel Arc B370 shows a configuration that is heavily constrained by its graphics solution. The measured frame rates across all resolutions and settings place this pairing in the low end of the performance spectrum, ranking 2683 out of 2924 tested combos. The CPU provides a solid foundation, but the integrated GPU becomes the definitive bottleneck, especially as resolution and graphical load increase. The data points to a system suitable for lower-resolution play at moderate settings, with a steep performance cliff as you push toward higher presets and 4K.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, built on a 5 nm process. It features a base clock of 4.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, with a 32 MB shared L3 cache. In the broader context of all tested CPUs, this processor sits at the 79th percentile, indicating it is a capable part for general computing and gaming. Its average benchmark score of 27636 is nearly identical to that of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X and Intel Core i5-12600K, with a delta of just 0.2%, meaning the 7600X offers essentially the same raw processing power as those rivals in synthetic tests.

For a city builder like Steamworld Build, which often involves managing numerous entities and simulating game logic, the CPU's multi-threaded performance is relevant. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15236 and Geekbench multicore score of 13858 suggest that the 7600X has sufficient headroom to handle the game's simulation layer. The single-thread performance is also strong, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2603 and a 3DMark single-thread score of 1060, which is important for the main game thread that often dictates frame pacing in such titles.

However, the measured FPS in this game do not reflect a CPU bottleneck. The frame rates scale dramatically with GPU-related settings, such as resolution and graphical preset. For instance, at 1080p, the average FPS increases from 55 on High to 95 on Low, a jump of 40 FPS that is characteristic of a GPU limitation, not a CPU one. The CPU's consistent performance across these scenarios indicates it is not the limiting factor; it is feeding the GPU with data as fast as needed, but the graphics processor cannot keep up with the rendering demands at higher settings. The data suggests that the 7600X is more than capable of supporting a more powerful discrete GPU, but in this specific combo, its potential is untapped due to the Arc B370's performance ceiling.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

The measured data provides a clear picture of playability across different presets. The goal is to identify a settings level that balances visual quality with a playable frame rate, generally considered to be 30 FPS or higher for a city builder, though higher is always better.

At 1920x1080, the Medium preset offers the best combination of performance and visual fidelity. The data shows an average FPS of 73, with a minimum of 62 and a maximum of 84. This is a smooth, playable experience that is significantly better than the 55 FPS average on High. While the Low preset achieves 95 FPS, it does so at a substantial visual cost. For players prioritizing a stable frame rate with acceptable visuals, Medium is the optimal choice at 1080p.

Moving up to 2560x1440, the Low preset becomes the only viable option for a consistently smooth experience, hitting an average of 61 FPS. The Medium preset at this resolution drops to 46 FPS, which is still playable but shows a noticeable dip. The High preset at 35 FPS is borderline, and the Ultra preset at 23 FPS is not recommended for a playable experience.

At 3840x2160, the situation is challenging. The data shows that even the Low preset only manages an average of 32 FPS, which is at the edge of playability. The Medium preset drops to 25 FPS, and High dips to 18 FPS. The Ultra preset is effectively unplayable at 12 FPS. Based on the measured rows, 4K gaming is not a practical option for this combo, with even the lowest settings struggling to maintain a smooth frame rate.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo play Steamworld Build at 4K resolution?

A: The data indicates that 4K gaming is not feasible. Even at the Low preset, the average FPS is only 32, and it drops to 25 on Medium and 18 on High. The Ultra preset achieves a mere 12 FPS, making the game unplayable at that resolution.

Q: What is the best settings preset for a 1080p monitor?

A: The Medium preset at 1920x1080 provides the best experience, with an average FPS of 73 and a minimum of 62. This offers a smooth frame rate while maintaining a reasonable level of visual detail, outperforming the High preset's 55 FPS average.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B370 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Arc B370's average benchmark score of 1184 is nearly identical to the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570, which scores 1186. It is also within 0.5% of the ATI Radeon HD 5770 and 0.7% of the AMD Radeon HD 7650M, indicating a similar level of raw graphics performance.

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X the bottleneck in this system?

A: No. The frame rates scale significantly with graphics settings and resolution, which is a classic sign of a GPU bottleneck. The CPU's strong performance, as indicated by its 79th percentile ranking and scores like the Cinebench R23 multi-core of 15236, suggests it is not the limiting factor in this game.

Q: What is the performance difference between the Low and Ultra presets at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 61 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 23 FPS. This represents a drop of 38 FPS, or a performance decrease of over 60%, when moving from the least to most demanding settings.

Q: Does the CPU's performance in synthetic benchmarks translate to a better experience in this game?

A: The CPU's benchmark scores, such as the 3DMark 16-thread score of 6879, indicate strong processing power. However, in Steamworld Build, the measured FPS is primarily determined by the GPU. The CPU's capabilities are sufficient, but they do not compensate for the graphics card's limitations at higher settings.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The combo of the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X and Intel Arc B370 ranks 2683 out of 2924 tested combinations in Steamworld Build. This places it in the bottom 10% of all configurations tested, which is a direct result of the GPU's low performance percentile. The Intel Arc B370 sits at the 5th percentile among all tested GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 1184. This is a very low score, indicating that the graphics processor is the primary reason for this combo's poor ranking.

In contrast, the CPU is a high-performing part, ranking at the 79th percentile. This creates a significant performance imbalance. The data shows that this combo's ranking is almost entirely dictated by the GPU. While the CPU is capable of high performance, as shown by its 0.2% delta from the Ryzen 7 5700X, its power is effectively wasted in this pairing. The combo rank reflects the overall gaming experience, which is severely limited by the graphics solution. For context, if the same CPU were paired with a more capable GPU, the ranking would likely be significantly higher, as the CPU is not the constraint. This pairing represents a case where the CPU's potential is not realized due to the GPU's limitations.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Arc B370 is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) based on the Xe3-LPG architecture, built on a 3 nm process. It has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz. Critically, it uses System Shared memory, meaning it has no dedicated VRAM and relies on the system's main memory. Its bandwidth is listed as "System Dependent," which means performance is tied to the speed and configuration of the system RAM.

The GPU's compute specifications are modest. It has 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, and 20 ROPs, along with 10 ray tracing cores. Its FP32 performance is 6.144 TFLOPS. These specs put it in the low-end tier of graphics processors, which is confirmed by its 5th percentile ranking among all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 1184 is nearly identical to that of an ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570, a legacy part from over a decade ago.

The lack of dedicated VRAM and the low raw compute power directly explain the measured FPS in Steamworld Build. The game's rendering demands increase with resolution and settings, and the Arc B370 simply cannot process the necessary pixel data fast enough. At 1920x1080, it manages 95 FPS on Low, but this drops to 37 FPS on Ultra. At 3840x2160, the workload is too great, and the GPU is overwhelmed, resulting in just 32 FPS on Low and 12 FPS on Ultra. The performance degradation across the board is consistent with a GPU that is starved for memory bandwidth and lacks the shading units to handle high-resolution assets and effects.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive look at this combo's capabilities. The performance scales predictably with resolution and settings, but the absolute numbers are low.

At 1920x1080, the best-case scenario for this combo, the results are as follows:

• Low: 95 FPS average. This is the only setting that delivers a very smooth experience.
• Medium: 73 FPS average, with a minimum of 62 and a maximum of 84. This is a solid, playable experience.
• High: 55 FPS average. This is playable but begins to show the GPU's strain.
• Ultra: 37 FPS average. This is a significant drop and is on the edge of playability.

At 2560x1440, the performance takes a clear hit:

• Low: 61 FPS average. This is the only acceptable setting for a consistent frame rate.
• Medium: 46 FPS average, with a minimum of 39 and a maximum of 53. This is playable but less smooth.
• High: 35 FPS average. This is borderline playable.
• Ultra: 23 FPS average. This is not a playable experience.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is severely overburdened:

• Low: 32 FPS average. This is at the minimum threshold for playability.
• Medium: 25 FPS average, with a minimum of 21 and a maximum of 28. This is not a smooth experience.
• High: 18 FPS average. This is not playable.
• Ultra: 12 FPS average. This is effectively a slideshow.

The data shows a clear pattern: the combo is only suitable for 1080p gaming with settings capped at Medium or Low. For 1440p, Low is the only viable option. 4K is out of the question for any meaningful gameplay. The minimum FPS data for Medium settings further confirms the instability at higher resolutions, with the gap between average and minimum FPS widening as resolution increases, indicating frame time inconsistency.