Barony

In Barony, a roguelike released in 2015, the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER pairing produces measured average frame rates from 45.5 FPS at 3840x2160 Ultra to 289.3 FPS at 1920x1080 Low. The dataset is flagged as measured and spans Low, Medium, High, and Ultra presets at each recorded resolution. Against all tested Barony combos, this configuration ranks 1203rd out of 1702. The CPU sits at the 86th percentile and the GPU at the 63rd percentile, giving a useful starting point for interpreting the game results.

How This Combo Ranks

At the aggregate level, the Ryzen 7 5800XT is a strong part of this pairing. Its average benchmark score is 29774, and it ranks at the 86th percentile of all CPUs. The nearest listed rivals are tightly clustered: the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE scores 29740 with a deltaPct of 0.1, the Ryzen 7 6800HS scores 29856 with -0.3, the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 scores 29682 with 0.3, and the Ryzen 7 7840H scores 29868 with -0.3. These deltas are small on both sides, so the 5800XT is not an outlier relative to its peer group.

The GPU side is more mid-pack. The RTX 2060 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 19774 and sits at the 63rd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the GTX TITAN at 19706 with a deltaPct of 0.3, the RTX 2070 at 19680 with 0.5, the Quadro K5200 at 19623 with 0.8, and the Tesla K40m at 19519 with 1.3. All of these deltas are positive, meaning the 2060 SUPER’s aggregate score is above each named rival. The closest is the GTX TITAN, with a delta of only 0.3.

Despite the CPU’s strong aggregate position, the game-specific ranking in Barony is 1203rd of 1702. This shows that measured FPS in this title is not simply a reflection of the CPU’s high percentile standing. The actual Barony results for this CPU-GPU combination are what define the rank.

GPU Role

The RTX 2060 SUPER’s memory configuration consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, with 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth. Its base clock is 1470 MHz, boost clock is 1650 MHz, and memory clock is 1750 MHz, listed as 14 Gbps effective. These figures describe the GPU’s capacity for high pixel-count work more than its low-resolution behavior.

In this dataset, the highest 4K preset, Ultra, averages 45.5 FPS, while the lowest 4K preset, Low, averages 94.7 FPS. At 2560x1440, the range is from 181.3 FPS on Low down to 84 FPS on Ultra. At 1920x1080, Low averages 289.3 FPS and Ultra averages 130.1 FPS. The GPU’s influence becomes more visible as resolution and quality rise: at 4K the average drops to 57.7 FPS on High and 71.9 FPS on Medium with Ultra at 45.5 FPS. The data does not include VRAM usage, so actual frame buffer utilization cannot be confirmed; the available capacity is 8 GB.

FAQ

Q: What are the highest and lowest measured averages in this dataset?

A: The highest average is 289.3 FPS at 1920x1080 Low. The lowest average is 45.5 FPS at 3840x2160 Ultra.

Q: How close is the CPU to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 7 5800XT’s average benchmark score is 29774. Its nearest rivals are the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE at 29740 with a deltaPct of 0.1, the Ryzen 7 6800HS at 29856 with -0.3, the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 at 29682 with 0.3, and the Ryzen 7 7840H at 29868 with -0.3. These are small deltas in both directions.

Q: How close is the GPU to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 2060 SUPER’s average benchmark score is 19774. The nearest rivals are the GTX TITAN at 19706 with a deltaPct of 0.3, the RTX 2070 at 19680 with 0.5, the Quadro K5200 at 19623 with 0.8, and the Tesla K40m at 19519 with 1.3. Each rival’s score is below the 2060 SUPER’s.

Q: What does the combo deliver at 1440p Ultra?

A: At 2560x1440 Ultra, average FPS is 84. For comparison, 1440p Low averages 181.3 FPS, Medium averages 137 FPS, and High averages 113.3 FPS.

Q: Are the FPS values averages, or do they include minimums and maximums?

A: The dataset contains only average FPS values. The minFps and maxFps fields are null for every resolution and settings combination.

Q: How does 1080p High compare to 4K High?

A: At 1920x1080 High, average FPS is 184.6. At 2560x1440 High, it is 113.3. At 3840x2160 High, it is 57.7. This is the measured High preset progression across the three resolutions.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The table below lists every measured FPS point in the dataset. All values are average FPS; no minimum or maximum values are reported.

| Resolution | Settings | Average FPS |

|---|---|---|

| 1920x1080 | Low | 289.3 |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 211.9 |

| 1920x1080 | High | 184.6 |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 130.1 |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 181.3 |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 137 |

| 2560x1440 | High | 113.3 |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 84 |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 94.7 |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 71.9 |

| 3840x2160 | High | 57.7 |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 45.5 |

The ordering is consistent: at every resolution, Low yields the highest average FPS, followed by Medium, then High, then Ultra. The absolute values scale with both pixel count and quality settings.

Resolution Scaling

Resolution scaling is the clearest trend in the measured data. At Low, average FPS moves from 289.3 at 1080p to 181.3 at 1440p to 94.7 at 4K. At Medium, the progression is 211.9, 137, and 71.9. At High, it is 184.6, 113.3, and 57.7. At Ultra, it is 130.1, 84, and 45.5. Every preset loses a substantial number of frames at each higher step.

Because the CPU is at the 86th percentile while the GPU is at the 63rd, the CPU has more aggregate headroom relative to its peers than the GPU. The Barony results fit that pattern. At 1080p Low, the combo produces 289.3 FPS, which is high enough that the 8-core, 16-thread CPU is not visibly limiting at low render load. At 4K Ultra, the combo produces 45.5 FPS, the lowest value in the dataset. The limiting component shifts toward the GPU as resolution and quality increase, with the 4K Ultra result being the clearest point where the GPU is under maximum pressure.