Rust
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 124 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 50 | 66 | 79 | 117 |
| 1440p QHD | 85 | 112 | 133 | 181 |
| 1080p Full HD | 124 | 163 | 176 | 205 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Rust with Intel Core i5-12400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, In-Depth Analysis
The Intel Core i5-12400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 delivers a distinctly resolution-dependent experience in Rust. The data shows an Ultra preset is only viable for 1080p displays, while High settings are the practical ceiling for 1440p. At 4K, even Medium settings struggle to hold 80 FPS, making Low the only smooth option for UHD panels. This combo ranks in the 91st percentile of tested configurations, but the CPU’s mid-range position limits performance at lower resolutions where the GPU has headroom.
Settings Recommendations
The measured FPS data makes the settings hierarchy clear. At 1920x1080, the combo handles all presets well: Low averages 205 FPS, Medium averages 176 FPS, High averages 163 FPS, and Ultra averages 124 FPS. The jump from High to Ultra costs 39 FPS, which is a 24% drop, suggesting that High is the sweet spot for 1080p gaming if you want to preserve a high refresh rate experience. Ultra remains playable, but the frame rate penalty is substantial.
For 2560x1440, the recommendation shifts. High averages 112 FPS, which is comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold and provides a smooth experience on most 1440p monitors. Medium averages 133 FPS, but the data shows a minimum of 113 FPS, which is still excellent. Ultra drops to 85 FPS, which is playable but noticeably less fluid than the lower presets. Low averages 181 FPS, but this preset is likely to reduce visual fidelity too much for the resolution. The optimal choice is High, as it balances visual quality with a 112 FPS average.
At 3840x2160, the situation changes dramatically. High averages 66 FPS, which is borderline for a 60 Hz display. Medium averages 79 FPS with a minimum of 67 FPS, making it the best playable option for 4K. Ultra averages only 50 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target and will feel stutter-prone. Low averages 117 FPS, but the visual trade-off at 4K is severe. The data indicates that Medium is the recommended preset for 4K, as it provides the highest average FPS above 60 while maintaining acceptable visual quality.
GPU Role
The RTX 4080 is the dominant component in this pairing, and its 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus provides 716.8 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU’s boost clock reaches 2505 MHz, with a base clock of 2205 MHz. The 9728 shading units and 76 RT cores handle Rust’s rendering load effectively, but the data shows that the GPU is not always the limiting factor.
At 4K, the GPU’s role is clear. The measured FPS scales with preset complexity: Low averages 117 FPS, Medium averages 79 FPS, High averages 66 FPS, and Ultra averages 50 FPS. This is a classic GPU-bound scenario where the RTX 4080’s raw compute power determines the frame rate. The 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for Rust at any preset, as the game does not appear to exceed this capacity in the measured rows.
At lower resolutions, the GPU’s role diminishes. At 1080p, the difference between Low and High is only 42 FPS (205 vs 163), which is a 20% gap. This suggests that the CPU is starting to become a factor, as the RTX 4080 is capable of higher frame rates than the CPU can feed. The GPU’s 48.74 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is more than enough for 1080p Rust, but the frame rates are capped by other bottlenecks. The GPU’s percentile ranking of 86 against all GPUs confirms it is a high-end part, but in this combo, its full potential is only realized at 4K.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i5-12400F has 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. Its 18 MB of shared L3 cache is a modest amount for a gaming CPU. The benchmark data shows a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12380 and a single-core score of 1680, which places it in the 73rd percentile of all CPUs. This is a mid-range processor, and Rust is known to be CPU-intensive in certain scenarios.
The CPU’s influence is most visible at 1080p. The measured FPS at Low is 205, which is high, but the gap between Low and Medium is only 29 FPS (205 vs 176). This relatively small difference suggests that the CPU is limiting the frame rate, as a purely GPU-bound system would show a larger drop when moving from Low to Medium. The same pattern appears at 1440p, where Low averages 181 FPS and Medium averages 133 FPS, a 48 FPS gap that is larger than at 1080p but still indicates CPU involvement.
The 12400F’s 12 threads are likely a bottleneck in Rust’s simulation-heavy areas, particularly when many players or structures are present. The nearest rivals in the CPU benchmark data include the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS with a delta of 0%, the Intel Core 3 201E at -0.1%, and the Intel Core i5-1335U at 0.3%. These rivals are similar in performance, confirming that the 12400F is not a high-end CPU. At 4K, the CPU’s role is reduced, as the GPU becomes the primary constraint, but at 1080p and 1440p, the CPU is a limiting factor that prevents the RTX 4080 from reaching its full potential.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo rank in Rust is 320 out of 3723 tested combinations, which places it in the top 8.6% of all configurations. This is a strong ranking, driven largely by the RTX 4080’s high-end performance. However, the rank is not higher because the i5-12400F holds the combo back in CPU-bound scenarios.
The data shows that this combo is well-suited for 4K gaming, where the GPU dominates. At 4K High, the 66 FPS average is respectable, and at 4K Medium, the 79 FPS average with a 67 FPS minimum is smooth. The combo’s rank would likely be higher if the CPU were stronger, as the RTX 4080 is capable of higher frame rates at 1080p and 1440p than the 12400F can deliver.
Compared to other combos, this pairing is balanced for high-resolution gaming but less so for competitive 1080p play. The 320th rank out of 3723 indicates that most of the combinations above this one likely feature stronger CPUs paired with high-end GPUs. For a builder targeting 4K or high-fidelity 1440p, this combo is a solid choice. For 1080p esports-style play, the CPU will be the limiting factor, and the rank reflects that.
FAQ
Q: Is this combo good for 4K gaming in Rust?
A: Yes, the data shows that at 3840x2160, Medium settings average 79 FPS with a minimum of 67 FPS, which is smooth. High settings average 66 FPS, which is playable, while Ultra drops to 50 FPS and is not recommended.
Q: What is the best preset for 1440p?
A: High settings at 2560x1440 average 112 FPS, making it the best choice for visual quality and performance. Medium averages 133 FPS but with a lower visual fidelity, and Ultra averages 85 FPS.
Q: Does the CPU bottleneck the GPU at 1080p?
A: The data suggests yes. At 1920x1080, Low averages 205 FPS and High averages 163 FPS, a 42 FPS difference that is smaller than what a fully GPU-bound system would show. The 6-core, 12-thread CPU is likely the limiter.
Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 4080 have, and is it enough?
A: The RTX 4080 has 16 GB of GDDR6X memory. The measured FPS data shows no signs of VRAM limitations at any resolution or preset, so 16 GB is sufficient for Rust.
Q: What is the combo’s overall ranking?
A: The combo ranks 320th out of 3723 tested combinations, putting it in the top 8.6% of all configurations tested.
Q: Is the Ultra preset ever worth using?
A: Only at 1080p, where Ultra averages 124 FPS. At 1440p, Ultra averages 85 FPS, and at 4K, it averages 50 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its highest frame rates. Low settings average 205 FPS. Medium settings average 176 FPS, with a minimum of 149 FPS and a maximum of 202 FPS. High settings average 163 FPS. Ultra settings average 124 FPS. The data shows a clear progression, with each preset tier reducing performance by roughly 20-40 FPS.
At 2560x1440, performance scales down. Low settings average 181 FPS. Medium settings average 133 FPS, with a minimum of 113 FPS and a maximum of 153 FPS. High settings average 112 FPS. Ultra settings average 85 FPS. The gap between Medium and High is 21 FPS, while the gap between High and Ultra is 27 FPS.
At 3840x2160, the GPU is fully utilized. Low settings average 117 FPS. Medium settings average 79 FPS, with a minimum of 67 FPS and a maximum of 90 FPS. High settings average 66 FPS. Ultra settings average 50 FPS. The drop from Low to Medium is 38 FPS, and from Medium to High is 13 FPS, showing that the GPU is the primary constraint at this resolution.
The measured data includes minimum and maximum FPS only for the Medium preset at each resolution. At 1080p Medium, the range is 149 to 202 FPS. At 1440p Medium, the range is 113 to 153 FPS. At 4K Medium, the range is 67 to 90 FPS. These ranges indicate that the Medium preset provides a stable experience, with the 4K minimum of 67 FPS being the only instance where the frame rate dips near the 60 FPS threshold.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i5-12400F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i5-12400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 in Rust
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 117.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 79.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 66.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 50.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 181.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 133.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 112.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 85.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 205.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 176.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 163.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 124.0 |
Rust with ii5-12400F + Other GPUs
See how Rust performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Rust with RTX 4080 + Other CPUs
See how Rust performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii5-12400F + RTX 4080
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.