Rust
This combination offers playable performance with an average of 36 FPS, though you may want to lower settings for smoother gameplay.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 13 | 18 | 21 | 31 |
| 1440p QHD | 23 | 30 | 35 | 53 |
| 1080p Full HD | 33 | 43 | 51 | 76 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Rust with AMD Ryzen 7 7700X + Intel Arc B390, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X paired with the Intel Arc B390 produces a severely GPU-limited experience in Rust, with performance that ranks near the bottom of all tested combinations. Across all resolutions and settings, the frame rates are consistently low, indicating that the integrated-class GPU is the overwhelming bottleneck, while the CPU’s substantial multi-threading capabilities remain largely underutilized. The data shows a clear pattern: this combo is only suitable for the lowest graphical presets at 1080p, where it can achieve a playable average, but it fails to deliver acceptable performance at higher resolutions or quality settings.
Resolution Scaling
The frame rate drop from 1080p to 4K in Rust is steep and reveals a system entirely constrained by the graphics processor. At Low settings, the average FPS falls from 76 at 1920x1080 to 53 at 2560x1440, a reduction of approximately 30%. Scaling further to 3840x2160, the average drops to 31 FPS, which is just 41% of the 1080p performance. This steep decline is characteristic of a GPU that is already at its limit even at the lowest resolution, and it indicates that the rendering workload is the primary factor limiting performance.
The pattern holds across all quality presets. At Medium settings, the average FPS drops from 51 at 1080p to 35 at 1440p, and then to 21 at 4K. At High settings, the averages are 43, 30, and 18 FPS for 1080p, 1440p, and 4K, respectively. The Ultra preset shows the most dramatic scaling, with average FPS falling from 33 at 1080p to 23 at 1440p, and finally to 13 at 4K. The consistent halving of performance from 1080p to 4K across all settings confirms that the Intel Arc B390 is the limiting component, as a CPU-bound scenario would show much smaller performance gaps when the resolution increases.
The 4K results are particularly telling. At Ultra settings, the combo averages only 13 FPS, which is effectively unplayable. Even at Low settings, 4K performance reaches just 31 FPS, which does not provide a smooth experience for a fast-paced survival game. The data indicates that the resolution scaling is entirely GPU-bound, and the 7700X’s processing power does not compensate for the GPU’s lack of rendering headroom. Consequently, users must prioritize lower resolutions to achieve any semblance of playability.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution and settings combination for this hardware in Rust?
A: The only configuration that yields a comfortable frame rate is 1920x1080 with Low settings, which produces an average of 76 FPS. All other tested combinations fall below 60 FPS, with 4K Ultra dropping to an average of 13 FPS.
Q: How much performance is lost when moving from 1080p to 4K at Low settings?
A: The average frame rate drops from 76 FPS at 1920x1080 to 31 FPS at 3840x2160, representing a loss of 45 FPS. This indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck, as the rendering load at 4K overwhelms its capabilities.
Q: Is the Ryzen 7 7700X the reason for the low frame rates?
A: No. The benchmark results indicate a severe GPU bottleneck. The CPU’s strong multi-core performance, as evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 19088, is not the limiting factor, since the frame rates are consistently low even at 1080p where CPU load is typically higher.
Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?
A: At 2560x1440, the average FPS drops from 53 at Low settings to 23 at Ultra settings. This shows that the GPU struggles with the increased graphical fidelity, resulting in a 57% performance reduction when switching to the highest quality preset.
Q: Does this combo rank well compared to other tested systems?
A: No. It ranks 2601 out of 2953 tested combinations, placing it in the bottom 12% of all systems. This is a very poor ranking, reflecting the limited performance of the integrated GPU.
Q: Are there any settings where the minimum FPS is close to the average?
A: At 1080p Medium settings, the minimum FPS is 44, which is close to the average of 51. This suggests that frame pacing is relatively stable, but it is still below the 60 FPS threshold for a smooth experience.
GPU Role
The Intel Arc B390 is the decisive component in this pairing, and its specifications explain the low performance observed in Rust. It is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2500 MHz. The memory is system shared, meaning its bandwidth is dependent on the system’s RAM. The GPU has 1536 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster output units. These are modest numbers for a modern game, and the 7.680 TFLOPS of FP32 compute power is insufficient for demanding titles at high resolutions.
The GPU’s benchmark results show it sits in the 9th percentile of all GPUs, with an average 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1482. This places it in the same performance tier as very old or low-end dedicated graphics cards like the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX and GT 710, which have average scores of 1463 and 1443, respectively. The data confirms that the Arc B390 is not designed for gaming at 1440p or 4K, and its performance is severely limited even at 1080p.
The lack of dedicated VRAM is also a critical factor. Because the GPU uses system shared memory, it competes with the CPU for memory bandwidth. In Rust, which is known for its complex world rendering, this shared memory configuration likely exacerbates the performance issues, particularly at higher resolutions where more memory is needed for textures and geometry. The pixel rate of 60.00 GPixel/s and texture rate of 120.0 GTexel/s are not enough to handle the demands of 4K Ultra settings, which is why the combo only averages 13 FPS in that scenario.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of this combo’s capabilities. At 1920x1080, the best-case scenario is Low settings, which delivers an average of 76 FPS. This is the only setting that achieves a frame rate above 60 FPS. The Medium preset averages 51 FPS, with a minimum of 44 and a maximum of 59. High settings drop to 43 FPS, while Ultra averages 33 FPS. These numbers show that even at the lowest resolution, the GPU is struggling to maintain high frame rates as settings increase.
Moving to 2560x1440, performance degrades significantly. The Low preset averages 53 FPS, which is a substantial drop from the 76 FPS at 1080p. Medium settings average 35 FPS, with a minimum of 30 and a maximum of 41. High settings dip to 30 FPS, and Ultra falls to 23 FPS. None of these averages are suitable for competitive or immersive play, as they all fall below the 60 FPS threshold.
At 3840x2160, the results are largely unplayable. Low settings average 31 FPS, which is a 59% drop from the 1080p Low result. Medium settings average 21 FPS, with a minimum of 18 and a maximum of 24. High settings average 18 FPS, and Ultra averages just 13 FPS. The data shows a clear pattern of diminishing returns, where the GPU cannot keep up with the rendering demands of 4K, regardless of the quality preset. The difference between Low and Ultra at 4K is only 18 FPS, highlighting how the GPU’s raw processing power is the primary constraint.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo’s ranking in Rust is exceptionally poor, placing 2601st out of 2953 tested combinations. This puts it in the bottom 12% of all systems, which is a strong indicator of its limited gaming potential. The data suggests that the GPU is so weak that it essentially negates the benefits of the high-end CPU. While the Ryzen 7 7700X is a powerful processor, it cannot compensate for the Arc B390’s lack of rendering power in a GPU-intensive game like Rust.
This low rank is consistent with the GPU’s individual percentile ranking. The Arc B390 sits in the 9th percentile of all GPUs, meaning it performs better than only 9% of the tested graphics hardware. When paired with a CPU that sits in the 85th percentile, the result is a stark mismatch. The combo’s ranking of 2601 indicates that most other CPU-GPU pairings in the database provide a better experience in Rust, likely because they feature dedicated graphics cards with significantly more processing power.
The ranking also implies that for users with this specific hardware, there is no headroom for future graphical improvements in Rust. As the game receives updates that increase its visual fidelity, this combo will likely fall further behind, as the GPU is already at its limit. The data supports the conclusion that this is a fundamentally imbalanced system for gaming, where the CPU’s power is wasted due to the GPU’s severe limitations.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X plays a minor role in this combo’s Rust performance, as the GPU bottleneck masks its capabilities. The CPU is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, with a base clock of 4.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. It has 32 MB of shared L3 cache and supports DDR5 memory. Its benchmark scores are strong, including a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 19088 and a single-core score of 1987. It also achieves a Passmark multithread score of 35686.
In Rust, the CPU’s strong multi-threading performance is not fully utilized because the frame rates are so low. At 1080p Low, the average FPS is 76, which is likely near the CPU’s limit for this game, but at higher settings and resolutions, the GPU is clearly the limiting factor. The CPU’s high single-thread performance, indicated by its 3DMark single-thread score of 1090 and Passmark single-thread score of 4190, should be sufficient for Rust’s game logic and physics, but it does not translate to higher frame rates when the GPU cannot render frames fast enough.
The 7700X’s nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845, Intel Core 7 250H, and AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, which have average benchmark scores of 35802, 35728, and 35719, respectively. The 7700X has an average benchmark score of 35909, putting it slightly ahead of these rivals by margins of 0.3% to 0.7%. This data confirms that the CPU is a high-performing part, but its power is irrelevant when paired with the Arc B390 in Rust. The combo’s low ranking is a direct result of the GPU’s inability to keep up, not a fault of the CPU.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X
Intel Arc B390
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 7700X + Intel Arc B390 in Rust
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 31.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 21.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 18.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 13.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 53.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 35.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 30.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 23.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 76.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 51.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 43.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 33.0 |
Rust with Ryzen 7 7700X + Other GPUs
See how Rust performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Rust with Arc B390 + Other CPUs
See how Rust performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 7700X + Arc B390
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.