Rust

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER pairing produces a mid-table result in Rust, ranking 2640th out of 3723 tested combos. This places the configuration in the lower half of the database, a position driven by the GPU’s age and the CPU’s strong but not class-leading throughput. The data shows a system that can handle Rust at 1080p with high frame rates, but it struggles to maintain playable performance at 4K on higher presets. This analysis breaks down the processor and graphics card contributions, the measured frame rates, and the optimal settings for this specific combination.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, built on TSMC’s 7 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, with a 105 W TDP. The CPU’s cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a 32 MB shared L3 cache. This configuration is well-suited for a game like Rust, which is known for its simulation-heavy gameplay and server-side calculations that can benefit from multiple threads.

Benchmark results for the 5800XT show a strong single-threaded foundation, with a 3dmark_single_thread score of 959 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3359. Multi-threaded performance is equally robust, as evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23794 and a 3dmark_max_threads score of 7680. The processor’s Passmark multithread score of 28053 and integer math score of 93942 indicate that it can handle complex AI and world-simulation tasks without becoming a bottleneck at lower resolutions.

The CPU’s percentile ranking versus all processors is 81, meaning it outperforms the majority of CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals in average benchmark score include the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H (deltaPct 0), the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (deltaPct -0.3), and the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X (deltaPct 0.6). These deltas are minimal, showing that the 5800XT is statistically tied with these processors in overall synthetic benchmarks. In Rust, this means the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU with enough data at 1080p and 1440p, but its performance headroom becomes less relevant when the GPU is the limiting factor at 4K.

The 5800XT supports DDR4 memory with a dual-channel bus and a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. While not the fastest platform available, this bandwidth is sufficient for Rust’s typical memory access patterns. The CPU’s PCIe Gen 4 support with 20 lanes ensures that the GPU and storage devices have adequate bandwidth, though the RTX 2060 SUPER itself uses PCIe 3.0 x16. The processor is unlocked for overclocking, which could offer modest gains, but the measured data in this database reflects stock performance.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER is a Turing-architecture GPU with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. Its base clock is 1470 MHz with a boost clock of 1650 MHz, and the memory operates at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The GPU has 2176 shading units, 136 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units, along with 34 RT cores and 272 tensor cores. This specification set gives the card a FP32 performance of 7.181 TFLOPS and a texture rate of 224.4 GTexel/s.

The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM is a critical factor in Rust, which can consume significant memory at higher resolutions and settings. The measured data shows that at 4K Ultra, the average FPS drops to 24, which is likely due to both the GPU’s compute limits and potential VRAM pressure. At 1080p and 1440p, the VRAM capacity is less of a concern, but the card’s raw compute power still dictates performance. The RTX 2060 SUPER’s Passmark G3D score is 16462, and its percentile ranking versus all GPUs is 62, placing it in the upper-middle tier of the database.

The GPU’s nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile (deltaPct -0.4), AMD Radeon Pro 5700 (deltaPct -0.5), and AMD Radeon RX 460 (deltaPct -1.5). These deltas are small, indicating that the RTX 2060 SUPER’s performance is comparable to these cards in synthetic tests. In Rust, the GPU’s role becomes dominant at 4K, where the average FPS at High settings is 32, and at Ultra it is 24. At 1440p, the GPU is still the primary bottleneck, with FPS ranging from 41 at Ultra to 95 at Low. At 1080p, the CPU’s capabilities come into play, allowing the GPU to push higher frame rates, with a Low preset average of 138 FPS.

The GPU’s 175 W TDP and dual-slot design are standard for this performance class, and it requires a 450 W power supply. The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, which are all API features that Rust can leverage for modern rendering. The 8 GB VRAM is a limiting factor at 4K Ultra, where the game likely exceeds this capacity, but at lower settings and resolutions, it is sufficient.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The combo of the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER ranks 2640th out of 3723 tested combinations in Rust. This places the pairing in the 71st percentile of the database, meaning about 29% of tested combos perform worse, but a significant majority perform better. This rank is influenced by the GPU’s mid-tier position (62nd percentile) relative to the CPU’s higher tier (81st percentile). The CPU is not the limiting factor; the GPU is.

Compared to other combos in the database, the 5800XT’s synthetic benchmark scores are nearly identical to its nearest CPU rivals, with deltas under 0.6%. This suggests that pairing the RTX 2060 SUPER with a faster CPU would not yield substantial FPS gains, as the GPU would still be the bottleneck in most scenarios. Conversely, pairing the 5800XT with a more powerful GPU would likely move this combo significantly higher in the rankings, as the CPU has headroom to support higher frame rates.

The combo’s rank of 2640 indicates that it is not a top-tier configuration for Rust, but it is also not at the bottom. The measured FPS data supports this: at 1080p, the combo achieves playable frame rates across all presets, with Low averaging 138 FPS and High averaging 78 FPS. At 1440p, the combo is still viable, with Low averaging 95 FPS and Medium averaging 64 FPS. However, at 4K, the combo struggles, with only the Low preset achieving an average above 50 FPS (56 FPS), while High and Medium fall to 32 and 38 FPS respectively, and Ultra drops to 24 FPS.

This rank suggests that the combo is best suited for 1080p gaming, where it can deliver high refresh rates on lower presets and solid performance on higher presets. At 1440p, it is a capable 60 FPS machine on Medium settings, but it will not sustain high refresh rates on Ultra. At 4K, it is only playable on Low settings, and even then, the average FPS of 56 is borderline for smooth gameplay.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of this combo’s performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its best results. The Low preset averages 138 FPS, which is excellent for competitive play. The Medium preset averages 92 FPS, with a minimum of 79 FPS and a maximum of 106 FPS. The High preset averages 78 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 59 FPS. These numbers show that at 1080p, the combo can handle all presets, with only Ultra dipping below 60 FPS on average.

At 2560x1440, performance drops noticeably. The Low preset averages 95 FPS, which is still smooth. The Medium preset averages 64 FPS, with a minimum of 54 FPS and a maximum of 73 FPS, indicating some frame time variance. The High preset averages 54 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 41 FPS. At this resolution, the combo is best used with Medium or Low settings to maintain a consistent 60 FPS or higher. High and Ultra presets will result in sub-60 FPS averages, which may be less desirable for fast-paced gameplay.

At 3840x2160, the combo is severely limited. The Low preset averages 56 FPS, which is playable but not ideal. The Medium preset averages 38 FPS, with a minimum of 32 FPS and a maximum of 43 FPS, showing significant frame drops. The High preset averages 32 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 24 FPS. These numbers make 4K gaming impractical for this combo, except on the Low preset, and even then, the frame rate is not stable enough for a consistently smooth experience.

The data reveals a clear pattern: the combo scales well from Low to Medium settings at each resolution, but the jump to High and Ultra introduces steep performance penalties. At 1080p, the difference between Low (138 FPS) and Ultra (59 FPS) is 79 FPS, showing that the GPU is taxed heavily by higher presets. At 1440p, the difference between Low (95 FPS) and Ultra (41 FPS) is 54 FPS. At 4K, the difference between Low (56 FPS) and Ultra (24 FPS) is 32 FPS, with diminishing returns as the resolution increases.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Rust?

A: The data shows that 1920x1080 is the only resolution where all presets achieve an average FPS above 55, with Low at 138 FPS, Medium at 92 FPS, High at 78 FPS, and Ultra at 59 FPS. 1440p is viable for Low and Medium, but 4K is only playable on Low (56 FPS).

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT has an average benchmark score of 29879, which is nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H (29868, deltaPct 0) and the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (29955, deltaPct -0.3). It is slightly ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X (29713, deltaPct 0.6). These differences are negligible, showing the 5800XT is competitive with these chips.

Q: Is the RTX 2060 SUPER’s 8 GB VRAM sufficient for Rust?

A: The measured FPS data suggests that 8 GB is adequate for 1080p and 1440p at all presets, as the frame rates remain playable. At 4K, the Ultra preset averages only 24 FPS, which may be due to VRAM limitations or compute constraints, but the Low preset at 56 FPS indicates the card can still function at this resolution with reduced settings.

Q: What is the combo’s overall rank in the database for Rust?

A: The combo ranks 2640th out of 3723 tested combinations. This places it in the lower half of the database, reflecting the GPU’s mid-tier status (62nd percentile) relative to the CPU’s higher tier (81st percentile).

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 2060 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 18093. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile, scores 18159 (deltaPct -0.4), while the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 scores 18189 (deltaPct -0.5). These deltas are minimal, indicating similar performance levels.

Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming in Rust?

A: The data shows that 4K gaming is only feasible on Low settings, with an average FPS of 56. Medium (38 FPS), High (32 FPS), and Ultra (24 FPS) all fall below 40 FPS on average, making them unsuitable for smooth gameplay. Users should stick to 1080p or 1440p for a better experience.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend on the target resolution and frame rate. For 1920x1080, the Medium preset offers the best balance of visual quality and performance, averaging 92 FPS with a minimum of 79 FPS. This ensures smooth gameplay without sacrificing too much visual fidelity. The High preset is also viable, averaging 78 FPS, but the drop from Medium to High is 14 FPS, which may not be worth the visual improvement for some users. The Ultra preset, at 59 FPS, is borderline and only recommended for users who prioritize visuals over frame rate consistency.

For 2560x1440, the Low preset is the safest choice, averaging 95 FPS, which provides a smooth experience. The Medium preset averages 64 FPS, but the minimum FPS of 54 indicates occasional stutters, which could be problematic in competitive scenarios. Users who can tolerate frame rate dips may prefer Medium, but Low is recommended for consistent performance. High (54 FPS) and Ultra (41 FPS) are not recommended for 1440p, as they fall below the 60 FPS threshold.

For 3840x2160, the only viable option is the Low preset, which averages 56 FPS. This is playable, but the frame rate is not stable enough for fast-paced action. Medium (38 FPS) and higher presets are not recommended, as they result in sub-40 FPS averages that will feel sluggish. Users seeking 4K performance should consider a more powerful GPU or lower the resolution.

The data indicates that the Medium preset at 1080p is the sweet spot for this combo, offering the highest average FPS above 90 with a reasonable minimum. For users with high refresh rate monitors, the Low preset at 1080p (138 FPS) is the best option to maximize frame rates. At 1440p, the Low preset provides the best experience, while at 4K, only Low is playable. The combo’s performance is heavily dependent on the preset, and users should prioritize frame rate over visual quality for a smoother experience.